Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is that why you support welfare, to provide cannon fodder for the military?People should boycott having kids.....that would be truly hilarious. Then some of you would say "but who is to sserve in the military"... Nobody. Lmao
So insurance shouldn't cover childbirth ? Vasectomy? Viagra ?
No you didn't. You read the entire thing and it proved you wrong (as always). Only an individual can have health idiot.There is no such thing as "public health". Only individuals have health. If you have cancer, that doesn't mean I have cancer. It's an individual issue.Public health is in everyone's best interest.
If there were a such thing as "Public Health" then Bill Clinton and the Dumbocrats wouldn't have created HIPAA to protect the privacy of the individual. After all, privacy is the polar opposite of public.
Any other false narratives you'd like to try today?There is no such thing as "public health".
That's where I stopped reading.
pub·lic health
noun
- the health of the population as a whole, especially as monitored, regulated, and promoted by the state.
"chlorine has been used to disinfect water supplies to protect public health"
So tell me - is "Public" the patient's first name or the patient's last name? And what is the rest of the patient's name (mandatory to schedule an appointment)? What is "Public's" Social Security Number? Lastly, who is "Public's" physician?the center for disease control also .Fluoride in the water comes to mind.Public health is in everyone's best interest.
You are talking about stuff companies cover because US Regulators require it. Trump will get rid of those.I don't care if it does. I'm fine with that. But don't mandate what a policy must have, don't mandate that the Church has to provide that stuff, and most of all - don't dare make it "free" from government. Because it's not "free". I pay for it. And it's not my job to pay for progressives to have sex and spread more STD's to each other.So insurance shouldn't cover childbirth ? Vasectomy? Viagra ?
If you have an insurance policy you do this every day and think nothing of it. You're already paying for for everyone, hence your ever climbing premiums since you've had insurance.
And your point would be??? Like all progressive socialists - you desperately want to make the case that everyone is absolved of personal responsibility while simultaneously everyone is responsible for everyone else.What about it? I am not paying for Viagra for someone who can't get an erection but is too lazy to get a job. Sex comes with responsibilities. If someone can't handle those responsibilities - then they shouldn't be having sex. Male or female.Another brilliant piece by Matt Walsh. If progressives don't want us involved in their sex lives, then they need to pay for their own damn sex lives. If I'm paying for it, you damn well better believe I will control it. Looks like you lazy progressives better get a damn job if you want to keep having engaging in several minutes of your disturbing, deviant, sexual behaviors...
If your sex life is none of my business, stop demanding that I finance it
What about Viagra and other erectile dysfunction medications and pumps, etc.? BTW, Planned Parenthood also treats men.
"Shouldn't" and reality are always two very different things.
Society "shouldn't" need police to keep the peace but unfortunately there are some pretty cunty behaviors within the human condition that always require some degree of supervision.
We " shouldn't" need to prosecute polluters or govt appointed "emergency managers" who poison an entire population through poor management of their water supply either. Unfortunately, without proper diligence, the cunty side of
human nature of just a few could impact the health of all of us.
Minimum wage positions will always have an abundance of available labor because minimum wage jobs are entry level positions for people seeking their first job (ie 16 year olds). Thanks for playing snowflake.Perhaps not allowing people to have kids would solve everything. Wouldn't bother me a bit and thetrthetre would be nobody to fill the low wage jobs. Those businesses would suffer. I would love to watch that happen.
Now that is radical. You really think outside of the box 65!Perhaps not allowing people to have kids would solve everything. Wouldn't bother me a bit and thetrthetre would be nobody to fill the low wage jobs. Those businesses would suffer. I would love to watch that happen.
Having those that produce them support them would solve everything.
You'd pay a lot more for welfare. RWers don't have sex? lolI don't care if it does. I'm fine with that. But don't mandate what a policy must have, don't mandate that the Church has to provide that stuff, and most of all - don't dare make it "free" from government. Because it's not "free". I pay for it. And it's not my job to pay for progressives to have sex and spread more STD's to each other.So insurance shouldn't cover childbirth ? Vasectomy? Viagra ?
You'd pay a lot more for welfare. RWers don't have sex? lolI don't care if it does. I'm fine with that. But don't mandate what a policy must have, don't mandate that the Church has to provide that stuff, and most of all - don't dare make it "free" from government. Because it's not "free". I pay for it. And it's not my job to pay for progressives to have sex and spread more STD's to each other.So insurance shouldn't cover childbirth ? Vasectomy? Viagra ?
not any more. ty, GOPMinimum wage positions will always have an abundance of available labor because minimum wage jobs are entry level positions for people seeking their first job (ie 16 year olds). Thanks for playing snowflake.Perhaps not allowing people to have kids would solve everything. Wouldn't bother me a bit and thetrthetre would be nobody to fill the low wage jobs. Those businesses would suffer. I would love to watch that happen.
Oh that's still the case. Unfortunately progressives want to make minimum wage a career. That's on you people.not any more. ty, GOPMinimum wage positions will always have an abundance of available labor because minimum wage jobs are entry level positions for people seeking their first job (ie 16 year olds). Thanks for playing snowflake.Perhaps not allowing people to have kids would solve everything. Wouldn't bother me a bit and thetrthetre would be nobody to fill the low wage jobs. Those businesses would suffer. I would love to watch that happen.