Ice Breaker Stuck in Arctic Ice!

masie_all_zoom_4km-2017-jan-21.png
 
www.nsidc.org
Arctic sea ice extent for December 2016 averaged 12.10 million square kilometers (4.67 million square miles), the second lowest December extent in the satellite record. This is 20,000 square kilometers (7,700 square miles) above December 2010, the lowest December extent, and 1.03 million square kilometers (397,700 square miles) below the December 1981 to 2010 long-term average.
 
The NH sea ice levels have been under reported for almost a year now. I was wondering how long it would be before NOAA got bitched slapped and their deception exposed..

Not only is the ice more than reported, its thickness is twice that of just last year according to the ships, that are stuck in it.. And Russian meteorologists are showing a very different picture than is NOAA.
So does this mean global warming causes thicker ice ?!

It's all very confusing.
 
Oh my, the stupid brigade is at it again. And no one said that there was no arctic ice, except someone as stupid as you fellows. What is being observed right now, is that the sea ice at both poles are at record lows.

N_stddev_timeseries_thumb.png


S_stddev_timeseries_thumb.png


Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

Someone said it was 50F warmer than usual
Yep, it is only zero degrees there today instead of 50 below, some think zero is when Ice turns to Water.
 
When the Arctic is down to a tenth of a single square kilometer of ice, you could still get an icebreaker stuck there.

This thread does nothing but illustrate - clearly - that you are either desperately lacking evidence, ignorant of basic science facts and logic or, most likely, a lot of both.
 
When the Arctic is down to a tenth of a single square kilometer of ice, you could still get an icebreaker stuck there.

This thread does nothing but illustrate - clearly - that you are either desperately lacking evidence, ignorant of basic science facts and logic or, most likely, a lot of both.
Even in the face of direct physical evidence that the Arctic melting is a lie you continue with the narrative hoping no one will notice... You have no shame..
 
When the Arctic is down to a tenth of a single square kilometer of ice, you could still get an icebreaker stuck there.

This thread does nothing but illustrate - clearly - that you are either desperately lacking evidence, ignorant of basic science facts and logic or, most likely, a lot of both.


lol......s0n.....you talk about "science facts" related to climate science as if they were facts of physics. Fucking duh.........nobody thinks that except the religion. The entire world accepts laws of physics as indisputable facts of science......not even close when it comes to climate science. Outside of the clubs, the jury is still out. Its called failing to make the case.

Very few people embrace the whole world is ending view of the members of the religion. As such, it is still a hobby for all practical purposes. The science of physics has changed the world. The science of climate science has changed nothing.:oops-28:

Classic case of progressives doing it wrong. And they never learn either. Classic case to illustrate......... them insisting on calling Trump a racist/fascist. Every time they do it, their side gets less popular.......BUT THEY STILL DO IT!!! Then they take bows thinking they are winning. That's what mental cases do. Its all in the DSM 5!:2up:
 
Last edited:
When the Arctic is down to a tenth of a single square kilometer of ice, you could still get an icebreaker stuck there.

This thread does nothing but illustrate - clearly - that you are either desperately lacking evidence, ignorant of basic science facts and logic or, most likely, a lot of both.
More accurate is: if the arctic ice were down to 1/10th of a km^2 you could still get an icebreaker stuck there. It`s because of people like you that we need to build driver-less cars. Next time you use a knife and fork to eat make sure to wear a hardhat and safetyglasses
 
Don't want to address the falsity of your argument. Lack of balls? Thought so.
 

Forum List

Back
Top