Is this administration ‘discreetly’ allowing Mexico’s people in to increase population and to help fund social security?

BrokeLoser

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2016
40,341
22,666
2,615
MEXIFORNIA
If so, why not write legislation to incentivize the natives to crank up the fertility rate?
Why pay Mexico, Central and South America $100 billion per year to not so discreetly invade?
 
What would it cost to implement such a program?
Write your congressman today and propose this plan....Maybe we can nudge Ole Joe and ask him to push it...we already know what illegals cost.
DvEZz1rV4AAXHes

 
What would it cost to implement such a program?
Write your congressman today and propose this plan....Maybe we can nudge Ole Joe and ask him to push it...we already know what illegals cost.
DvEZz1rV4AAXHes

Conservatives are overtly exhibiting their fear, ignorance, bigotry, and hate concerning immigration.
 
What would it cost to implement such a program?
Write your congressman today and propose this plan....Maybe we can nudge Ole Joe and ask him to push it...we already know what illegals cost.
DvEZz1rV4AAXHes

Conservatives are overtly exhibiting their fear, ignorance, bigotry, and hate concerning immigration.

I've never once heard a conservative oppose LEGAL AND SENSIBLE immigration...I doubt you have either.
How about addressing the premise of the thread?
 
If so, why not write legislation to incentivize the natives to crank up the fertility rate?
Why pay Mexico, Central and South America $100 billion per year to not so discreetly invade?
Because they love their little pet Mexican brown slaves.

Does the Democrat party ever change?
 
If so, why not write legislation to incentivize the natives to crank up the fertility rate?
Why pay Mexico, Central and South America $100 billion per year to not so discreetly invade?
Because they love their little pet Mexican brown slaves.

Does the Democrat party ever change?
Some things never change...the 21st century brown man is the pre 1865 black man to Democrats.
 
"Is this administration ‘discreetly’ allowing Mexico’s people in to increase population and to help fund social security?"

No.

Can you think of a more sensible reason to allow trespassers in at the expense and safety of Americans?
We had a favorable deal for Americans all worked out until Joe decided Americans deserve to be fucked while the deal turns favorable for the trespassers....You don't find that a bit traitorous?
 
If so, why not write legislation to incentivize the natives to crank up the fertility rate?
Why pay Mexico, Central and South America $100 billion per year to not so discreetly invade?

They had a program like that. It was called "welfare". Republicans said it incentivized "laziness", and ended the program. Republicans oppose any programs that give money to low income Americans. If they're not kept hungry and needy, they won't look for work.

It's because they're kept hungry and needy, that American women are NOT having babies. They're too expensive.
 
"Is this administration ‘discreetly’ allowing Mexico’s people in to increase population and to help fund social security?"

No.

Can you think of a more sensible reason to allow trespassers in at the expense and safety of Americans?
We had a favorable deal for Americans all worked out until Joe decided Americans deserve to be fucked while the deal turns favorable for the trespassers....You don't find that a bit traitorous?

You don't have any kind of "favourable deal" all worked out. You have a deal that funnells 80% of the wealth of the nation to the top 10%. That's destroying the middle class, and forcing the middle income earners to support themselves and low income workers whose wages are inadequate to provide a basic standard of living for their families.

That fails to provide adequate health care, education or child care for 40% of working Americans.
 
If so, why not write legislation to incentivize the natives to crank up the fertility rate?
Why pay Mexico, Central and South America $100 billion per year to not so discreetly invade?

They had a program like that. It was called "welfare". Republicans said it incentivized "laziness", and ended the program. Republicans oppose any programs that give money to low income Americans. If they're not kept hungry and needy, they won't look for work.

It's because they're kept hungry and needy, that American women are NOT having babies. They're too expensive.

Ummm....Welfare is robust, alive a very well here...our people on welfare drive Cadillacs, have cell phones, own flat screens and smoke lots of weed.
The problem is; it only attracts the dregs, only the most shameless among us, those whom we don't want to procreate.
The system needs some serious tweaking.
 
"Is this administration ‘discreetly’ allowing Mexico’s people in to increase population and to help fund social security?"

No.

Can you think of a more sensible reason to allow trespassers in at the expense and safety of Americans?
We had a favorable deal for Americans all worked out until Joe decided Americans deserve to be fucked while the deal turns favorable for the trespassers....You don't find that a bit traitorous?

You don't have any kind of "favourable deal" all worked out. You have a deal that funnells 80% of the wealth of the nation to the top 10%. That's destroying the middle class, and forcing the middle income earners to support themselves and low income workers whose wages are inadequate to provide a basic standard of living for their families.

That fails to provide adequate health care, education or child care for 40% of working Americans.
Start a thread about that...I'll be all over it.
This one is about not using illegal invaders to fund our SS.
 

Forum List

Back
Top