Jim Jordan's Twitter Hearing Backfires Spectacularly

[Dragonlady]

I can only image your disappointment when Mueller testified. After over a year of excitement screaming Muellers a bulldog we gottem now and Mueller looks almost as clueless as Ten Years Of Oil *Joe! It was absolutely hilarious. You keep hanging on to that report now.
HahahahhaahahhaHAaaaa!

Nobody really believes it was Russian disinformation except for the OP and his leftist friends.

The entire WORLD believes these facts. The only people dumb enough to deny the obvious are the people who get their news from billionaire globalists who want the USA controlled by a white nationalist authoritarian.

 

[Dragonlady]

Oh stfu misinformation queen

Do you have any evidence to back up your insults? You’re the guy who said that the Russian people wouldn’t have been fooled by the disinformation campaign of 2016. That tells us all we need to know about you.

 

[otto105]

You think it’s funny this racist voted for blackface?

I find it funny that you post such racist shit.

 

[jc456]

Do you have any evidence to back up your insults? You’re the guy who said that the Russian people wouldn’t have been fooled by the disinformation campaign of 2016. That tells us all we need to know about you.

Russia wasn’t voting

 

[otto105]

Russia wasn’t voting

Russia doesn’t vote.

They sign loyalty oaths to dear leader.

 

[gipper]

Thank you for admitting YOU were duped. And you continue to believe Trump's lies.

Like I said. Republicans lie to you because you'll believe ANYTHING they tell you.

I don’t believe anything Trump says. I’m not an R. You know this. You can’t even get along with someone who has stated numerous times Trump is a lying corrupt buffoon.

You shit libs are the worst.

 

[Clipper]

He's the son of a presidential nominee, dumbass.

So?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

I find it funny that you post such racist shit.

Feeeelings aren’t facts.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[Aldo Raine]

Did the Russians fake the nude pics of Hunter?
The pics of him smoking crack?

When did Hunter become part of the government?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

The so-called "established rules" are merely a blank check for Twitter to ban whatever it likes.

Then don't use it. Problem solved.

 

[otto105]

Feeeelings aren’t facts.

It's not a feeling.

It was a statement.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

When did Hunter become part of the government?

Never.

 

[Care4all]

Only if you are a revisionist. They admitted to covering up the Hunter Biden story and silencing right wing sources

Is that why at the NY POST, the Hunter Biden October Surprise article was the most read article in a 7 day period after release, in the Post's HISTORY?

Twitter holding back the article for two days, actually ten folded the readership! There was ZERO silencing! The Streisand Effect, happened! Look up the term!

Oh, and Twitter made their own decision to hold the article and links to it back. No one held a gun to Twitter's head from Trump's FBI....they are a private company, with free will to make the final call.... There is nothing illegal you can get anyone on! The gov't influencing or even giving an impression that turns out to be wrong is not a crime. Twitter still makes their own final decisions, with no fear of government reprimand, so no 1st amendment violation....imo.

 

[366h34d]

When did Hunter become part of the government?

All the time, he had been selling his dad and gov't info.

 

[366h34d]

Is that why at the NY POST, the Hunter Biden October Surprise article was the most read article in a 7 day period after release, in the Post's HISTORY?

Twitter holding back the article for two days, actually ten folded the readership! There was ZERO silencing! The Streisand Effect, happened! Look up the term!

Oh, and Twitter made their own decision to hold the article and links to it back. No one held a gun to Twitter's head from Trump's FBI....they are a private company, with free will to make the final call.... There is nothing illegal you can get anyone on! The gov't influencing or even giving an impression that turns out to be wrong is not a crime. Twitter still makes their own final decisions, with no fear of government reprimand, so no 1st amendment violation....imo.

Twitter held back the article and more readership is a different matter, and they were not "cause and effect".

In terms of the FBI and Twitter, it is either a 1st amendment or free press issue.

 

[otto105]

All the time, he had been selling his dad and gov't info.

And that was,,,,?

 

[otto105]

Twitter held back the article and more readership is a different matter, and they were not "cause and effect".

In terms of the FBI and Twitter, it is either a 1st amendment or free press issue.

Nope

 

[Aldo Raine]

All the time, he had been selling his dad and gov't info.

And of course you are the 1 that has real and verifiable proof of this. Why are you withholding this information from the courts? You do know that this is a crime, correct?