Hunter Biden agrees to open testimony

[rightwinger]

Not sure what you are talking about. Do you have a quote in which you believe Comer lied?

read my post

 

[Rawley]

read my post

I did. You didn't quote saying what you thought was a lie.

 

[rightwinger]

I did. You didn't quote saying what you thought was a lie.

it is what he intentionally left out

 

[Crepitus]

So...

Republicans were OK with Hunter's dick pics in a full, public session but not OK with his testimony in same?

What If he testified naked?

 

[Rawley]

it is what he intentionally left out

LOL He "lied" because he didn't spread Biden's absurd lie? LOL

 

[Zincwarrior]

Please explain that stupid baseless remark... lets try and put some substance to it... tell us what Don Jr did I bet you can't....

Don Jr is not allowed to run a charity because of theft.
Don Jr. is a party to the NY trial determining how many hundreds of millions of dollars they are going to be fined for fraud.
Don Jr. has never held his own job.

 

[rightwinger]

LOL He "lied" because he didn't spread Biden's absurd lie? LOL

The question was what Devon Archer testified to
While he claims he talked or was on the line with the VP 20 times, he also claimed business was never discussed

Comer conveniently left that part out.

Why Hunter Biden does not want a private deposition that Comer can misrepresent

 

[Rawley]

The question was what Devon Archer testified to
While he claims he talked or was on the line with the VP 20 times, he also claimed business was never discussed

Comer conveniently left that part out.

Why Hunter Biden does not want a private deposition that Comer can misrepresent

LOL It was a five hour deposition. He "left out" hours of testimony. That's why he released the transcript.

It's hilarious that you are crowing that Hunter calling his dad two dozen times during business meetings is exculpatory.

It's probably the single most damaging testimony against the President to date

 

[JimH52]

I was simply rendering my opinion.

In your opinion do you think Trump ever tells Gaetz, or MTG, Jordan, Comer etc etc what they should do?

They are a herd of insurrectionist.

 

[BlindBoo]

Nah. Comrade Garland would have to bring charges. And we've seen how deep he is in the Biden's pocket. Disgrace. Most corrupt AG in history.

Pony up the evidence of your claim then or it's just more lies without evidence from the Neo-GOP. Which of course is SOP for the Neo-Bunch of Wannabe fascists.

 

[Rawley]

Pony up the evidence of your claim then or it's just more lies without evidence from the Neo-GOP. Which of course is SOP for the Neo-Bunch of Wannabe fascists.

LOL Do you ignore any evidence that goes against the narrative you're ordered to follow? Or does the propaganda stream you call news not cover it?

IRS whistleblowers claim Justice Department meddled in Hunter Biden investigation

A pair of IRS whistleblowers testified before the House Oversight Committee about alleged meddling in the Justice Department investigation of Hunter Biden. The president's son reached an agreement to plead guilty to two federal misdemeanor counts of failing to pay his taxes and agreed to abide...

www.pbs.org

 

[BlindBoo]

LOL Do you ignore any evidence that goes against the narrative you're ordered to follow? Or does the propaganda stream you call news not cover it?

IRS whistleblowers claim Justice Department meddled in Hunter Biden investigation

A pair of IRS whistleblowers testified before the House Oversight Committee about alleged meddling in the Justice Department investigation of Hunter Biden. The president's son reached an agreement to plead guilty to two federal misdemeanor counts of failing to pay his taxes and agreed to abide...

www.pbs.org

Like I've said many times, allegations are not evidence. I mean the Neo-GOP has made all kind of nasty allegation about the President and the 2020 election. If they had any real evidence the sycophant's of Benedict Donald's party would have voted on impeachment many moons ago.

 

[Rawley]

Like I've said many times, allegations are not evidence.

??? The IRS agents' sworn testimony isn't evidence? Really? They testified as to facts. They testified to the fact that the DOJ stopped their investigations in several key areas.

 

[rightwinger]

LOL It was a five hour deposition. He "left out" hours of testimony. That's why he released the transcript.

It's hilarious that you are crowing that Hunter calling his dad two dozen times during business meetings is exculpatory.

It's probably the single most damaging testimony against the President to date

Exactly
Comer knew nobody was going to read five hours of testimony, so he gave his version

Hunter has seen his act and wants no part of it

 

[Rawley]

Exactly
Comer knew nobody was going to read five hours of testimony, so he gave his version

You're kidding, right?

Hunter has seen his act and wants no part of it

He wants no part of the subpoena'd sworn deposition. That' why he's trying this transparent PR stunt.

The only real question is whether Comrade Garland will indict him like he did Bannon and Navarro. I bet $1,000 no.

 

[BlindBoo]

??? The IRS agents' sworn testimony isn't evidence? Really? They testified as to facts. They testified to the fact that the DOJ stopped their investigations in several key areas.

No it's not. It's still an allegation without evidence.

"The Republican-led House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday released a transcript of testimony from Gary Shapley, an IRS official who, among other things, claimed that Garland had denied a request from U.S. Attorney David Weiss of Delaware to be appointed special counsel. That designation would have would have given Weiss the same status as the prosecutor leading the investigation into former President Donald Trump.

Weiss never made such a request, Garland said Friday, and always had full authority to file charges wherever and however he saw fit against President Joe Biden’s son. And Garland added that if Weiss — first appointed U.S. Attorney by Donald Trump — agrees to testify before Congress, the Justice Department will not stand in the way.

“He was given complete authority to make all decisions on his own,” Garland said. “I don’t know how it would be possible for anybody to block him for bringing a prosecution given that he has that authority.”

Garland denies whistleblower claims of DOJ interference in Hunter Biden investigation

Attorney General Merrick Garland pushed back Friday against claims from IRS whistleblowers that the Justice Department interfered with the investigation into Hunter Biden, saying more broadly that attacks on the department’s independence are corrosive.

www.pbs.org

 

[Rawley]

No it's not. It's still an allegation without evidence.

Wow. I really don't know how to respond when you believe sworn testimony is not evidence. Oh well.

 

[Rawley]

"The Republican-led House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday released a transcript of testimony from Gary Shapley, an IRS official who, among other things, claimed that Garland had denied a request from U.S. Attorney David Weiss of Delaware to be appointed special counsel. That designation would have would have given Weiss the same status as the prosecutor leading the investigation into former President Donald Trump.

Weiss never made such a request, Garland said Friday, and always had full authority to file charges wherever and however he saw fit against President Joe Biden’s son. And Garland added that if Weiss — first appointed U.S. Attorney by Donald Trump — agrees to testify before Congress, the Justice Department will not stand in the way.

“He was given complete authority to make all decisions on his own,” Garland said. “I don’t know how it would be possible for anybody to block him for bringing a prosecution given that he has that authority.”

Garland denies whistleblower claims of DOJ interference in Hunter Biden investigation

Attorney General Merrick Garland pushed back Friday against claims from IRS whistleblowers that the Justice Department interfered with the investigation into Hunter Biden, saying more broadly that attacks on the department’s independence are corrosive.

www.pbs.org

Everything you just posted is not evidence of anything. LOL

 

[BlindBoo]

Everything you just posted is not evidence of anything. LOL

Without supporting evidence the IRS agents testimony was hearsay. They had no proof that the DOJ denied any of Wiess's requests.

 

[Rawley]

Without supporting evidence the IRS agents testimony was hearsay.

Nope

They had no proof that the DOJ denied any of Wiess's requests.

????? They were testifying that their requests were denied by Garland's DOJ