Is The FBI Doing a Background Check of Christine Ford?

[Snouter]

If not, why not?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Behavioral Science knows where to look

 

[Asclepias]

If not, why not?

She isnt trying to get a job on the SC for starters?

She probably already had one if her job depended on it?

What made this question pop into your tiny brain?

 

[saveliberty]

Frankly, I am shocked she can find her way home from work.

Lied about being a psychologist. Allowed Feinstein to sit on her letter for a month. Took a polygraph in a hotel room either on her grandmother''s funeral day of the day after, can't remember. Needed a lawyer to tell her what to say and NOT say.

 

[caddo kid]

If not, why not?

Is The FBI Doing a Background Check of Christine Ford?


You should call the FBI & ask them

 

[Norman]

If not, why not?

She isnt trying to get a job on the SC for starters?

She probably already had one if her job depended on it?

What made this question pop into your tiny brain?

You think assessing her character and possible motivations for false accusation has nothing to do with this?

Okay... okay...

There needs to be thorough investigation, also including to whether she was actually coached.

 

[Billy_Bob]

If not, why not?

She is getting one all right... One that might not end with Kavanaugh in jail, but her if my suspicions are correct and she lied to smear him..

 

[Asclepias]

If not, why not?

She isnt trying to get a job on the SC for starters?

She probably already had one if her job depended on it?

What made this question pop into your tiny brain?

You think assessing her character and possible motivations for false accusation has nothing to do with this?

Okay... okay...

There needs to be thorough investigation, also including to whether she was actually coached.

Has nothing to do with her being sexually assaulted. Remember there is a scope.

Of course she was coached as was Kav. Thats what attorneys do. They coach their clients.

 

[theHawk]

The FBI is going to get statements from the same people that gave sworn statements already. It’s looney Ford against four others who say she is dead wrong.

It still won’t matter to Dems, they will all vote no regardless of what happens.

 

[toobfreak]

If not, why not?

She isnt trying to get a job on the SC for starters?

No, she's just trying to change the outcome of the Supreme Court for the next 20 years with accusations she cannot even keep straight, isn't prepared to back up with credible evidence and originally wanted to do from behind a concealed curtain, then wouldn't even appear before the man in the same room she was accusing.

 

[saveliberty]

If not, why not?

She is getting one all right... One that might not end with Kavanaugh in jail, but her if my suspicions are correct and she lied to smear him..

It was why the Republican's interviewer asked what she did. Now they confirm or find fault with her testimony.

 

[Asclepias]

If not, why not?

She isnt trying to get a job on the SC for starters?

No, she's just trying to change the outcome of the Supreme Court for the next 20 years with accusations she cannot even keep straight, isn't prepared to back up with credible evidence and originally wanted to do from behind a concealed curtain, then wouldn't even appear before the man in the same room she was accusing.

Lets say thats true. Why would the FBI do a BG on her? Are you retarded or something? That would be up to the defense team if this was a trial.

 

[Billy_Bob]

If not, why not?

She isnt trying to get a job on the SC for starters?

No, she's just trying to change the outcome of the Supreme Court for the next 20 years with accusations she cannot even keep straight, isn't prepared to back up with credible evidence and originally wanted to do from behind a concealed curtain, then wouldn't even appear before the man in the same room she was accusing.

Lets say thats true. Why would the FBI do a BG on her? Are you retarded or something? That would be up to the defense team if this was a trial.

Ford is getting a basic background done. There will be extensive questioning of those she said were present before they interview her. Its going to boil down to whom they think is more credible, those she claimed that were witnesses or her and her ever changing testimony...

 

[CrazedScotsman]

The FBI will take statements and give them to the Judiciary Committee and appropriate authorities and the appropriate authorities will investigate if there was any wrong doing.

Will the appropriate authorities charge the accused or the accusers depends on the FBI report.

 

[Billy_Bob]

If not, why not?

She is getting one all right... One that might not end with Kavanaugh in jail, but her if my suspicions are correct and she lied to smear him..

It was why the Republican's interviewer asked what she did. Now they confirm or find fault with her testimony.

Its going to be rather interesting how she squares up her ever changing testimony to four witnesses who discount her story.. Its going to boil down to whom they find more credible, Ford or those she named as witnesses..

 

[Billy_Bob]

The FBI will take statements and give them to the Judiciary Committee and appropriate authorities and the appropriate authorities will investigate if there was any wrong doing.

Will the appropriate authorities charge the accused or the accusers depends on the FBI report.

Exactly! All bets are off at this point...

 

[Asclepias]

If not, why not?

She isnt trying to get a job on the SC for starters?

No, she's just trying to change the outcome of the Supreme Court for the next 20 years with accusations she cannot even keep straight, isn't prepared to back up with credible evidence and originally wanted to do from behind a concealed curtain, then wouldn't even appear before the man in the same room she was accusing.

Lets say thats true. Why would the FBI do a BG on her? Are you retarded or something? That would be up to the defense team if this was a trial.

Ford is getting a basic background done. There will be extensive questioning of those she said were present before they interview her. Its going to boil down to whom they think is more credible, those she claimed that were witnesses or her and her ever changing testimony...

Questioning those that were present isnt the same as a background. A background consists of contacting people that know/Known her and have worked/work with her regardless of if they were present. Her finances, internet activity etc etc.

 

[Weatherman2020]

If not, why not?

If they aren’t they didn’t do their job.

 

[Asclepias]

If not, why not?

If they aren’t they didn’t do their job.

If they had more than a week they could do their job.

 

[Weatherman2020]

If not, why not?

If they aren’t they didn’t do their job.

If they had more than a week they could do their job.

Democrats shouldn’t have sat on it for so long if that’s your concern.