Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One should hate evil, therefore you, and ISIS, and Davis. That much the three of you deserve...Well glad I give you reason to live....Amusing a Hitler-youth isn't difficult. And you don't piss me off, I pity your whitey ass, which is more than you deserve. Like Davis, you are unworthy of the thoughts of decent people...I would put you on ignore but you amuse the living hell out of me so....keep going this shit is HILARIOUS.The fact it pisses you off THIS MUCH thrills me.No one needs or wants your pity....I despise you so....feeling ain't mutual.
No, it is not...Marriage is totally about children.
Depends on the application. But I expected that response from a troll sheep like you and your fellow parrots.Lol are you arguing that there's a conflict between religion and logic???Keep it in the religious realm because you lose to logic.
So how should we fine straight couples that don't want to have kids? And I assume you want to extend marriage benefits to gay couples that want to adopt kids right?Marriage is totally about children. It's just that those who legislated it didn't expect that part to have to be explained. Like the inventor of the glove didn't expect he'd have to provide directions.Marriage is not about children. And if disobeying the law ruins her life, so be it. She made her own bed...It changes everything. Procreation is no longer criteria.
Yes, it is. That's the only reason marriage perks exist.No, it is not...Marriage is totally about children.
One should hate evil, therefore you, and ISIS, and Davis. That much the three of you deserve...Well glad I give you reason to live....Amusing a Hitler-youth isn't difficult. And you don't piss me off, I pity your whitey ass, which is more than you deserve. Like Davis, you are unworthy of the thoughts of decent people...I would put you on ignore but you amuse the living hell out of me so....keep going this shit is HILARIOUS.The fact it pisses you off THIS MUCH thrills me.
If you hate me then I have done something right. I hope ALL cultural marxist swine hate me. I despise them and would not hesitate to annihilate them from earth if given that chance.One should hate evil, therefore you, and ISIS, and Davis. That much the three of you deserve...Well glad I give you reason to live....Amusing a Hitler-youth isn't difficult. And you don't piss me off, I pity your whitey ass, which is more than you deserve. Like Davis, you are unworthy of the thoughts of decent people...I would put you on ignore but you amuse the living hell out of me so....keep going this shit is HILARIOUS.The fact it pisses you off THIS MUCH thrills me.
Nope. Try again...Yes, it is. That's the only reason marriage perks exist.No, it is not...Marriage is totally about children.
Liberals, like the Founders of this nation, hate you, as they should. You, and Davis, and ISIS, same shit different day.If you hate me then I have done something right. I hope ALL cultural marxist swine hate me. I despise them and would not hesitate to annihilate them from earth if given that chance.
How about this for logical... YOU LOST! History has PASSED YOU OVER! I guess teh gheys must have spread sheep blood over their door before the SCOTUS ruling!Depends on the application. But I expected that response from a troll sheep like you and your fellow parrots.Lol are you arguing that there's a conflict between religion and logic???Keep it in the religious realm because you lose to logic.
Hetero couples could have children so the don't want children is open ended. With homos the issue is completely moot. I don't want homos or singles adopting because the data shows kids need mom and dad.So how should we fine straight couples that don't want to have kids? And I assume you want to extend marriage benefits to gay couples that want to adopt kids right?Marriage is totally about children. It's just that those who legislated it didn't expect that part to have to be explained. Like the inventor of the glove didn't expect he'd have to provide directions.Marriage is not about children. And if disobeying the law ruins her life, so be it. She made her own bed...It changes everything. Procreation is no longer criteria.
OH.... AM I WRONG ABOUT THAT?!
Yeah you are CERTAINLY deluded....to think ANY of the founders would think like you is just beyond hilarious.Liberals, like the Founders of this nation, hate you, as they should. You, and Davis, and ISIS, same shit different day.If you hate me then I have done something right. I hope ALL cultural marxist swine hate me. I despise them and would not hesitate to annihilate them from earth if given that chance.
She's hardly religious. She's simply a homophobe.Its an issue from the right because we believe in religious freedom and liberty and throwing her in jail will just make her a martyr that would be VERY bad for the democrats and the left.Especially for democrats running for president. Fine her OK then we will pay it as usual.Why so many threads about this? She will be fined or jailed or whatever, and her post will be vacated soon. And she'll be off to some cushy gig with some religious hate group. Or maybe land some speaker fees from backwards conservative organizations. Who cares?
She's inconvenienced a few couples, but they will get their way in the end. Maybe they will sue the state to recoup some damages.
Gay marriage is settled. It's over. It's history. About damn time. Now let's move on already! Don't give this thrice-divorced old bag any more attention!
For the left its an issue because its unfathomable for them to see ANYONE not willing to bend to the politically correct degeneracy that they have been able to force on America and Americans and they will stop at NOTHING to FORCE her to either issue licenses or throw her in jail. These kinds of people aren't very astute or good at seeing the long term affects. Should be fun either way!
There you go again. Settling for homo Crow law just because of decree. You are like a southern white racist from the 1950's.How about this for logical... YOU LOST! History has PASSED YOU OVER! I guess teh gheys must have spread sheep blood over their door before the SCOTUS ruling!Depends on the application. But I expected that response from a troll sheep like you and your fellow parrots.Lol are you arguing that there's a conflict between religion and logic???Keep it in the religious realm because you lose to logic.
They didn't suffer stupid children, and neither do I. You're done, little Hitler-youth. Move along...Yeah you are CERTAINLY deluded....to think ANY of the founders would think like you is just beyond hilarious.Liberals, like the Founders of this nation, hate you, as they should. You, and Davis, and ISIS, same shit different day.If you hate me then I have done something right. I hope ALL cultural marxist swine hate me. I despise them and would not hesitate to annihilate them from earth if given that chance.
Cool opinion. Too bad it's NO LONGER RELEVANT!Hetero couples could have children so the don't want children is open ended. With homos the issue is completely moot. I don't want homos or singles adopting because the data shows kids need mom and dad.So how should we fine straight couples that don't want to have kids? And I assume you want to extend marriage benefits to gay couples that want to adopt kids right?Marriage is totally about children. It's just that those who legislated it didn't expect that part to have to be explained. Like the inventor of the glove didn't expect he'd have to provide directions.Marriage is not about children. And if disobeying the law ruins her life, so be it. She made her own bed...It changes everything. Procreation is no longer criteria.
OH.... AM I WRONG ABOUT THAT?!
You are an outdated ultra-con lefty and have the nerve to declare what is relevant. You need to progress.Cool opinion. Too bad it's NO LONGER RELEVANT!Hetero couples could have children so the don't want children is open ended. With homos the issue is completely moot. I don't want homos or singles adopting because the data shows kids need mom and dad.So how should we fine straight couples that don't want to have kids? And I assume you want to extend marriage benefits to gay couples that want to adopt kids right?Marriage is totally about children. It's just that those who legislated it didn't expect that part to have to be explained. Like the inventor of the glove didn't expect he'd have to provide directions.Marriage is not about children. And if disobeying the law ruins her life, so be it. She made her own bed...It changes everything. Procreation is no longer criteria.
OH.... AM I WRONG ABOUT THAT?!
Omg I can't believe we're still arguing over this!
There you go again. Settling for homo Crow law just because of decree. You are like a southern white racist from the 1950's.How about this for logical... YOU LOST! History has PASSED YOU OVER! I guess teh gheys must have spread sheep blood over their door before the SCOTUS ruling!Depends on the application. But I expected that response from a troll sheep like you and your fellow parrots.Lol are you arguing that there's a conflict between religion and logic???Keep it in the religious realm because you lose to logic.
You want to know what's relevant? The FINES Kim Davis is about to be handed for disobeying the law!You are an outdated ultra-con lefty and have the nerve to declare what is relevant. You need to progress.Cool opinion. Too bad it's NO LONGER RELEVANT!Hetero couples could have children so the don't want children is open ended. With homos the issue is completely moot. I don't want homos or singles adopting because the data shows kids need mom and dad.So how should we fine straight couples that don't want to have kids? And I assume you want to extend marriage benefits to gay couples that want to adopt kids right?Marriage is totally about children. It's just that those who legislated it didn't expect that part to have to be explained. Like the inventor of the glove didn't expect he'd have to provide directions.Marriage is not about children. And if disobeying the law ruins her life, so be it. She made her own bed...
OH.... AM I WRONG ABOUT THAT?!
Omg I can't believe we're still arguing over this!
I love watching the frothing at the mouth of the bigoted left in here as this woman refuses to bend to their will.
