bendog
Diamond Member
Biblically, the only gound for divorce was unchastity, which I doubt the had three times previously. Even if she married the fourth time before adopting her view of religion, her current marriage is adulterous, because she could not remarry, yet she remains in the marriage apparantly enjoying the fruit thereof, which is itself adultery.She's picking one sin to be ok, adultery, and trying to block another, sodomy. And she herself is living in sin, yet setting herself above the sodomites. I think that'd be hubris.You must have a literacy problem, she is not the sodomite here.That'd be fine so long as she wasn't a public servant refusing to do that which she is obligated to do because she ran for election promising to do it, and even as a private citizen, you sort of lose your moral highground when you ignore adultry and not sodomy.
As far as "high moral ground" goes God will be her judge and she appears to understand that.
You on the other hand have failed to answer the question posed earlier, Do you believe on the Word of the Bible? Yes or no will suffice.
How is she living in sin?
But G5000 is correct. While she could simply be a sinner who cannot repent, she grants licenses to fellow adulters, and thus she's participating in further their sins. One might note it's hypocritial to single out only one sin to deny marriage licenses, but the fact that she's a hypocrite isn't really it. Rather the fact is she's using her official office to enable people to commit adultery.
If she asked for forgiveness and was truly repentant her sin is forgiven. This is fun smacking you Biblical illiterates around[/QUOTE}
.
Even assuming she didn't view the Bible more or less as a fundmentalist but rather in a more mainstream light like Pope Francis or even Billy Graham, you don't get forgiveness for repenting and then going back and committing the same sin, becuase that demonstrates your repentence is not genuine. If she's taking the Bible literally, she has two options: a. continue living in a state of perpetually reoccuring adultery, or b. living single and chaste. In that, her choices are sin or condemn herslef to the same life choice she'd inflict upon gays. Some irony there.
But her personal sin aside, she's falcilliting adulters to marry