Iran hangs woman despite campaign

[I.P.Freely]

I fail to see the problem? ........

She was convicted in a legal court of law and found guilty of murder.

Why are some people here siding with a criminal?

Religious rape
According to Islamic lay the killing of a virgin woman is prohibited. This reflects the objectification of women. In prison, if a virgin woman is to be executed, she is first "married" (raped) by one of the guards before execution. Afterwards the guard goes to the woman's family and declares that she is their son-in-law. It is totally distinct from the process of obtaining confession or to humiliate the prisoner. The prison guards are simply obeying Islamic law.

Nadereh was educated in France and had been in touch with opposition groups against the Shah. On the eve of the revolution she returned to Iran to take part in the anti-dictatorial movement against the Shah. For Naderh, like other Iranian intellectuals, it was vital to be present in this decisive historic struggle. During the revolution she worked for a socialist organisation.

She was arrested three years after the revolution. Although others with her alleged crime normally received a few years imprisonment, she was executed after a few month in prison. That was our first shock.

We discovered the reason later. In prison her interrogator took a fancy to her. She had more than once complained of her interrogator's advances towads her. When her case went to court, which consisted of one mullah as judge and no jury, the interrogator accused Nadereh of attempting to escape during her interrogation. The mullah accepted this obviously false charge and sentenced her to death. Both the mullah as the interrogator knew full well that this also gave the interrogator permission to rape Nadereh. The interrogator got what he wanted and fulfilled his religious duty in the bargain. Thousands of young women were executed in Iranian prisons (1), most of them were raped under Islamic law.

Shukuh Jalalie


Do you see any problem with that Sunni?

Yes that is 100% true. The animals would rape a woman before executing her, because it is against Islam for her to be a virgin.

Well goy that must have happened a lot under your beloved patriarch the Shah.
Ps did she still count as a virgin if they had used the snakes on her?

 

[Roudy]

Absolute

Wow another post showing how fulla shit you are. How many is that, five in a row? I am neither Christian nor did I live during "Reza Shah." Keep it up asshole, this is getting very entertaining.

For someone who claims to condemn "abuses" you are sure unhappy that the Shah treated religious and ethnic minorities equally, and not how your beloved Islamic animals did once they took power. If there was ever an oxymoron "Islamic human rights" be be one. LOL

But of course we know this is all a charade for this neo Nazi who pees vomits shit out of his his mouth regularly. Ha ha ha.

Any time a person claims that the shah was worse than the current islamic vermin is proof positive they are lying, possibly mentally ill trash with no facts and less of a clue. The shah was nothing compared the current islamic murderous, terrorist, vile scum running iran after 1979. 40,000 iranians who immediately recognized that the clerics would be worse were executed, and these animals have slaughtered tens of thousands of others around the mideast and beyond via their terrorism, in places like europe and south america. Including Evin prison, they run one of the world's largest gulag systems, and are stiflingly oppressive in every aspect of an iranian's life - unlike the shah who left you alone if you did not engage in trying to change the government. Women were very free under the shah, probably the freest in the mideast outside of Israel, and could work, drive, dress as they saw fit and travel however they liked. Compare that to the current diseased regime.

These facts are not even up for debate, they are well-known and only mentally ill scum with an anti-US/anti-Israel agenda would even try to argue them.

Despite what is being said, the Shah was a patriot who cared for his nation and his people. He refused to slaughter his people during the protests as have Assad, Sadam, and Gaddafi and not only did the Shah step down, but left his country.

He figured if people were stupid enough to fall for a fake revolution created by Western intelligence agencies, then that is what they deserve. As you can see his son has not shown any real interest in regaining his rightful crown. Why should he? For who, for an ungrateful people that did this to his father?

The closest you can get to the Shah would be Jordan's King Hussein, however the Shah did much more for Iran than King Hussein ever will for Jordan. Iran was becoming an oil rich country and a military and economic superpower. Now it's an economical catastrophe and almost failed state, led by a bunch of illiterate Islamic lunatics.

Over 90% of Iranians want this Islamic regime removed, but they are so brutal and barbaric, that nobody dares protest any longer.

Drivel, the **** loved his people so much he embezzled billions from them, he then famously lied in 1980 that he was poorer than many American millionaires.
He robbed his country and had some of its people, raped, tortured and murder and you call him a patriot. You are some piece of cowardly goyim drek.

Yeah? So what, he was a King, and Iran has been a monarchy for 2500 years. The people you claim he tortured were Marxists and those who were plotting to overthrow him. If you weren't involved in anything like that then you had nothing to worry about.

Like I said before the shah wasn't perfect and there was a lot of cronyism and corruption going on. But the world watched the country get a million times worse after the Islamists took over. And did nothing. All the complaining about the Shah evaporated when the Islamists starting their mass killings of people in the streets, and imposing punishments for not following strict Shariah law.

Funny part of all of this is you're the asshole who celebrates the fact that when Islamists took over they torrtured and killed ethnic and religious minorities.

So drek because the a woman is a Marxist it is ok to torture by inserting snakes in her vagina,because a woman is a Marxist it is ok to rape her, because a woman is a Marxist it is ok to murder her?

Neither are okay. But an ignorant hypocritic asshole like you doesn't have a concept of proportionality. I didn't see you get upset over the way the Islamic republic treated the minorities once they took over? In fact you were laughing and enjoying it. Scum.

 

[Roudy]

I fail to see the problem? ........

She was convicted in a legal court of law and found guilty of murder.

Why are some people here siding with a criminal?

Religious rape
According to Islamic lay the killing of a virgin woman is prohibited. This reflects the objectification of women. In prison, if a virgin woman is to be executed, she is first "married" (raped) by one of the guards before execution. Afterwards the guard goes to the woman's family and declares that she is their son-in-law. It is totally distinct from the process of obtaining confession or to humiliate the prisoner. The prison guards are simply obeying Islamic law.

Nadereh was educated in France and had been in touch with opposition groups against the Shah. On the eve of the revolution she returned to Iran to take part in the anti-dictatorial movement against the Shah. For Naderh, like other Iranian intellectuals, it was vital to be present in this decisive historic struggle. During the revolution she worked for a socialist organisation.

She was arrested three years after the revolution. Although others with her alleged crime normally received a few years imprisonment, she was executed after a few month in prison. That was our first shock.

We discovered the reason later. In prison her interrogator took a fancy to her. She had more than once complained of her interrogator's advances towads her. When her case went to court, which consisted of one mullah as judge and no jury, the interrogator accused Nadereh of attempting to escape during her interrogation. The mullah accepted this obviously false charge and sentenced her to death. Both the mullah as the interrogator knew full well that this also gave the interrogator permission to rape Nadereh. The interrogator got what he wanted and fulfilled his religious duty in the bargain. Thousands of young women were executed in Iranian prisons (1), most of them were raped under Islamic law.

Shukuh Jalalie


Do you see any problem with that Sunni?

Yes that is 100% true. The animals would rape a woman before executing her, because it is against Islam for her to be a virgin.

Well goy that must have happened a lot under your beloved patriarch the Shah.
Ps did she still count as a virgin if they had used the snakes on her?

Actually that happened a lot under the Islamic republic. The animals would first rape women who were about to get executed. The whole thing with them being virgins or not was just a religious excuse. I suggest you don't provide opinions on matters you know very little about, Islamo Nazi ass kisser.

And are you now pretending to be a Jew? No Jew runs around calling people "goy", you piece of shit. Now that's appropriate.

 

[Roudy]

Persecution, torture, murder: Iran blasted on human rights ahead of UN hearing

On the eve of Iran's defense of its human rights record Friday before a key United Nations panel, a lawyer for the woman executed in the Islamic Republic over the weekend for allegedly killing her attempted rapist accused the regime of widespread torture and murder.

A UN-appointed human rights advocate had already prepared a voluminous account of Tehran's egregious transgressions, including persecution and imprisonment of religious minorities, alarming numbers of executions and systematic disregard of due process by Saturday, when Reyhaneh Jabbari, a 27-year-old woman who had spent the last seven years in prison, was hanged. Jabbari became an international symbol of the regime's brutality, with the UN and rights groups such as Amnesty International decrying her death sentence. Jabbari's execution served to punctuate this week's hearings, including the independent forum in Geneva on Thursday and a procedure today before a UN Human Rights Council panel.

“I ask you to not allow for Iran to get away with lies.”
- Marina Nemat, former prisoner in Iran

"Because Reyhaneh Jabbari's case created a lot of attention inside and outside of Iran, a lot of people tried to save Reyhaneh Jabbari, but because of the power of Iran, on Saturday, they hanged her," Iranian Human Rights Attorney Mohammed Mostafaei, who represented Jabbari as well as some 200 death penalty defendants, told the independent watchdog group UN Watch on Thursday. "I'm sure we can -- if the Iranian government stopped the death penalty -- we can improve human rights in Iran."

Mostafaei, who represented Jabbari before fleeing Iran under threat, said Iranian jurisprudence disregards the concept of intent in determining guilt and meting out punishment, relying on sharia law. Once defendants are arrested, coerced confessions are common, say critics.

On Friday, the UN Human Rights Council conducted its periodic review of Iran's record in Geneva on Friday. Iran has long denied access to the UN’s independent experts and so-called special rapporteurs, including Ahmed Shaheed, the world body's special rapporteur on human rights in Iran. The meeting in Switzerland provided a rare occasion for UN member states to engage with the Iranian authorities, who have submitted a rebuttal which claims the regime does not engage in torture.

Iran's justice minister, Mostafa Pour Mohammadi, blamed Jabbari's death on the west, and several allies of Tehran, including Venezuela and Belarus, actually praised the Islamic Republic for defending human rights.

Related Image

Expand / Contract
In this picture taken on Dec. 15, 2008, Iranian Reyhaneh Jabbari, center, sits while attending her trial in a court in Tehran, Iran. Jabbari was hanged on Saturday, Oct. 25, 2014, who was convicted of murdering a man she said was trying to rape her, the official IRNA news agency reported. (AP)

According to a 28-page report submitted by Shaheed, some 852 people were reportedly executed between July 2013 and June 2014 in “an alarming increase” over already high rates from previous years. In 2014 alone, at least eight people executed were believed to have been under the 18 at the time when they allegedly committed their crimes.

While capital punishment is permitted under international law for cases involving intentional homicide, Shaheed noted, Iran applies it to economic and drug crimes and even homosexuality, a crime under Sharia law. In addition, children often view the public executions, typically carried out by hanging convicts from cranes in public.

"Eighty-percent of the 800 documented [executions] were for drug offenses," Shaheed said.

And the real problem, according to Shaheed, whose report notes prosecution of journalists, labor and education activists and forced marriages of girls as young as 9, is that Iranians cannot feel secure under the rule of law.

"When your rights aren't guaranteed [and] they depend upon the human fancy of those in power, then you live in either self-denial or self-limitation," he said. "There are reprisals against those who cooperate with international human rights mechanisms. I think it is fair to say that there is a climate of fear in terms of people not being able to exercise their rights fully."

The election more than a year ago of President Hassan Rouhani, who ran as a moderate and stoked hopes of a more tolerant regime, has not brought about the hoped-for reforms. Although some say the religious clerics who carry more power in the Islamic Republic, are responsible for the continuing human rights violations, critics say Rouhani could do more.

At least three American citizens are believed to be held in Iraq, including Pastor Saeed Abedini, a Boise, Idaho, married father of two who went back to his homeland to help establish a secular orphanage and was imprisoned for proselytizing; Amir Hekmati, a U.S. Marine who went to visit an ailing grandparent and was arrested and accused of being a spy and Robert Levinson, a former FBI and DEA agent who disappeared while investigating a cigarette -smuggling ring in the Kish Islands and is now believed to be the longest-held hostage in American history. Iran denies it is holding Levinson, but the State Department says it is.

Thursday's hearing by UN Watch served as something of a prelude to the UN's official inquiry on Friday. In addition to Mostafaei, the panel heard from former prisoners of Iran’s infamous Evin Prison, who recalled the horrors they endured. Marina Nemat, who was sent to Evin in 1981 at age 16 and says she was interrogated and tortured and even raped and forced to marry a prison guard, scoffed at Iran's defense of its human rights record.

"Iran doesn’t torture? Iran respects women’s rights?" an incredulous Nemat, now a professor at University of Toronto, asked at Thursday's forum. "They hired a fiction writer. I hope there is someone at the UN who would hold them accountable.

“I ask you to not allow for Iran to get away with lies,” she said in a direct appeal to today's UN gathering. “There are so many people how are more than willing to testify against it.

The Associated Press and FoxNews.com's Perry Chiaramonte contributed reporting to this story.

 

[Roudy]

For the Free Urinator who vomits regularly:

Surge in Executions and Human Rights Violations in Iran: Evidence of Rouhani's 'Moderate' Rule?

Iran: Ranks Number One in Executions Per Capita

Many Iranian citizens who voted for the moderate cleric Hassan Rouhani believed that he would deliver on his promises in improving the standards and conditions of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran. These human rights issues encompass areas ranging from freeing political prisoners, addressing the methods of torture, and restriction on freedom of press, expression and speech, to name a few.

Nevertheless, every report independently conducted by human rights watch groups; the United Nations, Amnesty International as well as the official statistical numbers revealed by the Iranian government, indicate not only that Rouhani has not delivered on his promises (not even keeping the status of human rights similar to that of his predecessor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's era), but that the condition of human rights has significantly worsened in Iran.

Recent reports by Amnesty International and UN watch groups have blasted Iran for the increase in persecution of ethnic and religious minorities, the cracking down on oppositional political figures, the mistreatment of political prisoners, arbitrary detention and unfair trials. The most controversial issue in the reports has been the surge in capital punishment and public executions.

Recently, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has sharply criticized Rouhani for failing to improve human rights since taking office in August. Ban pointed out, "He (Rouhani) has not made any significant improvement" in ending human rights abuses since taking office.

Surge in Capital Punishment: Iran Ranks Number One in Executions Per Capita

One of the most alarming trends indicating egregious human rights abuses has been the surge in executions, many conducted in public, under the presidency of the moderate Rouhani, particularly since the beginning of 2014.

Iran is ranked number one, surpassing China, in leading the world in executions per capita. Executed people in 2014 included women, human rights activists, political activists, and religious ethnic minorities. Recently, the United Nations human rights spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani referred to the rise of executions in the Islamic Republic by saying, "the surge in the use of the death penalty... has dampened hopes for human rights reforms under President Hassan Rouhani."

According to Ahmed Shaheed, the UN special rapporteur for human rights in Iran, at least 176 people had been put to death in January, February, and early March of 2014. Several were executed in public. At least 500 people were executed in 2013, with 57 publicly. Reportedly, those who were executed included 27 women and two children. These numbers are officially documented figures, but according to other sources, the figure for executions might be much higher. According to the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, more than 500 people have been executed since Rouhani has taken office.

In addition, the Islamic Republic has repeatedly refused to give permission to Shaheed to visit and investigate many of the abuse claims in Iran. The UN Secretary-General added, "The new government has not changed its approach regarding the application of the death penalty and seems to have followed the practice of previous administrations, which relied heavily on the death penalty..."

Hardliners v Moderates: Rouhani's Apologists?

Those who support Rouhani's government and those whose interests are vested in this government's power, exonerate Rouhani and his technocrat team from the surge in executions, public hangings, or other abuses. Some policy analysts, and even Western officials and politicians have bought the argument that the surge in executions is completely conducted by hardliners to undermine Rouhani's government, scuttle the ongoing nuclear talks, and weaken the moderate position in Iran.

The argument made by proponents of the current Iranian government suggests that if Rouhani succeeds in removing the threatening economic sanctions, and reaching a nuclear deal, the legitimacy and popularity of hardliners will be blemished. In other words, the moderates would be capable of further shoring up their political power and legitimacy in the country. As a result, the hardliners have been taking counterbalance measures, such as increasing the number of executions and level of crackdown, to secure their power.

The argument of the hardliners vis-a-vis the moderates might sound plausible in some analytical debates. However, when it comes to human rights abuses, this debate of hardliners versus moderates, is a classic political tactic and Machiavellian strategy used under several administrations by the Iranian government and by those who benefit from the establishment, economically and politically.

When it comes to human rights violations in Iran, such as the persecution of ethnic and religious minorities, arbitrary detentions and unfair trials, torture, executions, public hangings, and restrictions on freedom of press, expression and speech, there is no significant ideological division across Iran's political spectrum. In other words, there is a wide and general agreement among both the moderates and hardliners, particularly when it comes to the issue of conducting executions.

Even if we take the argument of those Western or Iranian scholars who attempt to exonerate Rouhani from the surge in executions and human rights violations in the Islamic Republic, any human beings would expect that a president of a country, who is elected by millions of votes and who calls for a moderate platform, would at least stand up, take a position and condemn the surge in executions and human rights abuses. He has the power, and support of millions of Iranians, to issue a minimal verbal or written criticism. The actual issue is that Mr. Rouhani is another classical power-seeking cleric who came from within the system and fully backs it, and is complicit in these human rights violations and executions.

Although some proponents of Rouhani's government might point out that hardliners remain fully in charge of the judiciary and security apparatus in Iran, it is crucial to indicate that there is no clear separation of powers between Iran's judiciary, executive and legislative branches. More fundamentally, even if we accept the argument by proponents of the current government, claiming that Rouhani has no influence over the judiciary and security apparatuses, then the question still arises: Why did he make promises knowing that he would not be capable of delivering? In fact, these governmental branches are closely interconnected and people across the political spectrum, such as the head of Iran's Judiciary Human Rights Council Mohammad Javad Larijani, Chairman of the Parliament Ali Larijani, or Rouhani do not ideologically or politically disagree on human rights issues and the matter of executions.

__________

Majid Rafizadeh, an American scholar at Harvard and political scientist, is president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He is originally from Islamic Republic of Iran and Syria.

A version of this post first appeared on Al Arabiya.

 

[I.P.Freely]

Absolute

Any time a person claims that the shah was worse than the current islamic vermin is proof positive they are lying, possibly mentally ill trash with no facts and less of a clue. The shah was nothing compared the current islamic murderous, terrorist, vile scum running iran after 1979. 40,000 iranians who immediately recognized that the clerics would be worse were executed, and these animals have slaughtered tens of thousands of others around the mideast and beyond via their terrorism, in places like europe and south america. Including Evin prison, they run one of the world's largest gulag systems, and are stiflingly oppressive in every aspect of an iranian's life - unlike the shah who left you alone if you did not engage in trying to change the government. Women were very free under the shah, probably the freest in the mideast outside of Israel, and could work, drive, dress as they saw fit and travel however they liked. Compare that to the current diseased regime.

These facts are not even up for debate, they are well-known and only mentally ill scum with an anti-US/anti-Israel agenda would even try to argue them.

Despite what is being said, the Shah was a patriot who cared for his nation and his people. He refused to slaughter his people during the protests as have Assad, Sadam, and Gaddafi and not only did the Shah step down, but left his country.

He figured if people were stupid enough to fall for a fake revolution created by Western intelligence agencies, then that is what they deserve. As you can see his son has not shown any real interest in regaining his rightful crown. Why should he? For who, for an ungrateful people that did this to his father?

The closest you can get to the Shah would be Jordan's King Hussein, however the Shah did much more for Iran than King Hussein ever will for Jordan. Iran was becoming an oil rich country and a military and economic superpower. Now it's an economical catastrophe and almost failed state, led by a bunch of illiterate Islamic lunatics.

Over 90% of Iranians want this Islamic regime removed, but they are so brutal and barbaric, that nobody dares protest any longer.

Drivel, the **** loved his people so much he embezzled billions from them, he then famously lied in 1980 that he was poorer than many American millionaires.
He robbed his country and had some of its people, raped, tortured and murder and you call him a patriot. You are some piece of cowardly goyim drek.

Yeah? So what, he was a King, and Iran has been a monarchy for 2500 years. The people you claim he tortured were Marxists and those who were plotting to overthrow him. If you weren't involved in anything like that then you had nothing to worry about.

Like I said before the shah wasn't perfect and there was a lot of cronyism and corruption going on. But the world watched the country get a million times worse after the Islamists took over. And did nothing. All the complaining about the Shah evaporated when the Islamists starting their mass killings of people in the streets, and imposing punishments for not following strict Shariah law.

Funny part of all of this is you're the asshole who celebrates the fact that when Islamists took over they torrtured and killed ethnic and religious minorities.

So drek because the a woman is a Marxist it is ok to torture by inserting snakes in her vagina,because a woman is a Marxist it is ok to rape her, because a woman is a Marxist it is ok to murder her?

Neither are okay. But an ignorant hypocritic asshole like you doesn't have a concept of proportionality. I didn't see you get upset over the way the Islamic republic treated the minorities once they took over? In fact you were laughing and enjoying it. Scum.

So my ickle goy runner, did you read the post where I condemned both regimes for being barbaric scum?
I work from a concept that one abuse of human rights is too many.

 

[Roudy]

Absolute

Despite what is being said, the Shah was a patriot who cared for his nation and his people. He refused to slaughter his people during the protests as have Assad, Sadam, and Gaddafi and not only did the Shah step down, but left his country.

He figured if people were stupid enough to fall for a fake revolution created by Western intelligence agencies, then that is what they deserve. As you can see his son has not shown any real interest in regaining his rightful crown. Why should he? For who, for an ungrateful people that did this to his father?

The closest you can get to the Shah would be Jordan's King Hussein, however the Shah did much more for Iran than King Hussein ever will for Jordan. Iran was becoming an oil rich country and a military and economic superpower. Now it's an economical catastrophe and almost failed state, led by a bunch of illiterate Islamic lunatics.

Over 90% of Iranians want this Islamic regime removed, but they are so brutal and barbaric, that nobody dares protest any longer.

Drivel, the **** loved his people so much he embezzled billions from them, he then famously lied in 1980 that he was poorer than many American millionaires.
He robbed his country and had some of its people, raped, tortured and murder and you call him a patriot. You are some piece of cowardly goyim drek.

Yeah? So what, he was a King, and Iran has been a monarchy for 2500 years. The people you claim he tortured were Marxists and those who were plotting to overthrow him. If you weren't involved in anything like that then you had nothing to worry about.

Like I said before the shah wasn't perfect and there was a lot of cronyism and corruption going on. But the world watched the country get a million times worse after the Islamists took over. And did nothing. All the complaining about the Shah evaporated when the Islamists starting their mass killings of people in the streets, and imposing punishments for not following strict Shariah law.

Funny part of all of this is you're the asshole who celebrates the fact that when Islamists took over they torrtured and killed ethnic and religious minorities.

So drek because the a woman is a Marxist it is ok to torture by inserting snakes in her vagina,because a woman is a Marxist it is ok to rape her, because a woman is a Marxist it is ok to murder her?

Neither are okay. But an ignorant hypocritic asshole like you doesn't have a concept of proportionality. I didn't see you get upset over the way the Islamic republic treated the minorities once they took over? In fact you were laughing and enjoying it. Scum.

So my ickle goy runner, did you read the post where I condemned both regimes for being barbaric scum?
I work from a concept that one abuse of human rights is too many.

The two regimes cannot be compared.

This from an ignorant fool who acts like a Jew, calling others "goy".

Are you trying to gin up hatred for Jews, or convince people that you are a mentally ill asshole?

 

[I.P.Freely]

I fail to see the problem? ........

She was convicted in a legal court of law and found guilty of murder.

Why are some people here siding with a criminal?

Religious rape
According to Islamic lay the killing of a virgin woman is prohibited. This reflects the objectification of women. In prison, if a virgin woman is to be executed, she is first "married" (raped) by one of the guards before execution. Afterwards the guard goes to the woman's family and declares that she is their son-in-law. It is totally distinct from the process of obtaining confession or to humiliate the prisoner. The prison guards are simply obeying Islamic law.

Nadereh was educated in France and had been in touch with opposition groups against the Shah. On the eve of the revolution she returned to Iran to take part in the anti-dictatorial movement against the Shah. For Naderh, like other Iranian intellectuals, it was vital to be present in this decisive historic struggle. During the revolution she worked for a socialist organisation.

She was arrested three years after the revolution. Although others with her alleged crime normally received a few years imprisonment, she was executed after a few month in prison. That was our first shock.

We discovered the reason later. In prison her interrogator took a fancy to her. She had more than once complained of her interrogator's advances towads her. When her case went to court, which consisted of one mullah as judge and no jury, the interrogator accused Nadereh of attempting to escape during her interrogation. The mullah accepted this obviously false charge and sentenced her to death. Both the mullah as the interrogator knew full well that this also gave the interrogator permission to rape Nadereh. The interrogator got what he wanted and fulfilled his religious duty in the bargain. Thousands of young women were executed in Iranian prisons (1), most of them were raped under Islamic law.

Shukuh Jalalie


Do you see any problem with that Sunni?

Yes that is 100% true. The animals would rape a woman before executing her, because it is against Islam for her to be a virgin.

Well goy that must have happened a lot under your beloved patriarch the Shah.
Ps did she still count as a virgin if they had used the snakes on her?

Actually that happened a lot under the Islamic republic. The animals would first rape women who were about to get executed. The whole thing with them being virgins or not was just a religious excuse. I suggest you don't provide opinions on matters you know very little about, Islamo Nazi ass kisser.

And are you now pretending to be a Jew? No Jew runs around calling people "goy", you piece of shit. Now that's appropriate.

no my ickle goy runner, I leave the make believe to you.
30,000 Iranian Jews worship in 60 synagogues across Iran, who knows who I am related to.

 

[I.P.Freely]

Absolute
Drivel, the **** loved his people so much he embezzled billions from them, he then famously lied in 1980 that he was poorer than many American millionaires.
He robbed his country and had some of its people, raped, tortured and murder and you call him a patriot. You are some piece of cowardly goyim drek.

Yeah? So what, he was a King, and Iran has been a monarchy for 2500 years. The people you claim he tortured were Marxists and those who were plotting to overthrow him. If you weren't involved in anything like that then you had nothing to worry about.

Like I said before the shah wasn't perfect and there was a lot of cronyism and corruption going on. But the world watched the country get a million times worse after the Islamists took over. And did nothing. All the complaining about the Shah evaporated when the Islamists starting their mass killings of people in the streets, and imposing punishments for not following strict Shariah law.

Funny part of all of this is you're the asshole who celebrates the fact that when Islamists took over they torrtured and killed ethnic and religious minorities.

So drek because the a woman is a Marxist it is ok to torture by inserting snakes in her vagina,because a woman is a Marxist it is ok to rape her, because a woman is a Marxist it is ok to murder her?

Neither are okay. But an ignorant hypocritic asshole like you doesn't have a concept of proportionality. I didn't see you get upset over the way the Islamic republic treated the minorities once they took over? In fact you were laughing and enjoying it. Scum.

So my ickle goy runner, did you read the post where I condemned both regimes for being barbaric scum?
I work from a concept that one abuse of human rights is too many.

The two regimes cannot be compared.

This from an ignorant fool who acts like a Jew, calling others "goy".

Are you trying to gin up hatred for Jews, or convince people that you are a mentally ill asshole?

listen you goy shvuntz, both regimes torture, rape and murder sochain yankel, farshporn yankel zol er oyf shteyn.

 

[Roudy]

I fail to see the problem? ........

She was convicted in a legal court of law and found guilty of murder.

Why are some people here siding with a criminal?

Religious rape
According to Islamic lay the killing of a virgin woman is prohibited. This reflects the objectification of women. In prison, if a virgin woman is to be executed, she is first "married" (raped) by one of the guards before execution. Afterwards the guard goes to the woman's family and declares that she is their son-in-law. It is totally distinct from the process of obtaining confession or to humiliate the prisoner. The prison guards are simply obeying Islamic law.

Nadereh was educated in France and had been in touch with opposition groups against the Shah. On the eve of the revolution she returned to Iran to take part in the anti-dictatorial movement against the Shah. For Naderh, like other Iranian intellectuals, it was vital to be present in this decisive historic struggle. During the revolution she worked for a socialist organisation.

She was arrested three years after the revolution. Although others with her alleged crime normally received a few years imprisonment, she was executed after a few month in prison. That was our first shock.

We discovered the reason later. In prison her interrogator took a fancy to her. She had more than once complained of her interrogator's advances towads her. When her case went to court, which consisted of one mullah as judge and no jury, the interrogator accused Nadereh of attempting to escape during her interrogation. The mullah accepted this obviously false charge and sentenced her to death. Both the mullah as the interrogator knew full well that this also gave the interrogator permission to rape Nadereh. The interrogator got what he wanted and fulfilled his religious duty in the bargain. Thousands of young women were executed in Iranian prisons (1), most of them were raped under Islamic law.

Shukuh Jalalie


Do you see any problem with that Sunni?

Yes that is 100% true. The animals would rape a woman before executing her, because it is against Islam for her to be a virgin.

Well goy that must have happened a lot under your beloved patriarch the Shah.
Ps did she still count as a virgin if they had used the snakes on her?

Actually that happened a lot under the Islamic republic. The animals would first rape women who were about to get executed. The whole thing with them being virgins or not was just a religious excuse. I suggest you don't provide opinions on matters you know very little about, Islamo Nazi ass kisser.

And are you now pretending to be a Jew? No Jew runs around calling people "goy", you piece of shit. Now that's appropriate.

no my ickle goy runner, I leave the make believe to you.
30,000 Iranian Jews worship in 60 synagogues across Iran, who knows who I am related to.

So are there Armenian Christians and Bahaais left in Iran. Those who's circumstances did not allow them to leave, ended up staying there. Many are elderly while others cannot afford to leave. That doesn't make Iran a country who respects it's minorities, moron. How many Jews and minorities lived in Iran before the Islamic revolution, you uneducated buffoon? Do you know how they were treated by the new regime? That must bring a smile to bigoted scum like you.

 

[I.P.Freely]

So you ran like a rabbit from Iran ?

 

[Roudy]

Yeah? So what, he was a King, and Iran has been a monarchy for 2500 years. The people you claim he tortured were Marxists and those who were plotting to overthrow him. If you weren't involved in anything like that then you had nothing to worry about.

Like I said before the shah wasn't perfect and there was a lot of cronyism and corruption going on. But the world watched the country get a million times worse after the Islamists took over. And did nothing. All the complaining about the Shah evaporated when the Islamists starting their mass killings of people in the streets, and imposing punishments for not following strict Shariah law.

Funny part of all of this is you're the asshole who celebrates the fact that when Islamists took over they torrtured and killed ethnic and religious minorities.

So drek because the a woman is a Marxist it is ok to torture by inserting snakes in her vagina,because a woman is a Marxist it is ok to rape her, because a woman is a Marxist it is ok to murder her?

Neither are okay. But an ignorant hypocritic asshole like you doesn't have a concept of proportionality. I didn't see you get upset over the way the Islamic republic treated the minorities once they took over? In fact you were laughing and enjoying it. Scum.

So my ickle goy runner, did you read the post where I condemned both regimes for being barbaric scum?
I work from a concept that one abuse of human rights is too many.

The two regimes cannot be compared.

This from an ignorant fool who acts like a Jew, calling others "goy".

Are you trying to gin up hatred for Jews, or convince people that you are a mentally ill asshole?

listen you goy shvuntz, both regimes torture, rape and murder sochain yankel, farshporn yankel zol er oyf shteyn.

Yeah sure, Free Pisser. So does Jordan, UAE, and many other Muslim countries. But that doesn't put them on the same level as the Islamic lunatics in charge of Iran. There are levels and degrees. A donkey like you would even compare the US to Iran, because at some point it "water boarded" prisoners.

 

[Roudy]

So you ran like a rabbit from Iran ?

Do you find it funny when Islamists torture and murder non Muslims?

 

[MrDVS1]

Iran

How can anyone defend these monsters?

Oh just about the same way one defends the GOP.

 

[I.P.Freely]

BBC NEWS Middle East Iran s proud but discreet Jews
strange since this was written the Jewish Iranian boutique owner has two more shops.

 

[Roudy]

BBC NEWS Middle East Iran s proud but discreet Jews
strange since this was written the Jewish Iranian boutique owner has two more shops.

Donkey boy, it would be better for you to stop posting articles that prove my point and expose you as an ignorant buffoon:

"These days anti-Jewish feeling is periodically stirred by the media.

Mr Hammami says state-run television confuses Zionism and Judaism so that "ordinary people may think that whatever the Israelis do is supported by all Jews".

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

During the fighting in Lebanon a hardline weekly newspaper, Yalesarat, published two photographs of synagogues on its front page full of people waving Israeli flags celebrating Israeli independence day.

The paper falsely said the synagogues were in Iran - even describing one as the Yusufabad synagogue in Tehran and locating another in Shiraz.

"This provoked a number of opportunists in Shiraz," explains Iran's Jewish MP, Maurice Mohtamed, "and there was an assault on two synagogues."

Mr Mohtamed says the incident was defused by the Iranian security forces, who explained to people that the news was not true.

And with the coming to power of an ultra-conservative like President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, there has been increased concern internationally about the fate of Iranian Jews.

'Holocaust denial'

Mr Ahmedinejad has repeatedly used rabid anti-Israeli rhetoric - slogans like "wipe Israel off the map" - and most controversially he has questioned the number killed in the Holocaust during World War II.

President Ahmedinejad has repeatedly used anti-Israeli rhetoric

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

"It's very regrettable to see a horrible tragedy so far reaching as the Holocaust being denied ... it was a very big insult to Jews all around the world,"

 

[High_Gravity]

As long as the Jews are quiet, stay in the background and don't ask for too much sure Iran is ok with them. What a crock of shit.

 

[Roudy]

Here is IP's paradise for Jews in Iran. What a fucking ignorant moron:

Humanitarian Tragedy: Iran’s Beleaguered Jewish Community
September 3, 2013 by Majid Rafizadeh
Majid Rafizadeh, an Iranian-American political scientist and scholar, is president of the International American Council and serves on the board of the Harvard International Review at Harvard University. Rafizadeh is also a former senior fellow at the Nonviolence International Organization based in Washington, DC and is a member of the Gulf project at Columbia University. He can be reached at [email protected]. Follow Rafizadeh at @majidrafizadeh.


Print This Post

One of the crucial humanitarian tragedies- that the world and the mainstream media has failed to focus on- is the fate and current living situation of Jewish communities in the Muslim-dominated countries, particularly the Shiite-Islamist country of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Jewish community in the Islamic state of Iran has been subject to little scholarly work and research. Largely due to the fact that the Islamist theocratic regime of Iran has not granted access to scholars, journalists, and other researchers to deeply investigate the conditions of the Jewish community under Islamist rule in Iran.

Although the Jewish community has long faced discrimination, inequality, and intolerance in Muslim communities such as Iran (for example in March 1839 many Jews in Iran were horrifically forced to convert to Islam in what is known as the Allahdad incident), the persecution of the Jewish people exponentially increased since the Shiite-Islamist and Sharia law-based ruling cleric came to power under the rule of the Ayatollah Ruhallah Khomeini. The Jewish community of Iran is a staple of the nation’s history though, as the Jews of Iran trace their history back 2,800 years, when communities of the tribes of Israel were taken into captivity by the Assyrian king and sent into exile. The Jewish community primarily settled in the Giliard region of Damavand, near Tehran.

When Ayatollah Khomeini began galvanizing the Iranian people against Muhammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, he issued statements on the condition of Iran’s Jewish community. Before ascending to power; Khomeini claimed that he believed the Jewish people in Iran should enjoy the same citizenship rights as every other citizen. This classic Machiavellian strategy was intended to gain the support of influential Jewish social groups in Tehran, which comprised approximately 150,000 members.

Nevertheless, when the Ayatollah Khomeini was capable of overthrowing the Shah’s government, and when the Islamist state of Iran was established, he and the ruling clerics immediately arrested some of the most prominent Iranian-Jewish community leaders and businessmen, including Habib Elghanian. The Jewish community leaders were tortured and executed. Since the onset of the persecution, the Israeli flag has been repeatedly torched, and the Star of David desecrated, in Palestine Square in Tehran. The Jewish community found their survival threatened and humanitarian rights repressed. These actions forced them to flee the area after calling the area home for thousands of years. The Iranian-Jewish population decreased to approximately 10,000 people who chose to remain in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Jewish community that was unwilling to flee from Iran was made up of devout and committed people aiming to protect their sacred places and synagogues regardless of the threats and persecutions, as well as seniors who were unable to resettle elsewhere.

When I lived in the city of Esfahan in Iran— a place where a few hundreds of Jewish people still reside— I met a young intelligent, cheerful, and kind girl called Zahra. After time I realized that her real name, what she was called at home, was indeed Abbey. She explained the reason for having two names: “I feel as if we live two different lives. We have to keep everything secrets about our faith, religion, and family from the public. We even have to have different names in the public. All my family members have two names. My parents always tell me that these times will pass.”

As the Islamist party of Iran came to power, verses of the Quran claiming the inferiority of the Jewish and Christian peoples became popular slogans for the Shiite-Islamist ruling clerics. The several verses of the Quran include:

“5:51- O you who believe! Do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people”, “4:91- If the unbelievers do not offer you peace, kill them [The Jews] wherever you find them. Against such you are given clear warrant”, “5:59-Jews and Christians are evil-livers”, and “9:30- Christians and Jews are perverse. Allah himself fights against them.”

Disregarding the public persecution, intolerance, and inequality that other religions face, the constitution has been used to safeguard the rights of the Muslim population in Iran. Article 12 of the Iranian Constitution states:

“The official religion of Iran is Islam and the Twelver Ja’fari school, and this principle will remain eternally immutable. Other Islamic schools are to be accorded full respect, and their followers are free to act in accordance with their own jurisprudence in performing their religious rites. These schools enjoy official status in matters pertaining to religious education, affairs of personal status (marriage, divorce, inheritance, and wills) and related litigation in courts of law. In regions of the country where Muslims following any one of these schools constitute the majority, local regulations, within the bounds of the jurisdiction of local councils, are to be in accordance with the respective school, without infringing upon the rights of the followers of other schools”

Currently, Jewish people are not allowed to take key governmental positions in Iran. According to the constitution, the Jews cannot hold decision-making positions such as being a member of the influential Guardian Council, a Commander in the Iranian Army, and serving as the President of the nation, among others. More fundamentally, the Jewish people can neither become judges at any level nor assist in the judicial and legislative systems. Furthermore, Jewish-Iranians are banned from becoming members of parliament (The Consultative Assembly) through general elections.

In addition, qisas or the right to equal retaliation has not been specified in the Penal Code for the Jewish people. Meaning that in the case of murder, the right of a family member to demand execution of the murderer would be totally left to the discretion of the Islamist judges. Furthermore, the diya, or blood money (compensation for the family of a victim) is half for the Jews and women.

These few Islamist rules and laws based on the Quran, Shiite-Iranian clerical and Shari’a law only begin to encompass the deep-rooted religious inequality of the region. Western Muslim scholars who enjoy their lives in the majority Christian societies, must look more closely at how other minorities, particularly the Jews, are being treated in nations such as Iran under majority Islamic and Shiite rule.

 

[Roudy]

As long as the Jews are quiet, stay in the background and don't ask for too much sure Iran is ok with them. What a crock of shit.

I think he Shits and Pees Freely from his mouth, and his brain is filled with crap.

He doesn't know that many Iranian Jews have done fake conversions to Islam so that the animals will get off their cases.

 

[ChrisL]

Iran

How can anyone defend these monsters?

Oh just about the same way one defends the GOP.

This just shows how nuts some of you really are. Seek help.