Javelins cost 100x more than the T72 they destroy. How much money are we wasting in Ukraine?

Ukraine definitely isn't going to pay. So every dollar spent in Ukraine is a a dollar wasted against about $0.015 cents. Since Russia spends 80th on their weapons that we do.

A javelin, as an example, is worth 100x more per shot than a T82B3 tank.

Let that sink in.
Russia is going to prevail in Ukraine ...

They have tens of thousands of throw away tanks and vehicles that they can continue to send and send and send till the cows come home.
Admittedly they are not cutting edge but volume is an edge all to itself.

JO
 
Russia interfered in the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections as well as many more, the Anti-Vietnam "peace" movement was almost entirely funded by the Soviet GRU (military intelligence). So, distracting them from interfering with the US is a good thing.
China does much much more interference than Russia ever did and they do it all the time.
 
Pure nonsense.

Russia is a petro state

And the Hunter laptop is "Russian Disinformation."

Yes, you Nazis lie, we get it.


1649943017204.png
 
Russia is going to prevail in Ukraine ...

They have tens of thousands of throw away tanks and vehicles that they can continue to send and send and send till the cows come home.
Admittedly they are not cutting edge but volume is an edge all to itself.

JO

I think that may have been Putin's plan, He want's to be Stalin, but he isn't. Slaughtering tens of thousands of young Russian men in those tanks isn't as easy for him as he thought it would be. The Russian people are not as willing to let their sons die as they were under Stalin.
 
And the Hunter laptop is "Russian Disinformation."

Yes, you Nazis lie, we get it.


View attachment 630530
The FACT that Russia is a petro state (so obviously NOT pushing the Green movement) has nothing to do with some laptop

But I guess when you're shown to be stupid you have to say something
 
The FACT that Russia is a petro state (so obviously NOT pushing the Green movement) has nothing to do with some laptop

But I guess when you're shown to be stupid you have to say something


The FACT that Russia was behind the Green Movement is fully documented.

Going all the way back to Gorbachev.

{Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection campaign group published a green paper in 2009, making a starry pitch for management of the .eco domain, and taking on a rival bid by Canadian company Big Room. That bid is supported by Gorbachev-founded charity Green Cross International. But the Guardian has learned that Gore's group has quietly dropped its plan, leaving the door open for Big Room to act as the registry for the new domain. The former US vice president delivered a speech on climate change to the Scottish Low Carbon Investment Conference on Wednesday morning.}


1649943875426.png
 
The FACT that Russia was behind the Green Movement is fully documented.

Going all the way back to Gorbachev.

{Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection campaign group published a green paper in 2009, making a starry pitch for management of the .eco domain, and taking on a rival bid by Canadian company Big Room. That bid is supported by Gorbachev-founded charity Green Cross International. But the Guardian has learned that Gore's group has quietly dropped its plan, leaving the door open for Big Room to act as the registry for the new domain. The former US vice president delivered a speech on climate change to the Scottish Low Carbon Investment Conference on Wednesday morning.}


View attachment 630541
“Agenda 21”

Yea. No crazy there
 
“Agenda 21”

Yea. No crazy there

{Agenda 21 policies date back to the 1970's but it got its real start in 1992 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro when President Bush signed onto it. President Clinton signed it later and continued the program in the United States. Agenda 21 is 'soft-law' and did not have to be voted on by the Congress. A non-governmental organization called the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives, ICLEI, is tasked with carrying out the goals of Agenda 21. Over 600 cities in the U.S. are members, and that number is growing. The costs are paid by taxpayers.}

Okay?

You seemed to be implying something. A UN resolution is "crazy?"
 
Ukraine definitely isn't going to pay. So every dollar spent in Ukraine is a a dollar wasted against about $0.015 cents. Since Russia spends 80th on their weapons that we do.

A javelin, as an example, is worth 100x more per shot than a T82B3 tank.

Let that sink in.
You're upset that your armor is being destroyed quite handily. Whatever the cost, it is worth it.

And don't even try this "we" shit here, comrade. You were an easy one to uncover.
 
Nowadays I would rather have my tax money go to help the Ukrainians fight the Russians than to have it go to provide welfare for the goddamn Illegals, or provide sex change operations for military personnel or for some stupid worthless Environmental Wacko project.
 
Russia is going to prevail in Ukraine ...

They have tens of thousands of throw away tanks and vehicles that they can continue to send and send and send till the cows come home.
Admittedly they are not cutting edge but volume is an edge all to itself.

JO
The Russian do have a lot of tanks. Most of which won’t run and would take tens of thousands of dollars each to repair. Even if they did, they don’t have the skilled crews to man those tanks and even Russian tanks are very complicated machines that need a lot of skilled maintenance every day to keep operational. The way Russian tanks are designed, the crews usually don’t survive the destruction of their tank. That’s three dead, expensively trained crewman foe each knocked out tank.
 
China does much much more interference than Russia ever did and they do it all the time.
China’s interference is more subtle, it tends to make small, long term “investments” in politicians across the board to get desired outcomes in the future like tech transfers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top