Jihadi demand apology from Spain

Moops? really? They were Berbers actually (with a few Arabs) and the only reason they succeeded was the fact that the Visigothic "apartheid" kingdom could not rely on it's subjects to support it. The Visigoths conquered Roman Iberia in the first place and ruled for 300-odd years; the Muslims ruled Andalusia for around 700 years. The Muslims did not expel anyone and created one of the most advanced and, for a time one, of the most tolerant societies in Western Europe. The reconquista on the other hand, created one of the most repressive and bigoted regimes in history, so yes, an aplogy is justified
 
Last edited:
An apology for actions from over 5 centuries ago?
Good gawd those muzzies are sensitive little inbreds and child fuckers
 
No more than any other group that has been persecuted throughout the ages. Anyway, what's wrong with showing remorse for a wrong doing? Isn't that a Christian thing?
 
No more than any other group that has been persecuted throughout the ages. Anyway, what's wrong with showing remorse for a wrong doing? Isn't that a Christian thing?


The jihadi, the muslims were the wrongdoers in Spain. They invaded and subjugated the Hispanic people, not vice versa and they shouldn't be offended by the fact they were thrown out of the country.

If America was invaded like this, I would think we would respond the same way
 
No more than any other group that has been persecuted throughout the ages. Anyway, what's wrong with showing remorse for a wrong doing? Isn't that a Christian thing?


The jihadi, the muslims were the wrongdoers in Spain. They invaded and subjugated the Hispanic people, not vice versa and they shouldn't be offended by the fact they were thrown out of the country.

If America was invaded like this, I would think we would respond the same way

Wrong again, the Berbers took Iberia from the Visigoths who subjugated the "Hispanic people", who drove out the Vandals who subjugated the "Hispanic people", who took it from the Romans who subjugated the "Hispanic people"; just another regime change for the natives. When the Catholics "reconquered" the place, however they expelled any Muslim and Jewish "Hispanic people" they came across or forced them to convert.

By your logic if the native Americans reconquered America from the European invaders and immigrants, you wouldn't be offended. OK.
 
Moops? really? They were Berbers actually (with a few Arabs) and the only reason they succeeded was the fact that the Visigothic "apartheid" kingdom could not rely on it's subjects to support it. The Visigoths conquered Roman Iberia in the first place and ruled for 300-odd years; the Muslims ruled Andalusia for around 700 years. The Muslims did not expel anyone and created one of the most advanced and, for a time one, of the most tolerant societies in Western Europe. The reconquista on the other hand, created one of the most repressive and bigoted regimes in history, so yes, an aplogy is justified
bunch of 19c myths.
1) "the most tolerant societies" as well as one of the most tyrannic ,it depends on which time and which Islamic state we refer to.
2) why Jews didn´t want to leave it? and still speak a form of Castilian ? + its clear that Ottoman empire was a &hitt hole compere to Spain , and many left very soon the leading Islamic state at that time for Holland, Italy , etc.
 

Forum List

Back
Top