If more guns = safety , then more nukes = safety?

[Dschrute3]

Yes, North Korea and Iran would be crazy not to develop Nuclear Weapons. They've seen what happened in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Those nations didn't have a Nuclear deterrent. And that's cost em bigtime. Can you really blame North Korea and Iran for seeking Nuclear Weapons?

Who is threatening NK or Iran with invasion? No, one. The reasons they want nuclear weapons is the very reasons they should not.

The US has been threatening to attack Iran and North Korea for years. It only makes sense they would do everything possible to defend themselves. And possessing Nuclear Weapons is the only deterrent they could have against a much more powerful adversary. You can't blame them for pursuing that deterrent.

 

[Freewill]

Yes, North Korea and Iran would be crazy not to develop Nuclear Weapons. They've seen what happened in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Those nations didn't have a Nuclear deterrent. And that's cost em bigtime. Can you really blame North Korea and Iran for seeking Nuclear Weapons?

Who is threatening NK or Iran with invasion? No, one. The reasons they want nuclear weapons is the very reasons they should not.

The US has been threatening to attack Iran and North Korea for years. It only makes sense they would do everything possible to defend themselves. And possessing Nuclear Weapons is the only deterrent they could have against a much more powerful adversary. You can't blame them for pursuing that deterrent.

Can you give me one direct quote of when the US threatened invasion of either countries? Both countries want to be bad nations and then use the EXCUSE of invasion to justify their behavior, and you are happy to help.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Interesting point.

not really

 

[Skull Pilot]

this is a common talking point for righties . If more guns are aviailble to people then there's less crime because everyone is armed .

Wouldn't that translate to a global scale with nuke weapons ? More countries wh nukes, then less likelyhood of war ! Right?

only in your tiny mind is a firearm the same as a nuclear weapon

 

[Timmy]

this is a common talking point for righties . If more guns are aviailble to people then there's less crime because everyone is armed .

Wouldn't that translate to a global scale with nuke weapons ? More countries wh nukes, then less likelyhood of war ! Right?

Sure... Nukes plus more nukes plus crazy people with nukes = peace.

Crazy according to who? The spinmasters ?

 

[Timmy]

this is a common talking point for righties . If more guns are aviailble to people then there's less crime because everyone is armed .

Wouldn't that translate to a global scale with nuke weapons ? More countries wh nukes, then less likelyhood of war ! Right?

only in your tiny mind is a firearm the same as a nuclear weapon

It's a matter of scale . A firearm is to a single person as a nuke is to a whole country . Same premise for both .

 

[ABikerSailor]

this is a common talking point for righties . If more guns are aviailble to people then there's less crime because everyone is armed .

Wouldn't that translate to a global scale with nuke weapons ? More countries wh nukes, then less likelyhood of war ! Right?

only in your tiny mind is a firearm the same as a nuclear weapon

It's a matter of scale . A firearm is to a single person as a nuke is to a whole country . Same premise for both .

What would a single person with a flamethrower be considered? How about those with RPG's?

 

[Borillar]

this is a common talking point for righties . If more guns are aviailble to people then there's less crime because everyone is armed .

Wouldn't that translate to a global scale with nuke weapons ? More countries wh nukes, then less likelyhood of war ! Right?

Sure... Nukes plus more nukes plus crazy people with nukes = peace.

Crazy according to who? The spinmasters ?

Does Kim Jong-Un seem the poster boy for sanity and restraint to you? Bad enough that an idiot like Trump has control over a huge nuclear arsenal.