healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,880
- 10,392
- 900
- Thread starter
- #21
We agree. A Landslide election should negate any fraud questions.The point in my posting the current polls results is that it will not be a landslide in either direction. We may never have another landslide election in our country's history.
The electorate is divided. That will not change anytime soon. It will be as close (if not closer) than it was in 2020 and 2016. That is just reality. Mail-in votes have nothing to do with things unless you really are questioning the integrity of our elections.
There will be armed conflicts or otherwise. There will be no split of the country. A winner will be declared, we'll yell and scream at each other, and move on.
You apparently don't think a landslide is possible.
You also don't believe in election fraud.
1. Each cycle, contributions from this group favor Democrats by a significant margin. In the 2014 election cycle, the industry contributed over $120 million to federal political candidates and interests, 70 percent of which went to Democrats
![www.opensecrets.org](https://cdn1.opensecrets.org/rails-assets/production/assets/logo2019-2-69ab7d41ab8dc6195363228b2092d7e6897a7997d79b549e0f6d2f5767ce947c.png)
Lawyers / Law Firms Summary
Opensecret's money profile for the Lawyers / Law Firms industry/interest group. See contributions and lobbying history.
![www.opensecrets.org](https://cdn1.opensecrets.org/rails-assets/production/assets/favicon/ouricon-32x32-c376e89f9d2207d6424f97cc3d42421507eaeb103bad82922551518ccb6a397e.png)
For instance, in Arizona, where President Biden won by a mere 10,457 votes in 2020, Heritage documents just four cases of fraudulent voting in the general election. Furthermore, while former Republican gubernatorial candidate and 2024 Senate candidate Kari Lake falsely claimed widespread fraud following her loss in 2022, there have been zero reported cases from that year thus far.
![www.brookings.edu](https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/2023-09-25T214218Z_1914042492_MT1USATODAY21502425_RTRMADP_3_POLLS-OPEN-AT-THE-OKLAHOMA-COUNTY-ELECTION-BOARD-FOR-EARLY.jpg)
Widespread election fraud claims by Republicans don't match the evidence | Brookings
Americans still believe voter fraud is rampant despite evidence running contrary.
![www.brookings.edu](https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/themes/brookings/assets/images/favicons/android-chrome-192x192.png)
Now my point is simple. If lawyers donated 70% to Democrats, and election lawsuits are managed by judges who are lawyers who gave 70% to Democrats... please explain how lawyers in these specific cases didn't do as the BIASED MSM has done, i.e. not been honest to protect their donations!
So the biased lawyers who donated 70% to Democrats AND as the follow two articles describe how the BIASED MSM donated 96% to Hillary and 90% to Biden along with the network news ABC,CBS,NBC did this in the 2020 election and sad to say most voters never were aware of the donations made by ABC,CBS,NBC and other so-called news media!
ABC,CBS,NBC gave Proof of the biased MSM that the donated $2.6 billion in free advertising for Democrats calling it "NEWS"!
Over 32.7 hours of coverage, from 7/29/2020-10/20/20). Everything You Need to Know About TV Advertising Costs
The average commercial costs $105,000 for a 30 sec. spot.
Therefore in 32.7 hours , two 30 second commercials in a minute or total of 25,440 30- second commercials @ $105,000 or $2,671,200,000 In television advertising value.
The following from the Washington Times...
"What they found was, over the summer, the broadcast networks have continued to pound Donald Trump and his team with the most hostile coverage of a president in TV news history — 92% negative, vs. just 8% positive.from July 29 through October 20"
![www.washingtontimes.com](https://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2020/08/03/Trump_54844.jpg-7eae0_c0-115-2757-1723_s1200x700.jpg?8c53b648f180f4265b220680ab2723edccb76e58)
Broadcast networks deliver 92% negative coverage for Trump, 66% positive for Biden: Study
The country’s major broadcast news media outlets have never been more negatively biased against a sitting president than Donald Trump, a conservative media watchdog has concluded in its latest study, which found President Trump receives negatively-slanted coverage 92% of the time in network news...
![www.washingtontimes.com](https://www.washingtontimes.com/static/icons/favicon-32x32.5a141a6b84bd.png)
92% of the news negative towards Trump! So where is the fair and balanced?
A very simple example of the biased news making negatives stories about Trump.
I'm sure you like millions of MSM users believe that Trump said
maybe if you drank bleach you may be okay—"
But Trump never said that! Biden DID and the biased MSM to this day as this search..
2,690,000 results of "Trump said drink bleach"
Case in point: It's been exactly one year since Trump suggested injecting bleach .
![www.politico.com](https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/894daea/2147483647/legacy_thumbnail/1200x799%3E/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2Ff9%2F53%2F1615c24b4e62bbaccda080acbd5f%2Fap20338801391322.jpg)
It’s been exactly one year since Trump suggested injecting bleach. We’ve never been the same.
It was wild in the moment. In time, it came to symbolize the chaotic nature of the presidency and the early Covid fight.
![www.politico.com](https://www.politico.com/favicon-32x32.png)