It Costs 12 TIMES As Much To Re-Settle / Care For Refugees in US Than Near Their own Nations!

[easyt65]

Refugee Resettlement Costs 12 Times More Than Providing Help In Their Region

Resettling refugees from the Middle East in the U.S. is not only a security risk but also too expensive, Center for Immigration Studies’ Executive Director Mark Krikorian argued Thursday before a House panel.

“We found that it costs 12 times as much to resettle a refugee from Syria, from the Middle East, in the United States as it does to provide for them in their own region.”

"...the five-year cost for such a refugee to be resettled into the U.S. is “conservatively estimated” to be $64,000. The United Nations estimates the five-year cost for providing for refugees in the region is about $5,300."

“In other words, each refugee that we bring to the United States from the Middle East means that 11 other people are not being helped with those same resources.”




*** DO THE MATH - MULTIPLY THE NUMBER OF 'REFUGEES' WE HAVE ALREADY BROUGHT HERE AND THE NUMBER HILLARY SAYS SHE WANTS TO BRING HERE BY 11 AND THAT IS HOW MANY 'REFUGEES' THE US IS NOT HELPING BY BRINGING THEM HERE!

...not to mention is more of a threat to our national security and citizens by bringing them HERE! SO WHAT IS THE REAL REASON BARRY AND HILLARY ARE BRINGING THEM ALL HERE?


Krikorian: Refugee Resettlement Costs 12 Times More Than Providing Help In Their Region - Breitbart

** Didn't want to 'hijack' another thread

 

[Fenton Lum]

Gee, perhaps endless war is expensive.

 

[Jackson]

Gee, perhaps endless war is expensive.

Bringing refugees here is like bringing the war to us. When they are bombing our cities, you don't think that is expensive?

 

[Moonglow]

They want them here along with illegals for a larger tax base, duh....

 

[Fenton Lum]

Gee, perhaps endless war is expensive.

Bringing refugees here is like bringing the war to us. When they are bombing our cities, you don't think that is expensive?

I think it is all wrapped up together, surely you're not attempting to suggest we went into war mode in the middle east in response to bombed out US cities are you?

 

[The Irish Ram]

Gee, perhaps endless war is expensive.

Idiot. They will be a permanent drag on our economy. They are here because the UN told us they are sending them here to spread Islam world wide. War has nothing to do with it. These aren't families fleeing. These are Muslim men who want to kill the great Satan. Hillary will finish what UN rep. Obama has started. We need to shut this down immediately. The longer we wait, the more pipe bombs we will be cleaning up after.

 

[easyt65]

What kind of 'good' leader / President intentionally spends 12 (TWELVE) TIMES more money (NEEDLESS MILLIONS) to bring potentially deadly terrorists to his country, potentially endangering his nation's and citizens' security, when he does not have to, when he could be helping all that he has PLUS 1 Million MORE if he just kept /cared for them in locations near their own countries?

Such a leader would either have to be 1) STUPID or 2) HAVE A PLAN / REASON to do so, one that is NOT in the best interest of his nation / citizens.

So which is it?

 

[defcon4]

No worries, fiat money can be printed non-stop 24/7. Where do you think the money came from to flood Europe with Muslims?

 

[Fenton Lum]

Gee, perhaps endless war is expensive.

Idiot. They will be a permanent drag on our economy. They are here because the UN told us they are sending them here to spread Islam world wide. War has nothing to do with it. These aren't families fleeing. These are Muslim men who want to kill the great Satan. Hillary will finish what UN rep. Obama has started. We need to shut this down immediately. The longer we wait, the more pipe bombs we will be cleaning up after.

Your "job creator" class is a permanent drag on your economy hon, goes back a bit over a half century. Wise the fuck up.

 

[Norman]

Democrat votes are expensive... who claimed otherwise?


Expensive for you that is, not for them.

 

[Fenton Lum]

What kind of 'good' leader / President intentionally spends 12 (TWELVE) TIMES more money (NEEDLESS MILLIONS) to bring potentially deadly terrorists to his country, potentially endangering his nation's and citizens' security, when he does not have to, when he could be helping all that he has PLUS 1 Million MORE if he just kept /cared for them in locations near their own countries?

Such a leader would either have to be 1) STUPID or 2) HAVE A PLAN / REASON to do so, one that is NOT in the best interest of his nation / citizens.

So which is it?

Your political class does what is in the best interest of your aristocracy, as it always has.

 

[easyt65]

What kind of 'good' leader / President intentionally spends 12 (TWELVE) TIMES more money (NEEDLESS MILLIONS) to bring potentially deadly terrorists to his country, potentially endangering his nation's and citizens' security, when he does not have to, when he could be helping all that he has PLUS 1 Million MORE if he just kept /cared for them in locations near their own countries?

Such a leader would either have to be 1) STUPID or 2) HAVE A PLAN / REASON to do so, one that is NOT in the best interest of his nation / citizens.

So which is it?

Your political class does what is in the best interest of your aristocracy, as it always has.

Nice try, Lum, but you intentionally DODGED the question!

What kind of 'good' leader / President intentionally spends 12 (TWELVE) TIMES more money (NEEDLESS MILLIONS) to bring potentially deadly terrorists to his country, potentially endangering his nation's and citizens' security, when he does not have to, when he could be helping all that he has PLUS 1 Million MORE if he just kept /cared for them in locations near their own countries?

Such a leader would either have to be 1) STUPID or 2) HAVE A PLAN / REASON to do so, one that is NOT in the best interest of his nation / citizens.

Which is it?


(If a CEO or business manager was caught dong this they would be FIRED!)

 

[Norman]

What kind of 'good' leader / President intentionally spends 12 (TWELVE) TIMES more money (NEEDLESS MILLIONS) to bring potentially deadly terrorists to his country, potentially endangering his nation's and citizens' security, when he does not have to, when he could be helping all that he has PLUS 1 Million MORE if he just kept /cared for them in locations near their own countries?

Such a leader would either have to be 1) STUPID or 2) HAVE A PLAN / REASON to do so, one that is NOT in the best interest of his nation / citizens.

So which is it?

Your political class does what is in the best interest of your aristocracy, as it always has.

Nice try, Lum, but you intentionally DODGED the question!

What kind of 'good' leader / President intentionally spends 12 (TWELVE) TIMES more money (NEEDLESS MILLIONS) to bring potentially deadly terrorists to his country, potentially endangering his nation's and citizens' security, when he does not have to, when he could be helping all that he has PLUS 1 Million MORE if he just kept /cared for them in locations near their own countries?

Such a leader would either have to be 1) STUPID or 2) HAVE A PLAN / REASON to do so, one that is NOT in the best interest of his nation / citizens.

Which is it?

The kind of president who puts votes before his nation.

 

[Fenton Lum]

What kind of 'good' leader / President intentionally spends 12 (TWELVE) TIMES more money (NEEDLESS MILLIONS) to bring potentially deadly terrorists to his country, potentially endangering his nation's and citizens' security, when he does not have to, when he could be helping all that he has PLUS 1 Million MORE if he just kept /cared for them in locations near their own countries?

Such a leader would either have to be 1) STUPID or 2) HAVE A PLAN / REASON to do so, one that is NOT in the best interest of his nation / citizens.

So which is it?

Your political class does what is in the best interest of your aristocracy, as it always has.

Nice try, Lum, but you intentionally DODGED the question!

What kind of 'good' leader / President intentionally spends 12 (TWELVE) TIMES more money (NEEDLESS MILLIONS) to bring potentially deadly terrorists to his country, potentially endangering his nation's and citizens' security, when he does not have to, when he could be helping all that he has PLUS 1 Million MORE if he just kept /cared for them in locations near their own countries?

Such a leader would either have to be 1) STUPID or 2) HAVE A PLAN / REASON to do so, one that is NOT in the best interest of his nation / citizens.

Which is it?

I haven't dodged anything, you want to argue about personalities and remain in denial about your system. You'll have to do that on your own without my assistance. The "good guys" and the "bad guys" are merely riding in different cars of the same train.

 

[Fenton Lum]

What kind of 'good' leader / President intentionally spends 12 (TWELVE) TIMES more money (NEEDLESS MILLIONS) to bring potentially deadly terrorists to his country, potentially endangering his nation's and citizens' security, when he does not have to, when he could be helping all that he has PLUS 1 Million MORE if he just kept /cared for them in locations near their own countries?

Such a leader would either have to be 1) STUPID or 2) HAVE A PLAN / REASON to do so, one that is NOT in the best interest of his nation / citizens.

So which is it?

Your political class does what is in the best interest of your aristocracy, as it always has.

Nice try, Lum, but you intentionally DODGED the question!

What kind of 'good' leader / President intentionally spends 12 (TWELVE) TIMES more money (NEEDLESS MILLIONS) to bring potentially deadly terrorists to his country, potentially endangering his nation's and citizens' security, when he does not have to, when he could be helping all that he has PLUS 1 Million MORE if he just kept /cared for them in locations near their own countries?

Such a leader would either have to be 1) STUPID or 2) HAVE A PLAN / REASON to do so, one that is NOT in the best interest of his nation / citizens.

Which is it?

The kind of president who puts votes before his nation.

Kudos, you've just described your entire political class, and the rubes who continue to vote them in.

 

[irosie91]

Gee, perhaps endless war is expensive.

Bringing refugees here is like bringing the war to us. When they are bombing our cities, you don't think that is expensive?

I think it is all wrapped up together, surely you're not attempting to suggest we went into war mode in the middle east in response to bombed out US cities are you?

you didn't see Bronx, New York in the 1970s

 

[Fenton Lum]

Gee, perhaps endless war is expensive.

Bringing refugees here is like bringing the war to us. When they are bombing our cities, you don't think that is expensive?

I think it is all wrapped up together, surely you're not attempting to suggest we went into war mode in the middle east in response to bombed out US cities are you?

you didn't see Bronx, New York in the 1970s

You don't know what I've seen and our fucking about in the middle east predates that.

 

[bendog]

A Trump campaign ad. How special.

 

[irosie91]

Gee, perhaps endless war is expensive.

Bringing refugees here is like bringing the war to us. When they are bombing our cities, you don't think that is expensive?

I think it is all wrapped up together, surely you're not attempting to suggest we went into war mode in the middle east in response to bombed out US cities are you?

you didn't see Bronx, New York in the 1970s

You don't know what I've seen and our fucking about in the middle east predates that.

fucking about in the middle east predates US. We did NOT go into war mode in the middle east because of bombed out US cities-----nor did we go to war with Germany in 1941 because of bombed out US cities

 

[turzovka]

Gee, perhaps endless war is expensive.

Bringing refugees here is like bringing the war to us. When they are bombing our cities, you don't think that is expensive?

I think it is all wrapped up together, surely you're not attempting to suggest we went into war mode in the middle east in response to bombed out US cities are you?

you didn't see Bronx, New York in the 1970s

You don't know what I've seen and our fucking about in the middle east predates that.

Oh, that.

IOW, the reason Arabs hate and tell lies to their children and murder Jews and infidels and continuously turn on those of their own faith and cause acts of terror around the globe like STEADY AND ALWAYS --- is because the USA and Britain wanted to extract oil in the Middle East a century ago, and the Arabs who made the deal never forgave the Americans or Brits for being part of it. So now that justifies all the evil they engage in.

Thanks for trying to sound like some sage of higher knowledge, yet cannot really debate any issue straight on. Hard to find anyone on the left worth talking to.