🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

It's Always Grab Their Guns and Mass Murder with the Leftists

The Khmer Rouge relied on kids like her to do most of the killing.
How like you to assume 'against the wall' means firing squad. How natural. I just love the things you stretch for to bite your knuckles over.
9.8 gymnastics score.

If Trump said we need to line up all Democrats against the wall.....


rush limbaugh "leave only SOME liberals left alive!"

ann coulter "we should shoot a few liberals to let the rest know it can happen to them."


Yes...they joke....the actual left wing socialists actually murder people...in the millions....and the demcorat party storm troopers, the antifa thugs, are already ramping up their violence.......Trump supporters beaten in public.......calls for arresting "climate deniers," shutting down bakers and photographers who disagree with the democrat party on the gay agenda, the bernie sanders supporter who tried to murder the Republican baseball team, the dayton shooter who supported Sanders and warren, the black hebrew israelites who shot up the Jewish deli.......actual, current violence, real violence....is by you left wing asshats.
 


is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....
 


is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.
 


is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.
That was rather weak... And even you know it. No “side” has ever had a monopoly on mass murder. It’s recorded in history going back to as far the Bronze Age and further. As for the body count... What has changed has much less to do with the politics involved, and more to do with the quantity of targets available, and the more technologically advanced methods developed by which to dispatch them.
 


is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.



"

Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact."


Hitler was RIGHT WING.

so NOT ALL.


are you suggesting that all people who are NOT conservatives MUST BE LEFT WING FASCISTS?


are you aware of the fact that LOTS of decent people are MODERATES and OPPOSE BOTH LEFTWING AND RIGHT WING?
 


is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.



"

Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact."


Hitler was RIGHT WING.

so NOT ALL.


are you suggesting that all people who are NOT conservatives MUST BE LEFT WING FASCISTS?


are you aware of the fact that LOTS of decent people are MODERATES and OPPOSE BOTH LEFTWING AND RIGHT WING?
Another fallacy some right wing conservatives fall victim to is the myopic view that has them constantly focused on the “left”. Leaving them oblivious to the fact that there are a great many who are even further to the right than they are...
 


is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........

Trump heroes.
 


is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.
That was rather weak... And even you know it. No “side” has ever had a monopoly on mass murder. It’s recorded in history going back to as far the Bronze Age and further. As for the body count... What has changed has much less to do with the politics involved, and more to do with the quantity of targets available, and the more technologically advanced methods developed by which to dispatch them.

Sorry.....after 1917 the worst mass murders in history have all been done by left wing socialilsts....yes, you have to try to hide that fact, but it is the truth......hitler, stalin, mao, pol pot, castro......killed close to 200 million people......in the modern age, not in the past.
 


is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.



"

Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact."


Hitler was RIGHT WING.

so NOT ALL.


are you suggesting that all people who are NOT conservatives MUST BE LEFT WING FASCISTS?


are you aware of the fact that LOTS of decent people are MODERATES and OPPOSE BOTH LEFTWING AND RIGHT WING?


hitler was not "Right" wing, he was a left winger who believed in socialism.......

Nazism is Socialism -- F A Hayek, et al

One of the main reasons why the socialist character of National Socialism has been quite generally unrecognized, is, no doubt, its alliance with the nationalist groups which represent the great industries and the great landowners. But this merely proves that these groups too -as they have since learnt to their bitter disappointment -have, at least partly, been mistaken as to the nature of the movement. But only partly because -and this is the most characteristic feature of modern Germany – many capitalists are themselves strongly influenced by socialistic ideas, and have not sufficient belief in capitalism to defend it with a clear conscience. But, in spite of this, the German entrepreneur class have manifested almost incredible short-sightedness in allying themselves with a move movement of whose strong anti-capitalistic tendencies there should never have been any doubt.

A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extend directed against their economic policy. What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice -their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with “the golden International of Jewish Capitalism.”

It would, indeed, hardly have been possible for the Nationalists to advance fundamental objections to the economic policy of the other socialist parties when their own published programme differed from these only in that its socialism was much cruder and less rational. The famous 25 points drawn up by Herr Feder,[2] one of Hitler’s early allies, repeatedly endorsed by Hitler and recognized by the by-laws of the National-Socialist party as the immutable basis of all its actions, which together with an extensive commentary is circulating throughout Germany in many hundreds of thousands of copies, is full of ideas resembling those of the early socialists. But the dominant feature is a fierce hatred of anything capitalistic -individualistic profit seeking, large scale enterprise, banks, joint-stock companies, department stores, “international finance and loan capital,” the system of “interest slavery” in general; the abolition of these is described as the “[indecipherable] of the programme, around which everything else turns.” It was to this programme that the masses of the German people, who were already completely under the influence of collectivist ideas, responded so enthusiastically.

That this violent anti-capitalistic attack is genuine – and not a mere piece of propaganda – becomes as clear from the personal history of the intellectual leaders of the movement as from the general milieu from which it springs. It is not even denied that man of the young men who today play a prominent part in it have previously been communists or socialists. And to any observer of the literary tendencies which made the Germans intelligentsia ready to join the ranks of the new party, it must be clear that the common characteristic of all the politically influential writers – in many cases free from definite party affiliations – was their anti-liberal and anti-capitalist trend. Groups like that formed around the review “Die Tat” have made the phrase “the end of capitalism” an accepted dogma to most young Germans.[3]

And more...

The Myth of "Nazi Capitalism" | Chris Calton

German socialism, as Mises defines it, differs from what he called “socialism of the Russian pattern” in that “it, seemingly and nominally, maintains private ownership of the means of production, entrepreneurship, and market exchange.” However, this is only a superficial system of private ownership because through a complete system of economic intervention and control, the entrepreneurial function of the property owners is completely controlled by the State. By this, Mises means that shop owners do not speculate about future events for the purpose of allocating resources in the pursuit of profits. Just like in the Soviet Union, this entrepreneurial speculation and resource allocation is done by a single entity, the State, and economic calculation is thus impossible.

“In Nazi Germany,” Mises tells us, the property owners “were called shop managers or Betriebsführer. The government tells these seeming entrepreneurs what and how to produce, at what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to whom to sell. The government decrees at what wages labourers should work, and to whom and under what terms the capitalists should entrust their funds. Market exchange is but a sham. As all prices, wages and interest rates are fixed by the authority, they are prices, wages and interest rates in appearance only; in fact they are merely quantitative terms in the authoritarian orders determining each citizen’s income, consumption and standard of living. The authority, not the consumers, directs production. The central board of production management is supreme; all citizens are nothing else but civil servants. This is socialism with the outward appearance of capitalism. Some labels of the capitalistic market economy are retained, but they signify here something entirely different from what they mean in the market economy.”
 
is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.
That was rather weak... And even you know it. No “side” has ever had a monopoly on mass murder. It’s recorded in history going back to as far the Bronze Age and further. As for the body count... What has changed has much less to do with the politics involved, and more to do with the quantity of targets available, and the more technologically advanced methods developed by which to dispatch them.

Sorry.....after 1917 the worst mass murders in history have all been done by left wing socialilsts....yes, you have to try to hide that fact, but it is the truth......hitler, stalin, mao, pol pot, castro......killed close to 200 million people......in the modern age, not in the past.
No ones trying to hide the aforementioned atrocities. But there have been others that some conveniently choose to ignore based on "the score". Like Bosnia, which you handily pretend wasnt mentioned. 100 years is a tiny window of time in human history. And mass murder has been around, and in practice since before recorded history, and finds itself at home on any side willing to use it. And both sides have shown that willingness...
 
Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.
That was rather weak... And even you know it. No “side” has ever had a monopoly on mass murder. It’s recorded in history going back to as far the Bronze Age and further. As for the body count... What has changed has much less to do with the politics involved, and more to do with the quantity of targets available, and the more technologically advanced methods developed by which to dispatch them.

Sorry.....after 1917 the worst mass murders in history have all been done by left wing socialilsts....yes, you have to try to hide that fact, but it is the truth......hitler, stalin, mao, pol pot, castro......killed close to 200 million people......in the modern age, not in the past.
No ones trying to hide the aforementioned atrocities. But there have been others that some conveniently choose to ignore based on "the score". Like Bosnia, which you handily pretend wasnt mentioned. 100 years is a tiny window of time in human history. And mass murder has been around, and in practice since before recorded history, and finds itself at home on any side willing to use it. And both sides have shown that willingness...


And again...mass murder has been a part of the human condition...but the worst mass murder in the modern age has all been committed by left wing socialists.....but keep trying to hide that fact.
 
Lack of guns for the target + a Big Powerful military tend to be pretty common in genocide.
Although, sometimes like in Rwanda, or Wolyn Massacre guns, nor much of a military were needed.

PS.
Gun rights Republicans support.

But, who's pushing more for a more powerful military in the USA?

A few years back 48% of the World's military budget was by the USA.
But, somehow we need more.
 
is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.
That was rather weak... And even you know it. No “side” has ever had a monopoly on mass murder. It’s recorded in history going back to as far the Bronze Age and further. As for the body count... What has changed has much less to do with the politics involved, and more to do with the quantity of targets available, and the more technologically advanced methods developed by which to dispatch them.

Sorry.....after 1917 the worst mass murders in history have all been done by left wing socialilsts....yes, you have to try to hide that fact, but it is the truth......hitler, stalin, mao, pol pot, castro......killed close to 200 million people......in the modern age, not in the past.
Actually those you mentioned are in fact "in the past". Like I said, "cherry picking"...
 
The first gun control in the USA were implemented against Blacks, and Native Americans.

Black slaves couldn't own guns.

Native Americans were disarmed before Wounded Knee Massacre.

Not so sure I'd call these 'Leftists, or Socialists"

But, surely its a great example to the gun control nuts.
 
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.
That was rather weak... And even you know it. No “side” has ever had a monopoly on mass murder. It’s recorded in history going back to as far the Bronze Age and further. As for the body count... What has changed has much less to do with the politics involved, and more to do with the quantity of targets available, and the more technologically advanced methods developed by which to dispatch them.

Sorry.....after 1917 the worst mass murders in history have all been done by left wing socialilsts....yes, you have to try to hide that fact, but it is the truth......hitler, stalin, mao, pol pot, castro......killed close to 200 million people......in the modern age, not in the past.
No ones trying to hide the aforementioned atrocities. But there have been others that some conveniently choose to ignore based on "the score". Like Bosnia, which you handily pretend wasnt mentioned. 100 years is a tiny window of time in human history. And mass murder has been around, and in practice since before recorded history, and finds itself at home on any side willing to use it. And both sides have shown that willingness...


And again...mass murder has been a part of the human condition...but the worst mass murder in the modern age has all been committed by left wing socialists.....but keep trying to hide that fact.
So... some mass murders are "better" than some which are worse... interesting take....
 
is this a joke?

have you conveniently forgotten that it is ALWAYS "I'VE GOT A GUN and I WANT TO START A CIVIL WAR so i can KILL ME A LOT OF LIBERALS!"

with every trump supporter in the country?


Moron......since 1917 all the mass murder in the millions was committed by left wing socialists..........
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.



"

Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact."


Hitler was RIGHT WING.

so NOT ALL.


are you suggesting that all people who are NOT conservatives MUST BE LEFT WING FASCISTS?


are you aware of the fact that LOTS of decent people are MODERATES and OPPOSE BOTH LEFTWING AND RIGHT WING?


hitler was not "Right" wing, he was a left winger who believed in socialism.......

Nazism is Socialism -- F A Hayek, et al

One of the main reasons why the socialist character of National Socialism has been quite generally unrecognized, is, no doubt, its alliance with the nationalist groups which represent the great industries and the great landowners. But this merely proves that these groups too -as they have since learnt to their bitter disappointment -have, at least partly, been mistaken as to the nature of the movement. But only partly because -and this is the most characteristic feature of modern Germany – many capitalists are themselves strongly influenced by socialistic ideas, and have not sufficient belief in capitalism to defend it with a clear conscience. But, in spite of this, the German entrepreneur class have manifested almost incredible short-sightedness in allying themselves with a move movement of whose strong anti-capitalistic tendencies there should never have been any doubt.

A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extend directed against their economic policy. What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice -their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with “the golden International of Jewish Capitalism.”

It would, indeed, hardly have been possible for the Nationalists to advance fundamental objections to the economic policy of the other socialist parties when their own published programme differed from these only in that its socialism was much cruder and less rational. The famous 25 points drawn up by Herr Feder,[2] one of Hitler’s early allies, repeatedly endorsed by Hitler and recognized by the by-laws of the National-Socialist party as the immutable basis of all its actions, which together with an extensive commentary is circulating throughout Germany in many hundreds of thousands of copies, is full of ideas resembling those of the early socialists. But the dominant feature is a fierce hatred of anything capitalistic -individualistic profit seeking, large scale enterprise, banks, joint-stock companies, department stores, “international finance and loan capital,” the system of “interest slavery” in general; the abolition of these is described as the “[indecipherable] of the programme, around which everything else turns.” It was to this programme that the masses of the German people, who were already completely under the influence of collectivist ideas, responded so enthusiastically.

That this violent anti-capitalistic attack is genuine – and not a mere piece of propaganda – becomes as clear from the personal history of the intellectual leaders of the movement as from the general milieu from which it springs. It is not even denied that man of the young men who today play a prominent part in it have previously been communists or socialists. And to any observer of the literary tendencies which made the Germans intelligentsia ready to join the ranks of the new party, it must be clear that the common characteristic of all the politically influential writers – in many cases free from definite party affiliations – was their anti-liberal and anti-capitalist trend. Groups like that formed around the review “Die Tat” have made the phrase “the end of capitalism” an accepted dogma to most young Germans.[3]

And more...

The Myth of "Nazi Capitalism" | Chris Calton

German socialism, as Mises defines it, differs from what he called “socialism of the Russian pattern” in that “it, seemingly and nominally, maintains private ownership of the means of production, entrepreneurship, and market exchange.” However, this is only a superficial system of private ownership because through a complete system of economic intervention and control, the entrepreneurial function of the property owners is completely controlled by the State. By this, Mises means that shop owners do not speculate about future events for the purpose of allocating resources in the pursuit of profits. Just like in the Soviet Union, this entrepreneurial speculation and resource allocation is done by a single entity, the State, and economic calculation is thus impossible.

“In Nazi Germany,” Mises tells us, the property owners “were called shop managers or Betriebsführer. The government tells these seeming entrepreneurs what and how to produce, at what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to whom to sell. The government decrees at what wages labourers should work, and to whom and under what terms the capitalists should entrust their funds. Market exchange is but a sham. As all prices, wages and interest rates are fixed by the authority, they are prices, wages and interest rates in appearance only; in fact they are merely quantitative terms in the authoritarian orders determining each citizen’s income, consumption and standard of living. The authority, not the consumers, directs production. The central board of production management is supreme; all citizens are nothing else but civil servants. This is socialism with the outward appearance of capitalism. Some labels of the capitalistic market economy are retained, but they signify here something entirely different from what they mean in the market economy.”

Because Fascists were far smarter than modern Republicans, even if more evil.

Only a really dumb person wouldn't grasp that Capitalism has fostered Multiculturalism, Gay rights, Porn, Prostitution, Illicit Drug legalization, Hollywood, the Liberal media, Facebook etc.

Although, we don't know how evil Republicans can get.

Some Republicans do in fact support Israel just to bring in an Apocalypse.
Lets hope these degenerates are wrong.
 
The Bosnia conflict says otherwise. And cherry picking a window is a sleazy way of thumbing the scale. Dial the time frame back just a bit, and add native Americans and suddenly the left aren’t the only ones capable of mass murder. The point? Mass murder has been part of politics since man has had warfare and politics. No side has a patent on this rather brutally effective means of seizing power....


Yes....the indians committed mass murder and cannabilim...I agree....you have to go all the way back to that point to hide the fact that mass murder in the millions, since 1917, has all been done by left wing socialists......stalin, mao, pol pot, castro, hitler.........you can't hide that fact.
That was rather weak... And even you know it. No “side” has ever had a monopoly on mass murder. It’s recorded in history going back to as far the Bronze Age and further. As for the body count... What has changed has much less to do with the politics involved, and more to do with the quantity of targets available, and the more technologically advanced methods developed by which to dispatch them.

Sorry.....after 1917 the worst mass murders in history have all been done by left wing socialilsts....yes, you have to try to hide that fact, but it is the truth......hitler, stalin, mao, pol pot, castro......killed close to 200 million people......in the modern age, not in the past.
No ones trying to hide the aforementioned atrocities. But there have been others that some conveniently choose to ignore based on "the score". Like Bosnia, which you handily pretend wasnt mentioned. 100 years is a tiny window of time in human history. And mass murder has been around, and in practice since before recorded history, and finds itself at home on any side willing to use it. And both sides have shown that willingness...


And again...mass murder has been a part of the human condition...but the worst mass murder in the modern age has all been committed by left wing socialists.....but keep trying to hide that fact.

LMFAO.
So, the British Capitalists of the United Kingdom, and the United States haven't killed 10's of millions?
Who's being naive?
 

Forum List

Back
Top