In May, Ecuador denied Human Rights Watch permission to visit Assange, and human rights experts reported that “concern is growing over his access to medical care.”[8] On Monday 18 June, international legal experts presenting to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland testified, “the UK shows a deliberate disregard for his medical needs by forcing [Assange] to choose between his human right to asylum and his human right to medical treatment.”[9]Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Is Wikileaks Founder Going to be Turned over to UK? US?
- Thread starter longknife
- Start date
In May, Ecuador denied Human Rights Watch permission to visit Assange, and human rights experts reported that “concern is growing over his access to medical care.”[8] On Monday 18 June, international legal experts presenting to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland testified, “the UK shows a deliberate disregard for his medical needs by forcing [Assange] to choose between his human right to asylum and his human right to medical treatment.”[9]WikiLeaks Retweeted
Hanna Jonasson @AssangeLegal May 25
LISTEN: Radio interview with Assange's Ecuadorian lawyer Carlos Poveda about:
-Trade pressure on Ecuador to remove Assange
- Disinformation, fabrications in joint Guardian/Ecuadorian site #OperationHotel series
- Ecuador's obligations to protect
Hanna Jonasson @AssangeLegal May 25LISTEN: Radio interview with Assange's Ecuadorian lawyer Carlos Poveda about:
-Trade pressure on Ecuador to remove Assange
- Disinformation, fabrications in joint Guardian/Ecuadorian site #OperationHotel series
- Ecuador's obligations to protect
WikiLeaksVerified account @wikileaks 29m29 minutes ago
Deport refugee! Revoke asyum! Letter from U.S. Democratic Senators Diane Feinstein, Mark Warner, Bob Menendez, Durbin, Blumenthal, Markey, Bennet, Coons, Manchin & Shaheen demands @VP Mike Pence tell Ecuador to revoke @JulianAssange's asylum. https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/6-27-18%20RM%20letter%20to%20Pence%20Ecuador.pdf …
Deport refugee! Revoke asyum! Letter from U.S. Democratic Senators Diane Feinstein, Mark Warner, Bob Menendez, Durbin, Blumenthal, Markey, Bennet, Coons, Manchin & Shaheen demands @VP Mike Pence tell Ecuador to revoke @JulianAssange's asylum. https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/6-27-18%20RM%20letter%20to%20Pence%20Ecuador.pdf …
- Oct 19, 2012
- 61,114
- 59,337
- 3,635
AZGAL....WikiLeaks and Julian Assange have gone their different ways.
Not together anymore
WikiLeaks has been compromised (now under CIA control)
Julian has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with compromised WikiLeaks anymore
Just wanted to let you know
GOD Bless Julian Assange! he is a real hero!
Not together anymore
WikiLeaks has been compromised (now under CIA control)
Julian has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with compromised WikiLeaks anymore
Just wanted to let you know
GOD Bless Julian Assange! he is a real hero!
How is Mr. Assange’s health considering he’s been arbitrarily detained without access to sunlight or fresh air since 19 June 2012?
Several doctors have recently confirmed that Mr. Assange’s health is in an increasingly dangerous condition. The UN found that his arbitrary detention is "cruel, inhuman and degrading" and tantamount to torture.
Several doctors have recently confirmed that Mr. Assange’s health is in an increasingly dangerous condition. The UN found that his arbitrary detention is "cruel, inhuman and degrading" and tantamount to torture.
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #28
© 2018 Al Jazeera Media Network
What is behind US decision to abandon UN Human Rights Council?
Washington pulls out of the UN Human Rights Council, calling it a 'cesspool of political bias'.
20 Jun 2018 17:58 GMT Human Rights, United States, Politics
q. What is behind US decision to abandon UN Human Rights Council?
a. Donald J. Trump doesn't give a damn about the rights of human beings, unless they kiss his ass and are a source of profit.
© 2018 Al Jazeera Media Network
What is behind US decision to abandon UN Human Rights Council?
Washington pulls out of the UN Human Rights Council, calling it a 'cesspool of political bias'.
20 Jun 2018 17:58 GMT Human Rights, United States, Politics
What is behind US decision to abandon UN Human Rights Council?
Washington pulls out of the UN Human Rights Council, calling it a 'cesspool of political bias'.
20 Jun 2018 17:58 GMT Human Rights, United States, Politics
Ciaron O'Reilly @CiaronOReilly Jul 1
STANDBY ALERT - *TUES July 3rd 4-7pm *"Julian #Assange Street Solidarity" affinity group call solidarity vigil outside the Australian High Commission, London, The Strand ! #FreeJulian Detained without charge in England since he was 39.
STANDBY ALERT - *TUES July 3rd 4-7pm *"Julian #Assange Street Solidarity" affinity group call solidarity vigil outside the Australian High Commission, London, The Strand ! #FreeJulian Detained without charge in England since he was 39.
Quora
Tim Van, 7 Years Intelligence Collector (ASA) 32 years Investigator
Answered Sep 16 2017 · Author has 1.1k answers and 621.7k answer views
Snowden had a Top Secret security clearance, the terms of which he violated.
Assange was under no such restrictions, he simply publishes that which he receives from traitors and betrayers of trust. The more embarrassing, the better.
Those who “leak” should think about the consequences of their actions before they do so. Those who publish information that is damaging to the security of a country or safety of the public should realize what the dissemination of the material in question would mean and take measures to safeguard that information.
Assange has no allegiance to the United States, nor he did not operate from within it’s borders. It’d be nice to question him about some of Wikileaks sources and methods but that’s pretty unlikely to happen anytime soon.
I don’t think Assange has broken any U.S. laws.
Tim Van, 7 Years Intelligence Collector (ASA) 32 years Investigator
Answered Sep 16 2017 · Author has 1.1k answers and 621.7k answer views
Snowden had a Top Secret security clearance, the terms of which he violated.
Assange was under no such restrictions, he simply publishes that which he receives from traitors and betrayers of trust. The more embarrassing, the better.
Those who “leak” should think about the consequences of their actions before they do so. Those who publish information that is damaging to the security of a country or safety of the public should realize what the dissemination of the material in question would mean and take measures to safeguard that information.
Assange has no allegiance to the United States, nor he did not operate from within it’s borders. It’d be nice to question him about some of Wikileaks sources and methods but that’s pretty unlikely to happen anytime soon.
I don’t think Assange has broken any U.S. laws.
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #34
sputniknews? Any other sources?
WikiLeaksVerified account @wikileaks Jul 3
DC District Court judge dismisses DNC suit alleging a conspiracy between Trump, @WikiLeaks and Russia on jurisdictional grounds. Full judgement: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4573209/DNCbreach20180703.pdf …
the statutory limitations of 28 U.S.C. § 1391 when
determining if venue is proper...
.
The structure of the federal venue
provisions confirms that they alone define whether venue exists in a given forum
it is clear that venue does not lie in the District.
CONCLUSION
In summation, this is the wrong forum for plaintiffs ’lawsuit. The Court takes no position
on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims. It holds
only that plaintiffs have failed to carry their burden to
demonstrate
that this Court has jurisdiction and is the appropriate venue.
Nor are plaintiffs entitled to jurisdictional discovery.
Therefore, the Court denies plaintiffs’ motion for
jurisdictional discovery and dismisses their suit without prejudice.
Ellen Segal Huvelle
United States District Judge
Date: July 3, 2018
DC District Court judge dismisses DNC suit alleging a conspiracy between Trump, @WikiLeaks and Russia on jurisdictional grounds. Full judgement: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4573209/DNCbreach20180703.pdf …
the statutory limitations of 28 U.S.C. § 1391 when
determining if venue is proper...
.
The structure of the federal venue
provisions confirms that they alone define whether venue exists in a given forum
it is clear that venue does not lie in the District.
CONCLUSION
In summation, this is the wrong forum for plaintiffs ’lawsuit. The Court takes no position
on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims. It holds
only that plaintiffs have failed to carry their burden to
demonstrate
that this Court has jurisdiction and is the appropriate venue.
Nor are plaintiffs entitled to jurisdictional discovery.
Therefore, the Court denies plaintiffs’ motion for
jurisdictional discovery and dismisses their suit without prejudice.
Ellen Segal Huvelle
United States District Judge
Date: July 3, 2018
Last edited:
HANNITY: Can you say to the American people, unequivocally, that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta’s emails, can you tell the American people 1,000 percent that you did not get it from Russia or anybody associated with Russia?
JULIAN ASSANGE: Yes. We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.
JULIAN ASSANGE: Yes. We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.
World Newsweek
Antifa Shares Names and Photos of 1,600 ICE Employees
By Jason Lemon On 6/20/18 at 6:05 PM
A Twitter account linked to the Nebraska branch of Antifa has tweeted out a list of ICE employees compiled from LinkedIn.
The anti-fascist organization shared a link on Tuesday that includes names, photos, job titles, cities and links to ICE employees' LinkedIn profiles. “Some enterprising hero archived the ICE employees listed on LinkedIn,” said the tweet from Nebraska Antifa, which claims to share news on trap hunting fascists and racists in Nebraska, Iowa and Kansas.
The document was originally compiled by Twitter user Sam Lavigne, who claimed to have “scraped LinkedIn for people that work for ICE.”...and they blamed Wikileaks for this...
Antifa Shares Names and Photos of 1,600 ICE Employees
By Jason Lemon On 6/20/18 at 6:05 PM
A Twitter account linked to the Nebraska branch of Antifa has tweeted out a list of ICE employees compiled from LinkedIn.
The anti-fascist organization shared a link on Tuesday that includes names, photos, job titles, cities and links to ICE employees' LinkedIn profiles. “Some enterprising hero archived the ICE employees listed on LinkedIn,” said the tweet from Nebraska Antifa, which claims to share news on trap hunting fascists and racists in Nebraska, Iowa and Kansas.
The document was originally compiled by Twitter user Sam Lavigne, who claimed to have “scraped LinkedIn for people that work for ICE.”...and they blamed Wikileaks for this...
Similar threads
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 330
- Replies
- 37
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 30
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 55
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 166
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 179
- Views
- 1K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8032
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 468
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-