Matted Joybeard
Gold Member
- Dec 2, 2014
- 978
- 324
- 188
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would agree on that being the most likely, but I still say that any nuclear attack is extremely unlikely. It makes everything a losing proposition for all parties. All the major parties have to be planning on success.
I think the alternative is an unfortunate situation for Israel in that they no longer have a monopoly on power and are going to take some hits. Iran too of course.
I'm pretty sure that the Iran nuclear threat is being created for political propaganda effect. Iran doesn't need nuclear weapons any more than does Israell. All proxies including Israel have nuclear backup. [\b]How could anyone stop Israel if they are convinced they'll face an existential threat unless Iran is disabled before acquiring nuclear weapons?
I can't just assume that he actually did, but I think that era with Kennedy has long passed and now Israel will be tight on causing any developments on hostilities. That's very safe logic to assume! As will be the case with Russia/China on Iran's hostilities.The Israelis might have assassinated JFK in their pursuit of nuclear weapons in the 70s, when he prohibited (or tired to) Israel from developing them.
The question is always going to be on Israel's use of a nuclear weapon bringing a response in kind. I think your theories could be correct if you're assuming that there won't be a response.I don't see how the US could do anything to Israel, even our elections are now being manipulated by them.
All well said and good, BUT we must be cognizant of the fact that the Israelis are the most belligerent actor in the Middle East and the most extremist reactionaries.I'm pretty sure that the Iran nuclear threat is being created for political propaganda effect. Iran doesn't need nuclear weapons any more than does Israell. All proxies including Israel have nuclear backup. [\b]
I can't just assume that he actually did, but I think that era with Kennedy has long passed and now Israel will be tight on causing any developments on hostilities. That's very safe logic to assume! As will be the case with Russia/China on Iran's hostilities.
The question is always going to be on Israel's use of a nuclear weapon bringing a response in kind. I think your theories could be correct if you're assuming that there won't be a response.
Great precautions have been taken by both America and Russia to make mutually agreeable limitations to that war. Likewise I think the same is true for this developing war.
I don't believe that Israel is doing anything against America's wishes or demands.
Everything in America's future depends on it! Nuclear war holds no future for either side.
Good conversation! I know that you're being sincere about this situation. Too bad none of the others can.
It’s likely that Tehran could imminently launch ballistic missiles against Israel a senior White House official told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday, as the Jewish state braced for an Iranian attack within the next 12 hours.
“The United States has indications that Iran is preparing to imminently launch a ballistic missile attack against Israel,” the official stated.
“We are actively supporting defensive preparations to defend Israel against this attack,” the US official said.
“A direct military attack from Iran against Israel,” the official stressed, “will carry severe consequences for Iran.”
Iran last attacked Israel in April, but its missiles were thwarted by the unified actions of five armies: Israel, the US, France, Jordan, and the United Kingdom.
It's presumed that this attack would be larger than the 120 ballistic missiles, 170 drones, and dozens of cruise missiles which Iran launched on Israel in April."
Three Israeli officials said that the attack would involve unmanned drones and missiles fired toward three military air bases and an intelligence headquarters north of Tel Aviv, The New York Times reported.
The second direct military showdown between Israel and Iran comes as the IDF has in the last weeks bombarded Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, significantly weakening the Iranian proxy group. This has included the assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. Iran had warned of repercussions to those attacks.
Iran launches hundreds of rockets into Israel in massive aerial attack
IDF vows to strike across the Middle East tonight • Iran launches 180 ballistic missiles, sending Israelis across the country to shelterwww.jpost.com
So have the ayatollahs finally grown a pair? Back in April, Israel demonstrated it can hit any target in Iran with great precision, but with Hezbollah under intense relentless fire and all of Iran's other militias being bombed and Israel closing Lebanon's airspace to Iranian planes, if Iran doesn't attack Israel now, regardless of the consequences, it will lose its credibility as a major power in the ME.
I get it on your opinion.Surely this is the opportunity Israel has long sought? a "justification" for bombing Iran's nuclear ambitions? Will it let such an opportunity pass it by?
I mean, this is like all falling into place, could there be a better time, the Biden administration could then take credit for bringing the "rogue" Iranian regime to heel right before an election...don't want Trump doing it and taking credit for it...
What is Iran's nuclear backup here?I get it on your opinion.
At least understand mine, even though you may not accept it.
Either Israel or Iran having nuclear weapons doesn't make a damn bit of difference.
They both have huge nuclear backup.
If you're envisioning no nuclear revenge strike if Israel pulls the nuclear trigger, you could have a point.
not this time, it seems ….You mean like last time when all 300 of their missiles were shot down
What losers
Absolutely! And I understand that you're probably basing your opinion of them going renegade on America's guidance.All well said and good, BUT we must be cognizant of the fact that the Israelis are the most belligerent actor in the Middle East and the most extremist reactionaries.
250+ missiles launched and the IDF is reporting zero injuriesnot this time, it seems ….
The IDF are dishonest - just sayin.250+ missiles launched and the IDF is reporting zero injuries
Iran is impotent
FineThe IDF are dishonest - just sayin.
The Brics to come soon, but right now Russia and probably China too.What is Iran's nuclear backup here?
Those aren’t “facts.” Just your usual anti Semitic propaganda baseless crap.All well said and good, BUT we must be cognizant of the fact that the Israelis are the most belligerent actor in the Middle East and the most extremist reactionaries.
Iran has no interest in killing civilians, children, babies and pregnant women or in attacking hospitals or schools. Why do you think killing civilians is the mark of success? where ever did you learn such a thing?Fine
When you get credible reports of Israeli casualties, feel free to post them
They sure gave it their best shotIran has no interest in killing civilians, children, babies and pregnant women or in attacking hospitals or schools. Why do you think killing civilians is the mark of success? where ever did you learn such a thing?