la county deputy tosses woman on ground

[Marener]

She does not have the authority to ignore the police

She does if they are issuing an unlawful order.

 

[Mac-7]

So sometimes you do support vigilante justice.

Thats not vigilante justice

In my state in many circumstances citizens have a legal right to protect their property from theft

This woman had no legal right to do as she pleases in defiance of the police

 

[toobfreak]

well it is the law protected by the constitution,,

You mean the 1st amendment we now know Biden's DOJ has tramped all over for year silencing people's right to speak their minds and views freely on social media especially to help get him elected and to suppress discussion of his crimes?

 

[Mac-7]

she has a right to ignore them if shes not under arrest,,

Thats insane

Ignoring them leads to arrest

 

[progressive hunter]

Thats not vigilante justice

In my state in many circumstances citizens have a legal right to protect their property from theft

This woman had no legal right to fo as she pleases in defiance of the police

yes she does,,

 

[Mac-7]

yes she does,,

Wrong

 

[progressive hunter]

Thats insane

Ignoring them leads to arrest

what law is it that says she is required to follow cops instructions when not under arrest??

I can wait,,

 

[progressive hunter]

You mean the 1st amendment we now know Biden's DOJ has tramped all over for year silencing people's right to speak their minds and views freely on social media especially to help get him elected and to suppress discussion of his crimes?

I can only assume your are trying to change the subject because you know youre wrong on this topic,,

 

[Marener]

In my state in many circumstances citizens have a legal right to protect their property from theft

So you want them to take the law into their own hands rather than let the courts decide if the law is being broken.

So it’s vigilante justice by your definition.

 

[toobfreak]

The courts will confirm your right to refuse to obey an unlawful order.

Maybe. Like I said, if you don't agree with an order given you by the police, FILE A FUCKING COMPLAINT WITH A JUDGE.

But arguing with a cop is just begging to get yourself arrested (or worse).

 

[progressive hunter]

Wrong

then what law requires anyone follow a cops orders when not under arrest??

 

[progressive hunter]

Maybe. Like I said, if you don't agree with an order given you by the police, FILE A FUCKING COMPLAINT WITH A JUDGE.

But arguing with a cop is just begging to get yourself arrested (or worse).

she never got that chance because she was assualted by the cop,,

 

[Marener]

FILE A FUCKING COMPLAINT WITH A JUDGE

Hahahahahahahaha!

Good one. What’ll that accomplish?

Nothing.

 

[Mac-7]

what law is it that says she is required to follow cops instructions when not under arrest??

I can wait,,

I cant give you a link to a law that says that specifically but the authority if the police certainly exists

How can they do their job if the public is free to ignore them and their commands?

 

[Mac-7]

Hahahahahahahaha!

Good one. What’ll that accomplish?

Nothing.

Still waiting for you to tell us how far you will go if you think you are right

Can you shoot the cop?

 

[progressive hunter]

I cant give you a link to a law that says that specifically but the authority if the police certainly exists

How can they do their job if the public is free to ignore them and their commands?

it exists personally only if you are under arrest..

SCOTUS has ruled on both videoing cops as legal and interference being a physical act,, she committed no crimes,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Still waiting for you to tell us how far you will go if you think you are right

Can you shoot the cop?

typical leftwing tactic to take it to the most absurd,,

 

[Mac-7]

So you want them to take the law into their own hands rather than let the courts decide if the law is being broken.

Citizens have a legal right to use deadly force to protect their property from thieves

But there are limits

Citizens have NO legal right to assault the police under any circumstances

 

[progressive hunter]

Citizens have a legal right to use deadly force to protect their property from thieves

But there are limits

Citizens have NO legal right to assault the police under any circumstances

why are you trying to change the subject??

that never happened in this case,,

 

[Mac-7]

it exists personally only if you are under arrest..

SCOTUS has ruled on both videoing cops as legal and interference being a physical act,, she committed no crimes,,

I have not disagreed that the woman may have had a legal right to video the arrest of her husband

But she had no legal right to defy police orders even if the police were wrong