Liberals determine ice cream names are now racists.

[james bond]

Why the heh vanilla WHITE ice cream always da default why not chocolate it's so much betta that's typical Amerikkka.

We got white chocolate now.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Left Wing is clearly a mental illness.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

Your opinion of me and my posting means nothing.

Liberalism wrote the Constitution, ...

Yes, back when classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's liberalism is socialist/Marxist/communist bullshit, far from classical liberalism. The term "liberal" has become so derogatory that the liberals now insist on being called "progressives" instead.

Today's liberalism is a mental disorder.

Finally there is no such thing as "the Democrat Party". Nothing by that name has ever existed.

I know. I use that term because it pisses off the democrats. Many others do the same and have done so for decades.

Democrat Party (epithet) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Screw the Democrat Party!

Besides, "Democratic Party" is a misnomer anyway. There is nothing democratic about their agenda or their modus operandi.

A republican is a member of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is therefore full of republicans.

Likewise, it follows that a democrat is a member of the Democrat Party, it being a party full of democrats.


SCREW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh poster please. "Classical" MY ASS. What a classical cop-out. You got caught misusing terms you don't begin to understand and now you're trying to slither out of it. READ YOUR OWN POST --- you started with 'Liberals" and by the end of your own text it had morphed to "leftists". Every one of your links was about "leftists", not "Liberals". Now you're gonna sit here and try to tell us multiple PoliSci terms mean the same thing, because ignorance?

I see your ignorance extends to the written word as well. A member of the Republican party is a Republican, not a republican --- they mean two different things. As do "Democrat" and "democrat".

No Goober, I'm afraid definitions are fixed. They're not made of rubber so you can re-form them to excuse whatever faux pas you just committed through that ignorance. You don't get to revise them to cover up. Your failure to assign a proper label because you don't know what those labels mean, is nobody else's doing but your own. And speaking of historical ignorance the Progressive Era ended about a hundred years ago.

Oh and further, by the same idiot nomenclature you just displayed, that other party would be called the Republic Party.

I know damn well where you got that misspelling --- Lush Rimjob. He couldn't figure it out either.

JC. Is spellin and punksheation yer bigese cuncern here> Plus bein a hall monotur on every thred

Got an idea about a new libturd ice cream favorite......................Creamy Fudge Packers Delight...Whadya thunk?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Big deal. A company made a business decision to change the name of their product. If they had somehow been force to make the change against their will, you might have something to whine about, even though I'm not sure what that something might be. Don't want to buy that product under it's new name? Then don't buy it. Problem solved.

/----/ " Big deal. A company made a business decision "
No, a business was threatened by a tiny activist group, and rather than fight, they changed the name out of cowardice. Wait until the Cancel Culture or Woke goes after something you care about.

 

[Pogo]

Libtard save the world from racist ice cream names. And it's White privilege vanilla ice cream to boot. No wonder liberalism is considered a mental disorder.

Ice Cream Flavor Name Changed Due to Racism Accusations

A New England ice cream producer has changed the name of one of its most popular flavors after some claimed that its name, "Just Jimmies," has a racist origin, Fox Business reported on Wednesday. The new name of the flavor is "Just Sprinkles." "Jimmies" is the name many New...

www.newsmax.com

Ice Cream Flavor Name Changed Due to Racism Accusations

View attachment 466328

The thread premise is a lie.

This has nothing to do with ‘liberals.’

Newsmax is an unreliable source.

“Overall, we rate Newsmax Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience as well as numerous failed fact checks.”

Newsmax - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

/——/ What’s unreliable about this or any Newsmax story? I’m sure you have many examples to share.

Breaking News from Newsmax.com New York Sens. Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand are calling on Gov. Cuomo to resign over multiple sexual harassment claims. Read More Here Watch latest details on Newsmax TV via Directv 349, Xfinity 1115, Dish 216, Uverse 1220, Fios 615, Optimum 102, Mediacom 277, Spectrum, Cox, Suddenlink, WOW!, or on FREE OTT via Roku, YouTube, Xumo, Pluto, Apple TV, more! Find all channels: More Info Here

AGAIN --- in this case it's not Spewsmax who is the unreliable narrator. It's you. And you've been repeatedly told why, and you had no answer.

/—-/ No one has posted any proof, just opinion.

The proof is in your title. FIRST FUCKING WORD. Cheeses Christ on a Cracker WHO wrote that??

 

[Pogo]

Your opinion of me and my posting means nothing.

Liberalism wrote the Constitution, ...

Yes, back when classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's liberalism is socialist/Marxist/communist bullshit, far from classical liberalism. The term "liberal" has become so derogatory that the liberals now insist on being called "progressives" instead.

Today's liberalism is a mental disorder.

Finally there is no such thing as "the Democrat Party". Nothing by that name has ever existed.

I know. I use that term because it pisses off the democrats. Many others do the same and have done so for decades.

Democrat Party (epithet) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Screw the Democrat Party!

Besides, "Democratic Party" is a misnomer anyway. There is nothing democratic about their agenda or their modus operandi.

A republican is a member of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is therefore full of republicans.

Likewise, it follows that a democrat is a member of the Democrat Party, it being a party full of democrats.


SCREW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh poster please. "Classical" MY ASS. What a classical cop-out. You got caught misusing terms you don't begin to understand and now you're trying to slither out of it. READ YOUR OWN POST --- you started with 'Liberals" and by the end of your own text it had morphed to "leftists". Every one of your links was about "leftists", not "Liberals". Now you're gonna sit here and try to tell us multiple PoliSci terms mean the same thing, because ignorance?

I see your ignorance extends to the written word as well. A member of the Republican party is a Republican, not a republican --- they mean two different things. As do "Democrat" and "democrat".

No Goober, I'm afraid definitions are fixed. They're not made of rubber so you can re-form them to excuse whatever faux pas you just committed through that ignorance. You don't get to revise them to cover up. Your failure to assign a proper label because you don't know what those labels mean, is nobody else's doing but your own. And speaking of historical ignorance the Progressive Era ended about a hundred years ago.

Oh and further, by the same idiot nomenclature you just displayed, that other party would be called the Republic Party.

I know damn well where you got that misspelling --- Lush Rimjob. He couldn't figure it out either.

Here you go, you uninformed idiot.

What Is Classical Liberalism? Definition and Examples

What is classical liberalism, where did it come from, and how does it differ from today’s drastically more politically-progressive social liberalism?

www.thoughtco.com

...and if you dare think you're anywhere near as intelligent as Rush Limbaugh, you are a total idiot.

 

[asaratis]

Your opinion of me and my posting means nothing.

Liberalism wrote the Constitution, ...

Yes, back when classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's liberalism is socialist/Marxist/communist bullshit, far from classical liberalism. The term "liberal" has become so derogatory that the liberals now insist on being called "progressives" instead.

Today's liberalism is a mental disorder.

Finally there is no such thing as "the Democrat Party". Nothing by that name has ever existed.

I know. I use that term because it pisses off the democrats. Many others do the same and have done so for decades.

Democrat Party (epithet) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Screw the Democrat Party!

Besides, "Democratic Party" is a misnomer anyway. There is nothing democratic about their agenda or their modus operandi.

A republican is a member of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is therefore full of republicans.

Likewise, it follows that a democrat is a member of the Democrat Party, it being a party full of democrats.


SCREW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh poster please. "Classical" MY ASS. What a classical cop-out. You got caught misusing terms you don't begin to understand and now you're trying to slither out of it. READ YOUR OWN POST --- you started with 'Liberals" and by the end of your own text it had morphed to "leftists". Every one of your links was about "leftists", not "Liberals". Now you're gonna sit here and try to tell us multiple PoliSci terms mean the same thing, because ignorance?

I see your ignorance extends to the written word as well. A member of the Republican party is a Republican, not a republican --- they mean two different things. As do "Democrat" and "democrat".

No Goober, I'm afraid definitions are fixed. They're not made of rubber so you can re-form them to excuse whatever faux pas you just committed through that ignorance. You don't get to revise them to cover up. Your failure to assign a proper label because you don't know what those labels mean, is nobody else's doing but your own. And speaking of historical ignorance the Progressive Era ended about a hundred years ago.

Oh and further, by the same idiot nomenclature you just displayed, that other party would be called the Republic Party.

I know damn well where you got that misspelling --- Lush Rimjob. He couldn't figure it out either.

Here you go, you uninformed idiot.

What Is Classical Liberalism? Definition and Examples

What is classical liberalism, where did it come from, and how does it differ from today’s drastically more politically-progressive social liberalism?

www.thoughtco.com

...and if you dare think you're anywhere near as intelligent as Rush Limbaugh, you are a total idiot.

Do you still deny the definition of classical liberalism? You're the one here digging yourself a hole.

Then again, perhaps you're looking for a sensible answer.

 

[DGS49]

The response to Cancel Culture and silly issues like this is to call attention to the concept of...the presence of absence of...MALICE.

Just because some professional Umbrage-Taker can figure out a reason to be offended is NOT SUFFICIENT to cause a non-malicious actor to change or revoke its position. And certainly not for the creator to be socially sanctioned.

NOBODY alive today actually considers "jimmies" to be a racist slur, and CERTAINLY NOT the people responsible for inventing and using that name for their ice cream flavor.

No malice; no foul.

Same for the idiot NBA player who exclaimed, "...**** BITCH..." while playing a video game. Regardless of where or how that silly expression sprang out of his head, it was utterly incongruous and harmless in context, with not even a hint of MALICE. No Jews or women within hearing distance, personally or virtually.

No malice; no foul.

I have spoken.

 

[Pogo]

Your opinion of me and my posting means nothing.

Liberalism wrote the Constitution, ...

Yes, back when classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's liberalism is socialist/Marxist/communist bullshit, far from classical liberalism. The term "liberal" has become so derogatory that the liberals now insist on being called "progressives" instead.

Today's liberalism is a mental disorder.

Finally there is no such thing as "the Democrat Party". Nothing by that name has ever existed.

I know. I use that term because it pisses off the democrats. Many others do the same and have done so for decades.

Democrat Party (epithet) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Screw the Democrat Party!

Besides, "Democratic Party" is a misnomer anyway. There is nothing democratic about their agenda or their modus operandi.

A republican is a member of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is therefore full of republicans.

Likewise, it follows that a democrat is a member of the Democrat Party, it being a party full of democrats.


SCREW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh poster please. "Classical" MY ASS. What a classical cop-out. You got caught misusing terms you don't begin to understand and now you're trying to slither out of it. READ YOUR OWN POST --- you started with 'Liberals" and by the end of your own text it had morphed to "leftists". Every one of your links was about "leftists", not "Liberals". Now you're gonna sit here and try to tell us multiple PoliSci terms mean the same thing, because ignorance?

I see your ignorance extends to the written word as well. A member of the Republican party is a Republican, not a republican --- they mean two different things. As do "Democrat" and "democrat".

No Goober, I'm afraid definitions are fixed. They're not made of rubber so you can re-form them to excuse whatever faux pas you just committed through that ignorance. You don't get to revise them to cover up. Your failure to assign a proper label because you don't know what those labels mean, is nobody else's doing but your own. And speaking of historical ignorance the Progressive Era ended about a hundred years ago.

Oh and further, by the same idiot nomenclature you just displayed, that other party would be called the Republic Party.

I know damn well where you got that misspelling --- Lush Rimjob. He couldn't figure it out either.

JC. Is spellin and punksheation yer bigese cuncern here> Plus bein a hall monotur on every thred

Got an idea about a new libturd ice cream favorite......................Creamy Fudge Packers Delight...Whadya thunk?

I think you're a charter member of the Illiterati if you think anything above had jack shit to do with spellin or punksheation. Go fourth an lurn tu reed. Just like everything I do here it had to do directly with honest argument versus ----- whatever that was. DEAL with it.

 

[Pogo]

Your opinion of me and my posting means nothing.

Liberalism wrote the Constitution, ...

Yes, back when classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's liberalism is socialist/Marxist/communist bullshit, far from classical liberalism. The term "liberal" has become so derogatory that the liberals now insist on being called "progressives" instead.

Today's liberalism is a mental disorder.

Finally there is no such thing as "the Democrat Party". Nothing by that name has ever existed.

I know. I use that term because it pisses off the democrats. Many others do the same and have done so for decades.

Democrat Party (epithet) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Screw the Democrat Party!

Besides, "Democratic Party" is a misnomer anyway. There is nothing democratic about their agenda or their modus operandi.

A republican is a member of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is therefore full of republicans.

Likewise, it follows that a democrat is a member of the Democrat Party, it being a party full of democrats.


SCREW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh poster please. "Classical" MY ASS. What a classical cop-out. You got caught misusing terms you don't begin to understand and now you're trying to slither out of it. READ YOUR OWN POST --- you started with 'Liberals" and by the end of your own text it had morphed to "leftists". Every one of your links was about "leftists", not "Liberals". Now you're gonna sit here and try to tell us multiple PoliSci terms mean the same thing, because ignorance?

I see your ignorance extends to the written word as well. A member of the Republican party is a Republican, not a republican --- they mean two different things. As do "Democrat" and "democrat".

No Goober, I'm afraid definitions are fixed. They're not made of rubber so you can re-form them to excuse whatever faux pas you just committed through that ignorance. You don't get to revise them to cover up. Your failure to assign a proper label because you don't know what those labels mean, is nobody else's doing but your own. And speaking of historical ignorance the Progressive Era ended about a hundred years ago.

Oh and further, by the same idiot nomenclature you just displayed, that other party would be called the Republic Party.

I know damn well where you got that misspelling --- Lush Rimjob. He couldn't figure it out either.

Here you go, you uninformed idiot.

What Is Classical Liberalism? Definition and Examples

What is classical liberalism, where did it come from, and how does it differ from today’s drastically more politically-progressive social liberalism?

www.thoughtco.com

...and if you dare think you're anywhere near as intelligent as Rush Limbaugh, you are a total idiot.

Do you still deny the definition of classical liberalism? You're the one here digging yourself a hole.

Then again, perhaps you're looking for a sensible answer.

What I ALREADY did was to call out your desperate conflation of a single term ("Liberalism") into two different and diametrically opposed definitions, using the same term, simply because of your own arrested development ignorance.

"Classical Liberalism" does not exist as a term except as a redundant one employed by bullshit rhetoricists who KNOW they're shoveling bullshit to do exactly what I just described in the first line above. Why don't we just start calling a bright sunny day "rainy", and parse it out to when it actually rains that's "classic rain".

No Twinkletoes, you don't get to pervert innocent PoliSci terms just because political bullshit cynics of the 1940s, jealous at having been shut out of the White House for 20 years, started polluting PoliSci terms into their own opposites just to demonize their opponents. They were wrong and so are you.

Go get a edumacation. I gave you a spoonful here and you turned away, preferring your own ignorance. I can lead you to the water but I can't make you think.

 

[asaratis]

Your opinion of me and my posting means nothing.

Liberalism wrote the Constitution, ...

Yes, back when classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's liberalism is socialist/Marxist/communist bullshit, far from classical liberalism. The term "liberal" has become so derogatory that the liberals now insist on being called "progressives" instead.

Today's liberalism is a mental disorder.

Finally there is no such thing as "the Democrat Party". Nothing by that name has ever existed.

I know. I use that term because it pisses off the democrats. Many others do the same and have done so for decades.

Democrat Party (epithet) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Screw the Democrat Party!

Besides, "Democratic Party" is a misnomer anyway. There is nothing democratic about their agenda or their modus operandi.

A republican is a member of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is therefore full of republicans.

Likewise, it follows that a democrat is a member of the Democrat Party, it being a party full of democrats.


SCREW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh poster please. "Classical" MY ASS. What a classical cop-out. You got caught misusing terms you don't begin to understand and now you're trying to slither out of it. READ YOUR OWN POST --- you started with 'Liberals" and by the end of your own text it had morphed to "leftists". Every one of your links was about "leftists", not "Liberals". Now you're gonna sit here and try to tell us multiple PoliSci terms mean the same thing, because ignorance?

I see your ignorance extends to the written word as well. A member of the Republican party is a Republican, not a republican --- they mean two different things. As do "Democrat" and "democrat".

No Goober, I'm afraid definitions are fixed. They're not made of rubber so you can re-form them to excuse whatever faux pas you just committed through that ignorance. You don't get to revise them to cover up. Your failure to assign a proper label because you don't know what those labels mean, is nobody else's doing but your own. And speaking of historical ignorance the Progressive Era ended about a hundred years ago.

Oh and further, by the same idiot nomenclature you just displayed, that other party would be called the Republic Party.

I know damn well where you got that misspelling --- Lush Rimjob. He couldn't figure it out either.

Here you go, you uninformed idiot.

What Is Classical Liberalism? Definition and Examples

What is classical liberalism, where did it come from, and how does it differ from today’s drastically more politically-progressive social liberalism?

www.thoughtco.com

...and if you dare think you're anywhere near as intelligent as Rush Limbaugh, you are a total idiot.

Do you still deny the definition of classical liberalism? You're the one here digging yourself a hole.

Then again, perhaps you're looking for a sensible answer.

What I ALREADY did was to call out your desperate conflation of a single term ("Liberalism") into two different and diametrically opposed definitions, using the same term, simply because of your own arrested development ignorance.

"Classical Liberalism" does not exist as a term except as a redundant one employed by bullshit rhetoricists who KNOW they're shoveling bullshit to do exactly what I just described in the first line above. Why don't we just start calling a bright sunny day "rainy", and parse it out to when it actually rains that's "classic rain".

No Twinkletoes, you don't get to pervert innocent PoliSci terms just because political bullshit cynics of the 1940s, jealous at having been shut out of the White House for 20 years, started polluting PoliSci terms into their own opposites just to demonize their opponents. They were wrong and so are you.

Go get a edumacation. I gave you a spoonful here and you turned away, preferring your own ignorance. I can lead you to the water but I can't make you think.

Again, you post bullshit in an effort to save face and paint yourself as being intelligent.

Liberals have morphed in recent decades to be a group infested with socialists, Marxists, and communists. This is evident to all, including the few wise among them. That is why they now want to be called "progressives" rather than "liberals".

Your ridiculous failed analogy is just more puerile bullshit. Classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's Democrat Party has ruined it by taking in too many ultra-liberal extremists. It gets worse on a continual basis as it absorbs Islamic radicals that openly support Sharia law rather than our Constitution.

.............................................................................................

Democrats Support Muslims and Sharia Law - CRTXNEWS

By Dr. Paul Revere Constitution I have studied the Koran a great deal, above all with respect to how we compare to Muslim populations in Algeria and throughout the Orient. I have come away from that study with the conviction that there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as...

crtxnews.com

Democrat "Rock Star" Maxine Waters Is Pro-Farrakhan, Supports Sharia

Maxine Waters, considered one of the most corrupt members of Congress, is also the Democratic Party icon. Dubbed by them, a "rock star", she has associations with and is a supporter of the most radical elements of our society.

www.independentsentinel.com

Ilhan Omar Is Dangerous, Supports Sharia Law And Al-Qaeda

Ilhan Omar and her compatriots in “the squad” hate America and hate Jews, especially Isreal which they have spoken out against while

amac.us

Republicans Pass Bill Banning Sharia Law With ZERO Democrat Votes – The Patriot Nation

This Muslim Congressman REFUSES To Renounce Sharia Law

This Muslim Congressman REFUSES To Renounce Sharia Law

thefederalistpapers.org

...................................................................................................

Your opinion as to whether classical liberalism is valid terminology is but one example of your sheer stupidity.

Don't take my word for it, just read some political science history books on the subject.

I'm done doing your homework for you. I have neither the inclination, the time nor the skills to teach special needs children such as you.

 

[Pogo]

Your opinion of me and my posting means nothing.

Liberalism wrote the Constitution, ...

Yes, back when classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's liberalism is socialist/Marxist/communist bullshit, far from classical liberalism. The term "liberal" has become so derogatory that the liberals now insist on being called "progressives" instead.

Today's liberalism is a mental disorder.

Finally there is no such thing as "the Democrat Party". Nothing by that name has ever existed.

I know. I use that term because it pisses off the democrats. Many others do the same and have done so for decades.

Democrat Party (epithet) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Screw the Democrat Party!

Besides, "Democratic Party" is a misnomer anyway. There is nothing democratic about their agenda or their modus operandi.

A republican is a member of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is therefore full of republicans.

Likewise, it follows that a democrat is a member of the Democrat Party, it being a party full of democrats.


SCREW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh poster please. "Classical" MY ASS. What a classical cop-out. You got caught misusing terms you don't begin to understand and now you're trying to slither out of it. READ YOUR OWN POST --- you started with 'Liberals" and by the end of your own text it had morphed to "leftists". Every one of your links was about "leftists", not "Liberals". Now you're gonna sit here and try to tell us multiple PoliSci terms mean the same thing, because ignorance?

I see your ignorance extends to the written word as well. A member of the Republican party is a Republican, not a republican --- they mean two different things. As do "Democrat" and "democrat".

No Goober, I'm afraid definitions are fixed. They're not made of rubber so you can re-form them to excuse whatever faux pas you just committed through that ignorance. You don't get to revise them to cover up. Your failure to assign a proper label because you don't know what those labels mean, is nobody else's doing but your own. And speaking of historical ignorance the Progressive Era ended about a hundred years ago.

Oh and further, by the same idiot nomenclature you just displayed, that other party would be called the Republic Party.

I know damn well where you got that misspelling --- Lush Rimjob. He couldn't figure it out either.

Here you go, you uninformed idiot.

What Is Classical Liberalism? Definition and Examples

What is classical liberalism, where did it come from, and how does it differ from today’s drastically more politically-progressive social liberalism?

www.thoughtco.com

...and if you dare think you're anywhere near as intelligent as Rush Limbaugh, you are a total idiot.

Do you still deny the definition of classical liberalism? You're the one here digging yourself a hole.

Then again, perhaps you're looking for a sensible answer.

What I ALREADY did was to call out your desperate conflation of a single term ("Liberalism") into two different and diametrically opposed definitions, using the same term, simply because of your own arrested development ignorance.

"Classical Liberalism" does not exist as a term except as a redundant one employed by bullshit rhetoricists who KNOW they're shoveling bullshit to do exactly what I just described in the first line above. Why don't we just start calling a bright sunny day "rainy", and parse it out to when it actually rains that's "classic rain".

No Twinkletoes, you don't get to pervert innocent PoliSci terms just because political bullshit cynics of the 1940s, jealous at having been shut out of the White House for 20 years, started polluting PoliSci terms into their own opposites just to demonize their opponents. They were wrong and so are you.

Go get a edumacation. I gave you a spoonful here and you turned away, preferring your own ignorance. I can lead you to the water but I can't make you think.

Again, you post bullshit in an effort to save face and paint yourself as being intelligent.

Liberals have morphed in recent decades to be a group infested with socialists, Marxists, and communists. This is evident to all, including the few wise among them. That is why they now want to be called "progressives" rather than "liberals".

Your ridiculous failed analogy is just more puerile bullshit. Classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's Democrat Party has ruined it by taking in too many ultra-liberal extremists. It gets worse on a continual basis as it absorbs Islamic radicals that openly support Sharia law rather than our Constitution.

.............................................................................................

Democrats Support Muslims and Sharia Law - CRTXNEWS

By Dr. Paul Revere Constitution I have studied the Koran a great deal, above all with respect to how we compare to Muslim populations in Algeria and throughout the Orient. I have come away from that study with the conviction that there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as...

crtxnews.com

Democrat "Rock Star" Maxine Waters Is Pro-Farrakhan, Supports Sharia

Maxine Waters, considered one of the most corrupt members of Congress, is also the Democratic Party icon. Dubbed by them, a "rock star", she has associations with and is a supporter of the most radical elements of our society.

www.independentsentinel.com

Ilhan Omar Is Dangerous, Supports Sharia Law And Al-Qaeda

Ilhan Omar and her compatriots in “the squad” hate America and hate Jews, especially Isreal which they have spoken out against while

amac.us

Republicans Pass Bill Banning Sharia Law With ZERO Democrat Votes – The Patriot Nation

This Muslim Congressman REFUSES To Renounce Sharia Law

This Muslim Congressman REFUSES To Renounce Sharia Law

thefederalistpapers.org

...................................................................................................

Your opinion as to whether classical liberalism is valid terminology is but one example of your sheer stupidity.

Don't take my word for it, just read some political science history books on the subject.

I'm done doing your homework for you. I have neither the inclination, the time nor the skills to teach special needs children such as you.

Once AGAIN trying desperately to cover your own failures you shit out a series of links ZERO of which have anything to do with "Liberals". You don't seem to have the cojones to admit you've been misusing a term you don't understand, the entire time.

Wallow in your own ignorance, Dippy. As I said I can lead you to the water but I can't make you think if you're only going to go

 

[asaratis]

Your opinion of me and my posting means nothing.

Liberalism wrote the Constitution, ...

Yes, back when classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's liberalism is socialist/Marxist/communist bullshit, far from classical liberalism. The term "liberal" has become so derogatory that the liberals now insist on being called "progressives" instead.

Today's liberalism is a mental disorder.

Finally there is no such thing as "the Democrat Party". Nothing by that name has ever existed.

I know. I use that term because it pisses off the democrats. Many others do the same and have done so for decades.

Democrat Party (epithet) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Screw the Democrat Party!

Besides, "Democratic Party" is a misnomer anyway. There is nothing democratic about their agenda or their modus operandi.

A republican is a member of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is therefore full of republicans.

Likewise, it follows that a democrat is a member of the Democrat Party, it being a party full of democrats.


SCREW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh poster please. "Classical" MY ASS. What a classical cop-out. You got caught misusing terms you don't begin to understand and now you're trying to slither out of it. READ YOUR OWN POST --- you started with 'Liberals" and by the end of your own text it had morphed to "leftists". Every one of your links was about "leftists", not "Liberals". Now you're gonna sit here and try to tell us multiple PoliSci terms mean the same thing, because ignorance?

I see your ignorance extends to the written word as well. A member of the Republican party is a Republican, not a republican --- they mean two different things. As do "Democrat" and "democrat".

No Goober, I'm afraid definitions are fixed. They're not made of rubber so you can re-form them to excuse whatever faux pas you just committed through that ignorance. You don't get to revise them to cover up. Your failure to assign a proper label because you don't know what those labels mean, is nobody else's doing but your own. And speaking of historical ignorance the Progressive Era ended about a hundred years ago.

Oh and further, by the same idiot nomenclature you just displayed, that other party would be called the Republic Party.

I know damn well where you got that misspelling --- Lush Rimjob. He couldn't figure it out either.

Here you go, you uninformed idiot.

What Is Classical Liberalism? Definition and Examples

What is classical liberalism, where did it come from, and how does it differ from today’s drastically more politically-progressive social liberalism?

www.thoughtco.com

...and if you dare think you're anywhere near as intelligent as Rush Limbaugh, you are a total idiot.

Do you still deny the definition of classical liberalism? You're the one here digging yourself a hole.

Then again, perhaps you're looking for a sensible answer.

What I ALREADY did was to call out your desperate conflation of a single term ("Liberalism") into two different and diametrically opposed definitions, using the same term, simply because of your own arrested development ignorance.

"Classical Liberalism" does not exist as a term except as a redundant one employed by bullshit rhetoricists who KNOW they're shoveling bullshit to do exactly what I just described in the first line above. Why don't we just start calling a bright sunny day "rainy", and parse it out to when it actually rains that's "classic rain".

No Twinkletoes, you don't get to pervert innocent PoliSci terms just because political bullshit cynics of the 1940s, jealous at having been shut out of the White House for 20 years, started polluting PoliSci terms into their own opposites just to demonize their opponents. They were wrong and so are you.

Go get a edumacation. I gave you a spoonful here and you turned away, preferring your own ignorance. I can lead you to the water but I can't make you think.

Again, you post bullshit in an effort to save face and paint yourself as being intelligent.

Liberals have morphed in recent decades to be a group infested with socialists, Marxists, and communists. This is evident to all, including the few wise among them. That is why they now want to be called "progressives" rather than "liberals".

Your ridiculous failed analogy is just more puerile bullshit. Classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's Democrat Party has ruined it by taking in too many ultra-liberal extremists. It gets worse on a continual basis as it absorbs Islamic radicals that openly support Sharia law rather than our Constitution.

.............................................................................................

Democrats Support Muslims and Sharia Law - CRTXNEWS

By Dr. Paul Revere Constitution I have studied the Koran a great deal, above all with respect to how we compare to Muslim populations in Algeria and throughout the Orient. I have come away from that study with the conviction that there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as...

crtxnews.com

Democrat "Rock Star" Maxine Waters Is Pro-Farrakhan, Supports Sharia

Maxine Waters, considered one of the most corrupt members of Congress, is also the Democratic Party icon. Dubbed by them, a "rock star", she has associations with and is a supporter of the most radical elements of our society.

www.independentsentinel.com

Ilhan Omar Is Dangerous, Supports Sharia Law And Al-Qaeda

Ilhan Omar and her compatriots in “the squad” hate America and hate Jews, especially Isreal which they have spoken out against while

amac.us

Republicans Pass Bill Banning Sharia Law With ZERO Democrat Votes – The Patriot Nation

This Muslim Congressman REFUSES To Renounce Sharia Law

This Muslim Congressman REFUSES To Renounce Sharia Law

thefederalistpapers.org

...................................................................................................

Your opinion as to whether classical liberalism is valid terminology is but one example of your sheer stupidity.

Don't take my word for it, just read some political science history books on the subject.

I'm done doing your homework for you. I have neither the inclination, the time nor the skills to teach special needs children such as you.

Once AGAIN trying desperately to cover your own failures you shit out a series of links ZERO of which have anything to do with "Liberals". You don't seem to have the cojones to admit you've been misusing a term you don't understand, the entire time.

Wallow in your own ignorance, Dippy. As I said I can lead you to the water but I can't make you think if you're only going to go

I see you reading comprehension abilities are near zero. The links refer to instances wherein "liberals" in the Democrat Party have come to favor Sharia law, thus tainting the entire Democrat Party as a haven for supporters of unconstitutional Sharia law, thus adding to the "liberals" desire to be call "progressives".

Very little of what today's "liberalism" promotes was promoted under "classical liberalism", a term you deny existence.

So you repeat your childish quips.

You're definitely not wallowing in ignorance. You're drowning in stupidity. (Look up the difference between the two.)

 

[Pogo]

Your opinion of me and my posting means nothing.

Liberalism wrote the Constitution, ...

Yes, back when classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's liberalism is socialist/Marxist/communist bullshit, far from classical liberalism. The term "liberal" has become so derogatory that the liberals now insist on being called "progressives" instead.

Today's liberalism is a mental disorder.

Finally there is no such thing as "the Democrat Party". Nothing by that name has ever existed.

I know. I use that term because it pisses off the democrats. Many others do the same and have done so for decades.

Democrat Party (epithet) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Screw the Democrat Party!

Besides, "Democratic Party" is a misnomer anyway. There is nothing democratic about their agenda or their modus operandi.

A republican is a member of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is therefore full of republicans.

Likewise, it follows that a democrat is a member of the Democrat Party, it being a party full of democrats.


SCREW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh poster please. "Classical" MY ASS. What a classical cop-out. You got caught misusing terms you don't begin to understand and now you're trying to slither out of it. READ YOUR OWN POST --- you started with 'Liberals" and by the end of your own text it had morphed to "leftists". Every one of your links was about "leftists", not "Liberals". Now you're gonna sit here and try to tell us multiple PoliSci terms mean the same thing, because ignorance?

I see your ignorance extends to the written word as well. A member of the Republican party is a Republican, not a republican --- they mean two different things. As do "Democrat" and "democrat".

No Goober, I'm afraid definitions are fixed. They're not made of rubber so you can re-form them to excuse whatever faux pas you just committed through that ignorance. You don't get to revise them to cover up. Your failure to assign a proper label because you don't know what those labels mean, is nobody else's doing but your own. And speaking of historical ignorance the Progressive Era ended about a hundred years ago.

Oh and further, by the same idiot nomenclature you just displayed, that other party would be called the Republic Party.

I know damn well where you got that misspelling --- Lush Rimjob. He couldn't figure it out either.

Here you go, you uninformed idiot.

What Is Classical Liberalism? Definition and Examples

What is classical liberalism, where did it come from, and how does it differ from today’s drastically more politically-progressive social liberalism?

www.thoughtco.com

...and if you dare think you're anywhere near as intelligent as Rush Limbaugh, you are a total idiot.

Do you still deny the definition of classical liberalism? You're the one here digging yourself a hole.

Then again, perhaps you're looking for a sensible answer.

What I ALREADY did was to call out your desperate conflation of a single term ("Liberalism") into two different and diametrically opposed definitions, using the same term, simply because of your own arrested development ignorance.

"Classical Liberalism" does not exist as a term except as a redundant one employed by bullshit rhetoricists who KNOW they're shoveling bullshit to do exactly what I just described in the first line above. Why don't we just start calling a bright sunny day "rainy", and parse it out to when it actually rains that's "classic rain".

No Twinkletoes, you don't get to pervert innocent PoliSci terms just because political bullshit cynics of the 1940s, jealous at having been shut out of the White House for 20 years, started polluting PoliSci terms into their own opposites just to demonize their opponents. They were wrong and so are you.

Go get a edumacation. I gave you a spoonful here and you turned away, preferring your own ignorance. I can lead you to the water but I can't make you think.

Again, you post bullshit in an effort to save face and paint yourself as being intelligent.

Liberals have morphed in recent decades to be a group infested with socialists, Marxists, and communists. This is evident to all, including the few wise among them. That is why they now want to be called "progressives" rather than "liberals".

Your ridiculous failed analogy is just more puerile bullshit. Classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's Democrat Party has ruined it by taking in too many ultra-liberal extremists. It gets worse on a continual basis as it absorbs Islamic radicals that openly support Sharia law rather than our Constitution.

.............................................................................................

Democrats Support Muslims and Sharia Law - CRTXNEWS

By Dr. Paul Revere Constitution I have studied the Koran a great deal, above all with respect to how we compare to Muslim populations in Algeria and throughout the Orient. I have come away from that study with the conviction that there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as...

crtxnews.com

Democrat "Rock Star" Maxine Waters Is Pro-Farrakhan, Supports Sharia

Maxine Waters, considered one of the most corrupt members of Congress, is also the Democratic Party icon. Dubbed by them, a "rock star", she has associations with and is a supporter of the most radical elements of our society.

www.independentsentinel.com

Ilhan Omar Is Dangerous, Supports Sharia Law And Al-Qaeda

Ilhan Omar and her compatriots in “the squad” hate America and hate Jews, especially Isreal which they have spoken out against while

amac.us

Republicans Pass Bill Banning Sharia Law With ZERO Democrat Votes – The Patriot Nation

This Muslim Congressman REFUSES To Renounce Sharia Law

This Muslim Congressman REFUSES To Renounce Sharia Law

thefederalistpapers.org

...................................................................................................

Your opinion as to whether classical liberalism is valid terminology is but one example of your sheer stupidity.

Don't take my word for it, just read some political science history books on the subject.

I'm done doing your homework for you. I have neither the inclination, the time nor the skills to teach special needs children such as you.

Once AGAIN trying desperately to cover your own failures you shit out a series of links ZERO of which have anything to do with "Liberals". You don't seem to have the cojones to admit you've been misusing a term you don't understand, the entire time.

Wallow in your own ignorance, Dippy. As I said I can lead you to the water but I can't make you think if you're only going to go

I see you reading comprehension abilities are near zero. The links refer to instances wherein "liberals" in the Democrat Party have come to favor Sharia law, thus tainting the entire Democrat Party as a haven for supporters of unconstitutional Sharia law, thus adding to the "liberals" desire to be call "progressives".

Very little of what today's "liberalism" promotes was promoted under "classical liberalism", a term you deny existence.

So you repeat your childish quips.

You're definitely not wallowing in ignorance. You're drowning in stupidity. (Look up the difference between the two.)

Anyone who's "promoting" what you claim they are, is not a "Liberal". That's the same lame false premise you've been squatting this bullshit strawman on the entire time, the same one you can't man up to admit you don't understand.

AGAIN --- it ain't the fault of the language that you can't figure out how to use it. it's YOURS.

 

[Pogo]

Your opinion of me and my posting means nothing.

Liberalism wrote the Constitution, ...

Yes, back when classical liberalism was a good thing. Today's liberalism is socialist/Marxist/communist bullshit, far from classical liberalism. The term "liberal" has become so derogatory that the liberals now insist on being called "progressives" instead.

Today's liberalism is a mental disorder.

Finally there is no such thing as "the Democrat Party". Nothing by that name has ever existed.

I know. I use that term because it pisses off the democrats. Many others do the same and have done so for decades.

Democrat Party (epithet) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Screw the Democrat Party!

Besides, "Democratic Party" is a misnomer anyway. There is nothing democratic about their agenda or their modus operandi.

A republican is a member of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is therefore full of republicans.

Likewise, it follows that a democrat is a member of the Democrat Party, it being a party full of democrats.


SCREW THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh poster please. "Classical" MY ASS. What a classical cop-out. You got caught misusing terms you don't begin to understand and now you're trying to slither out of it. READ YOUR OWN POST --- you started with 'Liberals" and by the end of your own text it had morphed to "leftists". Every one of your links was about "leftists", not "Liberals". Now you're gonna sit here and try to tell us multiple PoliSci terms mean the same thing, because ignorance?

I see your ignorance extends to the written word as well. A member of the Republican party is a Republican, not a republican --- they mean two different things. As do "Democrat" and "democrat".

No Goober, I'm afraid definitions are fixed. They're not made of rubber so you can re-form them to excuse whatever faux pas you just committed through that ignorance. You don't get to revise them to cover up. Your failure to assign a proper label because you don't know what those labels mean, is nobody else's doing but your own. And speaking of historical ignorance the Progressive Era ended about a hundred years ago.

Oh and further, by the same idiot nomenclature you just displayed, that other party would be called the Republic Party.

I know damn well where you got that misspelling --- Lush Rimjob. He couldn't figure it out either.

Here you go, you uninformed idiot.

What Is Classical Liberalism? Definition and Examples

What is classical liberalism, where did it come from, and how does it differ from today’s drastically more politically-progressive social liberalism?

www.thoughtco.com

...and if you dare think you're anywhere near as intelligent as Rush Limbaugh, you are a total idiot.

Do you still deny the definition of classical liberalism? You're the one here digging yourself a hole.

Then again, perhaps you're looking for a sensible answer.

AGAIN for the blindfolded Illiterati ---- there is no definition for "classical Liberalism". It's a bullshit term made up by dishonest hacks trying to pervert the philosophy that created this nation into ITS OWN OPPOSITE as a means of denigrating that noble experiment. You can't --- CAN NOT --- pervert a term into its own opposite and then hang the adjective "classical" on it as if it were the prefix "un-". English doesn't work that way. I can't sit under a bright blue sky and declare it's dark today, as distinguished from "classical dark". That's complete bullshit and you know it. Don't sit here and insult the entire internet's intelligence. LEARN to use terms correctly, or don't use them at all if you're not competent to do so.

The OP of this failed thread did the same thing. Plunked the adjective into his title, out of his ass.

 

[asaratis]

---- there is no definition for "classical Liberalism"

Just saving this ^^^^ for posterity.

For any users here who may be interested in learning more about classical liberalism, here are a few links.

classical liberalism definition at DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.

duckduckgo.com

 

[Pogo]

 

[PrincessAwesome]

Libtard save the world from racist ice cream names. And it's White privilege vanilla ice cream to boot. No wonder liberalism is considered a mental disorder.

Ice Cream Flavor Name Changed Due to Racism Accusations

A New England ice cream producer has changed the name of one of its most popular flavors after some claimed that its name, "Just Jimmies," has a racist origin, Fox Business reported on Wednesday. The new name of the flavor is "Just Sprinkles." "Jimmies" is the name many New...

www.newsmax.com

Ice Cream Flavor Name Changed Due to Racism Accusations

View attachment 466328

Phony outrage over a stupid but non-issue.

 

[bravoactual]

Cancel Culture, a RW sound bite. It is RW who cancel the Right To Vote. It was Cons who tried to cancel Liz Cheney.

They try to distract with nothing burgers like Dr. Seuss and non-anatomical plastic doll called Potato Head. While the RW attacks Voting Rights, they distracts books taken out print by the Seuss family and goddamn dolls.

 

[bravoactual]

Cancel Culture, a RW sound bite. It is RW who cancel the Right To Vote. It was Cons who tried to cancel Liz Cheney.

They try to distract with nothing burgers like Dr. Seuss and non-anatomical plastic doll called Potato Head. While the RW attacks Voting Rights, they distracts books taken out print by the Seuss family and goddamn dolls.

Do the RePubLiKlanS know that G.I. Joe and Ken do not a dick?