Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think you're a fool, Bulldog. You think you're accomplishing something because you might keep Trump from winning another term. What you're really doing is taking that choice out of the hands of the people and putting it in the hands of liberal DA's from liberal cities and States. We've NEVER done anything like this and with good reason! It's a slippery slope that you've pushed us all onto. At the bottom of that slope are places like Russia, China and Cuba.Trump practised that look in front of a mirror because he thinks it makes him look tough. It makes him look like he has gas.
So it is okay to subvert an election with fake electors?Wrong. They trial is an assault against the rule of law.
Alternate electors are one part of the process if you're challenging an election, Billo. Not illegal no matter what you call them.So it is okay to subvert an election with fake electors?
After the vote was certified, Trump tried to introduce fake electors.Alternate electors are one part of the process if you're challenging an election, Billo. Not illegal no matter what you call them.
You keep trying to call them fake electors, Billo. They were alternate electors. Which electors are the ones that count are then decided by the courts. It's how our system works and it's how it's worked for a long time.After the vote was certified, Trump tried to introduce fake electors.
"Fake electors" is your bogus term, not mine.So it is okay to subvert an election with fake electors?
Preventing trump from ever holding another office is an honorable goal.I think you're a fool, Bulldog. You think you're accomplishing something because you might keep Trump from winning another term. What you're really doing is taking that choice out of the hands of the people and putting it in the hands of liberal DA's from liberal cities and States. We've NEVER done anything like this and with good reason! It's a slippery slope that you've pushed us all onto. At the bottom of that slope are places like Russia, China and Cuba.
Nothing “honorable” about it, you hack. If you don’t like him, or if you don’t trust him or if you don’t believe he can be a good President, then don’t vote for him. But that’s not what vermin such as you are about. You scumbags don’t want me to have my ability to vote for him.Preventing trump from ever holding another office is an honorable goal.
Normally. But when you substitute partisan political persecution for the fair and just administration of our laws, you do manage to insert yourself improperly into the process.District attorneys have no part in our choice of qualified candidates.
Allegedly.Their job is to prosecute those who have broken laws.
You keep forgetting that uniquely American word: “allegedly” you hack.In this case, those that have broken laws happen to be politicions.
Derp.Running for office doesn't make you immune from facing our legal responsibilities.
By denying the voters their right to select the candidate of their choice? How is that "honorable"? If you don't like Trump? Defeat him at the ballot box and do it on the up and up. Don't hide information about his opponent from the voters. Don't smear him with made up "dossiers"! THAT is honorable!Preventing trump from ever holding another office is an honorable goal.
District attorneys have no part in our choice of qualified candidates. Their job is to prosecute those who have broken laws. In this case, those that have broken laws happen to be politicions. Running for office doesn't make you immune from facing our legal responsibilities.
Nothing “honorable” about it, you hack. If you don’t like him, or if you don’t trust him or if you don’t believe he can be a good President, then don’t vote for him. But that’s not what vermin such as you are about. You scumbags don’t want me to have my ability to vote for him.
Don’t try to seriously discuss our alleged “democracy” ever again. You’re not up to it.
Normally. But when you substitute partisan political persecution for the fair and just administration of our laws, you do manage to insert yourself improperly into the process.
Allegedly.
You keep forgetting that uniquely American word: “allegedly” you hack.
Derp.
Preventing trump from ever holding another office is an honorable goal.
District attorneys have no part in our choice of qualified candidates. Their job is to prosecute those who have broken laws. In this case, those that have broken laws happen to be politicions. Running for office doesn't make you immune from facing our legal responsibilities.
Nothing certain about that claim. It is, in fact, simply and fully wrong.It is certainly honorable to prevent a candidate who isn't qualified for the office from running.
Gee. You finally figured out that have a right to vote for him. Good for you. But who determines who is “found” to be qualified? You?You have every right to vote for him if he is found qualified to hold the job.
Yes. Even you should know by now.The requirements to run for president have been well known for a very long time.
Of course, in legal terms, he is only allegidly guilty of the crimes he is being charged with.
He hasn’t been convicted of any crimes at all, ever.That's why he isn't in prison, and is still a candidate for the republican/MAGA nomination,
Possibly or probably even after a conviction.and will remain as such at least until judgement of his alleged crimes is determined.
Irrelevant.Most believe he will be found guilty.
I don't know of any liberal candidate who instigated a seditous insurrection. Please point out the liberal candidate you think is guilty of that.If this was being done to a liberal you'd be foaming at the mouth, Bulldog! Can you imagine if the GOP had brought Hillary up on charges over her email scandal and then forced her to defend against multiple charges in multiple conservative strongholds in front of conservative judges in the middle of a campaign? You'd be screaming at the top of your lungs at how unfair it all was! You know you would.
Nothing certain about that claim. It is, in fact, simply and fully wrong.
Gee. You finally figured out that have a right to vote for him. Good for you. But who determines who is “found” to be qualified? You?
Yes. Even you should know by now.
Wrong. He is presumed not to have allegedly done anything criminal.
He hasn’t been convicted of any crimes at all, ever.
Possibly or probably even after a conviction.
Irrelevant.
Did they claim they were certified by the state?After the vote was certified, Trump tried to introduce fake electors.
That's a big fat lie.1. the judge will find him guilty or innocent.
2. From the 1980s until he was elected president in 2016, Donald John Trump Sr. and his businesses were involved in over 4,000 legal cases in U.S. federal and state courts, including battles with casino patrons, million-dollar real estate lawsuits, personal defamation lawsuits, and over 100 business tax disputes. Since then, he and people representing him and on his orders have been found guilty of lots of crimes, including sexual assault.
3. The requirements mentioned before will determine if he is qualified to run.
You are grabbing at straws. It's fully understood how the illegal scam was intended to work. It's a little late for you to try to nit pick facts to make it sound less illegal.Did they claim they were certified by the state?
No laws were broken, douchebag.You are grabbing at straws. It's fully understood how the illegal scam was intended to work. It's a little late for you to try to nit pick facts to make it sound less illegal.
Which part do you disagree with, and why?That's a big fat lie.
Your opinion is noted. What do you think is the judges opinion, and why?No laws were broken, douchebag.
