I told you the polls were bullshit

[dannyboys]

Go back and read my posts from months ago.
I was 100% right when I posted that traditional polling models no longer work.
I predicted Trump would win.
I won a total of $2000 from a few bets with friends.
I donated the money to the local 'Special Needs' volunteer group.
I predict that President Trump WILL live up to all the promises he made.
Speaking with a former female employees who used to work for Trump at the executive level she told me: "There are many businessmen all over the world who have done business with Trump. The one thing they all will tell you is love him or hate him he ALWAYS does what he says he will do".

 

[dannyboys]

and I was right.

Clinton is likely going to end up winning the popular vote. The national poll average will end up being off by about 3 points.

Yes, both may be true, after the fact. '

Believe what makes you feel good. Your candidate lost, she is a two time loser and a corrupt lying bitch. The Clinton crime family will never be in political power again, and that's good for our country

Stop crying and address the points.

You still here?

 

[dannyboys]

and I was right.

Clinton is likely going to end up winning the popular vote. The national poll average will end up being off by about 3 points.

So fucking what?
It's irrelevant whether Hillary won the 'popular vote' by a few thousand votes.
Talk about grasping at straws.

 

[Redfish]

and I was right.

Clinton is likely going to end up winning the popular vote. The national poll average will end up being off by about 3 points.

Yes, both may be true, after the fact. '

Believe what makes you feel good. Your candidate lost, she is a two time loser and a corrupt lying bitch. The Clinton crime family will never be in political power again, and that's good for our country

Stop crying and address the points.

You still here?

he/she/it is still here, crying about poor hilly losing. "it was her turn, damn it".

 

[BluesLegend]

These so called polls were intentional propaganda intended to suppress voter turn out for Trump, period.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

especially on Nov 6/7,,when everyone agreed that Hillary was up by 4 points,,,,,you take away all of the illegal votes, Trump would of won by 10 points?,,,,such bullshit that Hillary got more votes, maybe if we subtract the illegals and dead people who voted in NY and California, Trump would of gotton about 5 Million more votes?

 

[NYcarbineer]

and I was right.

Clinton is likely going to end up winning the popular vote. The national poll average will end up being off by about 3 points.

Yes, both may be true, after the fact. '

Believe what makes you feel good. Your candidate lost, she is a two time loser and a corrupt lying bitch. The Clinton crime family will never be in political power again, and that's good for our country

Stop crying and address the points.

make one and I will address it.

yes, hilly won the popular vote. mainly because of California and New York and big cities where there are high numbers of people. We have the EC so that a few cities cannot decide our elections. Without the EC many people would have no voice in presidential elections.

Sorry your heroine lost, but she lost because she is a corrupt lying person and a very unlikeable candidate. Not because of whitelash, sexism, or any of the other excuses being dreamed up by you sore losers.

Just think, Hillary Clinton is a two time loser. She lost to the black guy and to the guy who had never held any elected office. LOSER.

You're running away from your own topic. The national poll average called the election for Hillary, it is a popular vote poll, she won the popular vote.

 

[dannyboys]

The former First Lady lost to a negro with no fucking clue about even operating a watermelon stand.
She would have then lost to a dumbass old Socialist who promised "free tuition' to the snowflakes if the DNC hadn't literally stole the nomination from him.
Then she lost to a businessman who had never been elected to anything. Who was attacked by the LIB MSM, even his own party.
Face facts. She's a fucking LOSER!

 

[NYcarbineer]

especially on Nov 6/7,,when everyone agreed that Hillary was up by 4 points,,,,,you take away all of the illegal votes, Trump would of won by 10 points?,,,,such bullshit that Hillary got more votes, maybe if we subtract the illegals and dead people who voted in NY and California, Trump would of gotton about 5 Million more votes?

Trump won. Get over it.

 

[dannyboys]

and I was right.

Clinton is likely going to end up winning the popular vote. The national poll average will end up being off by about 3 points.

Yes, both may be true, after the fact. '

Believe what makes you feel good. Your candidate lost, she is a two time loser and a corrupt lying bitch. The Clinton crime family will never be in political power again, and that's good for our country

Stop crying and address the points.

make one and I will address it.

yes, hilly won the popular vote. mainly because of California and New York and big cities where there are high numbers of people. We have the EC so that a few cities cannot decide our elections. Without the EC many people would have no voice in presidential elections.

Sorry your heroine lost, but she lost because she is a corrupt lying person and a very unlikeable candidate. Not because of whitelash, sexism, or any of the other excuses being dreamed up by you sore losers.

Just think, Hillary Clinton is a two time loser. She lost to the black guy and to the guy who had never held any elected office. LOSER.

You're running away from your own topic. The national poll average called the election for Hillary, it is a popular vote poll, she won the popular vote.

So fucking WHAT?
Are you now going to post this for the next four years?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The former First Lady lost to a negro with no fucking clue about even operating a watermelon stand.
She would have then lost to a dumbass old Socialist who promised "free tuition' to the snowflakes if the DNC hadn't literally stole the nomination from him.
Then she lost to a businessman who had never been elected to anything. Who was attacked by the LIB MSM, even his own party.
Face facts. She's a fucking LOSER!

I'll bet most people in your country don't hold those views.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Clinton is likely going to end up winning the popular vote. The national poll average will end up being off by about 3 points.

Yes, both may be true, after the fact. '

Believe what makes you feel good. Your candidate lost, she is a two time loser and a corrupt lying bitch. The Clinton crime family will never be in political power again, and that's good for our country

Stop crying and address the points.

make one and I will address it.

yes, hilly won the popular vote. mainly because of California and New York and big cities where there are high numbers of people. We have the EC so that a few cities cannot decide our elections. Without the EC many people would have no voice in presidential elections.

Sorry your heroine lost, but she lost because she is a corrupt lying person and a very unlikeable candidate. Not because of whitelash, sexism, or any of the other excuses being dreamed up by you sore losers.

Just think, Hillary Clinton is a two time loser. She lost to the black guy and to the guy who had never held any elected office. LOSER.

You're running away from your own topic. The national poll average called the election for Hillary, it is a popular vote poll, she won the popular vote.

So fucking WHAT?
Are you now going to post this for the next four years?

I'm going to do what you would have done if Trump had won the popular vote and Clinton the election.

Fair enough?

 

[Redfish]

and I was right.

Clinton is likely going to end up winning the popular vote. The national poll average will end up being off by about 3 points.

Yes, both may be true, after the fact. '

Believe what makes you feel good. Your candidate lost, she is a two time loser and a corrupt lying bitch. The Clinton crime family will never be in political power again, and that's good for our country

Stop crying and address the points.

make one and I will address it.

yes, hilly won the popular vote. mainly because of California and New York and big cities where there are high numbers of people. We have the EC so that a few cities cannot decide our elections. Without the EC many people would have no voice in presidential elections.

Sorry your heroine lost, but she lost because she is a corrupt lying person and a very unlikeable candidate. Not because of whitelash, sexism, or any of the other excuses being dreamed up by you sore losers.

Just think, Hillary Clinton is a two time loser. She lost to the black guy and to the guy who had never held any elected office. LOSER.

You're running away from your own topic. The national poll average called the election for Hillary, it is a popular vote poll, she won the popular vote.

you are making my point. the polls had her winning the EC. She LOST the EC. She only won the popular vote because the blue states of Ca and NY have very large populations. Take away Ca and Trump wins the popular by huge margin

 

[Redfish]

The former First Lady lost to a negro with no fucking clue about even operating a watermelon stand.
She would have then lost to a dumbass old Socialist who promised "free tuition' to the snowflakes if the DNC hadn't literally stole the nomination from him.
Then she lost to a businessman who had never been elected to anything. Who was attacked by the LIB MSM, even his own party.
Face facts. She's a fucking LOSER!

I'll bet most people in your country don't hold those views.

actually they do. Hillary is a two time LOSER, a corrupt liar, and a criminal who should be jailed for violating national security laws.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Clinton is likely going to end up winning the popular vote. The national poll average will end up being off by about 3 points.

Yes, both may be true, after the fact. '

Believe what makes you feel good. Your candidate lost, she is a two time loser and a corrupt lying bitch. The Clinton crime family will never be in political power again, and that's good for our country

Stop crying and address the points.

make one and I will address it.

yes, hilly won the popular vote. mainly because of California and New York and big cities where there are high numbers of people. We have the EC so that a few cities cannot decide our elections. Without the EC many people would have no voice in presidential elections.

Sorry your heroine lost, but she lost because she is a corrupt lying person and a very unlikeable candidate. Not because of whitelash, sexism, or any of the other excuses being dreamed up by you sore losers.

Just think, Hillary Clinton is a two time loser. She lost to the black guy and to the guy who had never held any elected office. LOSER.

You're running away from your own topic. The national poll average called the election for Hillary, it is a popular vote poll, she won the popular vote.

you are making my point. the polls had her winning the EC. She LOST the EC. She only won the popular vote because the blue states of Ca and NY have very large populations. Take away Ca and Trump wins the popular by huge margin

You mean we shouldn't count New York, Trump's home state!

in the total? lolol, how pathetic can you get?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

I knew they were in deep shit when they were still campaigning in Michigan and Pennsylvania last week.

Absolutely right you are. Apparently Team Trump and Team Hellary had it right too. Really, CNN, MSNBC, FOX, et al were the only players who were clueless.

Side note- how high is Kellyanne Conways stock now?

 

[jc456]

I'm not sure what that means since being within the MOE means the numbers were accurate. How can it be inaccurate when it's accurate?

Where I agree with you again is the interpretation of the numbers. The media

1) Blends the national numbers implying Hillary is going better than she is in the electoral college
2) Didn't care they were causing observation error in battleground States. The left has been so malicious and belligerent, it was reasonably foreseeable not all Trump supporters would say that to the media

What I mean is that they took the numbers they had, established a MOE, then jimmied the numbers the way they wanted them to go within that MOE. Inaccurate, but with plausible deniability.

Given that it's now completely above board that media outlets are playing active advocacy roles for certain candidates, this scenario is completely plausible.

I'm not sure we're saying anything different in the end. The media certainly spun the numbers. That is 2 out of 4 elections they were just materially wrong in their reporting of exit poll results

what's funny is I watched MSNBC, CNN and Fox last night. They still don't understand what happened and making stupid stuff up. Wow these irritants that are on TV need new jobs that actually asks something from them. they can all fk off in my book. All you biased asshats lost, kiss my white ass.

 

[Tom Horn]

and I was right.

The polls weren't wrong, it was the interpretation of them that was wrong. Hillary won the popular vote by a small margin as indicated by the polls, they accurately identified the battleground States and it was pretty much the States that were indicated as being closest that Trump flipped. The result was also within the margin of error.

The part that was wrong was observation error. If you for example film a worker who knows you're observing them do a process, they won't make as many mistakes because they know you're watching them. Your observing the process changes the results.

In this case, the anti-Trump leftist demagoguery did cause observation error in exit polls. A small percentage of people didn't want to get into admitting they are voting for Trump and potentially get into it with a hate filled leftist moonbat. It was enough in the closest States to make the difference. The media did not account for how their vitriol to Trump could effect the answers they got at the polls

The network-affiliated polls were purposely wrong....bandwagon effect to lure voters into their scheme and make opposition seem useless. Trump continued berating the media to the point voters stopped paying attention to the fake stories and phony polls.

 

[kaz]

I'm not sure what that means since being within the MOE means the numbers were accurate. How can it be inaccurate when it's accurate?

Where I agree with you again is the interpretation of the numbers. The media

1) Blends the national numbers implying Hillary is going better than she is in the electoral college
2) Didn't care they were causing observation error in battleground States. The left has been so malicious and belligerent, it was reasonably foreseeable not all Trump supporters would say that to the media

What I mean is that they took the numbers they had, established a MOE, then jimmied the numbers the way they wanted them to go within that MOE. Inaccurate, but with plausible deniability.

Given that it's now completely above board that media outlets are playing active advocacy roles for certain candidates, this scenario is completely plausible.

I'm not sure we're saying anything different in the end. The media certainly spun the numbers. That is 2 out of 4 elections they were just materially wrong in their reporting of exit poll results

what's funny is I watched MSNBC, CNN and Fox last night. They still don't understand what happened and making stupid stuff up. Wow these irritants that are on TV need new jobs that actually asks something from them. they can all fk off in my book. All you biased asshats lost, kiss my white ass.

So you disagree with me that the media spun the numbers for Hillary? I'd say makes you the biased asshat

 

[Silhouette]

^^ of course the media did that!