Maduro steals election in Venezuela.

What lies?

Did the Dems try to remove Trump from an election ballot in Colorado, yes or no?

Did they succeed up to the State Court level, until this was overturned by the US Supreme Court, yes or no?
I'm not your assistant.

And nobody changed the vote totals.

And you seem confused. You're giving examples of peole following the rules.
 
Each state has its own rules for ballot access.

The Repubs might end up keeping the Dem nominee off the ballot in Ohio...yet you never whine about that...why not?

You didn't answer my question. Against Trump this was a deliberate attempt to remove him from the ballot.

In Biden's case it would have been because the Dems were idiots and set their convention after Ohio's deadline.

They tried to remove Trump from the ballot for supposed "insurrection", how is that any different from Maduro who actually removed his opponent except for success vs. failure?
 
What lies?

That Trump's Colorado election participation question is factually similar to Venezuela's banning of popular opposition leader from national election.

Even IF we unreasonably conceed the ENTIRETY of your stupid argument that TRYING to ban a condidate is factually the same as ACTUAL ban, even IF we open up discussion to FUTURE American elections that didn't even happen, even then Trump's national candidacy remains just as viable (unlike Venezuela's opposition leader).

Trump lost Colorado by big margins in 2016 and even bigger margin in 2020, there is zero reason to think he can get any electoral votes in that state.

Your argument is stupid nonsence on many levels. There is no similarity.
 
Thats Trump's Colorado election participation is relavant to topic of Venezuela's banning of popular opposition leader from national election.

Even IF we are ludecrously generous and conceed the ENTIRETY of your stupid argument that TRYING to ban a condidate is factually the same as ACTUAL ban, even IF we open up discussion to FUTURE American elections that didn't even happen, even then Trump's national candidacy is remains just as viable (unlike Venezuela's opposition leader). Trump lost Colorado by big margins in 2016 and even bigger margin in 2020, there is zero reason to think he can get any electoral votes in that state.

Your suggestin that there is any factual similarity is stupid nonsence on many levels.

Wow. more attempts at dodging making a simple answer to a simple question.

How fucking pathetic. You and fort fuckup Indiana should have a pitcher catcher bedroom night.
 
You didn't answer my question. Against Trump this was a deliberate attempt to remove him from the ballot.

In Biden's case it would have been because the Dems were idiots and set their convention after Ohio's deadline.

Yes, it is always different when your side does it.

How boring.

They tried to remove Trump from the ballot for supposed "insurrection", how is that any different from Maduro who actually removed his opponent except for success vs. failure?

It is different as it is a single state (just like Ohio) and a state that Trump has zero chance of wining to start with.
 
Wow. more attempts at dodging making a simple answer to a simple question.

How fucking pathetic. You and fort fuckup Indiana should have a pitcher catcher bedroom night.

FACT - Trump was not banned.
FACT - Venezuela's oppositon leader was banned.
FACT - there is no factual similarity.

FACT - you are a moron who doesn't know when to quit your dead end, transparently bullshit arguments.
 
Yes, it is always different when your side does it.

How boring.



It is different as it is a single state (just like Ohio) and a state that Trump has zero chance of wining to start with.

More not answering.

It's still trying to remove your opponent from the ballot, and in Ohio the Republicans didn't actually do anything, the date was set for getting on the ballot before the Dems scheduled their convention.

In colorado the dems ACTIVELY set out to remove Trump from the ballot, and succeded all the way up to the State court level.

These are hard facts, so of course you don't answer them directly and just deflect like a wibble bitch boi.
 
FACT - Trump was not banned.
FACT - Venezuela's oppositon leader was banned.
FACT - there is no factual similarity.

FACT - you are a moron who doesn't know when to quit your dead end bullshit arguments.

FACT-Trump was actually banned for a while due to the State court actions, injunctions not-withstanding, and the issue was only resolved by our SC.

Yep.

Nope.

FACT: you edited your post after I responded. Poseur.
 
FACT-Trump was actually banned

FACT - Trump was on the ballot in Colorado in 2020. Trump is also on the Colorado ballot for 2024 election. Even if he wasn't, he would still have same odds of winning national election, because he can't win any electoral votes in Colorado anyway.

FACT - Venezuela's oppositon leader was not on the ballot, could not participate in national election.

FACT - two cases are incomparable.


You are full of balatantly transparent bullshit.
 
Last edited:
FACT - was on the ballot in 2020 and is on the ballot for 2024 election.

You are full of balatantly transparent bullshit.

And for a while he wasn't in Colorado because the Dems tried to get him removed. That's a Fact.

And you can't admit it.
 
And for a while he wasn't in Colorado because the Dems tried to get him removed. That's a Fact.

And you can't admit it.

I admited it as an irrelavant fact.

Meaning that this irrelavant fact does not make any US Election comparable to Venezuela's ban on popular oppostion leader.

Trump ran in 2020, and is running today for 2024.
Venezuela's oppostion leader couldn't.

Factual difference could not be greater, you are just too dumb to get it.
 
I admited it as an irrelavant fact.

Meaning that this irrelavant fact does not make any US Election comparable to Venezuela's ban on popular oppostion leader.

Trump can run for office and Venezuela's oppostion leader couldn't

This is not rocket science moron.

Not your call, buckyboi.

It makes that example comparable only different in success.

For a while there he was purged from the ballot due to Democrat, i.e. the party in power, activities.
 
So Trump running and Venezuela's oppostion leader NOT running is not a significant difference to you?

Seriously moron?

It's a difference, but not as significant as you make out, because I have always been talking about intent.

The Dems ATTEMPTED to do the same thing Maduro accomplished.
 
It is a huge difference that makes the two situations incomparable on the facts.

get lost with your stupid bullshit already.

it makes the intent of both situations the same, the Dems wanted to do what Maduro did, they just didn't get away with it.

So they didn't want to remove Trump from the ballots? It never happened?
 

Forum List

Back
Top