Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before hearing

[Cecilie1200]

Totally crazy how we want to give him due process and give her an opportunity to make her claim.

Funny how you don't want that. It's almost like you do t care about a fair hearing

Due process requires an investigation, fool.

Ummmm, no, no it doesn't

Sure it does. A single hearing with two witnesses does not get to any of the facts.
An investigation will.

What are you afraid of?

investigate what exactly? can someone ask this punk, it's obvious he has me on ignore.

investigate what exactly? can someone ask this punk, it's obvious he has me on ignore.

Investigate the allegations, of course, dope.

I tend to ignore retarded questions.

So what you're telling us is that you think the FBI should descend en masse on the state of Maryland and go from door to door, asking every resident over the age of 45 or so if they know anything about a drunken teenaged house party anywhere in the state during June, July, and August of the year 1982 that might possibly have had Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Ford at it? Because honestly, I'm not seeing anything more specific and focused that could be done, based on what Dr. Ford has offered so far.

 

[Auld Phart]

It's amazing that the party that impeached the president over a consensual blow job is totally ok with nominating someone who is accused of attempted rape to sit on the Supreme Court.

Let that hypocrisy sink in.

think the key word there is...accused.

of something that MAY have happened 36 years ago.

 

[Pop23]

It's amazing that the party that impeached the president over a consensual blow job is totally ok with nominating someone who is accused of attempted rape to sit on the Supreme Court.

Let that hypocrisy sink in.

One is an admitted proven Fact, the other is a weak accusation with no evidence.

Let your stupidity sink in.

 

[Cecilie1200]

we can dump Kavanaugh and have an equally conservative nominee in 10 seconds. problem solved!

/——/ No we can’t do that. No reason for Kavanaugh to drop out. Libtards will do the same thing with the next appointee.

And yet, oddly, none of this occurred for Yeti Pube's last nominee, Gorsuch.

Are we supposed to be impressed that the left's current level of insanity has only developed recently?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So let the FBI investigate. Lying to the FBI is a felony.

There is nothing to investigate

No charges can be brought and this type of alleged crime is not the purview of the FBI

It's not a criminal investigation, dope.
It's a follow up to his background investigation.

What is Ms. Ford asking for? An FBI investigation. Essentially of the criminal variety.

Or have you been too busy reveling in this spectacle to pay any attention?

It can't be criminal, fool. Its not a federal crime and has long since been past the statute of limitations.

It would simply be a follow up to the background investigation focused on the allegation.

Then tell me, Hutch, what point would there be in bringing this up if the statutes of limitation have already expired? You can't charge him with a crime under state or federal law.

Honest question: What other reason would there be for it to be brought up? Political assassination perhaps?

WTF? Seriously?

You don't believe that if there is any validity to these claims that it would bring the character of the nominee into question at all?

 

[Cecilie1200]

We do know. She's lying. That's as obvious as the sun rising in the East. You only help the barbarians by saying you don't know if she's lying.

So let the FBI investigate. Lying to the FBI is a felony.

There is nothing to investigate

No charges can be brought and this type of alleged crime is not the purview of the FBI

It's not a criminal investigation, dope.
It's a follow up to his background investigation.

What is Ms. Ford asking for? An FBI investigation. Essentially of the criminal variety.

Or have you been too busy reveling in this spectacle to pay any attention?

It can't be criminal, fool. Its not a federal crime and has long since been past the statute of limitations.

It would simply be a follow up to the background investigation focused on the allegation.

Nope. Still not their job.

 

[jc456]

It's amazing that the party that impeached the president over a consensual blow job is totally ok with nominating someone who is accused of attempted rape to sit on the Supreme Court.

Let that hypocrisy sink in.

No they didn’t impeach anyone over a bj. Dude, can’t you discuss facts?

 

[JWBooth]

Mazie Hirono Says It's 'Bulls**t' That GOP Has Tried Everything To Contact Kavanaugh Accuser

So sad. So true.

Mazie Hirono is a Pearl City whore.

 

[jc456]

There is nothing to investigate

No charges can be brought and this type of alleged crime is not the purview of the FBI

It's not a criminal investigation, dope.
It's a follow up to his background investigation.

What is Ms. Ford asking for? An FBI investigation. Essentially of the criminal variety.

Or have you been too busy reveling in this spectacle to pay any attention?

It can't be criminal, fool. Its not a federal crime and has long since been past the statute of limitations.

It would simply be a follow up to the background investigation focused on the allegation.

Then tell me, Hutch, what point would there be in bringing this up if the statutes of limitation have already expired? You can't charge him with a crime under state or federal law.

Honest question: What other reason would there be for it to be brought up? Political assassination perhaps?

WTF? Seriously?

You don't believe that if there is any validity to these claims that it would bring the character of the nominee into question at all?

Post the issue first!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The FBI investigated Rob Porter.

The FBI did a background check on Rob Porter, the same as they did on Brett Kavanaugh. Had your sainted accuser ever bothered to report the incident away back then, the FBI would have found it and reported it to the White House in his background check.

You will notice that what the FBI did NOT do with Rob Porter was investigate the allegations as a criminal matter. That would be because the allegations did not involve a federal crime.

No one said they did a criminal investigation, dope. What they DID do was to open a follow up investigation into the allegations made by his ex-wives. The findings led to his later dissmissal.

 

[Pop23]

There is nothing to investigate

No charges can be brought and this type of alleged crime is not the purview of the FBI

It's not a criminal investigation, dope.
It's a follow up to his background investigation.

What is Ms. Ford asking for? An FBI investigation. Essentially of the criminal variety.

Or have you been too busy reveling in this spectacle to pay any attention?

It can't be criminal, fool. Its not a federal crime and has long since been past the statute of limitations.

It would simply be a follow up to the background investigation focused on the allegation.

Then tell me, Hutch, what point would there be in bringing this up if the statutes of limitation have already expired? You can't charge him with a crime under state or federal law.

Honest question: What other reason would there be for it to be brought up? Political assassination perhaps?

WTF? Seriously?

You don't believe that if there is any validity to these claims that it would bring the character of the nominee into question at all?

You can call EVERYONES character into question. The FBI did six investigations into him. EACH SHOWED HIM OF EXTREMELY GOOD CHARACTER.

God you people are fucked in the head.

 

[Cecilie1200]

If you cannot keep your story straight I get why you dont want to testify.

She has never said she doesn't want to testify, she just wants the FBI to conduct interviews and present facts. The only person who, so far, refuses to testify is Bart O'Kavanagh's blackout buddy.

Are you aware that no one else in this country gets to specify how the authorities handle their allegations of criminal activity, based on "I just want"? Why is it, precisely, that Dr. Ford is so much more special than the other 300 million-plus people who live in this country, and deserves extra-special rights?

The only investigatory body which properly and legally has jurisdiction over her accusations at this point is the Senate Judiciary Committee. THEY, not she, determine whether and how her accusations will be handled. The FBI is not her personal private detective agency, and they're not yours, to be dispatched to do her bidding because she "demands" it.

The proper response to her outrageously arrogant demands and conditions is for the Committee to say, "Either you show up and answer our questions on Monday, or never. Piss or get off the pot."

 

[jc456]

The FBI investigated Rob Porter.

The FBI did a background check on Rob Porter, the same as they did on Brett Kavanaugh. Had your sainted accuser ever bothered to report the incident away back then, the FBI would have found it and reported it to the White House in his background check.

You will notice that what the FBI did NOT do with Rob Porter was investigate the allegations as a criminal matter. That would be because the allegations did not involve a federal crime.

No one said they did a criminal investigation, dope. What they DID do was to open a follow up investigation into the allegations made by his ex-wives. The findings led to his later dissmissal.

What did the ex wives do first?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

LOL

The complete lack of knowledge of how the legal system works is utterly astounding. Even Ford's "lawyers" know full well that such an accusation can only be tried in the state in which it occurred. Rape is not a federal crime, it never will be until appropriate legislation is passed to codify it into federal statutes. It is a state crime.

Are any of you liberal lemmings paying attention?

No one is asking for a criminal investigation, dope.

Okay, so what are they asking for then? Why do they want the FBI to be involved?

The FBI conducted the background investigation on Kav. Obviously this allegation comes from his background. Investigating this would only be a continuation of that process.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Why would you seat a man who is accused of sexual assault without looking into it?
Does that seem responsible to you?

At this point, after he's been so thoroughly checked out by the FBI and there is no pattern of sexual abuse in his life (such as what we see in Bubba Clinton's life), there would have to be very clear and compelling evidence to overcome the obvious last minute partisan nature of the allegation. At the VERY least, one would expect the accuser to leap at the chance to tell her story in public. Instead, she's trying to dictate to whom she'll talk and who she'd allow to investigate her claims. It just doesn't work that way. One would also expect that the issue would have been raised during the hearing, when it was appropriate to ask questions. Waiting until now has severely, if not fatally, damaged the allegation.

So, minus more compelling evidence, Kavenaugh should be confirmed as originally planned. He has a great record and is eminently qualified, garnering praise from both sides of the aisle.

There doesn't need to ne a pattern of behavior for this incident to have occured as described.

Any compelling evidence might never come to light without an investigation.

You're a broken record. There's nothing to investigate.

Sure, dope.

You know all there is to know.

Sounds like you do too. Smartass. It's like you're in her...head, or something.

I certainly know that no one is asking for a criminal investigation, dope.

 

[jc456]

LOL

The complete lack of knowledge of how the legal system works is utterly astounding. Even Ford's "lawyers" know full well that such an accusation can only be tried in the state in which it occurred. Rape is not a federal crime, it never will be until appropriate legislation is passed to codify it into federal statutes. It is a state crime.

Are any of you liberal lemmings paying attention?

No one is asking for a criminal investigation, dope.

Okay, so what are they asking for then? Why do they want the FBI to be involved?

The FBI conducted the background investigation on Kav. Obviously this allegation comes from his background. Investigating this would only be a continuation of that process.

They are done! This allegation never came up.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's not about justice, fool.
It's about finding the facts.

its about delay n block. thats it.

Well, there's a credible allegation of sexual assault as well. That needs to be addressed.

Credible? In what way?

How is it not?
Where has it been disproven?

Better question:

Where has it been proven?

It hasn't, dope. That's the point.

Hence the need for the FBI to look into it.

Derp.....

 

[jc456]

At this point, after he's been so thoroughly checked out by the FBI and there is no pattern of sexual abuse in his life (such as what we see in Bubba Clinton's life), there would have to be very clear and compelling evidence to overcome the obvious last minute partisan nature of the allegation. At the VERY least, one would expect the accuser to leap at the chance to tell her story in public. Instead, she's trying to dictate to whom she'll talk and who she'd allow to investigate her claims. It just doesn't work that way. One would also expect that the issue would have been raised during the hearing, when it was appropriate to ask questions. Waiting until now has severely, if not fatally, damaged the allegation.

So, minus more compelling evidence, Kavenaugh should be confirmed as originally planned. He has a great record and is eminently qualified, garnering praise from both sides of the aisle.

There doesn't need to ne a pattern of behavior for this incident to have occured as described.

Any compelling evidence might never come to light without an investigation.

You're a broken record. There's nothing to investigate.

Sure, dope.

You know all there is to know.

Sounds like you do too. Smartass. It's like you're in her...head, or something.

I certainly know that no one is asking for a criminal investigation, dope.

No ones doing any investigation either.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Ford’s lawyers released a letter to committee chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), CNN reported, calling for an investigation to “ensure the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner and that the committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decision.”

Speaking with CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Tuesday, attorney Lisa Banks reiterated that her client was “prepared to cooperate with the committee and with any law enforcement investigation.”

Christine Blasey Ford Calls On FBI To Investigate Kavanaugh Accusation Before Hearing

Good for her! Even Kavanaugh should want a thorough investigation - otherwise this cloud of doubt and suspicion will hang over him.

Fuck that bitch. She can’t even provide enough information to start an investigation. Like where? When? Who was there?

She has clearly stated all such information.

"Sometime in the 80s, some house near a country club don't know whose, I have no idea how I got there, some party don't know who was there."

Yeah, very clearly stated. Uh huh.

some house near a country club don't know whose, I have no idea how I got there,

Do you imagine the FBI would question a house, dope?

She's already named who was there.

She better hurry and testify then. Three of her four witnesses have already said they have no idea what this crazy broad is talking about, Her friend said she has nothing bad to say about Kav and no knowledge of this party. Even a random wanna in get in the action chick took down her post saying she doesn't know anything.

That's a hell of a witness list there inspector.

 

[jc456]

its about delay n block. thats it.

Well, there's a credible allegation of sexual assault as well. That needs to be addressed.

Credible? In what way?

How is it not?
Where has it been disproven?

Better question:

Where has it been proven?

It hasn't, dope. That's the point.

Hence the need for the FBI to look into it.

Derp.....

Sure it was proven. Nothing found in the fbi background checks. You’re confused