"I ain't got no quarrel with them Viet Cong ... They never called me ******."

[Contumacious]

"I ain't got no quarrel with them Viet Cong ... They never called me ******."[

Muhammad Ali

Reason the Founding Fathers believed that Americans should be tried by a JURY OF HIS/HER PEERS. Prior to the 1890's Jurors KNEW that they had the authority to NULLIFY THE LAW

Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of "Not Guilty" despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged. The jury in effect nullifies a law that it believes is either immoral or wrongly applied to the defendant whose fate they are charged with deciding.

Courts nowadays routinely LIE to the Jurors by cautioning them they must accept the "judges" version of the law. The defendants' rights to due process is sacrificed to the Court's and government expediency.

 

[Snouter]

Unfortunately in America, unelected judges are like democrat "superdelegates" and can override the will of the people.

 

[Contumacious]

Unfortunately in America, unelected judges are like democrat "superdelegates" and can override the will of the people.

Exactly.

Federal judges are corrupt to their core. They can transgress upon a defendant's right, like Trump. with IMPUNITY. There is NOTHING Trump can do . The "judges" AMENDED VIA USURPATION the right of WE THE PEOPLE TO SUE THEM.


Cases should be tried by a defendant's peers .

 

[Siete]

Unfortunately in America, unelected judges are like democrat "superdelegates" and can override the will of the people.

Exactly.

Federal judges are corrupt to their core. They can transgress upon a defendant's right, like Trump. with IMPUNITY. There is NOTHING Trump can do . They "judges" AMENDED VIA USURPATION the right of WE THE PEOPLE TO SUE THEM.


Cases should be tried by a defendant's peers .

Trumps peers .... crooked billionaires with 3500 law suits against them ..

ok,you find them.

 

[Contumacious]

Unfortunately in America, unelected judges are like democrat "superdelegates" and can override the will of the people.

Exactly.

Federal judges are corrupt to their core. They can transgress upon a defendant's right, like Trump. with IMPUNITY. There is NOTHING Trump can do . They "judges" AMENDED VIA USURPATION the right of WE THE PEOPLE TO SUE THEM.


Cases should be tried by a defendant's peers .

Trumps peers .... crooked billionaires with 3500 law suits against them ..

ok,you find them.

So its better to allow a "judge" whose ancestry has been disparaged and who is IMMUNIZED to rule on the lawsuit?


Do you believe that all all white jury would have convicted OJ in spite of Detective Mark Fuhrman's testimony?

Do you believe that all white jury would have heeded Cochrans advise that " if the evidence 'doesn't fit, you must acquit"

.

 

[1stRambo]

"I ain't got no quarrel with them Viet Cong ... They never called me ******."[

Muhammad Ali

Reason the Founding Fathers believed that Americans should be tried by a JURY OF HIS/HER PEERS. Prior to the 1890's Jurors KNEW that they had the authority to NULLIFY THE LAW

Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of "Not Guilty" despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged. The jury in effect nullifies a law that it believes is either immoral or wrongly applied to the defendant whose fate they are charged with deciding.

Courts nowadays routinely LIE to the Jurors by cautioning them they must accept the "judges" version of the law. The defendants' rights to due process is sacrificed to the Court's and government expediency.

Yo,
Not Guilty:
The legal system in the US at least is founded upon the presumption of innocence. Thus the only finding a jury or judge can find in a criminal court is proof of guilt or absence of proof of guilt. A jury cannot, and should not, prove that a defendant is innocent, they need only find that they are not guilty, and then they are assumed innocent in the eyes of the law as a matter of course (whether or not they are actually innocent or not is another matter entirely).

You seem to think the Justice System is against you? Well, it is today, only because there is a Crooked Justice System in Washington D.C., under the control by the Socialist Democrat Party!!!

"GTP"

 

[Contumacious]

"I ain't got no quarrel with them Viet Cong ... They never called me ******."[

Muhammad Ali

Reason the Founding Fathers believed that Americans should be tried by a JURY OF HIS/HER PEERS. Prior to the 1890's Jurors KNEW that they had the authority to NULLIFY THE LAW

Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of "Not Guilty" despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged. The jury in effect nullifies a law that it believes is either immoral or wrongly applied to the defendant whose fate they are charged with deciding.

Courts nowadays routinely LIE to the Jurors by cautioning them they must accept the "judges" version of the law. The defendants' rights to due process is sacrificed to the Court's and government expediency.

Yo,
Not Guilty:
The legal system in the US at least is founded upon the presumption of innocence. Thus the only finding a jury or judge can find in a criminal court is proof of guilt or absence of proof of guilt. A jury cannot, and should not, prove that a defendant is innocent, they need only find that they are not guilty, and then they are assumed innocent in the eyes of the law as a matter of course (whether or not they are actually innocent or not is another matter entirely).

You seem to think the Justice System is against you? Well, it is today, only because there is a Crooked Justice System in Washington D.C., under the control by the Socialist Democrat Party!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 77705

It is true that the legal system in the US is founded upon the presumption of innocence.

But nowadays the US operates as a FASCIST state. GUILTY until proven innocent . The FASCIST STATE is always right.

.Read the SILK ROAD case and cry