Liberals cannot be racists

[World Savior]

AA treats blacks differently, like they are not equal, just like slavery did

Yes, AA treats blacks differently because the majority race perpetrated and continues to perpetrate today, discrimination, racism, humiliation, disadvantages, unequal justice, unequal opportunities at blacks. Yes. So you just agreed with me then. You agree racism exists and is caused by people of the majority race towards the minority race.

Are you aware that racism towards minorities exists? Yes or no? I am asking you.

 

[World Savior]

Yes, they are discriminated against and were enslaved because of their skin color.

No they were not, but you keep thinking that!

I am happy to disagree with you and remind you that you should read US history and keep your eye on the current state of affairs in America.

Says the far left drone that denies the history of the far left..

Hahaha. AA is here to stay. We all need AA. You don't like AA? Neither do I. Just as I don't like chemo if I have cancer. But you need to realize, the chemo pain is a requirement to cure the cancer. A surgery is a requirement to prevent your physical pain. A drug treatment, however painful and may have side effects, is necessary to cure the original disease.

I am really appalled that this basic principle of "pain cures pain" is not something the cons are capable of understanding. You people are completly blind to the idea that sometimes the treatment can be as painful as the original disease but we have to go through the treatment until the disease is cured. In worst case as in some disease, you have to continue to the treatment forever. It's not curable but it's manageable.

I don't like AA either. But I blame racism for creating AA. Don't blame liberals, blame the racists.

Do you people understand this?

Another explanation to cover the fact this far left is racist and does not want to admit to being one..

Oh I am so sorry you didn't like the parallelism of cancer-chemo vs. racism-AA. When people debate with me and I try to explain to them these simple concepts, they get agitated over it. You are not the first one, don't feel bad.

 

[amrchaos]

There is an easier way to end this argument, and that is through analogy.

I am a homophobe. I am. I have a fear of homosexuals--mainly men, and I do not think foundly of their lifestyle. Negatively in general.

However, I do think gays have the right to get married, adopt kids, and have general protections against being discriminated against in both public and private life

They, as citizens, should have the rights of citizens.

However, I know that I am a homophobe.

Do you understand that, World savior?
Do you see how this runs against your argument through analogy?

 

[Tank]

World Savior admits to judging people by the color of their skin

 

[FA_Q2]

There is a reason that 'no true Scotsman' is a logical fallacy.

That is all the OP did - post a blatant no true Scotsman fallacy.

Hahaha, I posted a lie? Really? Liberals are not racists. Don't believe me? Liberals get support from blacks, Jews, gays, Muslims, Indians, Asians, Africans, latinos, women and WHITE MEN too. Yes the coveted WHITE WHITE WHITE MEN MEN MEN.

Hohohoho. Yes, liberals must be so racists, virtually ALL ethnic people including white men join the liberals during elections. Hahahahaha. How racist!

Lie?

Where did I use the term lie. No, you posted a no true Scotsman fallacy. It is so blatant and obvious that I could use it as a direct example of what a no true Scotsman fallacy is.

 

[World Savior]

There is an easier way to end this argument, and that is through analogy.

I am a homophobe. I am. I have a fear of homosexuals--mainly men, and I do not think foundly of their lifestyle. Negatively in general.

However, I do think gays have the right to get married, adopt kids, and have general protections against being discriminated against in both public and private life

They, as citizens, should have the rights of citizens.

However, I know that I am a homophobe.

Do you understand that, World savior?
Do you see how this runs against your argument through analogy?

No sorry I must be too stupid today. I do not understand what you are trying to say. Please try again. Argument reset. Status, undelivered. Caontact sys admin or click here for help.

 

[World Savior]

World Savior admits to judging people by the color of their skin

Yes, I do judge people by the color of their skin when I realize that they are at the receiving end of racist right wing bigots and need protection from the bigots and haters. So yes, I judge people based upon their victimization by the majority race, some of whom (but not all) caused the problem known as racism.

 

[World Savior]

There is a reason that 'no true Scotsman' is a logical fallacy.

That is all the OP did - post a blatant no true Scotsman fallacy.

Hahaha, I posted a lie? Really? Liberals are not racists. Don't believe me? Liberals get support from blacks, Jews, gays, Muslims, Indians, Asians, Africans, latinos, women and WHITE MEN too. Yes the coveted WHITE WHITE WHITE MEN MEN MEN.

Hohohoho. Yes, liberals must be so racists, virtually ALL ethnic people including white men join the liberals during elections. Hahahahaha. How racist!

Lie?

Where did I use the term lie. No, you posted a no true Scotsman fallacy. It is so blatant and obvious that I could use it as a direct example of what a no true Scotsman fallacy is.

Where do you find the fallacy? Explain away.

 

[amrchaos]

Through analogue, I am basically a living contradiction to what you are saying.

If I can be a Homophobe that can argue for the rights of homosexuals,
why can't there exist a racist that argue for the rights of minorities?

There are. In both cases, the position taken is liberal.

 

[norwegen]

There is an easier way to end this argument, and that is through analogy.

I am a homophobe. I am. I have a fear of homosexuals--mainly men, and I do not think foundly of their lifestyle. Negatively in general.

However, I do think gays have the right to get married, adopt kids, and have general protections against being discriminated against in both public and private life

They, as citizens, should have the rights of citizens.

However, I know that I am a homophobe.

Do you understand that, World savior?
Do you see how this runs against your argument through analogy?

No sorry I must be too stupid today.

You just started today?

 

[ScienceRocks]

World Savior admits to judging people by the color of their skin

That makes him a racist. As far as I am concern I give blacks constructive criticsism in order for them to clean up their very real mess = I am a bigot. People like the op judge whites for being too perfect and hate us out of pure rage for it. The guy is far more racist.

 

[World Savior]

There is an easier way to end this argument, and that is through analogy.

I am a homophobe. I am. I have a fear of homosexuals--mainly men, and I do not think foundly of their lifestyle. Negatively in general.

However, I do think gays have the right to get married, adopt kids, and have general protections against being discriminated against in both public and private life

They, as citizens, should have the rights of citizens.

However, I know that I am a homophobe.

Do you understand that, World savior?
Do you see how this runs against your argument through analogy?

No sorry I must be too stupid today.

You just started today?

Started what?

 

[norwegen]

There is an easier way to end this argument, and that is through analogy.

I am a homophobe. I am. I have a fear of homosexuals--mainly men, and I do not think foundly of their lifestyle. Negatively in general.

However, I do think gays have the right to get married, adopt kids, and have general protections against being discriminated against in both public and private life

They, as citizens, should have the rights of citizens.

However, I know that I am a homophobe.

Do you understand that, World savior?
Do you see how this runs against your argument through analogy?

No sorry I must be too stupid today.

You just started today?

Started what?

Gold.

Pure gold.

 

[FA_Q2]

There is a reason that 'no true Scotsman' is a logical fallacy.

That is all the OP did - post a blatant no true Scotsman fallacy.

Hahaha, I posted a lie? Really? Liberals are not racists. Don't believe me? Liberals get support from blacks, Jews, gays, Muslims, Indians, Asians, Africans, latinos, women and WHITE MEN too. Yes the coveted WHITE WHITE WHITE MEN MEN MEN.

Hohohoho. Yes, liberals must be so racists, virtually ALL ethnic people including white men join the liberals during elections. Hahahahaha. How racist!

Lie?

Where did I use the term lie. No, you posted a no true Scotsman fallacy. It is so blatant and obvious that I could use it as a direct example of what a no true Scotsman fallacy is.

Where do you find the fallacy? Explain away.

This really should not have to be explained - it is the basics of debate...

No true Scotsman - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Person A: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
Person B: "But my uncle Angus likes sugar with his porridge."
Person A: "Ah yes, but no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
"And as I said racism and liberalism are mutually exclusive. If someone is a racist, he/she does not believe in the liberal principle of equality. So she may vote for a dem but she is not a liberal. LOL."

IOW, no true liberal is racist.

 

[World Savior]

There is a reason that 'no true Scotsman' is a logical fallacy.

That is all the OP did - post a blatant no true Scotsman fallacy.

Hahaha, I posted a lie? Really? Liberals are not racists. Don't believe me? Liberals get support from blacks, Jews, gays, Muslims, Indians, Asians, Africans, latinos, women and WHITE MEN too. Yes the coveted WHITE WHITE WHITE MEN MEN MEN.

Hohohoho. Yes, liberals must be so racists, virtually ALL ethnic people including white men join the liberals during elections. Hahahahaha. How racist!

Lie?

Where did I use the term lie. No, you posted a no true Scotsman fallacy. It is so blatant and obvious that I could use it as a direct example of what a no true Scotsman fallacy is.

Where do you find the fallacy? Explain away.

This really should not have to be explained - it is the basics of debate...

No true Scotsman - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Person A: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
Person B: "But my uncle Angus likes sugar with his porridge."
Person A: "Ah yes, but no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
"And as I said racism and liberalism are mutually exclusive. If someone is a racist, he/she does not believe in the liberal principle of equality. So she may vote for a dem but she is not a liberal. LOL."

IOW, no true liberal is racist.

Right, you still failed to explain why you think liberals are racists. If liberals were racists, then they would not be liberals. I know of no liberals who espoused racism and found the philosophy of liberalism still attractive. Even if you assume that no true scotsman fallacy applies to my argument, I still need to see widespread examples of liberals being racists.

It's a much easier proposition to prove conservative racism. No one even debates that anymore. But liberals being racists is unheard of. You can never find an example of liberal racists. Liberalism offers nothing to true racists.

 

[bripat9643]

Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality. The former principle is stressed in classical liberalism while the latter is more evident in social liberalism.

There are no racist liberals. Liberals do not discriminate against other people on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, ethnicity, religion....Liberals welcome everyone in this world. They are tolerant.

Liberals cannot be racists. I repeat: Liberals cannot be racists. I repeat again: Liberals cannot be racists.

Yeah, except for white Southern Christians, eh asshole?

 

[World Savior]

Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality. The former principle is stressed in classical liberalism while the latter is more evident in social liberalism.

There are no racist liberals. Liberals do not discriminate against other people on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, ethnicity, religion....Liberals welcome everyone in this world. They are tolerant.

Liberals cannot be racists. I repeat: Liberals cannot be racists. I repeat again: Liberals cannot be racists.

Yeah, except for white Southern Christians, eh asshole?

Sorry but white southern Christians are almost always ALL conservatives. We are talking about liberals here not white southern Christians. Nice try but still, Liberals cannot be racists.

 

[boedicca]

Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality. The former principle is stressed in classical liberalism while the latter is more evident in social liberalism.

There are no racist liberals. Liberals do not discriminate against other people on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, ethnicity, religion....Liberals welcome everyone in this world. They are tolerant.

Liberals cannot be racists. I repeat: Liberals cannot be racists. I repeat again: Liberals cannot be racists.

What a load of hooey.

 

[Correll]

Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality. The former principle is stressed in classical liberalism while the latter is more evident in social liberalism.

There are no racist liberals. Liberals do not discriminate against other people on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, ethnicity, religion....Liberals welcome everyone in this world. They are tolerant.

Liberals cannot be racists. I repeat: Liberals cannot be racists. I repeat again: Liberals cannot be racists.

Except that they do, all the time.

 

[World Savior]

World Savior admits to judging people by the color of their skin

That makes him a racist. As far as I am concern I give blacks constructive criticsism in order for them to clean up their very real mess = I am a bigot. People like the op judge whites for being too perfect and hate us out of pure rage for it. The guy is far more racist.

LOL, nice ad hominem dear. This thread was not about white people or black people. This thread was focused on liberalism and the absence of racism among liberals. You brought in the white race and white color and constructed a straw man out of it by saying I blame whites or hate whites or whatever.

Hey tell you what here's a simple idea: If liberals are racists, then they won't get the black votes OK. Oh god, you cons never stop providing your entertainment to me. Yeah, blacks will vote for "racist" liberals because "racist" liberals will try to help the blacks.

Hahaha. Yeah right, liberals are so "racists" that they help blacks and also the blacks vote for liberals as do whites by the millions. LOL!