Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #81
These kinds of unwarrented personal attacks advance your arguments AGAINST the First Lady advocating we do something about Childhood Obesity......how?
Unwarranted?
Hmmm...
Do you know what that word means?
To me..and likely to any intelligent person....intentionally spinning what someone says to discredit that person makes it a warranted action when that person points out what a pathetic tactic it is in a debate.
So I would not use the word unwarranted....because, once again, you are wrong.
So, you think that it is totally warranted to deflect from the topic of the First Lady being against Childhood Obesity by making this about me personally?
Hmmmm, that's how you think you win arguments? By going off topic and making it about name-calling the person are are arguing with?
We call that losing....going personal is for those who cannot forward a decent argument. It's the equivalent of saying "Oh yeah? Well, you're ugly and your momma's ugly too" on an Elementary school yard.
So...again, either a) show us what is so horrible about the First Lady advocating AGAINST Childhood obesity, or b) show us that we do not have a problem with Childhood obesity, or c) show us where the First Lady is FORCING us to make nutritional decisions for our children and will be charged with child abuse/neglect if we don't follow her forced plan.
Good luck. (and try not to make it about me again.....that's a loser's tact)
He thinks he wins arguments?