If the middle class is getting "peanuts" in this tax scam......?

Additionally, you may recall that Obama repeatedly proposed those "shovel-ready" jobs for infrastructure....but, was faced with fierce opposition by the do-nothing GOP.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed into law by Obama in February of 2009 with a Democratic majority in the House and Senate. They had plenty of time to get those "shovel-ready" jobs implemented and did not need the Republican Party to do so.
 
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed into law by Obama in February of 2009 with a Democratic majority in the House and Senate. They had plenty of time to get those "shovel-ready" jobs implemented and did not need the Republican Party to do so.


I am NOT excusing Obama.....but here is some dose of reality.....

Back in 2009, former President Barack Obama made some lofty promises about the infrastructure overhaul that his $800 billion economic stimulus plan would provide. Obama used the phrase “shovel-ready projects” in reference to construction projects that could begin right away.

In the end, however, only $98.3 billion of the $800 billion stimulus was dedicated to transportation and infrastructure. Of that $98.3 billion, only about $27.5 billion was actually spent on transportation infrastructure projects. Why?

“The problem is that spending it out takes a long time, because there’s really nothing – there’s no such thing as shovel-ready projects,” Obama said in a 2010 interview with the New York Times.

When it comes to economic stimulus, local governments may take years to begin actual construction even once they receive funding. The reason why such a small portion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ended up spent on infrastructure is that the projects are simply too slow to get off the ground to provide meaningful near-term stimulus.

“If you are talking about stimulating the economy, ‘shovel ready’ doesn’t mean get the money on Monday and start on Tuesday,” former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell said.

“When [Obama] says there’s no such thing as ‘shovel ready,’ he’s right…When we said ‘shovel ready’ we meant ‘shovel ready’ in the way we do things.”

What Happened To All The 'Shovel-Ready' Infrastructure Projects From The 2009 Stimulus Bill?
 
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed into law by Obama in February of 2009 with a Democratic majority in the House and Senate. They had plenty of time to get those "shovel-ready" jobs implemented and did not need the Republican Party to do so.


I am NOT excusing Obama.....but here is some dose of reality.....

Back in 2009, former President Barack Obama made some lofty promises about the infrastructure overhaul that his $800 billion economic stimulus plan would provide. Obama used the phrase “shovel-ready projects” in reference to construction projects that could begin right away.

In the end, however, only $98.3 billion of the $800 billion stimulus was dedicated to transportation and infrastructure. Of that $98.3 billion, only about $27.5 billion was actually spent on transportation infrastructure projects. Why?

“The problem is that spending it out takes a long time, because there’s really nothing – there’s no such thing as shovel-ready projects,” Obama said in a 2010 interview with the New York Times.

When it comes to economic stimulus, local governments may take years to begin actual construction even once they receive funding. The reason why such a small portion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ended up spent on infrastructure is that the projects are simply too slow to get off the ground to provide meaningful near-term stimulus.

“If you are talking about stimulating the economy, ‘shovel ready’ doesn’t mean get the money on Monday and start on Tuesday,” former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell said.

“When [Obama] says there’s no such thing as ‘shovel ready,’ he’s right…When we said ‘shovel ready’ we meant ‘shovel ready’ in the way we do things.”

What Happened To All The 'Shovel-Ready' Infrastructure Projects From The 2009 Stimulus Bill?

So, in other words, government isn't the most efficient mechanism of getting things done. Imagine that......
 
So, in other words, government isn't the most efficient mechanism of getting things done. Imagine that......

Well, you cannot state the above and then STILL support government's promise that giving tax cuts to conglomerates will solve everything....can you?
 
Or they give raises and bonuses to their employees as we've already seen several companies announce.


Please know that virtually EVERY company that is giving out bonuses are ALSO laying off workers......

(.....and, the reason for their bonuses just before the year's end, was that they could deduct from their tax liability at the rate of 35% versus 21% next year.)

Gotta make Santa Claus (the GOP-led Congress) look good to counter the 28% approval ratings of this tax scam.

More like to counter the leftist MSM who never tells the whole truth if any truth at all.

Those companies were going to lay people off anyway. How does that undo any good that Trump may have brought the remaining employees?
 
More like to counter the leftist MSM who never tells the whole truth if any truth at all.

Those companies were going to lay people off anyway. How does that undo any good that Trump may have brought the remaining employees?

Well, your beloved orange clown will have to contend with higher unemployment rates AND demadns for unemployment insurance payments from states.
 
More like to counter the leftist MSM who never tells the whole truth if any truth at all.

Those companies were going to lay people off anyway. How does that undo any good that Trump may have brought the remaining employees?

Well, your beloved orange clown will have to contend with higher unemployment rates AND demadns for unemployment insurance payments from states.

Because a couple of companies laid off some people??? People lose jobs all the time, it's the jobs lost vs jobs gained that count. With the little guy being able to have some extra money and the big guy the same, it sure as hell won't lead to higher unemployment.
 
Virtually EVERY dollar cut from the middle class' tax burden is re-channeled into a demand for goods and services.....

What happens when the tax burden is reduced for corporations?

They stash it in overseas tax havens????

They buy back stocks to benefit a whole bunch of foreign investors?

They buy Jets from France for their CEOs?

LOL (go to bed)

They stash it in overseas tax havens????

Our highest in the world corporate rate gave them a reason to do that.
You think cutting the rate gives them more incentive?

They buy back stocks

Yeah, higher stock prices are bad. DERP!

to benefit a whole bunch of foreign investors?

A whole bunch? Sounds serious.
 
“This is the biggest corporate rate cut ever, going back to the corporate income tax rate of roughly 80 years ago.This is a huge pro-growth stimulus for the economy. Every year the Obama WH overstated how the economy would grow. Now real economics and jobs." -WSJ
 
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed into law by Obama in February of 2009 with a Democratic majority in the House and Senate. They had plenty of time to get those "shovel-ready" jobs implemented and did not need the Republican Party to do so.


I am NOT excusing Obama.....but here is some dose of reality.....

Back in 2009, former President Barack Obama made some lofty promises about the infrastructure overhaul that his $800 billion economic stimulus plan would provide. Obama used the phrase “shovel-ready projects” in reference to construction projects that could begin right away.

In the end, however, only $98.3 billion of the $800 billion stimulus was dedicated to transportation and infrastructure. Of that $98.3 billion, only about $27.5 billion was actually spent on transportation infrastructure projects. Why?

“The problem is that spending it out takes a long time, because there’s really nothing – there’s no such thing as shovel-ready projects,” Obama said in a 2010 interview with the New York Times.

When it comes to economic stimulus, local governments may take years to begin actual construction even once they receive funding. The reason why such a small portion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ended up spent on infrastructure is that the projects are simply too slow to get off the ground to provide meaningful near-term stimulus.

“If you are talking about stimulating the economy, ‘shovel ready’ doesn’t mean get the money on Monday and start on Tuesday,” former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell said.

“When [Obama] says there’s no such thing as ‘shovel ready,’ he’s right…When we said ‘shovel ready’ we meant ‘shovel ready’ in the way we do things.”

What Happened To All The 'Shovel-Ready' Infrastructure Projects From The 2009 Stimulus Bill?

So, in other words, government isn't the most efficient mechanism of getting things done. Imagine that......
It is if you need to get something done. Capitalism cannot be trusted without a profit motive.
 
$20 trillion!! How the hell did we get to $20 trillion?


VERY bad policies by Reagan, GWB and, yes, Obama....

Now add another $1.5 TRILLION by the idiot Trump and additional $2 TRILLION when he wants to tackle infrastructure (of which there is a need.)

Now, ponder this.......

Donald Trump: Deficits Don't Matter | New Republic

A House Republican explains why deficits don't matter anymore - Vox

Six Years After Cheney Said 'Deficits Don't Matter,' The National Debt ...

Great, get back to us when Trump get's close to $10 trillion.
 
You know you can't lie your way out of this.

The vast majority of America will see more in their paychecks starting about February.


Moron.....if THAT was the deciding factor (a few more dollars in one's pay check) THEN, GWB AND Obama would have been economic geniuses....
Didn't quite happen....BUT, DO keep listening to hannity.....LOL.

Poor little Maoist gnat...

Both Dubya and ISIS Barry were reelected.

Americans vote their pocket books. The Republicans just gave Americans more money.

Your chances for regaining congress just went down the toilet. If you aren't bright enough to grasp it, you're rulers sure do.
 
So, with the majority of the USA now having less money to spend, what does it mean?

A tanked economy. After all, economies are demand driven, and there will be less demand. Only the most brainless cultists still profess belief in the total failure of supply-side economics.

Republicans never learn. Or, more correctly, they see that as a feature, one that keeps the working class subservient to their rich GOP masters.


What are you babbling about Comrade? Do you even know what day it is? Or what planet you are on?

About 90% of Americans will have more money due to the tax cut of the Republicans, you DO grasp that, right?
 
So, with the majority of the USA now having less money to spend, what does it mean?

A tanked economy. After all, economies are demand driven, and there will be less demand. Only the most brainless cultists still profess belief in the total failure of supply-side economics.

Republicans never learn. Or, more correctly, they see that as a feature, one that keeps the working class subservient to their rich GOP masters.


What are you babbling about Comrade? Do you even know what day it is? Or what planet you are on?

About 90% of Americans will have more money due to the tax cut of the Republicans, you DO grasp that, right?
The simpler it is, or the more common sense becomes involved the harder it is for progressives to understand. I mean why use common sense when nonsense and bullshit can be used to promote guilt in the insecure and manipulate them.. A sign of emasculation that we should curb.
 
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed into law by Obama in February of 2009 with a Democratic majority in the House and Senate. They had plenty of time to get those "shovel-ready" jobs implemented and did not need the Republican Party to do so.


I am NOT excusing Obama.....but here is some dose of reality.....

Back in 2009, former President Barack Obama made some lofty promises about the infrastructure overhaul that his $800 billion economic stimulus plan would provide. Obama used the phrase “shovel-ready projects” in reference to construction projects that could begin right away.

In the end, however, only $98.3 billion of the $800 billion stimulus was dedicated to transportation and infrastructure. Of that $98.3 billion, only about $27.5 billion was actually spent on transportation infrastructure projects. Why?

“The problem is that spending it out takes a long time, because there’s really nothing – there’s no such thing as shovel-ready projects,” Obama said in a 2010 interview with the New York Times.

When it comes to economic stimulus, local governments may take years to begin actual construction even once they receive funding. The reason why such a small portion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ended up spent on infrastructure is that the projects are simply too slow to get off the ground to provide meaningful near-term stimulus.

“If you are talking about stimulating the economy, ‘shovel ready’ doesn’t mean get the money on Monday and start on Tuesday,” former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell said.

“When [Obama] says there’s no such thing as ‘shovel ready,’ he’s right…When we said ‘shovel ready’ we meant ‘shovel ready’ in the way we do things.”

What Happened To All The 'Shovel-Ready' Infrastructure Projects From The 2009 Stimulus Bill?

So, in other words, government isn't the most efficient mechanism of getting things done. Imagine that......
It is if you need to get something done. Capitalism cannot be trusted without a profit motive.

Except that he just showed rather affectively that it isn’t. As for capitalism, the profit motive is what makes people strive to produce something better. Your Marxist garbage has been tried and failed repeatedly for over a century.
 
Deficits only don't matter when we have a positive multiplier such as welfare spending not a negative multiplier such as warfare spending.

Ok...when is welfare a positive multiplier and when a negative multiplier?
When it promotes the general welfare instead of the general warfare.

Our Founding Fathers also knew about economics, unlike the right wing.
 
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed into law by Obama in February of 2009 with a Democratic majority in the House and Senate. They had plenty of time to get those "shovel-ready" jobs implemented and did not need the Republican Party to do so.


I am NOT excusing Obama.....but here is some dose of reality.....

Back in 2009, former President Barack Obama made some lofty promises about the infrastructure overhaul that his $800 billion economic stimulus plan would provide. Obama used the phrase “shovel-ready projects” in reference to construction projects that could begin right away.

In the end, however, only $98.3 billion of the $800 billion stimulus was dedicated to transportation and infrastructure. Of that $98.3 billion, only about $27.5 billion was actually spent on transportation infrastructure projects. Why?

“The problem is that spending it out takes a long time, because there’s really nothing – there’s no such thing as shovel-ready projects,” Obama said in a 2010 interview with the New York Times.

When it comes to economic stimulus, local governments may take years to begin actual construction even once they receive funding. The reason why such a small portion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ended up spent on infrastructure is that the projects are simply too slow to get off the ground to provide meaningful near-term stimulus.

“If you are talking about stimulating the economy, ‘shovel ready’ doesn’t mean get the money on Monday and start on Tuesday,” former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell said.

“When [Obama] says there’s no such thing as ‘shovel ready,’ he’s right…When we said ‘shovel ready’ we meant ‘shovel ready’ in the way we do things.”

What Happened To All The 'Shovel-Ready' Infrastructure Projects From The 2009 Stimulus Bill?

So, in other words, government isn't the most efficient mechanism of getting things done. Imagine that......
It is if you need to get something done. Capitalism cannot be trusted without a profit motive.

Except that he just showed rather affectively that it isn’t. As for capitalism, the profit motive is what makes people strive to produce something better. Your Marxist garbage has been tried and failed repeatedly for over a century.
We "ditch Capitalism" for truer forms of Socialism, every time we have real times of war.

It is how some on the left know, our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror must be fake; because the right wing feels justified in lowering taxes for those long term costs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top