Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I wouldn't do that, Toast. He'll trade in $10 worth of stamps for a $2 bottle of Wild Irish Rose.Does Georgie need any food stamps ?? I'll be glad to send him some !
My memories of the MAO-A and VMAT-2 Genes are a little fuzzy; could you explain their relevance to Israel's illegal occupation of the West Bank and Gaza since The Principles of International Law and anything remotely resembling Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States seems to have little to do with Israel filling the Occupied Territories with its civilian population.georgephillip, et al,
Please do not read into this, I do not intent to antagonize or insult anyone.
(QUESTIONs)The occupation is a direct result of 650,000 Jews and their western corporate enablers inflicting a Jewish State on 1.2 million Arabs in 1948. Something Sir Ronald Storrs anticipated a generation earlier:
"Sir Ronald Storrs, the first Governor of Jerusalem, certainly had no illusions about what a Jewish homeland in Palestine meant for the British Empire: 'It will form for England, he said, 'a little loyal Jewish Ulster in a sea of potentially hostile Arabism.'
BTW, Rocco, trusting someone who claims advertising is "just another type of news" isn't conducive to making good moral choices in life.
(COMMENT)
- What are the "western corporate enablers?"
- Who profited?
Generally speaking, the pre-conflict violence (before May 1948) were Arab inspired insurgencies to oppose a whole host of agenda, attempting to achieve some Arab style greedy regime, unsatisfied with receiving 100% of the French Mandate and about 85% of the British Mandate; excluding the Arab Kingdoms of Iraq and Kuwait. The Arab was totally unwilling to share any portion of the of the former Ottoman Sovereignty. It was this greedy mentality that spawned the conflict. Any attempt to blame it entirely on the Jewish Settlers is just a rationalization of the Arab attempt to steal and control the relinquished Ottoman Territory.
Generally speaking, one can consider the 1948, '67 and '73 wars as conflicts of necessity to the survival survival of Israel. The requirement to suppress the Arab Palestinian attempt to dismantle Israel. In contrast, the 1956 and 1982 wars (and all operations since) can be viewed as political-military (pol-mil) options, seeking to achieve specific geo-political goals. The Arab Palestinian insistance on the continuation of the conflict was the principle concern. The Israelis have been faced with a perennial security dilemma that re-emerges with every non-productive generation that has become the parasite to peace; breaking down any tolerance the Jewish might have had toward reconciliation.
The three principle enablers:
1) The Populace
2) a political system that defers policy decisions to the states defense establishment,
- The Israelis: Driven by a long history of persecution.
- The Palestinians: Driven by the inability to make any prosperous or going concern, with a violent history.
3) a gradually evolving economy historically tethered to its own military-industrial complex.
- The Israelis: Driven by a long history of persecution.
- The Palestinians: Driven by the inability to make any prosperous or going concern, with a violent history.
- The Israelis: Driven by a long history of persecution.
- The Palestinians: Driven by the inability to make any prosperous or going concern, with a violent history.
(COMMENT)BTW, Rocco, trusting someone who claims advertising is "just another type of news" isn't conducive to making good moral choices in life.
I would rather trust Paul Harvey than a Palestinian that justifies the terrorism they for which they have become so famous. Anyone that tries to justify that the Palestinians has some right to conduct Munich Olympic event, the Achille Lauro, numerous airport attacks, numerous hijackings, etc, has something of a moral dilemma to explain. Sovereignty was never a question, in that the territory has been under other than Palestinian sovereignty for a millenium or more.
I'll stick with appreciating the peaceful approach, advocating the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States. Conversely, the Palestinian consistently argues that they have some inherent right to pursue a course of violence and terrorism as a means of coercion; violent acts which were intended to create fear; perpetrated for a religious (Islam), political (statehood, sovereignty, destruction of Israel), and ideological (anti-Semitic, prejudice, hatred and discrimination against Jews) goal.
Remember the MAO-A and VMAT-2 Genes.
Most Respectfully,
R