INSURRECTION in America: EXPLOSIVE new Email Evidence Links GINNY to the 1/6 COUP

[jc456]

Ginni Thomas' emails deepen her involvement in 2020 election

Newly discovered emails show that Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, was more deeply involved in baseless efforts to overturn the 2020 election than previously known.

apnews.com

The revelations first published by The Washington Post on Friday show that Thomas was more involved than previously known in efforts, based on unsubstantiated claims of fraud, to overturn Biden’s victory and keep then-President Donald Trump in office.

In the days after The Associated Press and other news organizations called the presidential election for Biden, Thomas emailed two lawmakers in Arizona to urge them to choose “a clean slate of Electors” and “stand strong in the face of political and media pressure.” The AP obtained the emails under the state’s open records law.

Thomas also had written to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in the weeks following the election encouraging him to work to overturn Biden’s victory and keep Trump in office, according to text messages first reported by the Post and CBS News.


Do you think this is enough to impeach Clarence Thomas and replace him with a Biden-backed liberal justice? Thoughts?

What is illegal?

 

[jc456]

Right. And only a superior intellect could possibly see the imminent danger to the nation because a court justices wife doesn’t agree with you and had the nerve to say so.

Go fuck yourself clown.

Right? I guess she is their enemy like joe explained to them

 

[CrusaderFrank]

An attempt at the largest voter fraud scheme in American history.

Biden said so himself

 

[fncceo]

EXPLOSIVE new Evidence​

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

So we should do nothing about voter fraud?

There was no widespread voter fraud.
Voter fraud happens in every election. But not on a scale that affects the outcome.

Funny how most of the individual fraud cases highlighted in 2020, came on the Republican side of the aisle.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

There was no widespread voter fraud.
Voter fraud happens in every election. But not on a scale that affects the outcome.

Funny how most of the individual fraud cases highlighted in 2020, came on the Republican side of the aisle.

 

[lennypartiv]

There was no widespread voter fraud.

Watch 2000 Mules.

 

[sartre play]

No

Yes and this is old news. There is lots of information out there about where & how she has involved her self.

 

[sartre play]

Watch 2000 Mules.

NEVER. its been proven, the man lies and cheats

 

[meaner gene]

Watch 2000 Mules.

And every time we do, we don't see any video evidence of the same person dropping off votes at multiple locations.

And the cellphone data isn't proof of anything except somebody with a vending machine route, visited the same places day after day.

 

[jc456]

Yes and this is old news. There is lots of information out there about where & how she has involved her self.

So fking what? Isn’t she allowed the same as joe?

Post that statute you are referring to

 

[meaner gene]

Do you think this is enough to impeach Clarence Thomas and replace him with a Biden-backed liberal justice? Thoughts?

Actually, they should call the Thomas's before congress and question Clarence about why he didn't recuse himself. And Ginni about if she ever discussed her politics and positions with Clarence.

If Clarence should have recused and did't, and Ginni discussed facts relevant to a case before the court, then it's clobbering time.

 

[jc456]

Actually, they should call the Thomas's before congress and question Clarence about why he didn't recuse himself. And Ginni about if she ever discussed her politics and positions with Clarence.

If Clarence should have recused and did't, and Ginni discussed facts relevant to a case before the court, then it's clobbering time.

Recuse from what?

 

[meaner gene]

So fking what? Isn’t she allowed the same as joe?

Post that statute you are referring to

Under the Judicial Code of Conduct, judges may not permit or consider “ex parte communications” in deciding a case unless expressly allowed by law.

 

[jc456]

Under the Judicial Code of Conduct, judges may not permit or consider “ex parte communications” in deciding a case unless expressly allowed by law.

So why do you think he needed to recuse

 

[bodecea]

If Hunter Biden's actions have no bearing on the President, why would the actions of Thomas's wife have any bearing on him?

What moves did Hunter Biden make to affect any election?

 

[jc456]

What moves did Hunter Biden make to affect any election?

 

[meaner gene]

Recuse from what?

Cases involving the Trump election in specific, and all Trump cases in general.

 

[jc456]

Cases involving the Trump election in specific, and all Trump cases in general.

Because?

 

[meaner gene]

So why do you think he needed to recuse

That's why congress needs to ask him why he didn't.