It took the centers for public integrity to solidify the evidence against Trump

[Sun Devil 92]

Funny faces are for the willfully stupid who sit around with their fingers up there ass getting left out. Can't blame them though. You can't defend the indefensible now can you?

Defend ?

Who needs to.

This isn't going anywhere and he'll be back after 2020.

Suck on it.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

It's not illegal for a United States President to hold up aid to a foreign country in exchange for cooperation in investigating corruption of American citizens.

Except there was no corruption, because no one has anything on Biden. Even if there was, Trump didn't call the FBI, which cancels out any foreign investigation into Biden.

And yes it is illegal to hold up foreign aid that has already been approved. He violated the Impoundment Act you idiot.

Call me when the trial starts.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Is the Senate trial going to any more fake than the House Impeachment?

Any Republicans dancing down the hallway laughing about how they are going to impeach the president?

Now that we have even more of the smoking gun evidence, let's see what the corrupt senate will do.

Why didn't they have this in the House Inquiry?

In too big a hurry to get all the info?

Must not have been, Nancy is stalling on taking it to the Senate.

It won't be fake. The Democrats have all the emails proving Trump's guilt. A trial is inevitable with witnesses and documents.CNN analyst on Ukraine email: Better than Schiff imagined - CNN Video

The Democrats have all the emails proving Trump's guilt.

Did they have them during the House inquiry?

A trial is inevitable with witnesses and documents

Fantastic.

Think you'll be able to convince more than 20 Republicans to find him guilty and remove him from office?



Remember, despite Clinton wagging his finger at the country, he still finished his term.

The evidence speaks for itself, and Republicans speak for themselves and what they get. And full filling their oath is not why they are there.

What needs solidifying? Most Democrats said there was enough evidence. Bipartisan votes said no.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Is the Senate trial going to any more fake than the House Impeachment?

Any Republicans dancing down the hallway laughing about how they are going to impeach the president?

Now that we have even more of the smoking gun evidence, let's see what the corrupt senate will do.

Why didn't they have this in the House Inquiry?

In too big a hurry to get all the info?

Must not have been, Nancy is stalling on taking it to the Senate.

It won't be fake. The Democrats have all the emails proving Trump's guilt. A trial is inevitable with witnesses and documents.CNN analyst on Ukraine email: Better than Schiff imagined - CNN Video

The Democrats have all the emails proving Trump's guilt.

Did they have them during the House inquiry?

A trial is inevitable with witnesses and documents

Fantastic.

Think you'll be able to convince more than 20 Republicans to find him guilty and remove him from office?



Remember, despite Clinton wagging his finger at the country, he still finished his term.

The evidence speaks for itself, and Republicans speak for themselves and what they get. And full filling their oath is not why they are there.

Same as 20 years ago, when democrats refused to find Clinton guilty, and walked out to state that to the press.

Oddly, the ones that made the most noise about Clinton innocence, are the loudest about Trumps guilt.


(Don't you just love the smell of hypocrisy in Congress?)

New York....

The state that elects:

Schumer
Clinton
Gillibrand

as senators.

They are as bad as California.

They forget it's the best we want...not the stuff from the garbage.

 

[BWK]

Funny faces are for the willfully stupid who sit around with their fingers up there ass getting left out. Can't blame them though. You can't defend the indefensible now can you?

Defend ?

Who needs to.

This isn't going anywhere and he'll be back after 2020.

Suck on it.

A non existent brain dead response is not a counter argument. Try again.

 

[BWK]

Is the Senate trial going to any more fake than the House Impeachment?

Any Republicans dancing down the hallway laughing about how they are going to impeach the president?

Now that we have even more of the smoking gun evidence, let's see what the corrupt senate will do.

Why didn't they have this in the House Inquiry?

In too big a hurry to get all the info?

Must not have been, Nancy is stalling on taking it to the Senate.

It won't be fake. The Democrats have all the emails proving Trump's guilt. A trial is inevitable with witnesses and documents.CNN analyst on Ukraine email: Better than Schiff imagined - CNN Video

The Democrats have all the emails proving Trump's guilt.

Did they have them during the House inquiry?

A trial is inevitable with witnesses and documents

Fantastic.

Think you'll be able to convince more than 20 Republicans to find him guilty and remove him from office?



Remember, despite Clinton wagging his finger at the country, he still finished his term.

The evidence speaks for itself, and Republicans speak for themselves and what they get. And full filling their oath is not why they are there.

What needs solidifying? Most Democrats said there was enough evidence. Bipartisan votes said no.

It's the frosting on the cake that was never needed. It was solidified by the fact that we now know why Trump gagged witnesses and held up the documents. Thanks to the Center for integrity we now know why. The suspected guilt about the documents and the emails is even better than we thought. CNN analyst on Ukraine email: Better than Schiff imagined - CNN Video

Anyone with a functioning brain beyond retardism sees the guilt. This is a slam dunk case.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Is the Senate trial going to any more fake than the House Impeachment?

Any Republicans dancing down the hallway laughing about how they are going to impeach the president?

Why didn't they have this in the House Inquiry?

In too big a hurry to get all the info?

Must not have been, Nancy is stalling on taking it to the Senate.

It won't be fake. The Democrats have all the emails proving Trump's guilt. A trial is inevitable with witnesses and documents.CNN analyst on Ukraine email: Better than Schiff imagined - CNN Video

The Democrats have all the emails proving Trump's guilt.

Did they have them during the House inquiry?

A trial is inevitable with witnesses and documents

Fantastic.

Think you'll be able to convince more than 20 Republicans to find him guilty and remove him from office?



Remember, despite Clinton wagging his finger at the country, he still finished his term.

The evidence speaks for itself, and Republicans speak for themselves and what they get. And full filling their oath is not why they are there.

What needs solidifying? Most Democrats said there was enough evidence. Bipartisan votes said no.

It's the frosting on the cake that was never needed. It was solidified by the fact that we now know why Trump gagged witnesses and held up the documents. Thanks to the Center for integrity we now know why. The suspected guilt about the documents and the emails is even better than we thought. CNN analyst on Ukraine email: Better than Schiff imagined - CNN Video

Oh wow. CNN. I’m sold.

 

[jknowgood]

Dems ramp up call for impeachment witnesses following 'explosive' emails With these latest email findings, the actual details of how, who, and for what reason the military aid was being held up is all out there for the public to see. And the picture they portray of holding the funds back for x reasons is now known. Guess what, Trump is guilty of using tax payer dollars to bribe a foreign power to help him get elected, and is backed up by seventeen witnesses. And with McConnell looking to turn this into a fake trial, that is going to back fire on the corrupt Right. Now that we have even more of the smoking gun evidence, let's see what the corrupt senate will do. Will they choose to cover for corruption, or honor their oath?

Here we go again.

 

[BWK]

It's not illegal for a United States President to hold up aid to a foreign country in exchange for cooperation in investigating corruption of American citizens.

Except there was no corruption, because no one has anything on Biden. Even if there was, Trump didn't call the FBI, which cancels out any foreign investigation into Biden.

And yes it is illegal to hold up foreign aid that has already been approved. He violated the Impoundment Act you idiot.

Call me when the trial starts.

Another non argument coming from a coward and an ignoramus absent of any arguing equity. In other words, you're a loser.

 

[BWK]

Dems ramp up call for impeachment witnesses following 'explosive' emails With these latest email findings, the actual details of how, who, and for what reason the military aid was being held up is all out there for the public to see. And the picture they portray of holding the funds back for x reasons is now known. Guess what, Trump is guilty of using tax payer dollars to bribe a foreign power to help him get elected, and is backed up by seventeen witnesses. And with McConnell looking to turn this into a fake trial, that is going to back fire on the corrupt Right. Now that we have even more of the smoking gun evidence, let's see what the corrupt senate will do. Will they choose to cover for corruption, or honor their oath?

View attachment 296655
Here we go again.

Try again. You're still losing.

 

[BWK]

It won't be fake. The Democrats have all the emails proving Trump's guilt. A trial is inevitable with witnesses and documents.CNN analyst on Ukraine email: Better than Schiff imagined - CNN Video

The Democrats have all the emails proving Trump's guilt.

Did they have them during the House inquiry?

A trial is inevitable with witnesses and documents

Fantastic.

Think you'll be able to convince more than 20 Republicans to find him guilty and remove him from office?



Remember, despite Clinton wagging his finger at the country, he still finished his term.

The evidence speaks for itself, and Republicans speak for themselves and what they get. And full filling their oath is not why they are there.

What needs solidifying? Most Democrats said there was enough evidence. Bipartisan votes said no.

It's the frosting on the cake that was never needed. It was solidified by the fact that we now know why Trump gagged witnesses and held up the documents. Thanks to the Center for integrity we now know why. The suspected guilt about the documents and the emails is even better than we thought. CNN analyst on Ukraine email: Better than Schiff imagined - CNN Video

Oh wow. CNN. I’m sold.

I know you are, because you failed miserably to shut the argument down.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Did they have them during the House inquiry?

Fantastic.

Think you'll be able to convince more than 20 Republicans to find him guilty and remove him from office?



Remember, despite Clinton wagging his finger at the country, he still finished his term.

The evidence speaks for itself, and Republicans speak for themselves and what they get. And full filling their oath is not why they are there.

What needs solidifying? Most Democrats said there was enough evidence. Bipartisan votes said no.

It's the frosting on the cake that was never needed. It was solidified by the fact that we now know why Trump gagged witnesses and held up the documents. Thanks to the Center for integrity we now know why. The suspected guilt about the documents and the emails is even better than we thought. CNN analyst on Ukraine email: Better than Schiff imagined - CNN Video

Oh wow. CNN. I’m sold.

I know you are, because you failed miserably to shut the argument down.

Does Vox and Media Matters agree?

 

[jknowgood]

Dems ramp up call for impeachment witnesses following 'explosive' emails With these latest email findings, the actual details of how, who, and for what reason the military aid was being held up is all out there for the public to see. And the picture they portray of holding the funds back for x reasons is now known. Guess what, Trump is guilty of using tax payer dollars to bribe a foreign power to help him get elected, and is backed up by seventeen witnesses. And with McConnell looking to turn this into a fake trial, that is going to back fire on the corrupt Right. Now that we have even more of the smoking gun evidence, let's see what the corrupt senate will do. Will they choose to cover for corruption, or honor their oath?

View attachment 296655
Here we go again.

Try again. You're still losing.

No, after 3 years of this crap, and he is still YOUR president. I'm winning!

 

[Weatherman2020]

Did they have them during the House inquiry?

Fantastic.

Think you'll be able to convince more than 20 Republicans to find him guilty and remove him from office?



Remember, despite Clinton wagging his finger at the country, he still finished his term.

The evidence speaks for itself, and Republicans speak for themselves and what they get. And full filling their oath is not why they are there.

What needs solidifying? Most Democrats said there was enough evidence. Bipartisan votes said no.

It's the frosting on the cake that was never needed. It was solidified by the fact that we now know why Trump gagged witnesses and held up the documents. Thanks to the Center for integrity we now know why. The suspected guilt about the documents and the emails is even better than we thought. CNN analyst on Ukraine email: Better than Schiff imagined - CNN Video

Oh wow. CNN. I’m sold.

I know you are, because you failed miserably to shut the argument down.

 

[Dana7360]

Dems ramp up call for impeachment witnesses following 'explosive' emails With these latest email findings, the actual details of how, who, and for what reason the military aid was being held up is all out there for the public to see. And the picture they portray of holding the funds back for x reasons is now known. Guess what, Trump is guilty of using tax payer dollars to bribe a foreign power to help him get elected, and is backed up by seventeen witnesses. And with McConnell looking to turn this into a fake trial, that is going to back fire on the corrupt Right. Now that we have even more of the smoking gun evidence, let's see what the corrupt senate will do. Will they choose to cover for corruption, or honor their oath?

They will choose to cover up the corruption for trump.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Funny faces are for the willfully stupid who sit around with their fingers up there ass getting left out. Can't blame them though. You can't defend the indefensible now can you?

Defend ?

Who needs to.

This isn't going anywhere and he'll be back after 2020.

Suck on it.

A non existent brain dead response is not a counter argument. Try again.

Again, not defending and not arguing (what part of that wasn't clear).

This is going NOWHERE.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

It's not illegal for a United States President to hold up aid to a foreign country in exchange for cooperation in investigating corruption of American citizens.

Except there was no corruption, because no one has anything on Biden. Even if there was, Trump didn't call the FBI, which cancels out any foreign investigation into Biden.

And yes it is illegal to hold up foreign aid that has already been approved. He violated the Impoundment Act you idiot.

Call me when the trial starts.

Another non argument coming from a coward and an ignoramus absent of any arguing equity. In other words, you're a loser.

Oh, I'm crushed.

Actually, I am the winner.

I got Gorsuch and Kavennaugh (sp?).

I will get a non-lefty for the next five years.

And I expect to get the house next year.

Arguing equality ? Try again.

 

[RodISHI]

Twenty-four socialist/communist Jews in Congress make demands for president Trump to fire Stephan Miller also a Jew but not of their clan. Stephan Miller is accused of being a collaborator with a accused or what is claimed to be a "former white supremacist". A report issued by the Southern Poverty Law Center using stolen/hacked emails between Stephan Miller and a previous editor at Briebart is their proof that Stephan Miller is an antiSemite who collaborated with this claimed "former white supremacist". That same report though fails to mention that Stephan Miller is also Jewish.

Guess which one of these signatories on this letter to the president is an originator of the organization calling themselves the Center For Public Integrity?

https://schneider.house.gov/sites/schneider.house.gov/files/2019.12.20 - Jewish Members_Stephen Miller_FINAL SIGNED.pdf

 

[ranfunck]

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Dems ramp up call for impeachment witnesses following 'explosive' emails With these latest email findings, the actual details of how, who, and for what reason the military aid was being held up is all out there for the public to see. And the picture they portray of holding the funds back for x reasons is now known. Guess what, Trump is guilty of using tax payer dollars to bribe a foreign power to help him get elected, and is backed up by seventeen witnesses. And with McConnell looking to turn this into a fake trial, that is going to back fire on the corrupt Right. Now that we have even more of the smoking gun evidence, let's see what the corrupt senate will do. Will they choose to cover for corruption, or honor their oath?

Center for Public Integrity - Media Bias/Fact Check