Kyle Rittenhouse defense again tries, fails to get gun possession charge dropped

[Rigby5]

"Not guilty"
/ duscussion

If the prosecution was not compromised and on the side of the police, then this silly judgement would be appealed and Kyle convicted.

 

[boedicca]

It's so amusing to see these sorely misguided threads live on.

Poor Proggies can't deal with Reality.

 

[Rigby5]

It did decide this one case........

He obviously needed a 30 round magazine because there were a lot of violent thugs in that crowd.......had they rushed him, even seeing the other idiots get shot......30 rounds would barely be enough....

If he hadn't chambered a round, the child rapist would likely have gotten his gun.....and very likely would have used it to murder Rittenhouse...........

the prosecutor was not in on the fix......

Please...seek treatment for your Rittenhouse Syndrome.......

It was illegal for Rittenhouse to even buy or have the rifle, and he would have been safe if he had stayed on private property, with the others against the riot/demo.
What he did was not just illegal, but incredibly irresponsible and foolish.
You NEVER chamber rounds around a group of people.
He would have been kicked out of any range go to.

 

[Abatis]

If the prosecution was not compromised and on the side of the police, then this silly judgement would be appealed and Kyle convicted.

It's funny, your opinions suggest you have no clue how the law operates and then you state a position that proves you have no clue how the law works.

The state can't "appeal" a not guilty verdict; the charges were dismissed with prejudice and double jeopardy attaches. I know you don't know what those terms mean because you throw out ridiculous statements about this case grounded only in your demented leftist politics.
.

 

[2aguy]

Or they can not tote the rifle, while hunting.
And only while hunting with a permit, is this exception to the ban on minors being in possession, valid.

Except for what the trained, experienced defense attorneys, and the scumbag, experienced prosecution attorneys, and the judge with decades of experience in actual judge experience said...

You mean except for that...right?

 

[2aguy]

He had no business pretending to ask if people "needed medical attention".
That was obviously a ruse to show off his AR.
He was deliberately attempting to intimidate and provoke.

Grosskreutz did NOT admit he pointed his pistol at Kyle, and testified he was too traumatized by the wound to be able to remember, but the angle of the wound proves his hands were up in the air when shot.

Your image is also silly because it shows Grosskreutz is not the one testifying a the moment.

Did you watch the trial? Where Grosscrud said Kyle didn't fire his weapon until gross crud pointed his gun at him....did you miss that whole section of the trial?

 

[Death-Ninja]

Or they can not tote the rifle, while hunting.
And only while hunting with a permit, is this exception to the ban on minors being in possession, valid.

I have your IQ running around 70 or so, you do not know what you are attempting to so stupidly assert knowledge over, I live here dumb ass, the law is simple, no hunter safety certificate, no long arm can be toted absent adult supervision, the age of purchase is "16-years" and with the hunter safety completed, the youth can carry the firearm about. Did you think you knew better than we do, or the judge, and prosecutor????

Now, run along and find a penis you can play with....

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

KENOSHA — Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team has tried again to get a charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor dropped. Again, Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder denied the motion, and the charge remains.

The charge in question on Tuesday was possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18, connected to Rittenhouse's possession of an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle during the shootings. Rittenhouse, who is now 18, was 17 at the time.

According to Wisconsin Statute 948.60(2)(a): "These restrictions only apply to a person under age 18 who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the firearm is a short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun, or if the person is not in compliance with the hunting regulations."

An AR-15 is classified as a rifle.



The defense has disputed this charge since early in the case, including right out of the gate when nationally recognized and controversial attorney John Pierce made himself available to defend Rittenhouse. A Second Amendment argument was raised, arguing that the law itself banning minors from carrying rifles is unconstitutional, but that argument has thus far been unsuccessful.

Kyle Rittenhouse defense again tries, fails to get gun possession charge dropped

Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team has tried again, unsuccessfully, to get a charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor dropped.

www.kenoshanews.com

Do you think the law banning minors from carrying weapons violates the Second Amendment?

6 year olds with AR15s?

Lol.... like fine wine..

 

[2aguy]

He had no business pretending to ask if people "needed medical attention".
That was obviously a ruse to show off his AR.
He was deliberately attempting to intimidate and provoke.

Grosskreutz did NOT admit he pointed his pistol at Kyle, and testified he was too traumatized by the wound to be able to remember, but the angle of the wound proves his hands were up in the air when shot.

Your image is also silly because it shows Grosskreutz is not the one testifying a the moment.

Grosskreutz did NOT admit he pointed his pistol at Kyle,


Yes....he did..........did you not see the testimony? Where he said Kyle didn't fire until he pointed his pistol at him?

it is at the 1:59 mark on this video...

He admits to the question that Kyle did not fire until he pointed his pistol at him.....please watch so you won't keep posting dumb stuff...

 

[2aguy]

He had no business pretending to ask if people "needed medical attention".
That was obviously a ruse to show off his AR.
He was deliberately attempting to intimidate and provoke.

Grosskreutz did NOT admit he pointed his pistol at Kyle, and testified he was too traumatized by the wound to be able to remember, but the angle of the wound proves his hands were up in the air when shot.

Your image is also silly because it shows Grosskreutz is not the one testifying a the moment.

More of the same video....grosskrud admitting he pointed his gun at Kyle...

This time at the 2:36 mark on the video...

 

[theHawk]

It was illegal for Rittenhouse to even buy or have the rifle, and he would have been safe if he had stayed on private property, with the others against the riot/demo.
What he did was not just illegal, but incredibly irresponsible and foolish.
You NEVER chamber rounds around a group of people.
He would have been kicked out of any range go to.

Poor Rigby, still bitterly clinging to your gun law that you can’t comprehend.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

He had no business pretending to ask if people "needed medical attention".
That was obviously a ruse to show off his AR.
He was deliberately attempting to intimidate and provoke.

Grosskreutz did NOT admit he pointed his pistol at Kyle, and testified he was too traumatized by the wound to be able to remember, but the angle of the wound proves his hands were up in the air when shot.

Your image is also silly because it shows Grosskreutz is not the one testifying a the moment.

You're full of shit.
He admitted he pointed his pistol at Kyle before Kyle shot him.
Thats where the face palm from the prosecutor came from.

Rittenhouse Shooting Survivor Thought He Was ‘Going To Die’—Was Shot After Pointing His Own Gun

Gaige Grosskreutz said he advanced toward Rittenhouse because he thought he was an “active shooter” during his testimony Monday.

www.forbes.com

 

[Death-Ninja]

Did you watch the trial? Where Grosscrud said Kyle didn't fire his weapon until gross crud pointed his gun at him....did you miss that whole section of the trial?

Speaking of Grosscrutz, he has two prior felon in possession charges, the latest one in October of 2020, which was dismissed by Binger on a ludicrous technicality, the other even more mystifying dismissal was in 2015, in both instances he was charged with OWI whilst also carrying a loaded pistol(Glock). In the 2015 event, the deputy noted that it became apparent a few days later that Grosscrutz was a felon prohibited from possessing, owning, or carrying a firearm of any type, and again the deputy noted in his report that the suspect had the pistol in a holster on his hip, a round chambered, all of which was illegal!

Interestingly, this case was also dumped, which is quite fortuitous for this scumbag as he was looking at a mandatory 5-year prison term for having the weapon at all, and with that weapon being loaded, and illegally secreted upon his body, that would have almost certainly served as an enhancement into a 10-20 year term. What captures my interest however, is the dismissal of such a deep serious charge in 2015, as though he had a wonderful guardian angel riding along on his back. He is antifa, he has by his own admission attended over 75 riots and violent protests in that time, yet miraculously not a single conviction stemming from such???

Mr Grosskrutz is most likely an FBI informant.....

 

[AZrailwhale]

If the prosecution was not compromised and on the side of the police, then this silly judgement would be appealed and Kyle convicted.

You're either an IDIOT or a foreigner who doesn't know US law. Not guilty verdicts can't be appealed. The prosecution gets one bite at the apple. with the government's resources that's usually plenty.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Poor Rigby, still bitterly clinging to your gun law that you can’t comprehend.

He's so stupid, I surprised he can remember the breathe in AND out.

 

[2aguy]

You're either an IDIOT or a foreigner who doesn't know US law. Not guilty verdicts can't be appealed. The prosecution gets one bite at the apple. with the government's resources that's usually plenty.

Unless the Feds come in with Civil Rights charges......there is that...but I don't think the morons controlling Biden will roll that dice...

 

[Rigby5]

It's funny, your opinions suggest you have no clue how the law operates and then you state a position that proves you have no clue how the law works.

The state can't "appeal" a not guilty verdict; the charges were dismissed with prejudice and double jeopardy attaches. I know you don't know what those terms mean because you throw out ridiculous statements about this case grounded only in your demented leftist politics.
.

I was referring to the charges dismissed illegally by the judge.
They can and should be appealed.
But the prosecutor obviously is not going to.
He worked hard to have them dismissed as it was.

Answer the question.
Has it ever been legal for a minor to be in possession of a loaded firearm in public, in WI?
The answer obviously is no.
If you disagree, then explain why the police immediate shot and killed Tamir Rice, (although that was not WI)?

 

[Rigby5]

Poor Rigby, still bitterly clinging to your gun law that you can’t comprehend.

And are you actually going to claim a minor can legally have a loaded firearm in public?
Then explain why the police immediately shot and killed 12 year old Tamir Rice playing with his air soft toy?

 

[2aguy]

I was referring to the charges dismissed illegally by the judge.
They can and should be appealed.
But the prosecutor obviously is not going to.
He worked hard to have them dismissed as it was.

Answer the question.
Has it ever been legal for a minor to be in possession of a loaded firearm in public, in WI?
The answer obviously is no.
If you disagree, then explain why the police immediate shot and killed Tamir Rice, (although that was not WI)?

It wasn't illegally dismissed by the judge........get your Rittenhouse Syndrome checked out before your brain completely melts down.........

Tamir Rice didn't put his replica gun down when the police thought it was a working pistol...you doofus......not even close to an accurate example...

 

[2aguy]

And are you actually going to claim a minor can legally have a loaded firearm in public?
Then explain why the police immediately shot and killed 12 year old Tamir Rice playing with his air soft toy?

They thought it was a real gun and he didn't comply with their orders.....you doofus...