Because he wants me to believe in him. Your 10 commandments are quite explicit on that point. It's number one on his "have to" list.Why would God want to do that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because he wants me to believe in him. Your 10 commandments are quite explicit on that point. It's number one on his "have to" list.Why would God want to do that?
“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.”
Learn Hebrew and read the account in Hebrew.For instance, we know Noah's flood is BS. At least the flood as described in the Bible. Not only isn't there enough water to cover the globe. A global flood would be visible in the geological record.
Stop reading Genesis as a science book or an Encyclopedia account. It's literature.You can toss Genesis. The origin of life is covered in multiple science disciplines. It's quite incredible to assume there's a person who could multiply food, raise people from the dead and arise himself. Etc. Etc.
It's not my job to convince you. I'm more than happy for you to miss out on the functional advantage of faith.You do realize that I've been quoting and replying to you and other people about all these things for about a day now, right? You keep on insisting I'm not looking at the evidence when at the same time urging me to find evidence. Completely trying to switch the burden of proof from you, who makes the God claim to me who doesn't. I don't refuse to look at any evidence, nor do I reject a God claim out of hand. The only thing I'm asking is to provide actual evidence. Not some claims based on very unsound epistemology.
I said find first. Once you have found, only then will questions have some intelligence behind them.It's not an assumption at this point. I'm sorry. Saying I need to find something that I can't question is assuming.
Why don't you tell me know how it differs? Then I can check if it's true what you are claiming, and we can continue. It's not me claiming there's a difference.Learn Hebrew and read the account in Hebrew.
Shrug. You see it as "have to". I see it as coaching and illuminating.Because he wants me to believe in him. Your 10 commandments are quite explicit on that point. It's number one on his "have to" list.
It's not my job to convince you. I'm more than happy for you to miss out on the functional advantage of faith.
There is no evidence you will accept. You dismiss it all. Your mind is made up. Go be happy.
It is your job to support what you claim in a discussion.It's not my job to convince you.
Who says? I'm the guy who told you flat out I changed my position on morality. I can change my mind. I do require convincing.There is no evidence you will accept.
It's not my job to convince you. You said you were looking for signs. I gave you the first and 2nd sign. You dismissed them both. Why should I waste my time arguing about it?It is your job to support what you claim in a discussion.
Who says? I'm the guy who told you flat out I changed my position on morality. I can change my mind. I do require convincing.
Why? Because you are not listening. And, you can figure it out for yourself if you weren't gung-ho determined not to believe. But I'll give you two hints: In Hebrew, 'earth' does not refer to the entire planet. The earth in your backyard could be flooded without the flood covering the planet Earth. In Hebrew a heavy vertical rain can also cover/flood one's sight of hills and mountains.Why don't you tell me know how it differs? Then I can check if it's true what you are claiming, and we can continue. It's not me claiming there's a difference.
was the universe created intentionally or through happenstance.
e=mc^2 says otherwise.universe has always been, the creation of cyclical events are metaphysical manifestations capable also of the creation of life as well.
Why is he asking for your belief/faith?Because he wants me to believe in him. Your 10 commandments are quite explicit on that point. It's number one on his "have to" list.
The image of the angry and hateful Christian is either wholly made up, or based on political differences,
In your anger and bitterness, you left out this part of my post:you are a joke ...
View attachment 972187
nothing lower in religion or politics than bible belt christianity.
or based on a small sample of isolated examples.
e=mc^2 says otherwise.
I suppose believing in imaginary beings brings some sort of relief from an otherwise miserable existence.
e=mc^2 says otherwise.you are a joke, that equation is a cyclical event - essentially verification of both the bb and boomerang theory ... as well refutes bings - pop corn theory.
Commandments. Doesn't imply optionality.Shrug. You see it as "have to". I see it as coaching and illuminating.