Care4all
Warrior Princess
- Mar 24, 2007
- 73,817
- 28,765
the citizen is agreeing to such when they choose to fly on a plane, which is not actually a constitutional right...and in this great Nation of ours, one is INNOCENT until proven guilty via trialSorry, we don't live in NAZI Germany, and in this great Nation of ours, one is INNOCENT until proven guilty via trial.If anyone is walking down the street in a violent drug infested gangbanger war zone they are only there for one of two reasons: They are mentally ill or they are there the 'score'. There is no other reason. Fucking period!I think it may have worked, but regardless, is against our constitutional rights, those that are law abiding citizens, to be stopped and frisked just because you may be walking down the street in a not so nice neighborhood, or just because of the color of your skin or gender.Those who comi
Link?
This is where you're denying reality. Look at violent crime rates subsequent to the implementation of stop and frisk. It's a well know fact stop and frisk has been an overwhelming success. Yeah I know all these liberally rags with thier agendas are claiming stop and frisk didn't work, so dont bother posting a link to one. I live in NY, I know it worked.
That has not been the case for a very long time now. Innocent people are not forced to submit to a body search prior to boarding a plane, nor does and innocent person have their bags searched when entering a stadium or race track prior to an event. There are a number of other examples if you think about it. In the US it is not you ae guilty until proven innocent.