bendog
Diamond Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 46,279
- 9,696
no, no, no. She could be a adultering lesbian sodomizer for all anyone cares. But, since she's holding herself out as the arbitrar of whom Christ would allow to marry, she needs to stick th HIS LAW. And, she's an adulter who could not legally remarry after divorce, according to Jesus.By this post you have made are you telling the world that you believe in the Bible and all of the Words in it?Kee-rect. She is an adulteress. She also grants licenses to other adulterers. This is how we know this isn't about religion or faith or the bible. She is putting a stain on all these things with her deception, and the rubes are being led astray by her.
From Christ's mouth to Kim Davis's ear: [A]nyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.
Therefore, Kim Davis should not be granting marriage licenses to anyone who has divorced.
Coming in at Number 7 on the TOP TEN SINS:
Thou shalt not commit adultery.
For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
How long ago did she get a divorce?
How long has she been married to the husband she has now?
She has been a Christian for four years.
Jesus never said that.
You are all spouting things that you know nothing about.
It's naught how long the lass's been a believer! Gahd did not countenance anahy of her davorces. She cah-naught remarry, for she was naught ever unmarried. It matters not whether or when she called hersef a beleiver or naugnt. What matters is NOW, and the lass is FORNICATING in an adulterus union that cah-naught be sancitoned by the Risen Lord!
Read the part of the bible that says when you are allowed to divorce. smart aleck.
Larhd Chreest gave only tha grand of unchastity!