It's Always Grab Their Guns and Mass Murder with the Leftists

[Pete7469]

Hitler was RIGHT WING.

so NOT ALL.


are you suggesting that all people who are NOT conservatives MUST BE LEFT WING FASCISTS?


are you aware of the fact that LOTS of decent people are MODERATES and OPPOSE BOTH LEFTWING AND RIGHT WING?

You're an imbecile.

Hitler was a socialist, a leftist vegan queer like you.

"Right wingers" do not support massive authoritarian states that control every aspect of people's lives, limit freedom to travel, own property, worship or speak freely, or maintain a private arsenal. Bed wetting pieces of shit like you promote those things you fucking fascist asshat.

That's why you assholes are hell bent to undermine the rights of others to carry and keep guns.


.

 

[anynameyouwish]

Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.

That was rather weak... And even you know it. No “side” has ever had a monopoly on mass murder. It’s recorded in history going back to as far the Bronze Age and further. As for the body count... What has changed has much less to do with the politics involved, and more to do with the quantity of targets available, and the more technologically advanced methods developed by which to dispatch them.

Sorry.....after 1917 the worst mass murders in history have all been done by left wing socialilsts....yes, you have to try to hide that fact, but it is the truth......hitler, stalin, mao, pol pot, castro......killed close to 200 million people......in the modern age, not in the past.

No ones trying to hide the aforementioned atrocities. But there have been others that some conveniently choose to ignore based on "the score". Like Bosnia, which you handily pretend wasnt mentioned. 100 years is a tiny window of time in human history. And mass murder has been around, and in practice since before recorded history, and finds itself at home on any side willing to use it. And both sides have shown that willingness...

And again...mass murder has been a part of the human condition...but the worst mass murder in the modern age has all been committed by left wing socialists.....but keep trying to hide that fact.

LMFAO.
So, the British Capitalists of the United Kingdom, and the United States haven't killed 10's of millions?
Who's being naive?

well

even though I know you are a paid russian troll.....

on this issue I cannot argue.

 

[Gdjjr]

It is not like calling for a second amendment solution.

Solution: shall not be infringed.

 

[Vastator]

Another thing that's lost on many making this argument is perspective, and context. In the case of say mao, or Lenin... there were predominately two sides. The imperialists who wanted to retain their monarchies, and the Socialists. Totalotarian Monarchy is to the left of socialism. So for those actually involved, and doing the killing and dying... it was the right wingers of the moment who were filling mass graves with Leftwing Loyalists...

 

[Circe]

The Khmer Rouge relied on kids like her to do most of the killing.

How like you to assume 'against the wall' means firing squad. How natural. I just love the things you stretch for to bite your knuckles over.

Because putting people against the wall DOES mean firing squad. It's the meaning of that phrase.

And that probably is exactly what she meant. The Left is incredibly violent.

 

[Pete7469]

LMFAO.
So, the British Capitalists of the United Kingdom, and the United States haven't killed 10's of millions?
Who's being naive?

Are you suggesting the Imperialist British were operating as a Constitutional Republic and trying to force colonies to accept liberty?

Then you wonder why people call you a stupid fucking pollack.

Stupid fucking pollack.


.

 

[Circe]

You are an idiot.
This is known.

I love the "this is known" quote from Game of Thrones.

 

[Hellbilly]

You are an idiot.
This is known.

I love the "this is known" quote from Game of Thrones.

It’s actually from Avengers Endgame


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Pete7469]

Another thing that's lost on many making this argument is perspective, and context. In the case of say mao, or Stalin... there were predominately two sides. The imperialists who wanted to retain their monarchies, and the Socialists. Totalotarian Monarchy is to the left of socialism. So for those actually involved, and doing the killing and dying... it was the right wingers of the moment who were filling mass graves with Leftwing Loyalists...

I'd call them all leftists, because as you pointed out, both sides are authoritarian statists. "Right wingers" are libertarians, full blown anarchists who seek ZERO government, no authority at all, would be right wing extremists. Anarcho-communists are just imbeciles.

 

[Circe]

You are an idiot.
This is known.

I love the "this is known" quote from Game of Thrones.

It’s actually from Avengers Endgame

Wikipedia:

In George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series (e.g. in Game of Thrones), this is a common saying among the Dothraki tribe, typically used either to make a point or to make reference to a bit of cultural knowledge.

For instance: "The last dragon died a thousand years ago, Khaleesi. It is known." Occasionally it will be echoed by others within earshot as well, to reinforce the point.
******************************************************************************
I wonder if the Avengers Endgame used it before or after Martin's Dothraki?
It's quite a thoughtful comment on how "knowledge" is culturally constructed and agreed on.

 

[Gdjjr]

Another thing that's lost on many making this argument is perspective, and context. In the case of say mao, or Stalin... there were predominately two sides. The imperialists who wanted to retain their monarchies, and the Socialists. Totalotarian Monarchy is to the left of socialism. So for those actually involved, and doing the killing and dying... it was the right wingers of the moment who were filling mass graves with Leftwing Loyalists...

History means absolutely nothing to a narrative-

 

[Gdjjr]

"Right wingers" are libertarians, full blown anarchists who seek ZERO government, no authority at all,

Can you cite the evidence for your conclusion?

 

[Pete7469]

"Right wingers" are libertarians, full blown anarchists who seek ZERO government, no authority at all,

Can you cite the evidence for your conclusion?

 

[Vastator]

Another thing that's lost on many making this argument is perspective, and context. In the case of say mao, or Stalin... there were predominately two sides. The imperialists who wanted to retain their monarchies, and the Socialists. Totalotarian Monarchy is to the left of socialism. So for those actually involved, and doing the killing and dying... it was the right wingers of the moment who were filling mass graves with Leftwing Loyalists...

I'd call them all leftists, because as you pointed out, both sides are authoritarian statists. "Right wingers" are libertarians, full blown anarchists who seek ZERO government, no authority at all, would be right wing extremists. Anarcho-communists are just imbeciles.

While from our perspective here, and today... yes. Comparatively both are to our left. However we dont get to insert ourselves into the already established history and make sweeping declarations like "all the mass murders were committed by "leftists". For those involved when it was happening, and when it actually totally mattered; it was the right wingers of the story filling the mass graves with the left wingers of the time.

 

[Pete7469]

Another thing that's lost on many making this argument is perspective, and context. In the case of say mao, or Stalin... there were predominately two sides. The imperialists who wanted to retain their monarchies, and the Socialists. Totalotarian Monarchy is to the left of socialism. So for those actually involved, and doing the killing and dying... it was the right wingers of the moment who were filling mass graves with Leftwing Loyalists...

I'd call them all leftists, because as you pointed out, both sides are authoritarian statists. "Right wingers" are libertarians, full blown anarchists who seek ZERO government, no authority at all, would be right wing extremists. Anarcho-communists are just imbeciles.

While from our perspective here, and today... yes. Comparatively both are to our left. However we dont get to insert ourselves into the already established history and make sweeping declarations like "all the mass murders were committed by "leftists". For those involved when it was happening, and when it actually totally mattered; it was the right wingers of the story filling the mass graves with the left wingers of the time.

I get what you're saying, but I felt compelled to point out that no one who promoted liberty, at any point in history, had to execute even a few dozen people, let alone millions. Even after the brits were defeated here, the loyalists were not rounded up and murdered in massive numbers by agents of the new government. I know some people were killed by "patriots" for being "traitors", but they were the exception rather than the rule. Die hard loyalists to the crown were allowed to stay if they wished or free to leave.

 

[Gdjjr]

"Right wingers" are libertarians, full blown anarchists who seek ZERO government, no authority at all,

Can you cite the evidence for your conclusion?

That said nothing about libertarian-

 

[Pete7469]

"Right wingers" are libertarians, full blown anarchists who seek ZERO government, no authority at all,

Can you cite the evidence for your conclusion?

That said nothing about libertarian-

If you can't infer that conclusion on your own I can't help you.

 

[Gdjjr]

I get what you're saying, but I felt compelled to point out that no one who promoted liberty, at any point in history, had to execute even a few dozen people, let alone millions.

The only good Indian is a dead Indian- made dead by starvation and outright killing and disease- Manifest Destiny as though ordained killing made it okay- all men are created equal and have certain unalienable rights has no caveats, or political preference/stripe.
BTW, the founders were classical "liberals"- not classical "conservatives"- the root of conservative is to conserve- to conserve is to keep- the political definition of to keep is Status Quo- the status quo of today is the neo liberal policy of the early 60's- today's elite in DC (both sides) subscribe to that early 60's neo liberal *planks* and has morphed into Neocon policy, which is world wide hegemony and colony establishment through Military Bases- the founders actually acted in an anarchist manner- it threw off the British gov't rule- leaving a vacuum-

 

[Gdjjr]

If you can't infer that conclusion on your own I can't help you.

That conclusion is your inference- it said absolutely nothing about libertarians- that leads me to believe you don't know what you're talking about- you want inference- you want others to believe your inference is absolute and true- it ain't- I'd suggest you do some research on your own and stop relying on you tube for your absolutist attitude-
Libertarians and libertarians write here- Home – The Future of Freedom Foundation

 

[Pete7469]

If you can't infer that conclusion on your own I can't help you.

That conclusion is your inference- it said absolutely nothing about libertarians- that leads me to believe you don't know what you're talking about- you want inference- you want others to believe your inference is absolute and true- it ain't- I'd suggest you do some research on your own and stop relying on you tube for your absolutist attitude-
Libertarians and libertarians write here- Home – The Future of Freedom Foundation