Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 30,442
- 14,046
- 1,473
How does it violate it? You don’t won’t say because you don’t know!I literally just said, it violated the Sherman anti-trust act
What part of that don’t you get?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does it violate it? You don’t won’t say because you don’t know!I literally just said, it violated the Sherman anti-trust act
What part of that don’t you get?
Isn’t that exactly what you’re doing?All you are worthy of. Provide actual content instead of just snark and worthless rebuttal next time.
Yes he could. Anywhere he did or does businessBy your logic he could have filed the case anywhere in the entire country. He chose North Texas because he knows the judges there are okay with rich guys using lawsuits to suppress free speech.
Judges in the rest of the country don’t really put up with that and haven’t, as your link proved when the judge in California ruled Musk was attacking free speech.
Nah. Most judges wouldn’t allow that. The rabidly conservative judges in north Texas will because they are okay with attacks on free speech by rich conservative jerks.Yes he could. Anywhere he did or does business
I’ve repeated answered your question on what they are alleging.How does it violate it? You don’t won’t say because you don’t know!
What the F are you talking about? A plaintiff can file a lawsuit wherever they were damagedNah. Most judges wouldn’t allow that. The rabidly conservative judges in north Texas will because they are okay with attacks on free speech by rich conservative jerks.
He is venue shopping proving it’s all about attacking free speech.
But you won’t say what they’re alleging because you don’t know! You never read the lawsuit!But what they alleged is that they violated for the reasons outlined in the law suit
No reason to file the lawsuit in North Texas other than shopping for conservative hack judges who will let him attack free speech.What the F are you talking about? A plaintiff can file a lawsuit wherever they were damaged
I did! Haha wow, either yoj can’t read or can’t comprehend…or are just a liarBut you won’t say what they’re alleging because you don’t know! You never read the lawsuit!
Why not? He does business there. Dallas is a big city.No reason to file the lawsuit in North Texas other than shopping for conservative hack judges who will let him attack free speech.
None of the people in the lawsuit are centered in North Texas. The friendly judges are.
I keep asking and you cant answer because you don’t know!I did! Haha wow, either yoj can’t read or can’t comprehend…or are just a liar
Because no one in the lawsuit is in Dallas.Why not? He does business there. Dallas is a big city.
What the f? They all do business in Texas!Because no one in the lawsuit is in Dallas.
There’s only one reason to file the lawsuit there.
Illegal boycotts violate the actI keep asking and you cant answer because you don’t know!
How does it violate the Sherman Antitrust act? You can’t say!
None of them are in North Texas.What the f? They all do business in Texas!
The plantiff is moving his multi billion dollar companies there. He can file it there
What's illegal about the boycott? You won't say because you don't know!Illegal boycotts violate the act
You are dumb keep deflectingWhat's illegal about the boycott? You won't say because you don't know!
It’s not deflected to ask what was illegal about the boycott. You keep avoiding the question because you don’t know!You are dumb keep deflecting
Prove none of them do business in Dallas…None of them are in North Texas.
There's only one reason to file it there. Lawfare!
I am not the jury…part of that don’t you get?It’s not deflected to ask what was illegal about the boycott. You keep avoiding the question because you don’t know!