The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Life, Liberty and The Pursuit of Happiness.Meanwhile, republicans are all for abortion to ensure the life of the mother and if the fetus is non viable, for rape and for incest.
now what you complaining about?
1. There is no such thing as "abortion to ensure the life of the mother ."
2. " for rape and for incest. "
The concept that there are "cases of rape or incest" is a chimera.
They really don't exist.....well, the fact is that 98.5% of abortion don't involve either abhorrent event.
The cases in which abortion is for rape, 1%; and .5% incest.http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf
Nearly every abortion is for nothing more than convenience.
The Abortion Debate Isn’t As Partisan As Politicians Make It Seem
you'd be surprised on how many plug the plug on babies, republicans included.
Really?
Let's check.....or shall we simply assume you're as wrong as you always are?
"Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) introduced the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which would provide medical care to babies born after botched abortions. Doctors would be required to provide medical care to a baby who survived an abortion, just as they would with any other patient. If doctors failed to provide care he or she would face criminal charges.
"I want to ask each and every one of my colleagues whether or not we're OK with infanticide," Sasse asked his colleagues.
But when the bill came to the Senate floor for a vote on Monday, Democrats filibustered."
Disgusting: Dems Prove, Once Again, They Support Infanticide With Their Latest Filibuster
"...all six Democrats running for president in 2020 voted against the bill. The list includes Sens. Cory Booker (NJ), Sherrod Brown (OH), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), Kamala Harris (CA.), Amy Klobuchar (MN), and Elizabeth Warren (MA.). Independent Bernie Sanders (VT) also voted in line with Democrats."
Now.....where do you stand on the slaughter of babies????
Why does the Left oppose all three?