🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

How to stop the leftist take-over of our youth

Whatever. You’re deflecting. How about the points? Wouldn’t it make sense to have more diversity of thought at the college level, rather than 95% leftists influencing our children?
.
NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!

Nobody is EVER allowed to disagree with leftists!

iu


.
 
ha! Talk about delusions!

Jehovah's Witnesses frown on higher education...
So do many evangelicals and fundamentalists. About 1915 at a Protestant conference in Pennsylvania they decided that science and modernity were evil. It's all reactionary.
 

Nothing new either according to this 2016 article.


As for the students:

 

Nothing new either according to this 2016 article.


As for the students:


I can see it now.

Government: Please, take this test.

Government: Based upon the test scores, you, over there, you will be a plumber. You, over there, you are to be a college professor.......................................
 
I can see it now.

Government: Please, take this test.

Government: Based upon the test scores, you, over there, you will be a plumber. You, over there, you are to be a college professor.......................................
Evidently colleges are requiring a test and picking mostly libtard students and facility.....Turds in = Polished turds out.
 
Of course you are, or you wouldn’t be pulling all the Dem tactice: deflection, attacking the messenger, and outright denial.

It’s not a lying website. One article out of thousands apparently had false information. Nowhere near as bad as the lying liberal media.

So, back to the question, for the third and last time: Given that instructors at colleges are almost exclusively leftist, with a small minority of exceptions (probably in the engineering department), shouldn’t we aim for more diversity of thought and actively seek to bring in more conservative professors?
I'm for diversity of thought. Having said that how do you suppose to go about this?

Some kind of affirmative action for registered Republicans?

At the moment you Republicans draw the main part of their base from uneducated white people. This is not criticism just a statistical fact. There are undoubtably exception to that fact, but it is not all that big of a pool.

So, do you want these exceptions to be qualified by having a postgraduate degree? Do you want those exceptions that have a post graduate degree adhere to the principles of higher education? Or does anybody do?
 
I'm for diversity of thought. Having said that how do you suppose to go about this?

Some kind of affirmative action for registered Republicans?

At the moment you Republicans draw the main part of their base from uneducated white people. This is not criticism just a statistical fact. There are undoubtably exception to that fact, but it is not all that big of a pool.

So, do you want these exceptions to be qualified by having a postgraduate degree? Do you want those exceptions that have a post graduate degree adhere to the principles of higher education? Or does anybody do?
Well of course the Republicans would have to post-graduate degrees for a college professorship - and there is no shortage to choose from.

The idea that an “educated Republican” is a rarity is just Democrat propaganda. In fact, your implication that it would be difficult to find an educated Republican is as downright insulting as if someone said it was difficult to find an educated black.
 
Whatever. You’re deflecting. How about the points? Wouldn’t it make sense to have more diversity of thought at the college level, rather than 95% leftists influencing our children?
So you now want to make the Business school left wing too? Because it goes both ways and business schools are much bigger...
 
Well of course the Republicans would have to post-graduate degrees for a college professorship - and there is no shortage to choose from.

The idea that an “educated Republican” is a rarity is just Democrat propaganda. In fact, your implication that it would be difficult to find an educated Republican is as downright insulting as if someone said it was difficult to find an educated black.
No, I didn't say it would be difficult to find an educated Republican. I said it wouldn't be all that big of a pool.
,
My other question. If it was an educated Republican would he have to adhere to the principles of higher education? For instance.

Trump's assertions that the election was stolen from him was soundly rejected by the courts as having no merit. Would your hypothetical Republican law professor have the obligation to teach his law students that that ruling is determinative to the veracity of the claim, or would he be allowed to teach his students that their feelings about the matter are equally valid?
 
So you now want to make the Business school left wing too? Because it goes both ways and business schools are much bigger...
Sure, no problem. The schools are overwhelmingly Democrat, and it’s time to become inclusive and welcome diversity of through. There are plenty of left-wingers in the business schools, too.
 
Sure, no problem. The schools are overwhelmingly Democrat, and it’s time to become inclusive and welcome diversity of through. There are plenty of left-wingers in the business schools, too.
There are? You've clearly never been within a mile of one then.
 
No, I didn't say it would be difficult to find an educated Republican. I said it wouldn't be all that big of a pool.

Still insulting. There is a wide pool of educated Republicans.
,
My other question. If it was an educated Republican would he have to adhere to the principles of higher education? For instance.

Trump's assertions that the election was stolen from him was soundly rejected by the courts as having no merit. Would your hypothetical Republican law professor have the obligation to teach his law students that that ruling is determinative to the veracity of the claim, or would he be allowed to teach his students that their feelings about the matter are equally valid?

Actually, the Courts rejected it without hearing evidence. The professor could state that, and he would also be allowed to discuss the anomalies of an election in which six swing states, in which one candidate was in the lead, simultaneously called a halt to the count in the wee hours of the night, only to restart again with a reversal in which the other candidate received ballots so lopsided that it was a statistical anomaly.

Also, the professor could instruct that the Jan 6 riot was not an insurrection, but an attempt to delay certification until a full review was done.

There will be plenty of Democrats to argue the other side. The difference is, there would now be Republicans presenting the opposing viewpoints.

And of course, all views from students would be discussed.
 
You guys are total morons. College educated supported a Republican Party that pushed for their wealth accumulation until it jumped the shark and became a dumbass bigot-fest. Now the educated would rather give up some wealth to the poor who are being led to their grave by GOP culture warriors instead of being associated with that stupidity and bigotry. Colleges aren’t changing people, the GOP is changing them.
 
Still insulting. There is a wide pool of educated Republicans.


Actually, the Courts rejected it without hearing evidence. The professor could state that, and he would also be allowed to discuss the anomalies of an election in which six swing states, in which one candidate was in the lead, simultaneously called a halt to the count in the wee hours of the night, only to restart again with a reversal in which the other candidate received ballots so lopsided that it was a statistical anomaly.

Also, the professor could instruct that the Jan 6 riot was not an insurrection, but an attempt to delay certification until a full review was done.

There will be plenty of Democrats to argue the other side. The difference is, there would now be Republicans presenting the opposing viewpoints.

And of course, all views from students would be discussed.
Oh really. No evidence?

Oh?
By contract, plaintiffs do not offer any affidavits or specific eyewitness evidence to substantiate their assertions. Plaintiffs merely assert in their verified complaint “Hundreds or thousands of ballots were duplicated solely by Democratic party inspectors and then counted.” Plaintiffs’ allegation is mere speculation.

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020AP1930-OAfinal-12-4-20.pdf Instead, the evidentiary support rests almost entirely on the unsworn expert report1 of a former campaign employee that offers statistical estimates based on call center samples and social media research. This petition falls far short of the kind of compelling evidence and legal support we would undoubtedly need to countenance the court-ordered disenfranchisement of every Wisconsin voter. The petition does not even justify the exercise of our original jurisdiction.

Not only have Plaintiffs failed to provide the Court with factual support for their extraordinary claims

The Kraken lawsuit. Resulting in sanctions for the lawyers.

a “shocking ask” to nullify Nevada’s election results and order a new election on scant evidence of voter fraud brought by a group tied to former U.S. Senate candidate and conservative activist Sharron Angle.

Russell wrote that he found the evidence offered by the Trump campaign to have “little to no value,” and failed to provide under any standard of proof that the campaign’s long list of alleged fraud and vote irregularities could be backed up under any evidentiary standard.


Feel free to look around. Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

All instances where judge ruled on the evidence and found it wanting.
All instances where justices commented on the strength of the evidence.

Some of these cases directly involving the "issues, you brought up".

So again would this hypothetical professor be allowed to teach his students that all these judges were biased?
 

Forum List

Back
Top