Why The GOP Doesn't Know What To Do With Kamala Harris Replacing Biden

Gotta say, I'm loving this chickenshit stuff. Trump campaign really projecting strength here.
It's okay .. you'll survive and the honeymoon with harris will be waning soon. I'd also recommend this book, so you don't sound so stupid on basic government next time.

1722356663967.png
 
David Pecker didn't work in Trumps White House, and his testimony was the one that killed Trump. Neither did Cohen. Nor did Daniels. Again, what Trump did had nothingto do with his office. Hope Hicks was testifying about something that had nothing to do with his office.
Actually the only reason they could convert a misdemeanor into a felony is because the prosecutors claimed Trump was involved in a criminal conspiracy to hide the truth from the public so he could get elected.

Same could be said about Biden conspiring with 51 former intelligence officers to claim Hunter's laptop was fake Russian election interference. Biden wasn't president when this happened so he's not protected by any immunity.
 
'The Daily Show's' Jon Stewart presents all the reasons why the Republican Party doesn't know how to handle VP Kamala Harris coming in and taking over as the Presidential candidate for President Joe Biden

As usual, he brings all the receipts and you can see it here...



To top it off, Trump's terrible VP pick, JD Vance, has privately admitted that Kamala Harris gave them a WHOPPING blow...


Do you think the GOP will be able to recover, or will they be steamrolled by the juggernaut that is Presidential candidate Kamala Harris?

We have already discovered that the establishment cheated. If Trump deserves to be convicted for cheating FEC campaign violations, then ACTBlue needs to be dissolved and SOMEONE needs to be held to account. :rolleyes:

Funny Money: ActBlue Accused Of "MASSIVE Money Laundering Operation" As Trump Files FEC Complaint Over $91M Transfer To Kamala​

Thursday, Jul 25, 2024 - 05:11 AM
"Democrat donation platform ActBlue has been accused of a engaging in a "MASSIVE money laundering operation," by which contributions from large donors are being funneled through hundreds of thousands of small donations made in the name of people who have no clue they've donated. . . . "
<snip>

According to the complaint, Harris is "seeking to perpetrate a $91.5 million dollar heist of Joe Biden’s leftover campaign cash."

Trump campaign general counsel David Warrington called the act a "brazen money grab that would constitute the single largest excessive contribution and biggest violation in the history of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended," adding "Kamala Harris is in the process of committing the largest campaign finance violation in American history and she is using the Commission’s own forms to do it."

"The Commission must not and cannot sit idly by while one candidate takes nearly one hundred million dollars from the authorized committee of another, in violation of the Act and the will of the donors who gave the money in the first place."

The complaint names Biden, Harris, "Biden for President (aka Harris for President) and Keana Spencer, as treasurer, for flagrantly violating the Act by making and receiving an excessive contribution of nearly one hundred million dollars, and for filing fraudulent forms with the Commission purporting to repurpose one candidate’s principal campaign committee for the use of another candidate."


The complaint argues that if "Kamala Harris were a candidate for something in 2024, federal law requires her to have filed a Statement of Candidacy and for her name to have appeared in the name of her authorized committee. But Kamala Harris’s name does not appear in the name of her purported authorized committee, ‘Biden for President,’ and, until Sunday, no Statement of Candidacy existed for her. Then Sunday, rather than filing her own Statement of Candidacy, she merely altered Joe Biden’s to replace his name with hers. There is no mechanism under the Act for one individual to end another’s federal candidacy by simply amending the other’s Form 2. Moreover, in that purported amended Form 2 Harris designated ‘Biden for President’ as her principal campaign committee and then renamed it. Altering a document submitted to a federal agency is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1519.3." -Fox News

IOW? The folks that gave campaign cash to Biden, did not necessarily endorse a Harris/? ticket, and there is a major undemocratic, illegal heist of their cash, as well of a forgery of other ill begotten gains toward the effort.



1722356843556.png


. . . so we are to believe that the record breaking Harris fundraising included MAGA donations? :rolleyes:


Donations Don't Add Up: FEC Data Shows Top WinRed Donor in NJ Gave $154k. She says 'impossible.'​

Nov 1, 2023


Now we just need to find out who is the mastermind behind it.

While I do agree that JD Vance is terrible, I don't agree that Kamala is well loved. She has no real support except among neolibs, neocons, and the billionaire class on Wall Street and over in silicon valley.
 
At some point the campaign will be about the record of both candidates, Marc and when Kamala's record has been examined in the past...her popularity plummets. People don't want a liberal California politician running the country. They've seen what that's done to Cali.
What was "done to Cali?"
 
When you say it like that, it makes Trump chickening out of the debate even more puzzling. Many are saying it's the biggest display of political cowardice we've ever seen.
Ah, she's not even the Democratic nominee yet, Greenbeard! What an idiotic thing for anyone to say!

I'm curious...have you ever seen Donald Trump back down from a challenge? He just agreed to debate Joe Biden...on CNN...with two moderators that have a long history of not liking him...what makes you think he'll back out of debating Kamala Harris...a candidate who when she WAS involved in a Presidential debate got her ass handed to her simply by someone bringing up her record as a DA!
 
That case won't be dropped. Trump is a man convicted on 34 counts. You don't care? Yeah, and here we see white privilege. You don't care if a white presidential canddate is a convicted felon, but you rant about how unqualified a black woman is based on claims that she had sex. Sex is not illegal betwen consenting aduts. What Trump did was illegal.
When sex is between a supervisor and an underling and the sex is rewarded with promotions and more money it's sleazy at best. When it involves a public official and the payoff is made with tax payer monies it's even sleazier!
 
She didn't back out because of what you claimed. And she didn't get savaged on her record. Tulsi nutjob made a bunch of inaccurate comments.

You seem to forget the one big thing, and it's gong to be played by Harrs. Trump is a convicted felon. So you guys can talk about what you think her record is, but her record does not include being convicted of a crime. Trumps does. And that should disqualify him from holding the office that is required to uphold the laws of this and.
Nobody cares about that conviction, IM2. They know that it was politically motivated. They know it will eventually be overturned.

So we're right back to running on each candidates RECORD and that's where things start to get really ugly for Kamala! It's what Tulsi Gabbard hit her with in that debate and what she had no answer to. That record hasn't changed. If anything it's gotten worse because she was part of the Biden/Harris Administration.
 

Forum List

Back
Top