Liberal fascism

[francoHFW]

I wonder if the majority of American people are as helpless with the definitions of fascism, socialism and communism as a percentage of posters on these boards? But even more surprising are the number of people that seem unable, or even helpless to find the correct definitions. I wonder what the problem is?

What's actually funny, and pathetic of course is that you can't refute a damn thing.

You can't defend the authoritarian nature of you politics, you can't argue that fascists, nazis and the DNC don't have far more in common philosophically with each other than with the GOP.

No....

You'll just keep parroting that everyone else is wrong, and your programmers are right.

The problem is that you're a fucking oxygen thief.

Regent, the problem is bought off GOPers, their huge propaganda machine (Murdoch Fox, Rush Limbaugh etc [Levin, Jones, Savage etc etc] talk radio, Adelson Washington Times and Moonie Examiner (not real papers at all) Koch Heritage and many other BS orgs, institutes etc- ALL run by greedy idiot RW billionaires to save greedy idiot billionaires. And racism of course. POOR AMERICA. GO TRUMP- learn and take the dupes with you...we're overwhelmed by RW BS. No, the rich don't pay too much in taxes, and Dems are NOT evil corrupt commies. Ay caramba.

 

[francoHFW]

The fact remains that companies remained capitalist and aristocrats prospered unless they were Jewish or protested Nazi policy. Of course they had to do what the Nazis wanted, and the great majority were happy to. Not socialists at all. They were all in concentration camps DUHHHH, dupe. This is all brand new GOP/dupe revisionism.

Brand new? Ludwig Von Mises died in 1973. As I said earlier, private ownership of the means of production in Nazi Germany was a facade.

Look at the 25 point National Socialist Program, hardly a ringing endorsement of capitalism.

National Socialist Program - Wikipedia

Hysterical....

A member of the race can only be one who is of German blood

... Hitler wasn't of German blood.

Oh really?



Austria is still a Germanic region, which is why Hitler annexed it, you ignorant git.

And he was still born of Austrian blood, not German blood.

1. What language Austrians speak?

2. Don't go by this:


3.On March 12, 1938, Hitler’s troops rolled over the border from Germany, into Austria. This was the Anschluss, the annexation of Austria into Greater Germany. Three days later, Hitler entered Vienna, greeted by an enthusiastic crowd of up to one million people. A plebiscite was held in less than a month, and 99.7% of Austrians voted to join the Third Reich.
Guess why.

Because it was rigged DUHHHHH.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If you wanted to start a store or other business, GO RIGHT AHEAD, unless you're Jewish or protesting Nazism or a SOCIALIST OR COMMUNIST,

Nope, you're lying you ignorant fool. Business could neither start nor stop without the permission of the Ministry of Commerce, which fell under Obermenschefuher Goering.

IF you had read a smidgen of History, you would know this, but you are an ignorant fool.

in which case off to the concentration camp. I have a Masters in History concentrations on HITLER and France and you are a gd idiot lol. The Reich was only interested in WAR PRODUCTION, shutting down protest, and stealing from the Jews. STHU. TYVM.

All production was to serve the war and the Reich, you lying fascist pile of shit.

You are both a liar, and abysmally ignorant.

There was nothing even approaching "capitalist" in Nazi Germany.

Read a history book, you fool.

 

[francoHFW]

Brand new? Ludwig Von Mises died in 1973. As I said earlier, private ownership of the means of production in Nazi Germany was a facade.

Look at the 25 point National Socialist Program, hardly a ringing endorsement of capitalism.

National Socialist Program - Wikipedia

Hysterical....

A member of the race can only be one who is of German blood

... Hitler wasn't of German blood.

Oh really?



Austria is still a Germanic region, which is why Hitler annexed it, you ignorant git.

And he was still born of Austrian blood, not German blood.

1. What language Austrians speak?

2. Don't go by this:


3.On March 12, 1938, Hitler’s troops rolled over the border from Germany, into Austria. This was the Anschluss, the annexation of Austria into Greater Germany. Three days later, Hitler entered Vienna, greeted by an enthusiastic crowd of up to one million people. A plebiscite was held in less than a month, and 99.7% of Austrians voted to join the Third Reich.
Guess why.

Because it was rigged DUHHHHH.

Even brilliant Obama had brain farts DUHHHHH.

 

[francoHFW]

If you wanted to start a store or other business, GO RIGHT AHEAD, unless you're Jewish or protesting Nazism or a SOCIALIST OR COMMUNIST,

Nope, you're lying you ignorant fool. Business could neither start nor stop without the permission of the Ministry of Commerce, which fell under Obermenschefuher Goering.

IF you had read a smidgen of History, you would know this, but you are an ignorant fool.

in which case off to the concentration camp. I have a Masters in History concentrations on HITLER and France and you are a gd idiot lol. The Reich was only interested in WAR PRODUCTION, shutting down protest, and stealing from the Jews. STHU. TYVM.

All production was to serve the war and the Reich, you lying fascist pile of shit.

You are both a liar, and abysmally ignorant.

There was nothing even approaching "capitalist" in Nazi Germany.

Read a history book, you fool.

And you got permission DUHHHHH, unless you were a Jew, socialist, or communist. You will NEVER tell me a a single fact about Nazis, Jethro. Nazis were fascists DUHHH. NEVER LIBERALS, superdupe.

 

[francoHFW]

Isn't that cute? Fawn is trying to pretend he knows something.

View attachment 120368

As always Fawn, what you "know" simply isn't so.

Socialism is state CONTROL of the means of production.

"Why does the state need to own business? The state owns the owners" - Benito Mussolini

But remember Fawlina, Hitler nationalized HUGE swaths of German industry. The oil and coal industry were taken by the Reich, the steel industry, BMW was nationalized for the war effort, etc.

Even among those industries NOT directly owned by the Reich, Nazi stooges were placed in charge (have you never seen "Schindler's List," fawn?)

Of course Hitler was a military guy, not much interested in economics. Fascism was the baby of that old Bolshevik Mussolini. Il Duce was going to "fix" Communism so it would work. Creating a kleptocracy DID work - in the short term.

It's cute how you think your made up definitions magically replace actual definitions.

But then again, I am pointing this out to the moron who doesn't know the difference between a fawn and a faun.

"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."

Fawn clings to the big lie. It served the left since the Marxists in academia crafted it in the 50's. It was a concerted and deliberate lie that was SO OUTRAGEOUS that people accepted it.

Claiming that fascism is "right wing" is like claiming that ice is hot. BUT given the right audience of young minds who are told that recitation of the big lie proves them wise, you soon have those like fawn who are utterly convinced that up is down, because the party mandates it.

"...the Marxists in academia crafted it in the 50's."

1. "The Captive Mind...is a 1953 work of nonfiction byPolish writer, academic andNobel laureate,Czesław Miłosz.... It draws upon his experiences as an underground writer during World War II, and his position within the political and cultural elite of Poland in the immediate post-war years.


The book attempts to explain both the intellectual allure of Stalinism and the temptation of collaboration with the Stalinist regime among intellectuals in post-warCentral and Eastern Europe. Miłosz describes the book as having been written "under great inner conflict"....a portrayal of four different gifted Polish men who capitulated, in some fashion, to the demands of the Communist state.....
The book elaborates the idea of "enslavement through consciousness" ..."


The book is described by historian Norman Davies as a "devastating study" which "totally discredited the cultural and psychological machinery of Communism".[5]In that the book represents the view of an insider and draws on extensive analysis, it has been compared to Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler and Nineteen Eighty-Fourby George Orwell.[4]"
The Captive Mind - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


2. In the above we find how Soviet indoctrination directed a singular focus on Nazi atrocities and an ignorance of far worse ones by Stalin's communists...

".....Communists in control of pop culture populate the entertainment media with Nazi villains, and, secondarily, CIA or corporate villains, leading to the America of today, accepting communist aims "with never a commissar, Gulag guard, or show trial in sight."
West "American Betrayal," p. 282



The result is dolts such as Faun the Fool.

My point is that Academia started widely disseminating this propaganda in the 1950's; seeking to spark a Communist revolution, which they nearly did in the 60's. Communism was defeated in the 80's, but not on American campuses, where it remains the ONLY view permitted at most institutions.

That's socialism, FAIR CAPITALISM, NOT communism, superdupe.

 

[francoHFW]

OP- "Liberal Fascism" is the stupidest, most misinforming book ever written on history, and the bible of superdupes...

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

And you got permission DUHHHHH, unless you were a Jew, socialist, or communist. You will NEVER tell me a a single fact about Nazis, Jethro. Nazis were fascists DUHHH. NEVER LIBERALS, superdupe.

Again retard, the ability to start of stop a business was up to the state. The market had NOTHING to do with it.

You've had your ass handed to you, you ignorant fascist fool. Run along now.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It's cute how you think your made up definitions magically replace actual definitions.

But then again, I am pointing this out to the moron who doesn't know the difference between a fawn and a faun.

"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."

Fawn clings to the big lie. It served the left since the Marxists in academia crafted it in the 50's. It was a concerted and deliberate lie that was SO OUTRAGEOUS that people accepted it.

Claiming that fascism is "right wing" is like claiming that ice is hot. BUT given the right audience of young minds who are told that recitation of the big lie proves them wise, you soon have those like fawn who are utterly convinced that up is down, because the party mandates it.

"...the Marxists in academia crafted it in the 50's."

1. "The Captive Mind...is a 1953 work of nonfiction byPolish writer, academic andNobel laureate,Czesław Miłosz.... It draws upon his experiences as an underground writer during World War II, and his position within the political and cultural elite of Poland in the immediate post-war years.


The book attempts to explain both the intellectual allure of Stalinism and the temptation of collaboration with the Stalinist regime among intellectuals in post-warCentral and Eastern Europe. Miłosz describes the book as having been written "under great inner conflict"....a portrayal of four different gifted Polish men who capitulated, in some fashion, to the demands of the Communist state.....
The book elaborates the idea of "enslavement through consciousness" ..."


The book is described by historian Norman Davies as a "devastating study" which "totally discredited the cultural and psychological machinery of Communism".[5]In that the book represents the view of an insider and draws on extensive analysis, it has been compared to Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler and Nineteen Eighty-Fourby George Orwell.[4]"
The Captive Mind - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


2. In the above we find how Soviet indoctrination directed a singular focus on Nazi atrocities and an ignorance of far worse ones by Stalin's communists...

".....Communists in control of pop culture populate the entertainment media with Nazi villains, and, secondarily, CIA or corporate villains, leading to the America of today, accepting communist aims "with never a commissar, Gulag guard, or show trial in sight."
West "American Betrayal," p. 282



The result is dolts such as Faun the Fool.

My point is that Academia started widely disseminating this propaganda in the 1950's; seeking to spark a Communist revolution, which they nearly did in the 60's. Communism was defeated in the 80's, but not on American campuses, where it remains the ONLY view permitted at most institutions.

That's socialism, FAIR CAPITALISM, NOT communism, superdupe.

You are truly stupid, fascist boi.

 

[Uncensored2008]

OP- "Liberal Fascism" is the stupidest, most misinforming book ever written on history, and the bible of superdupes...

The big lie has failed, you drooling retard.

 

[francoHFW]

If you wanted to start a store or other business, GO RIGHT AHEAD, unless you're Jewish or protesting Nazism or a SOCIALIST OR COMMUNIST,

Nope, you're lying you ignorant fool. Business could neither start nor stop without the permission of the Ministry of Commerce, which fell under Obermenschefuher Goering.

IF you had read a smidgen of History, you would know this, but you are an ignorant fool.

in which case off to the concentration camp. I have a Masters in History concentrations on HITLER and France and you are a gd idiot lol. The Reich was only interested in WAR PRODUCTION, shutting down protest, and stealing from the Jews. STHU. TYVM.

All production was to serve the war and the Reich, you lying fascist pile of shit.

You are both a liar, and abysmally ignorant.

There was nothing even approaching "capitalist" in Nazi Germany.

Read a history book, you fool.

Yup, stores, restaurants, hotels, grocery stores, and non-military factories and businesseswere all militarized my ass. It continued thru the war too... And the capitalist war producers loved all the money they made. They still competed for contracts for the gov't just like here, doofus. SEE Heinkel Inc vs Messerschmitt Inc vs Focke-Wolfe LLC vs Porsche Inc. etc etc etc.

 

[francoHFW]

OP- "Liberal Fascism" is the stupidest, most misinforming book ever written on history, and the bible of superdupes...

The big lie has failed, you drooling retard.

You got nothing, brainwashed ignoramus functional MORON.

 

[francoHFW]

[

And you got permission DUHHHHH, unless you were a Jew, socialist, or communist. You will NEVER tell me a a single fact about Nazis, Jethro. Nazis were fascists DUHHH. NEVER LIBERALS, superdupe.

Again retard, the ability to start of stop a business was up to the state. The market had NOTHING to do with it.

You've had your ass handed to you, you ignorant fascist fool. Run along now.

DUHHH. They were STILL capitalist enterprises and had to deal with the market forces at the same time, even if the fascist gov't was the client.. Even the Jewish or socialist owned ones that were confiscated were then sold to new owners, and the money used to fund the war-goal economy that would have gone bankrupt without a war of conquest.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Isn't that cute? Fawn is trying to pretend he knows something.

View attachment 120368

As always Fawn, what you "know" simply isn't so.

Socialism is state CONTROL of the means of production.

"Why does the state need to own business? The state owns the owners" - Benito Mussolini

But remember Fawlina, Hitler nationalized HUGE swaths of German industry. The oil and coal industry were taken by the Reich, the steel industry, BMW was nationalized for the war effort, etc.

Even among those industries NOT directly owned by the Reich, Nazi stooges were placed in charge (have you never seen "Schindler's List," fawn?)

Of course Hitler was a military guy, not much interested in economics. Fascism was the baby of that old Bolshevik Mussolini. Il Duce was going to "fix" Communism so it would work. Creating a kleptocracy DID work - in the short term.

It's cute how you think your made up definitions magically replace actual definitions.

But then again, I am pointing this out to the moron who doesn't know the difference between a fawn and a faun.

"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."

Fawn clings to the big lie. It served the left since the Marxists in academia crafted it in the 50's. It was a concerted and deliberate lie that was SO OUTRAGEOUS that people accepted it.

Claiming that fascism is "right wing" is like claiming that ice is hot. BUT given the right audience of young minds who are told that recitation of the big lie proves them wise, you soon have those like fawn who are utterly convinced that up is down, because the party mandates it.

"...the Marxists in academia crafted it in the 50's."

1. "The Captive Mind...is a 1953 work of nonfiction byPolish writer, academic andNobel laureate,Czesław Miłosz.... It draws upon his experiences as an underground writer during World War II, and his position within the political and cultural elite of Poland in the immediate post-war years.


The book attempts to explain both the intellectual allure of Stalinism and the temptation of collaboration with the Stalinist regime among intellectuals in post-warCentral and Eastern Europe. Miłosz describes the book as having been written "under great inner conflict"....a portrayal of four different gifted Polish men who capitulated, in some fashion, to the demands of the Communist state.....
The book elaborates the idea of "enslavement through consciousness" ..."


The book is described by historian Norman Davies as a "devastating study" which "totally discredited the cultural and psychological machinery of Communism".[5]In that the book represents the view of an insider and draws on extensive analysis, it has been compared to Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler and Nineteen Eighty-Fourby George Orwell.[4]"
The Captive Mind - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


2. In the above we find how Soviet indoctrination directed a singular focus on Nazi atrocities and an ignorance of far worse ones by Stalin's communists...

".....Communists in control of pop culture populate the entertainment media with Nazi villains, and, secondarily, CIA or corporate villains, leading to the America of today, accepting communist aims "with never a commissar, Gulag guard, or show trial in sight."
West "American Betrayal," p. 282



The result is dolts such as Faun the Fool.

My point is that Academia started widely disseminating this propaganda in the 1950's; seeking to spark a Communist revolution, which they nearly did in the 60's. Communism was defeated in the 80's, but not on American campuses, where it remains the ONLY view permitted at most institutions.

I wonder how many know the name of the man who welcomed the neo-Marxists of the Frankfurt School into our nation, to take over the colleges and universities.


Waiting to ally themselves with the Frankfurt School Marxists were the Americans who had accepted the Wilson/TR synthesis of Hegel and Marx. And a welcoming ‘nest’ was provided for these vipers by the Columbia University Sociology department. And, the perfect storm: America was up for helping scholars fleeing from Germany. The guy in charge of this was Edward R. Murrow, the Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced Foreign Scholars.
See Breitbart, "Righteous Indignation'

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nazi capitalism, yes. All to go to war...

franco hater dupe bot, you have virtually zero knowledge of history.

Would you care to explain how this Nazi "capitalism" worked? Could any person just start a business? No worries about the state? Were all people free to buy and sell with no knowledge of the Nazi Reich needed? A trade between one man and another was perfectly legal? The market determined the production goals of companies, not the Reich? Hitler never ordered his ministers to build production plans, since he was Capitalist and trusted the market?

Do tell?

If you wanted to start a store or other business, GO RIGHT AHEAD, unless you're Jewish or protesting Nazism or a SOCIALIST OR COMMUNIST, in which case off to the concentration camp. I have a Masters in History concentrations on HITLER and France and you are a gd idiot lol. The Reich was only interested in WAR PRODUCTION, shutting down protest, and stealing from the Jews. STHU. TYVM.

" I have a Masters in History "

This is the funniest thing you've ever said.

Either you're lying, or this is the greatest indictment of higher education ever.

 

[PoliticalChic]

[

And you got permission DUHHHHH, unless you were a Jew, socialist, or communist. You will NEVER tell me a a single fact about Nazis, Jethro. Nazis were fascists DUHHH. NEVER LIBERALS, superdupe.

Again retard, the ability to start of stop a business was up to the state. The market had NOTHING to do with it.

You've had your ass handed to you, you ignorant fascist fool. Run along now.

DUHHH. They were STILL capitalist enterprises and had to deal with the market forces at the same time, even if the fascist gov't was the client.. Even the Jewish or socialist owned ones that were confiscated were then sold to new owners, and the money used to fund the war-goal economy that would have gone bankrupt without a war of conquest.

No they weren't.

They were controlled by the Nazi government.

Totally.

 

[francoHFW]

It's cute how you think your made up definitions magically replace actual definitions.

But then again, I am pointing this out to the moron who doesn't know the difference between a fawn and a faun.

"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."

Fawn clings to the big lie. It served the left since the Marxists in academia crafted it in the 50's. It was a concerted and deliberate lie that was SO OUTRAGEOUS that people accepted it.

Claiming that fascism is "right wing" is like claiming that ice is hot. BUT given the right audience of young minds who are told that recitation of the big lie proves them wise, you soon have those like fawn who are utterly convinced that up is down, because the party mandates it.

"...the Marxists in academia crafted it in the 50's."

1. "The Captive Mind...is a 1953 work of nonfiction byPolish writer, academic andNobel laureate,Czesław Miłosz.... It draws upon his experiences as an underground writer during World War II, and his position within the political and cultural elite of Poland in the immediate post-war years.


The book attempts to explain both the intellectual allure of Stalinism and the temptation of collaboration with the Stalinist regime among intellectuals in post-warCentral and Eastern Europe. Miłosz describes the book as having been written "under great inner conflict"....a portrayal of four different gifted Polish men who capitulated, in some fashion, to the demands of the Communist state.....
The book elaborates the idea of "enslavement through consciousness" ..."


The book is described by historian Norman Davies as a "devastating study" which "totally discredited the cultural and psychological machinery of Communism".[5]In that the book represents the view of an insider and draws on extensive analysis, it has been compared to Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler and Nineteen Eighty-Fourby George Orwell.[4]"
The Captive Mind - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


2. In the above we find how Soviet indoctrination directed a singular focus on Nazi atrocities and an ignorance of far worse ones by Stalin's communists...

".....Communists in control of pop culture populate the entertainment media with Nazi villains, and, secondarily, CIA or corporate villains, leading to the America of today, accepting communist aims "with never a commissar, Gulag guard, or show trial in sight."
West "American Betrayal," p. 282



The result is dolts such as Faun the Fool.

My point is that Academia started widely disseminating this propaganda in the 1950's; seeking to spark a Communist revolution, which they nearly did in the 60's. Communism was defeated in the 80's, but not on American campuses, where it remains the ONLY view permitted at most institutions.

I wonder how many know the name of the man who welcomed the neo-Marxists of the Frankfurt School into our nation, to take over the colleges and universities.


Waiting to ally themselves with the Frankfurt School Marxists were the Americans who had accepted the Wilson/TR synthesis of Hegel and Marx. And a welcoming ‘nest’ was provided for these vipers by the Columbia University Sociology department. And, the perfect storm: America was up for helping scholars fleeing from Germany. The guy in charge of this was Edward R. Murrow, the Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced Foreign Scholars.
See Breitbart, "Righteous Indignation'

The few who weren't already killed in concentration camps... Of course, anyone to the left of Louis XIV is a Marxist to you lol...

 

[PoliticalChic]

If you wanted to start a store or other business, GO RIGHT AHEAD, unless you're Jewish or protesting Nazism or a SOCIALIST OR COMMUNIST,

Nope, you're lying you ignorant fool. Business could neither start nor stop without the permission of the Ministry of Commerce, which fell under Obermenschefuher Goering.

IF you had read a smidgen of History, you would know this, but you are an ignorant fool.

in which case off to the concentration camp. I have a Masters in History concentrations on HITLER and France and you are a gd idiot lol. The Reich was only interested in WAR PRODUCTION, shutting down protest, and stealing from the Jews. STHU. TYVM.

All production was to serve the war and the Reich, you lying fascist pile of shit.

You are both a liar, and abysmally ignorant.

There was nothing even approaching "capitalist" in Nazi Germany.

Read a history book, you fool.

Yup, stores, restaurants, hotels, grocery stores, and non-military factories and businesseswere all militarized my ass. It continued thru the war too... And the capitalist war producers loved all the money they made. They still competed for contracts for the gov't just like here, doofus. SEE Heinkel Inc vs Messerschmitt Inc vs Focke-Wolfe LLC vs Porsche Inc. etc etc etc.

By the late 1930s, taxation, regulations and general hostility towards the business community were becoming so onerous that one German businessman wrote: "These Nazi radicals think of nothing except ‘distributing the wealth,'” while some businessmen were “studying Marxist theories, so that they will have a better understanding of the present economic system."
Günter Reimann, The Vampire Economy: Doing Business Under Fascism, Mises Institute (2014) p. 6. Letter from German businessman, first published in 1939.

 

[francoHFW]

Nazi capitalism, yes. All to go to war...

franco hater dupe bot, you have virtually zero knowledge of history.

Would you care to explain how this Nazi "capitalism" worked? Could any person just start a business? No worries about the state? Were all people free to buy and sell with no knowledge of the Nazi Reich needed? A trade between one man and another was perfectly legal? The market determined the production goals of companies, not the Reich? Hitler never ordered his ministers to build production plans, since he was Capitalist and trusted the market?

Do tell?

If you wanted to start a store or other business, GO RIGHT AHEAD, unless you're Jewish or protesting Nazism or a SOCIALIST OR COMMUNIST, in which case off to the concentration camp. I have a Masters in History concentrations on HITLER and France and you are a gd idiot lol. The Reich was only interested in WAR PRODUCTION, shutting down protest, and stealing from the Jews. STHU. TYVM.

" I have a Masters in History "

This is the funniest thing you've ever said.

Either you're lying, or this is the greatest indictment of higher education ever.

U of Rochester, 1990. I'm slumming here with you brainwashed functional morons, for a book I'm writing. You're perfect RW chumps.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."

Fawn clings to the big lie. It served the left since the Marxists in academia crafted it in the 50's. It was a concerted and deliberate lie that was SO OUTRAGEOUS that people accepted it.

Claiming that fascism is "right wing" is like claiming that ice is hot. BUT given the right audience of young minds who are told that recitation of the big lie proves them wise, you soon have those like fawn who are utterly convinced that up is down, because the party mandates it.

"...the Marxists in academia crafted it in the 50's."

1. "The Captive Mind...is a 1953 work of nonfiction byPolish writer, academic andNobel laureate,Czesław Miłosz.... It draws upon his experiences as an underground writer during World War II, and his position within the political and cultural elite of Poland in the immediate post-war years.


The book attempts to explain both the intellectual allure of Stalinism and the temptation of collaboration with the Stalinist regime among intellectuals in post-warCentral and Eastern Europe. Miłosz describes the book as having been written "under great inner conflict"....a portrayal of four different gifted Polish men who capitulated, in some fashion, to the demands of the Communist state.....
The book elaborates the idea of "enslavement through consciousness" ..."


The book is described by historian Norman Davies as a "devastating study" which "totally discredited the cultural and psychological machinery of Communism".[5]In that the book represents the view of an insider and draws on extensive analysis, it has been compared to Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler and Nineteen Eighty-Fourby George Orwell.[4]"
The Captive Mind - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


2. In the above we find how Soviet indoctrination directed a singular focus on Nazi atrocities and an ignorance of far worse ones by Stalin's communists...

".....Communists in control of pop culture populate the entertainment media with Nazi villains, and, secondarily, CIA or corporate villains, leading to the America of today, accepting communist aims "with never a commissar, Gulag guard, or show trial in sight."
West "American Betrayal," p. 282



The result is dolts such as Faun the Fool.

My point is that Academia started widely disseminating this propaganda in the 1950's; seeking to spark a Communist revolution, which they nearly did in the 60's. Communism was defeated in the 80's, but not on American campuses, where it remains the ONLY view permitted at most institutions.

I wonder how many know the name of the man who welcomed the neo-Marxists of the Frankfurt School into our nation, to take over the colleges and universities.


Waiting to ally themselves with the Frankfurt School Marxists were the Americans who had accepted the Wilson/TR synthesis of Hegel and Marx. And a welcoming ‘nest’ was provided for these vipers by the Columbia University Sociology department. And, the perfect storm: America was up for helping scholars fleeing from Germany. The guy in charge of this was Edward R. Murrow, the Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced Foreign Scholars.
See Breitbart, "Righteous Indignation'

The few who weren't already killed in concentration camps... Of course, anyone to the left of Louis XIV is a Marxist to you lol...

Here's you lesson for today, dunce:

All of these have exactly the same outcomes in mind for society:
Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Fascism and Progressivism.