edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
Here is yet another example of CON$ervative dishonesty. The deceiver demonizes the project because he says the leader heads a "PR firm" but when he challenges me he admits it is a CONSULTING firm, not a PR firm. It is an energy CONSULTING firm whose consulting projects include nuclear power generation, oil pipeline leak detection, oil recovery, coal gasification, battery and fuel cell technologies. But because they consult on the efficient use of these energy sources he demonizes them as an ECO firm and therefore unscientific!Don't you just love how CON$ call their pontifications "proof."The Berkley project is a science front for a PR firm... Thats already been proven..
The only thing that has been "proven" is your stupidity.
No the head scientist at that project and most of the staff with him are on the board of an ECO-PR firm... I already showed this earlier.. The entire study is a concocted bit of pseudo-science...
You care to try and deny hes not the head of a Eco consulting firm??? Come on please deny it.... I dare you...
Like I said you have only proven your stupidity.
Basically this comes back to CON$ controlling the definitions. CON$ claim they believe in freedom and liberty, but they have to control everything, especially the language. They define everything even people's intent, whether the people are alive or dead. They are always telling us what the "original intent" of the founders was, and that settles it. The individual is not even free to say what they intend or mean by what they say, that is how absolute the control is that CON$ demand.
October 11, 2011
RUSH: I've often said, I said last week he who controls the definition of words, the meaning of words, controls the debate. He who controls the language controls the debate.