Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Dammit...that's what I've been trying to say...I just couldn't figure out the right words!no, they did not, you moron.No, they also discard the papers that did not endorse the view of anthropogenic global warming which includes those who REJECT it also.Exactly.The study said Only 32.6 percent of the papers endorsed the view of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming...You're misreading the study.
They searched for as many peer-reviewed papers as they could find that mentioned "global warming" and "global climate change".
Of all of the papers that mentioned global warming 33.6% of them expressed an opinion on it's causes.
So, there's your sample...that's the method they used to find papers that expressed an opinion - which was what they were studying.
They ENDORSED the view of anthropogenic global warming and is not a neutral group or sample.
You've got it.
They discarded the 66.4% that expressed no opinion.
32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming.
It's funny for the start...when you can imagine the look on their faces when they think they've got irrefutable proof that they're right and their opponents have been lying, or cooking the numbers.I swear...I would promise to do something gross....like eat a cockroach or take a deep breath inside Staph's trailer....if one of these idiots would issue a full on retraction after starting a retard thread like this. Just once.
Dammit...that's what I've been trying to say...I just couldn't figure out the right words!no, they did not, you moron.No, they also discard the papers that did not endorse the view of anthropogenic global warming which includes those who REJECT it also.Exactly.The study said Only 32.6 percent of the papers endorsed the view of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming...You're misreading the study.
They searched for as many peer-reviewed papers as they could find that mentioned "global warming" and "global climate change".
Of all of the papers that mentioned global warming 33.6% of them expressed an opinion on it's causes.
So, there's your sample...that's the method they used to find papers that expressed an opinion - which was what they were studying.
They ENDORSED the view of anthropogenic global warming and is not a neutral group or sample.
You've got it.
They discarded the 66.4% that expressed no opinion.
32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming.
Stupidity that takes your words away.Dammit...that's what I've been trying to say...I just couldn't figure out the right words!no, they did not, you moron.No, they also discard the papers that did not endorse the view of anthropogenic global warming which includes those who REJECT it also.Exactly.The study said Only 32.6 percent of the papers endorsed the view of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming...
They ENDORSED the view of anthropogenic global warming and is not a neutral group or sample.
You've got it.
They discarded the 66.4% that expressed no opinion.
32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming.
Mr. Elder has a talent for doing that. Doesn't he?
it is a gift.Dammit...that's what I've been trying to say...I just couldn't figure out the right words!no, they did not, you moron.No, they also discard the papers that did not endorse the view of anthropogenic global warming which includes those who REJECT it also.Exactly.The study said Only 32.6 percent of the papers endorsed the view of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming...You're misreading the study.
They searched for as many peer-reviewed papers as they could find that mentioned "global warming" and "global climate change".
Of all of the papers that mentioned global warming 33.6% of them expressed an opinion on it's causes.
So, there's your sample...that's the method they used to find papers that expressed an opinion - which was what they were studying.
They ENDORSED the view of anthropogenic global warming and is not a neutral group or sample.
You've got it.
They discarded the 66.4% that expressed no opinion.
32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming.
I'd return it if I were you.it is a gift.Dammit...that's what I've been trying to say...I just couldn't figure out the right words!no, they did not, you moron.No, they also discard the papers that did not endorse the view of anthropogenic global warming which includes those who REJECT it also.Exactly.The study said Only 32.6 percent of the papers endorsed the view of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming...
They ENDORSED the view of anthropogenic global warming and is not a neutral group or sample.
You've got it.
They discarded the 66.4% that expressed no opinion.
32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming.
I'd return it if I were you.it is a gift.Dammit...that's what I've been trying to say...I just couldn't figure out the right words!no, they did not, you moron.No, they also discard the papers that did not endorse the view of anthropogenic global warming which includes those who REJECT it also.Exactly.
You've got it.
They discarded the 66.4% that expressed no opinion.
32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming.
You're right...apologies Mr Eder...too many other things going on at the moment.I'd return it if I were you.it is a gift.Dammit...that's what I've been trying to say...I just couldn't figure out the right words!no, they did not, you moron.No, they also discard the papers that did not endorse the view of anthropogenic global warming which includes those who REJECT it also.
You may want to re-read. You have misunderstood Mr. Elder's position. Perhaps your sarcasm meter needs adjusting.
You're right...apologies Mr Eder...too many other things going on at the moment.I'd return it if I were you.it is a gift.Dammit...that's what I've been trying to say...I just couldn't figure out the right words!no, they did not, you moron.
You may want to re-read. You have misunderstood Mr. Elder's position. Perhaps your sarcasm meter needs adjusting.
What does it have to do with 'liberals'?
The evidence has been presented by 'scientists'.
