Liberal Lawyer taken away in handcuffs after showdown with Boston judge

[The Purge]

Boston Herald ^

A Boston judge ordered the defense attorney for a Straight Pride Parade protester to be taken away in handcuffs after she argued he didn’t have the right to refuse to dismiss a case.

Attorney Susan Church was held in contempt of court Wednesday by Boston Municipal Court Judge Richard Sinnott while defending Lilley Antoinette, 29, a protester from Somerville who was charged with disorderly conduct at the Straight Pride Parade in Boston Saturday.

Both Church and the prosecutor requested dismissing Antoinette’s case due to the police report of her arrest lacking information, including what her exact actions were at the event and who may have been victimized.

“We’re outraged,” said Elizabeth Rucker, who has been leading efforts to pay for the protesters’ bails. “An argument between the two is an overstatement of what happened. How could you possibly say (Antoinette) victimized someone if there’s no name of a victim?” Sinnott, who declined requests from prosecutors to dismiss some of the cases the day before, pushed back against Church when she spoke out about statutes regarding case dismissals.

“This is the only warning you’re going to get. Do not try to talk over me, do not try to turn this into theater,” Sinnott said before ordering Church to be held in contempt.

Antoinette’s arraignment was rescheduled due to Church’s removal, though she said her lawyer’s actions only made her like her more.

“My lawyer is a badass,” Antoinette said.

--------------

Now getting 3 straight behind bars!... ROTFLMFAO!!!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

This doesn't happen to leftist radical lawyers nearly often enough.

 

[Blackrook]

If the prosecution said it should be dismissed this case isn't going anywhere.

 

[The Irish Ram]

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Boston Herald ^

A Boston judge ordered the defense attorney for a Straight Pride Parade protester to be taken away in handcuffs after she argued he didn’t have the right to refuse to dismiss a case.

Attorney Susan Church was held in contempt of court Wednesday by Boston Municipal Court Judge Richard Sinnott while defending Lilley Antoinette, 29, a protester from Somerville who was charged with disorderly conduct at the Straight Pride Parade in Boston Saturday.

Both Church and the prosecutor requested dismissing Antoinette’s case due to the police report of her arrest lacking information, including what her exact actions were at the event and who may have been victimized.

“We’re outraged,” said Elizabeth Rucker, who has been leading efforts to pay for the protesters’ bails. “An argument between the two is an overstatement of what happened. How could you possibly say (Antoinette) victimized someone if there’s no name of a victim?” Sinnott, who declined requests from prosecutors to dismiss some of the cases the day before, pushed back against Church when she spoke out about statutes regarding case dismissals.

“This is the only warning you’re going to get. Do not try to talk over me, do not try to turn this into theater,” Sinnott said before ordering Church to be held in contempt.

Antoinette’s arraignment was rescheduled due to Church’s removal, though she said her lawyer’s actions only made her like her more.

“My lawyer is a badass,” Antoinette said.

--------------

Now getting 3 straight behind bars!... ROTFLMFAO!!!

Now getting 3 straight behind bars!... ROTFLMFAO!!!

Instead of laughing, you should be angry at the judge for abrogating the Constitutional rights of the accused in this case and then jumping and holding the defense's attorney in contempt for teaching him about the Mass. law and the 6th Amendment right to confront one's accuser! Besides, the prosecution even moved to drop the case for the same fucking reason of an unnamed accuser in the charging docs as pointed out in your own source cited in your own vacuous OP!

Now who's the fool being laughed at!

 

[Jets]

Not a smart move for ANY lawyer to quarrel with a judge. Even if you are right, the judge will have the last word.

 

[The Purge]

Boston Herald ^

A Boston judge ordered the defense attorney for a Straight Pride Parade protester to be taken away in handcuffs after she argued he didn’t have the right to refuse to dismiss a case.

Attorney Susan Church was held in contempt of court Wednesday by Boston Municipal Court Judge Richard Sinnott while defending Lilley Antoinette, 29, a protester from Somerville who was charged with disorderly conduct at the Straight Pride Parade in Boston Saturday.

Both Church and the prosecutor requested dismissing Antoinette’s case due to the police report of her arrest lacking information, including what her exact actions were at the event and who may have been victimized.

“We’re outraged,” said Elizabeth Rucker, who has been leading efforts to pay for the protesters’ bails. “An argument between the two is an overstatement of what happened. How could you possibly say (Antoinette) victimized someone if there’s no name of a victim?” Sinnott, who declined requests from prosecutors to dismiss some of the cases the day before, pushed back against Church when she spoke out about statutes regarding case dismissals.

“This is the only warning you’re going to get. Do not try to talk over me, do not try to turn this into theater,” Sinnott said before ordering Church to be held in contempt.

Antoinette’s arraignment was rescheduled due to Church’s removal, though she said her lawyer’s actions only made her like her more.

“My lawyer is a badass,” Antoinette said.

--------------

Now getting 3 straight behind bars!... ROTFLMFAO!!!

Now getting 3 straight behind bars!... ROTFLMFAO!!!

Instead of laughing, you should be angry at the judge for abrogating the Constitutional rights of the accused in this case and then jumping and holding the defense's attorney in contempt for teaching him about the Mass. law and the 6th Amendment right to confront one's accuser! Besides, the prosecution even moved to drop the case for the same fucking reason of an unnamed accuser in the charging docs as pointed out in your own source cited in your own vacuous OP!

Now who's the fool being laughed at!

YOU, you asshole since you know nothing about the case and you weren't there...And since it was a scumbag liberal lawyer that had to try to make her point over the judges directions she should spend a few weeks in jail, and get the protestor to visit her..Too easy, these ABNORMALS!

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Boston Herald ^

A Boston judge ordered the defense attorney for a Straight Pride Parade protester to be taken away in handcuffs after she argued he didn’t have the right to refuse to dismiss a case.

Attorney Susan Church was held in contempt of court Wednesday by Boston Municipal Court Judge Richard Sinnott while defending Lilley Antoinette, 29, a protester from Somerville who was charged with disorderly conduct at the Straight Pride Parade in Boston Saturday.

Both Church and the prosecutor requested dismissing Antoinette’s case due to the police report of her arrest lacking information, including what her exact actions were at the event and who may have been victimized.

“We’re outraged,” said Elizabeth Rucker, who has been leading efforts to pay for the protesters’ bails. “An argument between the two is an overstatement of what happened. How could you possibly say (Antoinette) victimized someone if there’s no name of a victim?” Sinnott, who declined requests from prosecutors to dismiss some of the cases the day before, pushed back against Church when she spoke out about statutes regarding case dismissals.

“This is the only warning you’re going to get. Do not try to talk over me, do not try to turn this into theater,” Sinnott said before ordering Church to be held in contempt.

Antoinette’s arraignment was rescheduled due to Church’s removal, though she said her lawyer’s actions only made her like her more.

“My lawyer is a badass,” Antoinette said.

--------------

Now getting 3 straight behind bars!... ROTFLMFAO!!!

Now getting 3 straight behind bars!... ROTFLMFAO!!!

Instead of laughing, you should be angry at the judge for abrogating the Constitutional rights of the accused in this case and then jumping and holding the defense's attorney in contempt for teaching him about the Mass. law and the 6th Amendment right to confront one's accuser! Besides, the prosecution even moved to drop the case for the same fucking reason of an unnamed accuser in the charging docs as pointed out in your own source cited in your own vacuous OP!

Now who's the fool being laughed at!

YOU, you asshole since you know nothing about the case and you weren't there...And since it was a scumbag liberal lawyer that had to try to make her point over the judges directions she should spend a few weeks in jail, and get the protestor to visit her..Too easy, these ABNORMALS!

YOU, you asshole since you know nothing about the case and you weren't there

Given the very great probability you weren't in the courtroom either, I would suspect the only thing you know of the case is what was in the article that you "interpreted" through your biased far RW lens and cited in the OP. Of course, bypassing any reasonable thought of what may have caused Ms. Church to cite those various statutes to Judge Sinnot which caused him to become so outraged in his embarrassment at his foolish error to go to the extreme of charging her with contempt just to shut up that "uppity woman" who was explaining the LAW to him, per her duty to the Court, her client and the State's Bar.

The difference being, I read and understood the article, while you skimmed the article, plucked the bits that fit you warped themes of sycophancy and made a fool of yourself... to be clear, now for a second time on this thread!!

Cheers Fool!

 

[Jitss617]

I had dinner with Susan church 16 years ago

 

[justoffal]

If the prosecution said it should be dismissed this case isn't going anywhere.

Doesn't matter....

Now she ( the lawyer ) has a process crime attached to her...
She's gonna go through hell...a la the Mueller Brigade....LOL