SassyIrishLass
Diamond Member
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,945
- 73,303
- 3,605
LOL, lassieno, no, no. She could be a adultering lesbian sodomizer for all anyone cares. But, since she's holding herself out as the arbitrar of whom Christ would allow to marry, she needs to stick th HIS LAW. And, she's an adulter who could not legally remarry after divorce, according to Jesus.By this post you have made are you telling the world that you believe in the Bible and all of the Words in it?Kee-rect. She is an adulteress. She also grants licenses to other adulterers. This is how we know this isn't about religion or faith or the bible. She is putting a stain on all these things with her deception, and the rubes are being led astray by her.Now let's be fair. If she's truly repented her adultery ..... wait. Since the Bible prohibits divorcees from remarrying because they couldn't get divorced in the first place .... she's always in a state of adultery. Mon Dieu, she's in trouble.
From Christ's mouth to Kim Davis's ear: [A]nyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.
Therefore, Kim Davis should not be granting marriage licenses to anyone who has divorced.
Coming in at Number 7 on the TOP TEN SINS:
Thou shalt not commit adultery.
For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
Your lack of Biblical knowledge is astounding.
Matthew 5:32 - But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
You can't base the entire Bible and belief on one verse, she wasn't a Christian when she obtained a divorce, divorce is allowed in the Church under certain circumstances anyway. You all are all over the map with your nonsense on this one and the butt hurt is real