Liberal Reporter Slimes Catholic Pastor

But I'm not bigoted against them. There is not a single right I want to see taken away from people of faith. There is not a single service or area of public accommodation I want to see them denied. There isn't a single organization I want them denied membership in.

You just want them to shut the hell up, and you DO want their right of association with who they want to associate with taken away.

Fuck off Bigot.

Nope...don't want that either. I want some of them to stop trying to deny me equal rights or to take away those I have, but that's it.

What you want is acceptance by them, and you are not going to get it. You may protest that it is not the case, but we all know it.

How is switching from boy scouts to a private group that doesn't allow gay teens in it denying YOU YOUR rights?
 
You just want them to shut the hell up, and you DO want their right of association with who they want to associate with taken away.

Fuck off Bigot.

Nope...don't want that either. I want some of them to stop trying to deny me equal rights or to take away those I have, but that's it.

What you want is acceptance by them, and you are not going to get it. You may protest that it is not the case, but we all know it.

How is switching from boy scouts to a private group that doesn't allow gay teens in it denying YOU YOUR rights?

You keep swinging and missing, slugger.

I don't care if "they" accept me either (whoever "they" are). I have the acceptance of all the people I need in my life, family, friends, and clergy of varying faiths. I don't care if you accept me or even tolerate me. Hate me to your hearts content...just give me equal rights while doing it. Not so hard is it?
 
Nope...don't want that either. I want some of them to stop trying to deny me equal rights or to take away those I have, but that's it.

What you want is acceptance by them, and you are not going to get it. You may protest that it is not the case, but we all know it.

How is switching from boy scouts to a private group that doesn't allow gay teens in it denying YOU YOUR rights?

You keep swinging and missing, slugger.

I don't care if "they" accept me either (whoever "they" are). I have the acceptance of all the people I need in my life, family, friends, and clergy of varying faiths. I don't care if you accept me or even tolerate me. Hate me to your hearts content...just give me equal rights while doing it. Not so hard is it?

Bullshit. The problem with progressives like you is you lie. You lie ALOT. You say one thing, but mean another. Its all about acceptance. If it wasn't you would accept civil unions, which would give you the EXACTLY the same rights. What you want is the name, and the name means acceptance.

But keep up with the obvious bullshit, its charming.
 
You just want them to shut the hell up, and you DO want their right of association with who they want to associate with taken away.

Fuck off Bigot.

Nope...don't want that either. I want some of them to stop trying to deny me equal rights or to take away those I have, but that's it.

What you want is acceptance by them, and you are not going to get it. You may protest that it is not the case, but we all know it.

How is switching from boy scouts to a private group that doesn't allow gay teens in it denying YOU YOUR rights?

You do know that the actor in your avatar is a homo, right?
 
Nope...don't want that either. I want some of them to stop trying to deny me equal rights or to take away those I have, but that's it.

What you want is acceptance by them, and you are not going to get it. You may protest that it is not the case, but we all know it.

How is switching from boy scouts to a private group that doesn't allow gay teens in it denying YOU YOUR rights?

You do know that the actor in your avatar is a homo, right?

Yep. What's your point?
 
What's ironic here is that probably half of all priests around the world are homosexual men who are not openly gay. Most are probably not sexually active, but that does not mean they are not homosexuals.
 
What's ironic here is that probably half of all priests around the world are homosexual men who are not openly gay. Most are probably not sexually active, but that does not mean they are not homosexuals.

If you provided credible data - and I promise I will give you a pass even if that data comes from a left-of-center publication - to prove your claim it would be more credible.
 
What's ironic here is that probably half of all priests around the world are homosexual men who are not openly gay. Most are probably not sexually active, but that does not mean they are not homosexuals.

If you provided credible data - and I promise I will give you a pass even if that data comes from a left-of-center publication - to prove your claim it would be more credible.

its not even close to half. The ones who were abusers, however, were mostly likely homosexuals who repressed their orientation.
 
What's ironic here is that probably half of all priests around the world are homosexual men who are not openly gay. Most are probably not sexually active, but that does not mean they are not homosexuals.

If you provided credible data - and I promise I will give you a pass even if that data comes from a left-of-center publication - to prove your claim it would be more credible.

It's just common sense. For an adult, heterosexual male to give up a lifetime without a woman--very unusual. For a homosexual man, especially one who does not accept his homsexuality, the priesthood is a choice than can make sense. As well, I'm highly doubtful there is no homosexual activity going on between priests. Is there an data for this? Of course not because they would all deny it. But, it is a reasonable assumption.
 
What's ironic here is that probably half of all priests around the world are homosexual men who are not openly gay. Most are probably not sexually active, but that does not mean they are not homosexuals.

If you provided credible data - and I promise I will give you a pass even if that data comes from a left-of-center publication - to prove your claim it would be more credible.

It's just common sense. For an adult, heterosexual male to give up a lifetime without a woman--very unusual. For a homosexual man, especially one who does not accept his homsexuality, the priesthood is a choice than can make sense. As well, I'm highly doubtful there is no homosexual activity going on between priests. Is there an data for this? Of course not because they would all deny it. But, it is a reasonable assumption.

Those whose devout faith is coupled with a strong will can resist physical/biological urges.

Of course, atheists/liberals can not comprehend that.
 
If you provided credible data - and I promise I will give you a pass even if that data comes from a left-of-center publication - to prove your claim it would be more credible.

It's just common sense. For an adult, heterosexual male to give up a lifetime without a woman--very unusual. For a homosexual man, especially one who does not accept his homsexuality, the priesthood is a choice than can make sense. As well, I'm highly doubtful there is no homosexual activity going on between priests. Is there an data for this? Of course not because they would all deny it. But, it is a reasonable assumption.

Those whose devout faith is coupled with a strong will can resist physical/biological urges.

Of course, atheists/liberals can not comprehend that.
Holier than thou bullshit.

Most liberals and athiests are better, finer, nobler, more honest, ethical and decent human beings than most Catholics.
 
Last edited:
It's just common sense. For an adult, heterosexual male to give up a lifetime without a woman--very unusual. For a homosexual man, especially one who does not accept his homsexuality, the priesthood is a choice than can make sense. As well, I'm highly doubtful there is no homosexual activity going on between priests. Is there an data for this? Of course not because they would all deny it. But, it is a reasonable assumption.

Those whose devout faith is coupled with a strong will can resist physical/biological urges.

Of course, atheists/liberals can not comprehend that.
Holier than thou bullshit.

Most liberals and athiests are better, finer, nobler, more honest, ethical and decent human beings than most Catholics.

Here you go again!

You must drop this habit of making assertions without backing them up with solid, credible data.
 

Forum List

Back
Top