Is free speech under attack?

[AzogtheDefiler]

This has nothing to do with monopolization, dipshit.

Yeah it does. If companies collude to put another company out of business. Or to intimidate fellow companies. How about we let the courts decide, asswipe?

 

[yidnar]

Now, quick, run along and go vote for the guy who wants to put journalists in jail who are mean to him.

you mean like Obama did commie ?

 

[Marener]

Yeah it does. If companies collude to put another company out of business. Or to intimidate fellow companies. How about we let the courts decide, asswipe?

There’s no monopolization. These companies don’t even compete with Twitter.

 

[Marener]

you mean like Obama did commie ?

Who would that be?

 

[yidnar]

Who would that be?

there were several ..

14 Pulitzer Winners Blast Obama Admin on Prosecuting NYT’s Risen

Fourteen Pulitzer Prize-winning journalists issued strong individual statements Monday that voiced emphatic support for New York Times reporter James Risen and urged the Justice Department to stop threatening him with harsh fines or imprisonment. Many of the statements from the Pulitzer winners...

gijn.org

 

[Marener]

there were several ..

14 Pulitzer Winners Blast Obama Admin on Prosecuting NYT’s Risen

Fourteen Pulitzer Prize-winning journalists issued strong individual statements Monday that voiced emphatic support for New York Times reporter James Risen and urged the Justice Department to stop threatening him with harsh fines or imprisonment. Many of the statements from the Pulitzer winners...

gijn.org

And what did that have to do with this journalist “being mean to him”?

 

[yidnar]

And what did that have to do with this journalist “being mean to him”?

does it matter what reason commie .. the fact is Obama went after journalists he doesn't like ..

 

[Marener]

does it matter what reason commie .. the fact is Obama went after journalists he doesn't like ..

Who said he doesn’t like him?

Looks like they were just chasing after someone that was a national security threat.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

There’s no monopolization. These companies don’t even compete with Twitter.

Bot response. Not what I said. You are a bot. OmG

Fuck off

 

[Marener]

Bot response. Not what I said. You are a bot. OmG

Fuck off

You’re the one that brought up monopoly rules.

Shit for brains, we have monopoly rules. Collusion is against the law. You dumb defect.

Seems like you don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.

Azog now thinks all boycotts are illegal. Collusion!

 

[d0gbreath]

I'm 100% for free speech. Misinformation, violence, or any of the other fun things, does not mean that it cannot be said, nor posted online.

Censorship is for scaredy cats.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You’re the one that brought up monopoly rules.



Seems like you don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.

Azog now thinks all boycotts are illegal. Collusion!

Collusion is illegal.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You’re the one that brought up monopoly rules.



Seems like you don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.

Azog now thinks all boycotts are illegal. Collusion!

Douchebag we have antitrust laws for a reason. So the courts will decide.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I'm 100% for free speech. Misinformation, violence, or any of the other fun things, does not mean that it cannot be said, nor posted online.

Censorship is for scaredy cats.

Thank you

Why does the D party want to curb free speech?

 

[Marener]

Collusion is illegal.

lol, and you call me a bot.

It’s not a monopoly.
It’s not a labor union.

What is it?

Do you really think all boycotts are illegal?

 

[Marener]

Douchebag we have antitrust laws for a reason. So the courts will decide.

Which don’t apply because these companies aren’t competing with Twitter.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

lol, and you call me a bot.

It’s not a monopoly.
It’s not a labor union.

What is it?

Do you really think all boycotts are illegal?

Antitrust

The lawsuit said, opens new tab advertisers, acting through a World Federation of Advertisers initiative called Global Alliance for Responsible Media, collectively withheld “billions of dollars in advertising revenue” from X, previously known as Twitter.
It said they acted against their own economic self-interests in a conspiracy against the platform that violated U.S. antitrust law.

So the courts will decide. Yes or no? You never answer questions. Bitch.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Which don’t apply because these companies aren’t competing with Twitter.

Moron. It’s X not Twitter. Bot malfunction.

The lawsuit said, opens new tab advertisers, acting through a World Federation of Advertisers initiative called Global Alliance for Responsible Media, collectively withheld “billions of dollars in advertising revenue” from X, previously known as Twitter.
It said they acted against their own economic self-interests in a conspiracy against the platform that violated U.S. antitrust law.

 

[dblack]

Antitrust

The lawsuit said, opens new tab advertisers, acting through a World Federation of Advertisers initiative called Global Alliance for Responsible Media, collectively withheld “billions of dollars in advertising revenue” from X, previously known as Twitter.
It said they acted against their own economic self-interests in a conspiracy against the platform that violated U.S. antitrust law.

So the courts will decide. Yes or no? You never answer questions. Bitch.

"Withheld"? If they are refusing to pay for advertising they received, or contracted to receive, then it's just a matter of fraud, and they should definitely be sued.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

"Withheld"? If they are refusing to pay for advertising they received, or contracted to receive, then it's just a matter of fraud, and they should definitely be sued.

I only asked if the courts should decide. Marener is too cowardly to answer.