ChrisL
Diamond Member
![coffee :coffee: :coffee:](/styles/smilies/coffee.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not but the Vegas psycho was firing into a huge crowdThere is a difference between automatic fire and semiautomatic fire.
Bump stocks do not change semiautomatic fire into automatic fire.
Well, that is the impression the media has been giving. What exactly does it do then?
Automatic fire 1 trigger pull needed for multiple rounds to be fired
Semiautomatic fire 1 trigger pull needed for every round fired
So how is it different if you use a bump stock?
All bump firing does is use the natural recoil of the rifle to move the gun back and forth while the trigger finger remains stationary. Yes it can result in faster fire than keeping the rifle stationary and moving the trigger finger but it still isn't anywhere near as fast as automatic fire.
Doesn't seem like it would be very accurate at all.
. Mattered not in that particular situation because the chosen venue fit the chosen application he used. Until we learn how many were actually trampled verses how many were shot, we have to be highly critical of the bumpstock mechanism used to increase the rate of fire in order to injure as many as he could during the attack. It's either that he's a genius or a bumbling fool, so I ask everyone here which is it I wonder ??There is a difference between automatic fire and semiautomatic fire.
Bump stocks do not change semiautomatic fire into automatic fire.
Well, that is the impression the media has been giving. What exactly does it do then?
Automatic fire 1 trigger pull needed for multiple rounds to be fired
Semiautomatic fire 1 trigger pull needed for every round fired
So how is it different if you use a bump stock?
All bump firing does is use the natural recoil of the rifle to move the gun back and forth while the trigger finger remains stationary. Yes it can result in faster fire than keeping the rifle stationary and moving the trigger finger but it still isn't anywhere near as fast as automatic fire.
Doesn't seem like it would be very accurate at all.
The only thing that needs to be banned is quick reloading magazines. Just limit the guns to 15 rounds and reloading one cartridge at a time. That would eliminate the ability of one person to fire thousands of rounds into crowds.You can bump fire a semiautomatic without a bump stock but of course you didn't know that.
There's already a way around that.
The Vegas shooter would not have fired so many shots with that contraption. He was firing 50 round burst. If laws don't work then eliminate all traffic & drug laws & building codes.
Yes. He fired hundreds of rounds of ammunition that fortunately hit nothing but air. That is the nature of rapid fire. You don't hit anything important.
lol...maybe if you're shooting at a single target.
He fired into a crowd of 20,000 people piled together like sardines....he hit plenty of people.
What are you talking about?. Did the case and the people shot disappear off the face of the Earth ?? How do we know who was shot & wounded, and who was trampled ??? Where did the case go ??.The Vegas shooter would not have fired so many shots with that contraption. He was firing 50 round burst. If laws don't work then eliminate all traffic & drug laws & building codes.
Yes. He fired hundreds of rounds of ammunition that fortunately hit nothing but air. That is the nature of rapid fire. You don't hit anything important.
You are right. It's been pretty quiet. No names of people who died, no updates about how the people who were injured are doing, nothing.
These Are the Victims of the Las Vegas Shooting
I'm talking about on the news of course. This is from Time and it's dated October 6. It is now October 24.
The only thing that needs to be banned is quick reloading magazines. Just limit the guns to 15 rounds and reloading one cartridge at a time. That would eliminate the ability of one person to fire thousands of rounds into crowds.
There's already a way around that.
The Vegas shooter would not have fired so many shots with that contraption. He was firing 50 round burst. If laws don't work then eliminate all traffic & drug laws & building codes.
Yes. He fired hundreds of rounds of ammunition that fortunately hit nothing but air. That is the nature of rapid fire. You don't hit anything important.
lol...maybe if you're shooting at a single target.
He fired into a crowd of 20,000 people piled together like sardines....he hit plenty of people.
That's right, 20,000 people at the concert which makes it even more suspicious that "Paddock" would have needed to shoot from two Windows.
. Yes, and the fact that he took it that far seems to suggest it was a hired hit that was meant to do maximum damage. Who hired Paddock to do what he had done ?? Was he desperate for money due to some events that took place in his life, and who knew of his desperation ? Was he betrayed after being hired, and then killed after the hit took place ??There's already a way around that.
The Vegas shooter would not have fired so many shots with that contraption. He was firing 50 round burst. If laws don't work then eliminate all traffic & drug laws & building codes.
Yes. He fired hundreds of rounds of ammunition that fortunately hit nothing but air. That is the nature of rapid fire. You don't hit anything important.
lol...maybe if you're shooting at a single target.
He fired into a crowd of 20,000 people piled together like sardines....he hit plenty of people.
That's right, 20,000 people at the concert which makes it even more suspicious that "Paddock" would have needed to shoot from two Windows.
He shot from two windows, because he didnt just shoot at the crowd. He also tried to blow up a fuel tank. These are facts known to anyone who reads the news.
. Yes, and the fact that he took it that far seems to suggest it was a hired hit that was meant to do maximum damage. Who hired Paddock to do what he had done ?? Was he desperate for money due to some events that took place in his life, and who knew of his desperation ? Was he betrayed after being hired, and then killed after the hit took place ??He shot from two windows, because he didnt just shoot at the crowd. He also tried to blow up a fuel tank. These are facts known to anyone who reads the news.That's right, 20,000 people at the concert which makes it even more suspicious that "Paddock" would have needed to shoot from two Windows.The Vegas shooter would not have fired so many shots with that contraption. He was firing 50 round burst. If laws don't work then eliminate all traffic & drug laws & building codes.
Yes. He fired hundreds of rounds of ammunition that fortunately hit nothing but air. That is the nature of rapid fire. You don't hit anything important.
lol...maybe if you're shooting at a single target.
He fired into a crowd of 20,000 people piled together like sardines....he hit plenty of people.