It's Official. No Obama nominee

[paperview]

There is a story, ABCnews.com.co , that Obama has tapped Rashad Hussain

The site is NOT ABCnews

The story is that Obama appointed Hussain via executive order.

Talk about ignoring the Constitution!...lol

Right...sure he did.

What about The Constitution, now, sport?

http://abcnews.com.co/obama-signs-executive-order-appoints-rashad-hussain-as-supreme-court-justice/

Holy shit.

You fell for it.



A sucker born every day.

 

[JimH52]

I don't have to pretend. It's very obvious. The Original Intent was for the Senate to give Advice and Consent. They, like stubborn children, are doin

It says "and with the Advise and Consent". That means they give their permission. It is not mandated by the President.

But they aren't offering their Advice and Consent, now are they?

Since they aren't doing their duty, maybe Obama should just skip the part they are refusing to do?

Of course they giving advice and they advise that they aren't going to let Obama have his nominee.

Eternal chin McConnell hurt his party when he announced there would be no consideration.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

I don't have to pretend. It's very obvious. The Original Intent was for the Senate to give Advice and Consent. They, like stubborn children, are doin

It says "and with the Advise and Consent". That means they give their permission. It is not mandated by the President.

But they aren't offering their Advice and Consent, now are they?

Since they aren't doing their duty, maybe Obama should just skip the part they are refusing to do?

Of course they giving advice and they advise that they aren't going to let Obama have his nominee.

Eternal chin McConnell hurt his party when he announced there would be no consideration.

How so?

 

[Faun]

There is a story, ABCnews.com.co , that Obama has tapped Rashad Hussain

The site is NOT ABCnews

The story is that Obama appointed Hussain via executive order.

Talk about ignoring the Constitution!...lol

Right...sure he did.

What about The Constitution, now, sport?

http://abcnews.com.co/obama-signs-executive-order-appoints-rashad-hussain-as-supreme-court-justice/

Dumbfuck.

That's abcnews.com.co, The real ABC news is at abcnews.go.com

 

[paperview]

There is a story, ABCnews.com.co , that Obama has tapped Rashad Hussain

The site is NOT ABCnews

The story is that Obama appointed Hussain via executive order.

Talk about ignoring the Constitution!...lol

Right...sure he did.

What about The Constitution, now, sport?

http://abcnews.com.co/obama-signs-executive-order-appoints-rashad-hussain-as-supreme-court-justice/

Dumbfuck.

That's abcnews.com.co, The real ABC news is at abcnews.go.com

Damn. I wanted him to go on defending it, and showing what a full blown retard he is for falling for it.

Well, there's still a chance he might.lol

He linked to it even *after* being told it wasn't really ABC news.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

There is a story, ABCnews.com.co , that Obama has tapped Rashad Hussain

The site is NOT ABCnews

The story is that Obama appointed Hussain via executive order.

Talk about ignoring the Constitution!...lol

Right...sure he did.

What about The Constitution, now, sport?

http://abcnews.com.co/obama-signs-executive-order-appoints-rashad-hussain-as-supreme-court-justice/

Dumbfuck.

That's abcnews.com.co, The real ABC news is at abcnews.go.com

Oh well. It don't matter, anyway.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

He can take his choice and shove it up his islamic ass.

Nope.....you have no say in the matter. You are powerless even with your 214 IQ.

President Obama will do his job and appoint a Justice. Then it will be up to the Senate to do its job and either approve or reject that appointment. If they do nothing, then they fail to do their job as per the Constitution.

Please post the applicable constitutional article/section/paragraph that confirms your statement in regards to the Senate.

Kindly note post #32...where I copy the pertinent paragraph in the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 2.

I will proceed from the assumption that you have some actual knowledge of the English language.

"He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;"

This, obviously, means the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate present is required in order for the president to make a valid, binding treaty. Without it, he cannot.

Do you agree, or disagree? If disagree, please indicate the specific language that is the basis of your disagreement.

"and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall APPOINT (my emphasis) Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT (my emphasis), and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law"

Again, obviously, the president may nominate at will, but may not appoint without, again, the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate present.

Do you agree, or disagree? If disagree, please indicate the specific language that is the basis of your disagreement.

"but the Congress may, by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."

States that Congress may permit the president to fill vacancies in the "inferior" offices noted in the phrase on his own, but is not required to do so. Irrelevant to the question at hand.

So, this is your proof of your contention? If so, please indicate where in the article and section to which you referred the Senate is required to take any advise and consent action on a presidential nominee.

Be specific.

What is to respond to...You are proving my point. It is their job....the section of the Constitution you have quoted shows that that is their job. If they do not do their job, why are they even getting paid?

There is no constitutional requirement for the Senate to take any action whatsoever in the matter of Supreme Court Justice nominations.

I'm sorry to say so, bodecea, but in light of the exchange you strike me as no more than a common idiot with a draw string in the back.

No offense.

 

[bodecea]

President Obama should present his choice to the Senate soon...Then the Ball is in their court as to whether they do their job or not.

This makes the 2016 election one of the 3 most critical in US history. The next 100 years of our nation will be shaped by this election and historians will point to it as a major shift in our courts and foreign policy.

We must get the numbers out to vote Republican in 2016.

We hear that every 4 years.

He can take his choice and shove it up his islamic ass.

Nope.....you have no say in the matter. You are powerless even with your 214 IQ.

President Obama will do his job and appoint a Justice. Then it will be up to the Senate to do its job and either approve or reject that appointment. If they do nothing, then they fail to do their job as per the Constitution.

You don't understand the Constitution do you....?

I understand it quite well.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

There is a story, ABCnews.com.co , that Obama has tapped Rashad Hussain

The site is NOT ABCnews

The story is that Obama appointed Hussain via executive order.

Talk about ignoring the Constitution!...lol

Right...sure he did.

What about The Constitution, now, sport?

http://abcnews.com.co/obama-signs-executive-order-appoints-rashad-hussain-as-supreme-court-justice/

Dumbfuck.

That's abcnews.com.co, The real ABC news is at abcnews.go.com

Aren't you one of the cats that thinks that Joe McCarthy was chairman of the HUAC?

 

[jon_berzerk]

President Obama should present his choice to the Senate soon...Then the Ball is in their court as to whether they do their job or not.

This makes the 2016 election one of the 3 most critical in US history. The next 100 years of our nation will be shaped by this election and historians will point to it as a major shift in our courts and foreign policy.

We must get the numbers out to vote Republican in 2016.

We hear that every 4 years.

He can take his choice and shove it up his islamic ass.

Nope.....you have no say in the matter. You are powerless even with your 214 IQ.

President Obama will do his job and appoint a Justice. Then it will be up to the Senate to do its job and either approve or reject that appointment. If they do nothing, then they fail to do their job as per the Constitution.

You don't understand the Constitution do you....?

I understand it quite well.

maybe

however a president who ever that is

nominates someone for the position

it takes the president and congress to appoint that someone

 

[bodecea]

I don't have to pretend. It's very obvious. The Original Intent was for the Senate to give Advice and Consent. They, like stubborn children, are doin

It says "and with the Advise and Consent". That means they give their permission. It is not mandated by the President.

But they aren't offering their Advice and Consent, now are they?

Since they aren't doing their duty, maybe Obama should just skip the part they are refusing to do?

Of course they giving advice and they advise that they aren't going to let Obama have his nominee.

That will require a down vote...and that's ok.

No, not required.

Well, if they want to be known for not doing their job....like they can sit there all during their term and not vote for or against any bills either.....how does that look?

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

It says "and with the Advise and Consent". That means they give their permission. It is not mandated by the President.

But they aren't offering their Advice and Consent, now are they?

Since they aren't doing their duty, maybe Obama should just skip the part they are refusing to do?

Of course they giving advice and they advise that they aren't going to let Obama have his nominee.

That will require a down vote...and that's ok.

No, not required.

Well, if they want to be known for not doing their job....like they can sit there all during their term and not vote for or against any bills either.....how does that look?

They are doing their job. They're opposing Obamas communist agenda.

 

[HenryBHough]

He can certainly put forth a candidate.

He set's 'em up....

Senate knocks 'em down.

But surely he can come up with one candidate.

However twixt now and January, 2017 do you really think he can find about a dozen willing sacrificial lambs?

 

[bodecea]

I don't have to pretend. It's very obvious. The Original Intent was for the Senate to give Advice and Consent. They, like stubborn children, are doin

It says "and with the Advise and Consent". That means they give their permission. It is not mandated by the President.

But they aren't offering their Advice and Consent, now are they?

Since they aren't doing their duty, maybe Obama should just skip the part they are refusing to do?

Of course they giving advice and they advise that they aren't going to let Obama have his nominee.

Eternal chin McConnell hurt his party when he announced there would be no consideration.

The Republicans will become known as the Do-Nothing Party.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

He can certainly put forth a candidate.

He set's 'em up....

Senate knocks 'em down.

But surely he can come up with one candidate.

However twixt now and January, 2017 do you really think he can find about a dozen willing sacrificial lambs?

Good point. Who in their right mind would want to go through THAT colonoscopic gauntlet?

 

[jillian]

That's right. The Senate has just officially ruled they will not even consider any Obama SCJ nominee.
This means President Trump and his REP majority Senate will be able to choose, during President Trump's two terms about 5-6 REP SCJ's.
This will fundamentally affect the social direction of America for decades!
To GOD be the praise!
GOP Judiciary: No hearing on Obama court nominee
How did your "phone and pen" work out for you asshole?
If you hadn't acted like the piece of shit you are you may have had more cooperation across the aisle.
Hillary just got news today a judge has questioned her motive for having a secret private server hidden in her bathroom closet.
I give Hillary a couple of weeks before she drops out for 'health reasons'. Leaving Bernie to go against Trump.
Blame Debbie. She was the one who told Biden and Warren to piss off. "Theirs services were not required".

cool. the loons just guaranteed a huge democratic turn out and a democratic senate and president.

 

[jillian]

I don't have to pretend. It's very obvious. The Original Intent was for the Senate to give Advice and Consent. They, like stubborn children, are doin

It says "and with the Advise and Consent". That means they give their permission. It is not mandated by the President.

But they aren't offering their Advice and Consent, now are they?

Since they aren't doing their duty, maybe Obama should just skip the part they are refusing to do?

Of course they giving advice and they advise that they aren't going to let Obama have his nominee.

Eternal chin McConnell hurt his party when he announced there would be no consideration.

The Republicans will become known as the Do-Nothing Party.

become?

 

[jon_berzerk]

the libtard crystal ball comes out again

--LOL

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

I don't have to pretend. It's very obvious. The Original Intent was for the Senate to give Advice and Consent. They, like stubborn children, are doin

It says "and with the Advise and Consent". That means they give their permission. It is not mandated by the President.

But they aren't offering their Advice and Consent, now are they?

Since they aren't doing their duty, maybe Obama should just skip the part they are refusing to do?

Of course they giving advice and they advise that they aren't going to let Obama have his nominee.

Eternal chin McConnell hurt his party when he announced there would be no consideration.

The Republicans will become known as the Do-Nothing Party.

And that's fine, because most Americans don't want a nanny state.

 

[jon_berzerk]

It says "and with the Advise and Consent". That means they give their permission. It is not mandated by the President.

But they aren't offering their Advice and Consent, now are they?

Since they aren't doing their duty, maybe Obama should just skip the part they are refusing to do?

Of course they giving advice and they advise that they aren't going to let Obama have his nominee.

Eternal chin McConnell hurt his party when he announced there would be no consideration.

The Republicans will become known as the Do-Nothing Party.

And that's fine, because most Americans don't want a nanny state.

but they are doing something