Iowa Reaches Milestone on Wind-Energy Production - 64%

[abu afak]

You have no idea of the cost.
Abu only offers a long rant that is nothing more than a contradiction based on abu's imagination.

Abu, a fossil fuel plant lasts over 80 years. Wind turbines maybe 10 years.

Abu you are clueless

You call that a "long rant" you illiterate idiot? What is it.. 6 sentences?
I guess the since you could Not answer/produce a source for your Lie "300 Trillion" it made you hostile.
My post had substance, Yours, a failure to substantiate your claim/s or answer mine.
You lost Moron.

`

 

[jc456]

You have no idea of the cost.
Abu only offers a long rant that is nothing more than a contradiction based on abu's imagination.

Abu, a fossil fuel plant lasts over 80 years. Wind turbines maybe 10 years.

Abu you are clueless

he also thinks the turbines are free, the land is free. everything for abu is free. Well, then every fossil fuel plant is free. I mean, the fuel comes from the same land turbines are on.

 

[abu afak]

Your posts never have substance and you are an illiterate dolt who can't compose a coherent paragraph.

My posts always have substance (and as usual this Pillar point/OP is one) as opposed to half of your gratuitous 5-10 last-word farts.
Ding is a joke who (as all can see daily) oft 'runs the section with 8 OCD mini-posts in 10 minutes: USMB's conspicuous Clown.

Just as with you, I have caught Elektra in a Big Fat Lie and he can't respond.
He Lied/Lost.
When you're caught you just knee-jerk cover it with 3 one-liners.

You're a dishonest Religious nut Lying for Jesus with 90% less content than ChemEngineer.
`

 

[elektra]

Just as with you, I have caught Elektra in a Big Fat Lie and he can't respond.
He Lied/Lost.
When you're caught you just knee-jerk cover it with 3 one-liners.

Hahaha. I have answered everyone of your comments and left you dribbling spit on your keyboard.

I answered you here, directed you to the source of the $300 trillion.

Abu, if you know that figure to be wrong how come you dont tell us how much has been and will be spent on green energy.

Abu, how much will green energy cost

 

[abu afak]

Hahaha. I have answered everyone of your comments and left you dribbling spit on your keyboard.

I answered you here, directed you to the source of the $300 trillion.

Abu, if you know that figure to be wrong how come you dont tell us how much has been and will be spent on green energy.

Abu, how much will green energy cost

Elektra Ultra-Lying Again!
He Claimed "$300 Trillion" in post #37...
Whiffed on my challenge for that source in his #39...
and Then he (LOL) deleted what would have been post #41 which was going to (He thought) name that source, but he couldn't find one.
Now Lies/Whiffs again in #45.
Shameless LIAR.
No source.

Elektra is a Shameless MAGAt ass-hole. (like dingy)

`

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How’s it cheaper?

If it’s “cheaper” why did Janet Yelling like a Moonbat say it will cost an additional $3 TRILLION ANNUALLY???

 

[elektra]

Elektra Ultra-Lying Again!
He Claimed "$300 Trillion" in post #37...
Whiffed on my challenge for that source in his #39...
and Then he (LOL) deleted what would have been post #41 which was going to (He thought) name that source, but he couldn't find one.

Elektra is a shameless MAGAt asshole. (like dingy)

I did not delete my post #41. Not at all.

$300 Trillion to fight climate change. I kid you not. What can anyone say about that number other than Green, Renewables, Sustainable, power is obviously ridiculous to even consider, given the cost! ...

What will a green global economy cost? Our experts on the numbers—and what’s at stake.

Three authors of our latest research on the net-zero transition talk about the potential risks and opportunities that lie ahead in a more sustainable world.

www.mckinsey.com

Here is my thread that you know was linked to in post #41 as well as a screen shot showing abu saw the thread and negative repped the thread.

$300 Trillion To Save The Planet From Climate Change

$300 Trillion to fight climate change. I kid you not. What can anyone say about that number other than Green, Renewables, Sustainable, power is obviously ridiculous to even consider, given the cost! It is all greed. Greedy bankers, investors, Wall Street. Politicians, Dictators, the United...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[elektra]

Elektra Ultra-Lying Again!
He Claimed "$300 Trillion" in post #37...
Whiffed on my challenge for that source in his #39...
and Then he (LOL) deleted what would have been post #41 which was going to (He thought) name that source, but he couldn't find one.
Now Lies/Whiffs again in #45.
Shameless LIAR.
No source.

Elektra is a Shameless MAGAt ass-hole. (like dingy)

Abu is always a liar. Abu saw the thread that sourced the $300 trillion, negative repped the opening comment, then scurried away like a rat

$300 Trillion To Save The Planet From Climate Change

$300 Trillion to fight climate change. I kid you not. What can anyone say about that number other than Green, Renewables, Sustainable, power is obviously ridiculous to even consider, given the cost! It is all greed. Greedy bankers, investors, Wall Street. Politicians, Dictators, the United...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[abu afak]

I did not delete my post #41. Not at all.

Here is my thread that you know was linked to in post #41 as well as a screen shot showing abu saw the thread and negative repped the thread.

$300 Trillion To Save The Planet From Climate Change

$300 Trillion to fight climate change. I kid you not. What can anyone say about that number other than Green, Renewables, Sustainable, power is obviously ridiculous to even consider, given the cost! It is all greed. Greedy bankers, investors, Wall Street. Politicians, Dictators, the United...

www.usmessageboard.com

View attachment 1001860

So STILL No "$300 Trillion" except Elektra's even older Lie!

HIS thread title MIScharacterizing a McKinsay article we all laughed at then... too.

CAUGHT LYING AGAIN NOW, ELEKTRA TRIED TO BURY IT WITH TWO GIANT POSTS.

`

 

[elektra]

I guess the since you could Not answer/produce a source for your Lie "300 Trillion" it made you hostile.
My post had substance, Yours, a failure to substantiate your claim/s or answer mine.
You lost Moron.

Abu, I know you will always ignore or lie. You have yet to tell us the cost.

What is funny is for the cost I use the wind and solar industries advocates.

Abu claims I am wrong. I did not come up with the cost. The websites I use are democrat websites

Abu laughs off the websites that support green energy.

Abu, how much did Iowa's failed green energy experiment cost.

 

[elektra]

$300 trillion is needed to stop global warming, and that’s a bargain

As shockingly large as this number may seem, it’s minimal compared with the likely price tag for doing nothing.

www.google.com

$275 trillion in addition to the $25 trillion already spent.
The BNEF estimate actually is on the low end compared with a McKinsey reckoning that transitioning society away from fossil fuels will require average annual spending of $US9.2 trillion between 2021 and 2050, or $US275 trillion.

 

[elektra]

How about Barclays for a source

The Green Transition| Barclays CIB

The world will have to undergo an unprecedented global economic transformation to achieve a zero-carbon economy.

www.ib.barclays

The predicted costs of the green transition vary significantly, with estimates ranging from $100 trillion to $300 trillion between now and 2050. On an annual net basis, this requires investment of 2-8% of global GDP, which is substantial but far from impossible.

 

[abu afak]

Teed up and ready to go... of course.
An unbiased search/question with First, not biased result.

Let me show you and 1000x "$76 Trillion" Liar ToddsterParrot a simple trick:

"Showing results for how much would a renewable grid cost

"Search Results​

"Featured snippet from the web​

"Converting the entire U.S. power grid to 100% renewable energy in the next decade is technologically and logistically attainable, and would cost an estimated $4.5 trillion, according to a recent analysis by the energy research firm Wood Mackenzie.
Jun 28, 2019
Yale E360

Shifting U.S. to 100 Percent Renewables Would Cost $4.5 Trillion, Analysis Finds

e360.yale.edu

And that was 2019.
That was 450 Mil a yr If done in 10 years, and some is already done now/since.
Renewables more efficient now.`

`

 

[elektra]

According to the united nations we need less, we only need to triple what already has been spent. $40 trillion was in the 5 years prior to 2021 when this article was wrote.

What's the cost of net zero? - Climate Champions

Commissioned by the UN High-Level Climate Action Champions, new research with support from Vivid Economics breaks down the numbers behind the where, who and how of the trillions of investments required to meet the net zero goal.

climatechampions.unfccc.int

$125 trillion of climate investment is needed by 2050 to meet net zero, with investment from now until 2025 needing to triple compared to the last five years to put the world on track.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Teed up and ready to go... of course.
An unbiased search/question with First, not biased result

Let me show you and 1000x "$76 Trillion" Liar ToddsterParrot a simple trick:

"Showing results for how much would a renewable grid cost

"Search Results​

"Featured snippet from the web​

Converting the entire U.S. power grid to 100% renewable energy in the next decade is technologically and logistically attainable, and would cost an estimated $4.5 trillion, according to a recent analysis by the energy research firm Wood Mackenzie.
Jun 28, 2019
Yale E360

Shifting U.S. to 100 Percent Renewables Would Cost $4.5 Trillion, Analysis Finds

e360.yale.edu

And that was 2019.
That was 450 Mil a yr If done in 10 years, and some is already done now/since.
Renewables more efficient now.`

`

They seem very unbiased.

And that was 2019.
That was 450 Mil a yr If done in 10 years, and some is already done

That would be $4.5 billion. You're off by a factor of 1000, abu fucktard.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Abu posts are almost unreadable

And he can't do math to save his life.

 

[abu afak]

Teed up and ready to go... of course.
An unbiased search/question with First, not biased result.

Let me show you and 1000x "$76 Trillion" Liar ToddsterParrot a simple trick:

"Showing results for how much would a renewable grid cost

"Search Results​

"Featured snippet from the web​

"Converting the entire U.S. power grid to 100% renewable energy in the next decade is technologically and logistically attainable, and would cost an estimated $4.5 trillion, according to a recent analysis by the energy research firm Wood Mackenzie.
Jun 28, 2019
Yale E360

Shifting U.S. to 100 Percent Renewables Would Cost $4.5 Trillion, Analysis Finds

e360.yale.edu

And that was 2019.
450 Mil a yr If done in 10 years, and some is already done now/since.
Renewables more efficient now.`

`

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Teed up and ready to go... of course.
An unbiased search/question with First, not biased result.

Let me show you and 1000x "$76 Trillion" Liar ToddsterParrot a simple trick:

"Showing results for how much would a renewable grid cost

"Search Results​

"Featured snippet from the web​

"Converting the entire U.S. power grid to 100% renewable energy in the next decade is technologically and logistically attainable, and would cost an estimated $4.5 trillion, according to a recent analysis by the energy research firm Wood Mackenzie.
Jun 28, 2019
Yale E360

Shifting U.S. to 100 Percent Renewables Would Cost $4.5 Trillion, Analysis Finds

e360.yale.edu

And that was 2019.
450 Mil a yr If done in 10 years, and some is already done now/since.
Renewables more efficient now.`

`

Your math is bad, no matter how many times you post it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The last page contains 5 No Content one-line ding personal insult Trolls.
We need moderation here.

`

And some math moderation.

Abu can't multiply or divide very well.

 

[ding]

Ding is a joke who (as all can see daily) oft 'runs the section with 8 OCD mini-posts in 10 minutes: USMB's conspicuous Clown.

You insult others and when it's done back to you, you cry like a lil bitch.