Hypocrisy factor: absurd. Powerful women's love lives off limits. Only women's.

[Dragonlady]

'Hypocrisy factor: absurd. Powerful women's love lives off limits. Only women's.'


ANYTHING EMBARASSING or NEGATIVE regarding Democrats is 'OFF-LIMITS', ESPECIALLY SEXUAL MISCONDUCT / BEHAVIOR.

PRESIDENT Bill Clinton - Monica Lewinski Scandal
President Bill Clinton is caught having a sexual affair with an intern in the WH.

Democrats / Snowflakes Defense:
"Whatever happens in a President's Personal Life Is No One's Business But His Own!"

CITIZEN Donald Trump - Stormy Daniels Affair
News Broke of CITIZEN Donald Trump's affair with Stormy Daniels and the perfectly legal Non-Disclosure Agreement they both consensually agreed to.
- Democrats / Snowflakes broke out the pitch forks and torches, demanding the President be Impeached for an affair he had PRIOR to entering the race for President.

WHAT HAPPENED TO "WHATEVER HAPPENS IN A PRESIDENT'S - OR IN TRUMP'S CASE, A CIVILIAN'S - PERSONAL LIFE IS NO ONE ELSE'S BUSINESS"?!

It seems that only applies to Democrats...

Democrats broke out their favorite tactic of 'The Politics of Personal Destruction', in which the objective is not to just defeat an opponent politically but to destroy every aspect of their opponent's life - past, present, future, the ability to keep their job, the ability to ever get another job, their wife, their husband, their kids, their marriage, etc... The tactic became 'affectionately known' as 'Herman Cain'ing. It involves dragging women out of the proverbial woodwork to (falsely) accuse the target of sexual misconduct, bury them with law suits, and hammering them with the fake news media. Herman Cain. Brett Kavanaugh. Donald Trump. The technique has been used against all of them. Democrats? Not so much...

Bill Clinton: 'Nunya Bidness'

Did he even face Ethics Violations...Censure? NO.

Democrat Senators: 'Nothing to see here.'
** Democrats were caught not only engaging in sexual misconduct for DECADES, but they refused to stop it and chose instead to create a committee whose sole purpose was to buy the silence of their victims using tax dollars to do so. Were they dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did they face Ethics Violations / Censure? No...it quietly went away.


Kamala Harris Affair: 'Nunya Bidness...Nothing To See Here'

Was she dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did she face Ethics violations...Censure? No...it quietly went away.


Corey 'I Am Spartacus' Booker Admission Of Sexual Assault: 'Nothing To See Here.'

Was he dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did she face Ethics violations...Censure? No...it quietly went away.



Hypocrisy factor: OFF THE CHART!

Once again, the Russian doesn't know what he was talking about.

Nearly all of the Presidents, Republican or Democrat, were rumoured to have had affairs, including FDR, JFK, Ike, Clinton, and Trump. But the difference is that nothing about these affairs was ever made public because they were consenual and and both sides were guilty. The public only found about JFK and his women many years after his death. The same with Eisenhauer and the others. The press kept it out of the papers out of respect for the office.

All of that changed under Bill Clinton. A rabidly partisan Newt Gingerich tried everything conceivable up to and including appointing a Special Prosecutor and nothing touched Clinton. He was more Teflon than Reagan. The ONLY weakness Slick Willy had was his willy, so that's when they started going after the sexual antics of Presidents.

And the ONLY way they could get these women to smear Bill Clinton was to bully these women and threaten them with jail if they didn't.

Really, your attempts to deflect are getting more and more pathetic by the minute.

 

[Dragonlady]

Harris has no credentials that suit her to be President any more than a substantial percentage of the entire nation.

What would be the credentials Harris does have, in your opinion?

What is the "substantial percentage", roughly, and how did you figure out they have at least the credentials Harris has?

How did you find out which credentials suit anyone to be President, and which are they?

Oh, BTW, you got argument-by-assertion down pat. Just... among those committed to reasoned debate, that skill is occasionally frowned upon.

You want that she does not have the necessary to be POTUS to be proven to you?

Yes. Because Donald Trump has absolutely NOTHING necessary to be President of the United States, and yet you voted for him.

 

[Olde Europe]

Harris has no credentials that suit her to be President any more than a substantial percentage of the entire nation.

What would be the credentials Harris does have, in your opinion?

What is the "substantial percentage", roughly, and how did you figure out they have at least the credentials Harris has?

How did you find out which credentials suit anyone to be President, and which are they?

Oh, BTW, you got argument-by-assertion down pat. Just... among those committed to reasoned debate, that skill is occasionally frowned upon.

You want that she does not have the necessary to be POTUS to be proven to you?

So, no answer as to her credentials, no answer to these credentials' prevalence among the general population, and no answer to the credentials befitting a would-be president.

Thought so.

 

[there4eyeM]

My regrets to have entered this thread. It's just an echo chamber for the wings.

 

[22lcidw]

Don't even try to go there with me, you pathetic weakling. Men don't feel they need to dominate women. Stop painting with one- size-fits-all panties. We have plenty of ability to be strong, powerful people. Just because you don't doesn't mean it's someone else's fault. Stop being a victim and start being a winner.

Yeah, there's going to be a slew of other INCELs arriving, fantasizing about women's sex lives - just not with them. The discombobulated nonsense is going to be hilarious. Just...

Stop painting with one- size-fits-all panties.​

... there's one even painting with panties. It's sure going to get better...

Ludicrous.

Her behavior was morally and ethically and perhaps legally wrong.


She deserves to be judged on her actions, and the content of her character.


This is not about fantasizing about her sex life.




IF, you support her politically, you have to take this hit and make the case that she deserves to be President despite her minuses, like we did with Trump.

She was pretty much judge, jury and executioner at the Kavanaugh hearing. His wife and kids were there. Kavanaugh may not even be what he is promoted to be as a judge.

 

[iceberg]

Harris has no credentials that suit her to be President any more than a substantial percentage of the entire nation.

What would be the credentials Harris does have, in your opinion?

What is the "substantial percentage", roughly, and how did you figure out they have at least the credentials Harris has?

How did you find out which credentials suit anyone to be President, and which are they?

Oh, BTW, you got argument-by-assertion down pat. Just... among those committed to reasoned debate, that skill is occasionally frowned upon.

You want that she does not have the necessary to be POTUS to be proven to you?

Yes. Because Donald Trump has absolutely NOTHING necessary to be President of the United States, and yet you voted for him.

if only trump had "community organizer" under his belt. the left would be much happier.

 

[Olde Europe]

My regrets to have entered this thread.

Yep, you have chosen to take a dump on a woman, and to rebleat the core of the contents of the rightarded character assassination. You've been found unable to explain, much less back up, the assertions you put forward, and then you realized you got that tiny thing of yours into a wood chipper.

I sort of understand you regret to have "entered".

 

[rightwinger]

And one of those who weaponized her vagina is seeking to become the president. This should be good.

She didn't "weaponize her vagina". She had a relationshiop with a man. Period. End of story.

If you think this woman wouldn't be as successful as she was without her "connections" you are too stupid to be allowed to vote. You and your asshole friends are terrified of a woman president.

She had an affair with a married man. She whored herself out.

Having an affair with a married man is slutty. Doing it for financial gain, makes is prostitution.

Sounds like our First Whore

 

[Olde Europe]

Sounds like our First Whore

No it doesn't. It sounds like retarded misogyny, and you should be ashamed of yourself for joining their chorus.

 

[John Shaw]

And one of those who weaponized her vagina is seeking to become the president. This should be good.

She didn't "weaponize her vagina". She had a relationshiop with a man. Period. End of story.

If you think this woman wouldn't be as successful as she was without her "connections" you are too stupid to be allowed to vote. You and your asshole friends are terrified of a woman president.

You're Canadian, so it's none of your fucking business who our president is.

 

[easyt65]

'Hypocrisy factor: absurd. Powerful women's love lives off limits. Only women's.'


ANYTHING EMBARASSING or NEGATIVE regarding Democrats is 'OFF-LIMITS', ESPECIALLY SEXUAL MISCONDUCT / BEHAVIOR.

PRESIDENT Bill Clinton - Monica Lewinski Scandal
President Bill Clinton is caught having a sexual affair with an intern in the WH.

Democrats / Snowflakes Defense:
"Whatever happens in a President's Personal Life Is No One's Business But His Own!"

CITIZEN Donald Trump - Stormy Daniels Affair
News Broke of CITIZEN Donald Trump's affair with Stormy Daniels and the perfectly legal Non-Disclosure Agreement they both consensually agreed to.
- Democrats / Snowflakes broke out the pitch forks and torches, demanding the President be Impeached for an affair he had PRIOR to entering the race for President.

WHAT HAPPENED TO "WHATEVER HAPPENS IN A PRESIDENT'S - OR IN TRUMP'S CASE, A CIVILIAN'S - PERSONAL LIFE IS NO ONE ELSE'S BUSINESS"?!

It seems that only applies to Democrats...

Democrats broke out their favorite tactic of 'The Politics of Personal Destruction', in which the objective is not to just defeat an opponent politically but to destroy every aspect of their opponent's life - past, present, future, the ability to keep their job, the ability to ever get another job, their wife, their husband, their kids, their marriage, etc... The tactic became 'affectionately known' as 'Herman Cain'ing. It involves dragging women out of the proverbial woodwork to (falsely) accuse the target of sexual misconduct, bury them with law suits, and hammering them with the fake news media. Herman Cain. Brett Kavanaugh. Donald Trump. The technique has been used against all of them. Democrats? Not so much...

Bill Clinton: 'Nunya Bidness'

Did he even face Ethics Violations...Censure? NO.

Democrat Senators: 'Nothing to see here.'
** Democrats were caught not only engaging in sexual misconduct for DECADES, but they refused to stop it and chose instead to create a committee whose sole purpose was to buy the silence of their victims using tax dollars to do so. Were they dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did they face Ethics Violations / Censure? No...it quietly went away.


Kamala Harris Affair: 'Nunya Bidness...Nothing To See Here'

Was she dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did she face Ethics violations...Censure? No...it quietly went away.


Corey 'I Am Spartacus' Booker Admission Of Sexual Assault: 'Nothing To See Here.'

Was he dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did she face Ethics violations...Censure? No...it quietly went away.



Hypocrisy factor: OFF THE CHART!

Once again, the Russian doesn't know what he was talking about.

Nearly all of the Presidents, Republican or Democrat, were rumoured to have had affairs, including FDR, JFK, Ike, Clinton, and Trump. But the difference is that nothing about these affairs was ever made public because they were consenual and and both sides were guilty. The public only found about JFK and his women many years after his death. The same with Eisenhauer and the others. The press kept it out of the papers out of respect for the office.

All of that changed under Bill Clinton. A rabidly partisan Newt Gingerich tried everything conceivable up to and including appointing a Special Prosecutor and nothing touched Clinton. He was more Teflon than Reagan. The ONLY weakness Slick Willy had was his willy, so that's when they started going after the sexual antics of Presidents.

And the ONLY way they could get these women to smear Bill Clinton was to bully these women and threaten them with jail if they didn't.

Really, your attempts to deflect are getting more and more pathetic by the minute.

The way you have to re-write history to manufacture 'good' Democrats is hilarious.

Bill Clinton was a proven pig. His ENABLER, Hillary, demonized, bullied, and silenced his victims. And snowflakes like you argued what he did in his personal life was his own business....even if he was sticking cigars up inside some little intern in the Oral, I mean OVAL office.

The fecal matter hit the rotating oscillator when he was found in Contempt of Court during his trial for dropping his pants and telling the wrong woman to 'suck it'.

He lost his license to practice law in Arkansas for a while for his crime AND was Impeached for it as well...and ended up paying a boat-load of money to make his victim GO AWAY.

The SNL politician, 'Stewart Smalley', was forced out of office for his misconduct, for which he apologized...before declaring he wasn't really sorry at all.

John Conyers was one of the 1st Democrats exposed for sexual misconduct with women for DECADES while in office and for using tax dollars to buy his victims' silence...he was followed by a lot more.

Of course, not all Democrats sexually harassed little girls / women...Barney Frank like the boys....especially, reportedly, in the U.S. House gym. Frank was the 1st politician to run as openly gay ... and to run a Prostitution Ring out of his own House with his male prostitute boyfriend, Stephen Gobie. Frank was also investigated by the House Ethics committee - Frank wrote a misleading letter of recommendation for Gobie and had Gobie’s parking tickets waived. Guess that's what they call 'Friends with Benefit's.

(You can read all about Frank in his biography, called “Barney Frank: The Story of America’s Only Left-Handed, Gay, Jewish Congressman.”)

Barney’s Great Adventure

Oh, those madcap Liberal perverts...

 

[Stormy Daniels]

'Hypocrisy factor: absurd. Powerful women's love lives off limits. Only women's.'


ANYTHING EMBARASSING or NEGATIVE regarding Democrats is 'OFF-LIMITS', ESPECIALLY SEXUAL MISCONDUCT / BEHAVIOR.

PRESIDENT Bill Clinton - Monica Lewinski Scandal
President Bill Clinton is caught having a sexual affair with an intern in the WH.

Democrats / Snowflakes Defense:
"Whatever happens in a President's Personal Life Is No One's Business But His Own!"

CITIZEN Donald Trump - Stormy Daniels Affair
News Broke of CITIZEN Donald Trump's affair with Stormy Daniels and the perfectly legal Non-Disclosure Agreement they both consensually agreed to.
- Democrats / Snowflakes broke out the pitch forks and torches, demanding the President be Impeached for an affair he had PRIOR to entering the race for President.

WHAT HAPPENED TO "WHATEVER HAPPENS IN A PRESIDENT'S - OR IN TRUMP'S CASE, A CIVILIAN'S - PERSONAL LIFE IS NO ONE ELSE'S BUSINESS"?!

It seems that only applies to Democrats...

Democrats broke out their favorite tactic of 'The Politics of Personal Destruction', in which the objective is not to just defeat an opponent politically but to destroy every aspect of their opponent's life - past, present, future, the ability to keep their job, the ability to ever get another job, their wife, their husband, their kids, their marriage, etc... The tactic became 'affectionately known' as 'Herman Cain'ing. It involves dragging women out of the proverbial woodwork to (falsely) accuse the target of sexual misconduct, bury them with law suits, and hammering them with the fake news media. Herman Cain. Brett Kavanaugh. Donald Trump. The technique has been used against all of them. Democrats? Not so much...

Bill Clinton: 'Nunya Bidness'

Did he even face Ethics Violations...Censure? NO.

Democrat Senators: 'Nothing to see here.'
** Democrats were caught not only engaging in sexual misconduct for DECADES, but they refused to stop it and chose instead to create a committee whose sole purpose was to buy the silence of their victims using tax dollars to do so. Were they dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did they face Ethics Violations / Censure? No...it quietly went away.


Kamala Harris Affair: 'Nunya Bidness...Nothing To See Here'

Was she dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did she face Ethics violations...Censure? No...it quietly went away.


Corey 'I Am Spartacus' Booker Admission Of Sexual Assault: 'Nothing To See Here.'

Was he dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did she face Ethics violations...Censure? No...it quietly went away.



Hypocrisy factor: OFF THE CHART!

Once again, the Russian doesn't know what he was talking about.

Nearly all of the Presidents, Republican or Democrat, were rumoured to have had affairs, including FDR, JFK, Ike, Clinton, and Trump. But the difference is that nothing about these affairs was ever made public because they were consenual and and both sides were guilty. The public only found about JFK and his women many years after his death. The same with Eisenhauer and the others. The press kept it out of the papers out of respect for the office.

All of that changed under Bill Clinton. A rabidly partisan Newt Gingerich tried everything conceivable up to and including appointing a Special Prosecutor and nothing touched Clinton. He was more Teflon than Reagan. The ONLY weakness Slick Willy had was his willy, so that's when they started going after the sexual antics of Presidents.

And the ONLY way they could get these women to smear Bill Clinton was to bully these women and threaten them with jail if they didn't.

Really, your attempts to deflect are getting more and more pathetic by the minute.

It's good to see you applying the Brett Kavanaugh standard to Clinton's accusers.

 

[Correll]

Don't even try to go there with me, you pathetic weakling. Men don't feel they need to dominate women. Stop painting with one- size-fits-all panties. We have plenty of ability to be strong, powerful people. Just because you don't doesn't mean it's someone else's fault. Stop being a victim and start being a winner.

Yeah, there's going to be a slew of other INCELs arriving, fantasizing about women's sex lives - just not with them. The discombobulated nonsense is going to be hilarious. Just...

Stop painting with one- size-fits-all panties.​

... there's one even painting with panties. It's sure going to get better...

Ludicrous.

Her behavior was morally and ethically and perhaps legally wrong.


She deserves to be judged on her actions, and the content of her character.


This is not about fantasizing about her sex life.




IF, you support her politically, you have to take this hit and make the case that she deserves to be President despite her minuses, like we did with Trump.

She was pretty much judge, jury and executioner at the Kavanaugh hearing. His wife and kids were there. Kavanaugh may not even be what he is promoted to be as a judge.

Ahh, so that's why the lefties are loving her.

 

[Correll]

And one of those who weaponized her vagina is seeking to become the president. This should be good.

She didn't "weaponize her vagina". She had a relationshiop with a man. Period. End of story.

If you think this woman wouldn't be as successful as she was without her "connections" you are too stupid to be allowed to vote. You and your asshole friends are terrified of a woman president.

She had an affair with a married man. She whored herself out.

Having an affair with a married man is slutty. Doing it for financial gain, makes is prostitution.

Sounds like our First Whore

Trump was already separated when they met. That you have to lie, is an admission on your part that you know you are in the wrong.


Why are you a Harris partisan?

 

[rightwinger]

Harris has no credentials that suit her to be President any more than a substantial percentage of the entire nation.

You mean she never hosted a reality TV Show or ran a major university?

 

[danielpalos]

'Hypocrisy factor: absurd. Powerful women's love lives off limits. Only women's.'


ANYTHING EMBARASSING or NEGATIVE regarding Democrats is 'OFF-LIMITS', ESPECIALLY SEXUAL MISCONDUCT / BEHAVIOR.

PRESIDENT Bill Clinton - Monica Lewinski Scandal
President Bill Clinton is caught having a sexual affair with an intern in the WH.

Democrats / Snowflakes Defense:
"Whatever happens in a President's Personal Life Is No One's Business But His Own!"

CITIZEN Donald Trump - Stormy Daniels Affair
News Broke of CITIZEN Donald Trump's affair with Stormy Daniels and the perfectly legal Non-Disclosure Agreement they both consensually agreed to.
- Democrats / Snowflakes broke out the pitch forks and torches, demanding the President be Impeached for an affair he had PRIOR to entering the race for President.

WHAT HAPPENED TO "WHATEVER HAPPENS IN A PRESIDENT'S - OR IN TRUMP'S CASE, A CIVILIAN'S - PERSONAL LIFE IS NO ONE ELSE'S BUSINESS"?!

It seems that only applies to Democrats...

Democrats broke out their favorite tactic of 'The Politics of Personal Destruction', in which the objective is not to just defeat an opponent politically but to destroy every aspect of their opponent's life - past, present, future, the ability to keep their job, the ability to ever get another job, their wife, their husband, their kids, their marriage, etc... The tactic became 'affectionately known' as 'Herman Cain'ing. It involves dragging women out of the proverbial woodwork to (falsely) accuse the target of sexual misconduct, bury them with law suits, and hammering them with the fake news media. Herman Cain. Brett Kavanaugh. Donald Trump. The technique has been used against all of them. Democrats? Not so much...

Bill Clinton: 'Nunya Bidness'

Did he even face Ethics Violations...Censure? NO.

Democrat Senators: 'Nothing to see here.'
** Democrats were caught not only engaging in sexual misconduct for DECADES, but they refused to stop it and chose instead to create a committee whose sole purpose was to buy the silence of their victims using tax dollars to do so. Were they dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did they face Ethics Violations / Censure? No...it quietly went away.


Kamala Harris Affair: 'Nunya Bidness...Nothing To See Here'

Was she dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did she face Ethics violations...Censure? No...it quietly went away.


Corey 'I Am Spartacus' Booker Admission Of Sexual Assault: 'Nothing To See Here.'

Was he dragged before committees on national TV, vilified, demonized, hammered by the media? Did she face Ethics violations...Censure? No...it quietly went away.



Hypocrisy factor: OFF THE CHART!

why should we imperil the "greater glory of our immortal souls" for the moral turpitude of false witness bearing for sex in modern times?

thank Goodness women don't really believe in equality and equal rights and proclaim; where are the guys who have problems with women and sex? Bring them forward.

 

[there4eyeM]

Harris has no credentials that suit her to be President any more than a substantial percentage of the entire nation.

You mean she never hosted a reality TV Show or ran a major university?

Although being qualified has not been considered important by voters in recent Presidential campaigns, that is no reason not to hope for something better this time, 'winger.
What does this candidate bring to the Presidency?

 

[Stormy Daniels]

What does this candidate bring to the Presidency?

Genitals and skin tone.

 

[there4eyeM]

What does this candidate bring to the Presidency?

Genitals and skin tone.

Impressive credentials.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

What does this candidate bring to the Presidency?

Genitals and skin tone.

Impressive credentials.

They can be, in the right circumstances. I've met a couple men who were very successful at turning their combination of genitals and skin tone into real money makers.